ML20151E466

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Operating Rept for 1987
ML20151E466
Person / Time
Site: Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1987
From: Pliml G
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
NRC
References
NUDOCS 8804150251
Download: ML20151E466 (10)


Text

' ' ~

h ZION GENERATING STATION i

ANNUAL OPERATING REPORT 1987 6 8 DOCKETS 50-295 AND 50-304 l

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY

+

[

F !

/ -

gg43$$ $b*hh {

R ,

1042o

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Submitted in Part III. Zion Station Operating Report. By Environmental Affairs II. Waukegan Memorial Airport Expansion Plans III. Modifications, Tests and Experiments IV. Annual Occupational Exposure Data, submitted under separate cover V .' Challenges to Primary System PORY and Safety Valves I

r i s 5

(

1

's t

l i

r L

P 1 f i

1042o ,

I

II, Waukegan Memorial Airport FAA 5090 Report attached 1042o

Y...,-

g gg

y. 1 l

Waukegan Port District . Waukegan Regional Airport Port of Waukegan '

I February 3, 1988 l

Commonwealth Edisen Zion Generating Station 101 Shiloh Blvd.

Zion, IL 60099 Attn: Mr. George Plimi Station Manager, Zian Station Re: Your Letter January 12th, 1988 Waukegan Regional Airport FAA 5010 Report.

Gentlemen:

Attached is the most recent copy of the FAA 5010 report Airport Master recc-d. We wish to draw to your attention the following changes which have not been proparly noted: (1) FAA 5010 report has been changed and is now the 5090 report (2) Item 14; Airport Manager - Robert R. Denison (3) Item 15;-

address 3500 N. McAree Rd., Waukegan, IL 60087 (4) Item 10: Airport Latitude /

42-25-16' North (5) Item 28; Airport Longitude /87-52-10' West.

Yours truly, ldt Robert R. Denison Airport Manager RRD/rm enc.

l Administrative Offices * (312) 244-3133 55 South Harbor Place P 0. Br;x 620

  • Wa,skegan. Ilhnois 60079

( . -. .. ._ _ _ _.

(

",{ffe'='"ZN,g ?"*"**"2g -

AIRPI AT c"AsTE R CacIno Pe

e. TNT~ Daf.t es./23/ef, e e .eee

)

P >l A5500 Clif 8 CHIC AG0/Nautt Ga2 4 ST Af t IL FAA Sitt gRt 34533e4 1

>f AltPCR T DAPt! WAVEtGAN ktGick4L S COUNf f t L AKC IL 3 C40 to AIRPopf tNN)* 35 N 6 RES/A001 ASL/ CHI T SECT AERO Chit CHICAGO centr AL SERVICES BASCO AIRCRAFT

If OWufRfM18! PurLIC 378 FUCLt 178 ROSAS A 90 SIN 6LC CN61 191

, >ll OW4(43 tauktC AN POR T DISTRICT )?! AIRFRAMC RPR$t MAJOR 91 PULf! (NSI 51

>t2 A00RCSSI Po 80s af f >72 PWR PL ANT RPRS MAJOR 98 Jtit if .

WAUKESAh IL Efff9 373 20ffLE OITSEN! MISM TOTAL IS9

>l3 PH0ht N#1 312*244 3133 >?4 BULE CITGFN! *

,. )l4 wANacts! PATRICK MOLAN 75 TSNT S10maatt fit H64 93 MELICOPitRSt t stS A00RCSS! P O mor $2e 76 OTHER StpVICES8 CMTR 94 SLIBE R S t WAUKtCAN IL 6 psf

  • RNTL SALES INSTR 95 MILif4RTt

, >l6 PHOkt h88 312 744-8055 96 UL TR A.LI Shit

> l 7 A f f 14 0. A C C SC h( Dtt C l Po*fFS Days Pota$

, ALL sLL ALL FACIL! fits OPttafl0NS .

>Pa ARPT 2CN! C6 100 Alt CARRitat

, 18 AIR P18f U*C t PUBLlt 381 APT LST SRt0te0USK DAWN IF1 COMMuftti 19 A API L AI! 4 fats =17N ESf!PAft0 372 UNICOMielt3ef f f 182 AIR TAtti 1884 29 #RPT L0hst #87aSt.FtW 344 WINO INDIC47088 ftS 193 6 A LOCALt T4339

