ML20151G447
| ML20151G447 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 07/20/1988 |
| From: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Milhoan J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| TAC-68467, NUDOCS 8807280367 | |
| Download: ML20151G447 (4) | |
Text
..
July 20,1988=
Docket No. 50-298 MEMORANDUM FOR:
James L. Milhoan, Director Division of Reactor Safety Region IV FROM:
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Director l
Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
LICENSEE REVIEW OF ISI PROGRAM CHANGES i
(TAC N0. 68467) l Your memorandum dated June 23, 1988 requests the NRR position en licensee review of Inservice Inspection (ISI) program changes. The memorandum notes that the Cooper Nuclear Station Operations Review Committee (SORC) reviews specific ISI HDE procedures but does not review programmatic changes such as changes to the scope and frequency of ISI inspections. This issue is identified as Unresolved Item 298/88-08-01 in Inspr,ction Report 50-298/88-08.
It is the NRR position that "cach newly created procedure, program or change thereto shall be independently reviewed by an individual knowledgeable in the area affected other than the individual who prepared the procedure, program or procedure change, but who may be from the same organization as the individual /
group which prepared the procedure or procedure change." These words are incorporated into the Technical Specifications of recently licensed facilities, are consistent with para. 5.2.15 of ANSI N18.7-1976/ANS 3.2 (Ref: RG 1.33),
and will noncally be incorporated into the facility's approved QA program. At Cooper, the QA organization provides overview of the ISI program to ensure that the scope, frequency and methods are in accordance with Technical Specifications (Ref: CNS Procedure QAP-1500).
It follows fron the above that onsite comittee (SORC) review of ISI program changes would not be required except in unusual circumstances such as when there is a question of need for Code relief or a potential unresolved safety question.
It is hoped that the above satisfactorily responds to your needs. Please contactWilliamLong(492-1336) if you need additional information.
Dennis Mf*[rutchfield, Director Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION Docket Filt i
NRC PDR Local PDR PD4 Reading E. Butcher L. Rubenstein J. Calvo P. Hoonan W. Lon F. A11enspach ACRS(g) 1 OGC-Rockville E. Jordan B. Grimes 10 PD4 Plant File R. Hermann A. Gody
- See pt vious concurrences:
9h j
PDIV:L DIV:PM* LPEB*
EMTB*
PDIV:D ADRIVy V DRS PNoonan WLong:kb AGody RHermann JCalvo LRubensteie \\ 07/2d 88 DCrutchfield j
C7/l6/88 07/13/88 07/13/88 07/13/88 07//s/88 07/4188 j
M(lc'gi 8807280367 880720 PDR ADOCK 05000298 G
PNU I
" - - - " - - ^ ~
g' g
4
' Docket No. 50-298 MEMORANDUM FOR:
James L. Milhoan, Director Division of Reactor Safety i
Region IV FROM:
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Director Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
LICENSEE REVIEW OF ISI PROGRAM CHAKGES T e c, lp 39 L f Your memorandum dated June 23, 1988 requests the NRR po ition on licensee review of Inservice Inspection (ISI) program changes. The memorandum notes l
that the Cooper Nuclear Station Operations Review Consnittee (SORC) reviews l
specific ISI NDE procedures buty/does not review programmatic changes such as changes to the scope and frequency of ISI inspections. This issue is identified as Unresolved Item-200/0000-01 in Inspection Report 50-298/88-08.
1.*M/W OS ot 1
It is the NRR position that "each newly created procedure, program or change thereto shall be independently reviewed by an individual knowledgeable in the area affected other than the individual who prepared the procedure, program or procedure change, but who may be from the same organization as the l
individual / group which prepared the procedure or procedure change." These words are incorporated into the Technical Specifications of recently/icensed v
facilities, are consistent with para. 5.2.15 of ANSI N18.7-1976/ANS 3.2 (Ref:
RG 1.33), and will nomally be incorporated into the facility's approved QA i
program. At Cooper, the OA organization provides overview of R.:
program T"
I to ensure that the scope, frequency and methods are in accordance with TechnicalSpecifications(Ref: CNSProcedureQAP-1500).
l It follows from the above that onsite cenmittee (50RC) review of ISI program fincluding-essociated-proceduru.) changes would not be required except in x
unusual circumstances such as when there is a question of need for Code relief or a potential unresolved safety question.
It is hoped that the above satisfactorily responds to your needs.