' 23 ARPt.tttyt efft? CSTIP4fte 94 StGmtNit0 C12CLtt NONE 194 GA ITNPNf 3 S4796

, lps ff ACREAGE: 4P8 PS CONTROL TWtt NO 2PS MILITARft

>t3 RIGHT T RAFFICI N0 46 FSSt NANRAKEt TOTALI 178438

. >?4 N ON =C CM R L4N0 LNG Ftt! TCS 87 FSS ON AR*f t TCS

?S NASP/7ECttAL AstFEMfNf3 NCY 48 FSS PHONC NAS 81S=935-5811 0*ttafl0NS FOR 12 f 6 F AR l!9 IN0tti N A9 TOLL FRtt NRI 1 888*322.SSSt 808 (N0148 3940V86 a

RunWAT DATA

)30 RUNW AT 10 tN T 95/23 14/32

>31 LtNSTPt 6989 37tp

>32 W10fMt 158 75

>33 SURF TYPtaC040 CONC =C CONC *S

>34 SUR F IRC A f st4T 35 GR054 Wf t SW 9" 16 r 23 34 E IN TPSPS) OW 128 37 PfW 2PS

, 34 00tW LISMilNC/ APCM AIDS

........... 35/33 34/33

>41 EOGC thfCNSfff NI SH , MCO +

. 4L NOW ELERCNT Al

, 442 RWT n 4R R f f Pt CONO Nel*4 /lFl*8 S$CaF /e tc.F / / /

/

443 yAL? v4 L /v4L v4L /N / /

38 / /

44 T HR ' <RO S $ 1 NG MS T 37 #88 / /

3 59 / / / /

, 45 VISU AL GLIOC ANGLE 3 88 /3eff /

N=N /N *N N aN / N =4 / /

> 4 6 C N T #L t.10 F /

>e? RvR. tty kN /m=4 NN f M *N / /

/N / / /

, >48 4 tlL Y / 4

/ /

>49 APCP LISMit / / /

, ORSTRUrfl04 OATA

........... #S/23 14/32 O t V) /8tVI / / /

58 F A4 ?? CattR0pf Si vl /C 588 / / / /

,, >98 DISPlatt0 TW4 /

/ /

452 CTLS Ce sf 4 fttt / RCAO /f tf C /

/

/ / /

>53 Ossim N ARKC0/Lsf 0 /

/ /

,, >St Msf APSVC PWT (R0 39 / IS /38 /

/ 3 t? 5 / /

>99 0161 > Row RWT END ett- /. 289 /

/

>56 CNTRLt CFFSCT Sf6L / 1954 /6SL / /

/

,, 17 08Sf 3 CLNC SLOPE 1911 /5881 eft 1 /3511 / /

/ /

/4 N /4 /

E8 CL0tt=lN 0811N N

,, 7583 LAMPikG LEPSTM .

.. .. ....... 05/23 14/32 /

/ / / /

8 8 L ANDING R tT*LEN6fM / /

/ / /

,, t.1 CTLS CP ST ACLt / /

/

At M87*480VE fut / /

/ /

/

63 0181 Fsem fue / /

/ / /

/

,, 64 CNTRL4 CFFStf /

4H ARPT PSD PLCAst A0yltt FSS IN IftM 46 WMEN CHANSt$ GCCUR 70 IftRS PatCECfD OT 5 TTIs acrksua; APS7 RWV 14 APCW R4fl0 29314T OSPLCD TM4 70 TRttS.

U81 stif f MIRL S/23 #EIL 9 & P!RL 14/32 . telef e ,

, n'#2 F8tt lif eS* AT8L ON se.ee alle +81 Cf 41 Pl4A10RT OIROS OR k 14 VCNTY CF ARPfe nint -ft 'WY f5 AtlL 015 thotre e  %

k C

t ... e..n...e. e., 19, eset Inert 9steveA 313 LAlf INte stet _ _ _ _ _

9 e3

  • aim i.
  • I

-e.

yn'a.

- l

, pw y,hagp' !9 e

c d

r i

' g' ' ,

E N .

! f. . ,,h}' ,.

i

. i, s.- l ../  ;

h -

..- t  !

.a 4 s I " -

e .

m ..cd 4 M ..

. n 8 0 1 !l .:.f .: '.  !

0 ,

T'd

" , .1 ..

-==

  • 4

=,

3 8 i s y_7 ' " ,' . i  :.

E --

iv p"),"

" bO

.. thy 2 f.f*i .

[==

DQ -

  • e gl&p. d ;m as y , r L, y  ; [f h e-.

(".

'f !'

nef

)[

$ 5 ,_

. . . . , um.

N,w- 3" god SCALg 4 .... ,.

e -

teHet I

'?**

l .

o e

}

7

..a-...

) -

,,s-,

i p g '

"m i

, g!'

<h \

=

% z x

)

j 1 ,

6 i

d

III. Modifications, Tests and Experiments Three inodifications and two fuel loads were completed in 1987. Unit One refueling outage started in September 1986 and was completed in March 1987. Unit two Refueling Outage and low pressure turbine change from Westinghouse to Brown Boveri turbines started in March 1987 and ended in August 1987. The Fuel Reloads did not involve any unreviewed safety questions and were performed under the provisions of 10CFR50.59. The reloads did not require a change to the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR). The modification of the low pressure turbines from Westinghouse to Brown Boveri turbines will require a change to the USAR.

1. Modification M22-1 028 - Description Modification 1-87-028, containment purge and vent valves, RV0005 & 6 were changed from gate valves to butterfly valves. The gate valves required the presence of a vendor representative to get a satisfactory leak test. The new posi-seal butterfly valves are of a better design for sealing and if maintenance is required, it can be performed.by our maintenance personnel. This modification does require a change to the FSAR.

Safety Evaluation Summary A. The probability of an occurrence or the consequence of an accident, or malfunction of equipment important to safety as previously evaluated in the FSAR is not increased because the values provide containment isolation function for the vacumn and pressure relief line. Dual valve isolation provides redundancy to maintain leakage below technical specification limit of less than 1% per' day. To assure reliability, the valves are inspected periodically.

B. The possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than previously evaluated in the Final Safety Analysis Report is not created because the valves are designed to fail safe closed on all accidents, loss of electrical power and loss of air.

C. The margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification has not been reduced because the newly installed valves will be tested in accordance with technical specification section 3.9.

1042o

2. Modification M22-2-84-040 - Description The reason this modification is being implemented is to increase the safety margin and operability of the RCFC equipment. this modification consists of permanently re-routing the norwal RCFC flow-path through the "accident" portion of the RCFC plenum. This will be accomplished by fixing the flowpath control dampers in the accident mode for both normal and accident operation. Upon completion of this modification, a safety initiation signal will only switch the motor speed from high speed (1200 RPM) to low speed (900 RPM). Also, this modification will consist of the removal of the existing moisture separators and HEPA filters located in the accident pertion of the RCFC plenum upstream of the RCFC cooling coils. These separators and HEPA filters were provided upstream of "future" charcoal filter units to protect from flooding of these charcoal units during the accident environment. However, these "future" charcoal units were not required to be installed since other safety systems within the Zion systems design were adequate to meet the off-site boundary dose rate limits. A thorough review of the FSAR has been completed and no credit in any of the accident analyses for contributory af fects fo containment clean-up from the existing moisture separators and HEPA filters was found. This review was, in part, based upon the results of an evaluation performed by Sargent and Lundy Engineers. This evaluation included a thorough review of the Zion Station FSAR, the updated FSAR, and the Technical Specifications. In addition, the preliminary shielding analysis for Zion Station was reviewed.

Safety Evaluation Summary A. The probability of an occurrence or the consequer.ce of en accident or palfunction of equipment important to safety as previously evaluated in the FSAR as previcusly evaluated in the 4 FSAR is not increased because the probability of a malfunction of the RCFC's has been decreased with this modification. The requirement for dampers to switch from the nornel mode to the accident mode has been deleted. Since the dampers will be in the accident mode during all operations, reliability and operabilities of the RCFC System will be improved. The Operations will not have to rely on the functioning of the dampers. Since the accident analysis found in the FSAR do not address clean-up; removal of the elements does not change operation as analyzed.

B. The possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than previously evaluated in the FSAR is not created because a major portion of this system will already be operating in accident mode.

1042o

C. The margin of safety as defined in the basis for any technical specification has not been reduced because this modification increases the margin of safety. Operation of this system has been simplified and is no longer dependent upon the switching of dampers from the normal mode to the accident mode. Dampers will already be in the accident mode during nornel operation .

The design basis of the Technical Specification and referenced FSAR does not take credit for containment clean-up. Therefore, the deletion of this equipment will not decrease the margin of safety as orginally analyzed in the Technical Specification.

3. Modification M22-1-85-051 Description Modification 1-85-051 replaced existing source range preamps with new models having greater immunity to electrostatic and electromagnetic noise that is generated inside the containment. The new model is compatible with existing source range electronics and is designed to use existing mounting hardware and electronic connections to facilitate direct replace. This modification does require a change to the USAR.

Safety Evaluation Summary A. The probability of an occurrence or the consequence of an accident, or malfunction of equipment important to safety as previously evaluated in the Final Safety Analysis Report has not increased because the setpoint criterion as listed in the '

PLS document remains at approximately 100 VAC below the operating voltage.

B