Please contact William Long (492-1336) if you need additional information.
l l
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Director i
l Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC PDR Local PDR PD4 Reading E. Butcher L. Rubenstein J. Calvo P. Noonan W. Lnn F. A11enspach i
ACRS (g )
l OGC-Rockville E. Jordan B. Grimes 10 PD4 olant File l
R. Hertnann A. Gody W-W $D4 A
l PDIV:LA PDIV:PM LPEB EMTB %'gPDIV:D ADRIV DRSP PNoonan WLong:kb AGody RHermann JCalvo LRubenstein DCrutchfield
/ /88 t/d/88 7/6 8 7//J/88
/ /88
/ /88
/ /88 i
i i
m July '20,.1988
.4 e
i Docket No. 50-298 MEMORANDUM FOR:
James L. Milhoan, Director Division of Reactor Safety Region IV l
FROM:
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Director Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
LICENSEE REVIEW OF ISI PROGRAM CHANGES (TACN0.68467)
Your mem uandum dated June 23, 1988 requests the NRR position en licensee review of Inservice Inspection (ISI) program changes. The memorandum notes that the Cooper Nuclear Station Operations Review Committee (SORC) reviews specific ISI NDE procedures but does not review programatic changes such as changes to the scope and frequency of ISI inspec', ions. This issue is identified as Unresolved Item 298/88-08-01 in Inspection Report 50-298/88-08.
It is the NRR position that "each newly created procedure, program or change thereto shall be independently reviewed by an individual knowledgeable in the area affected other than the individual who prepared the procedure, program or procedure change, but who may be from the same organization as the individual /
i group which prepared the procedure or procedure change." These words are incorporated into the Technical Spe'ifications of recently licensed facilities, are consistent with para 5.2.15 of ANSI N18.7-1976/ANS 3.2 (Ref: RG 1.33),
and will nonna11y be incorporated into the facility's approved QA program. At Cooper, the QA organization provides overview of the ISI program to ensure that the scope, frequency and methods are in accordance with Technical Specifications (Ref:
CNS Procedure QAP-1500).
It follows fron the above that onsite comittee (SORC) review of ISI program changes would not be required except in unusual circumstances such as when there is a question of need for Code relief or a potential unresolved safety question.
It is hoped thet the above satisfactorily responds to your needs. Please contactWilliamLong(492-1336) if you need additional information.
1 DennisMf*[rutchfield, Director Division of Reactor Projects - III, i
IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC PDR Local PDR PD4 Readirg E. Butcher L. Rubenstein J. Calvo P. Noonan We Lon F. Allenspach l
ACRS(g)
OGC-Rockville E. Jordan B. Grimes 10 PD4 Plant File R. Hermann A. Gody h
+See pr vious concurrences:
a PDIV:
DIV:PM* LPEB*
EMTB*
PDIV:D ADRI l V DRS PNoonan WLong:kb AGody RHermann JCalvo LRubenstei DCrutchfield 07/)6 /88 07/13/88 07/13/88 07/13/88 07/ff/88 07/M/88 07/st/88
~
[ na o
UNITED STATES g
8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
?,
/
July 20, 1988
....+
Docket No. 50-298 MEMORANDUM FOR:
James L. Milhoan, Director Division of Reactor Safety Region IV FROM:
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Director Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
LICENSEE REVIEW OF ISI PROGRAM CHANGES (TAC NO. 68467)
Your memorandum dated June 23, 1988 requests the NRR position on licensee review of Inservice Inspection (*SI) program changes. The memorandum notes that the Cooper Nuclear Station Operations Review Committee (50RC) reviews specific ISI NDE procedures but does not review programatic changes such as changes to the scope and frequency of ISI inspections. This issue is identified as Unresolved Item 298/88-08-01 in Inspection Report 50-298/88-08.
It is the NRR position that "each newly created procedure, program or change thereto shall be independently reviewed by an individual knowledgeable in the area affected other than the individual who prepared the procedure, program or procedure change, but who may be from the same organization as the individual /
group which prepared the procedure or procedure change." These words are incorporated into the Technical Specifications of recently licensed facilities, are consistent with para. 5.2.15 of ANSI N18.7-1976/ANS 3.2 (Ref: RG 1.33),
and will nomally be incorporated into the facility's approved QA program. At Cooper, the QA organization provides overview of the ISI program to ensure that the scope, frequency and n'ethods are in accordance with Technical Specifications (Ref: CNS Procedure OAP-1500).
It follows from the above that onsite comittee (SORC) review of ISI program changes would not be required except in unusual circumstances such as when there is a question of need for Code relief or a potential unresolved safety question.
It is hoped that the above satisfactorily responds to your needs. Please contact William Long (492-1336) if you need additional infomation.
s Dennis
- 1. Crutchfield, Director Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation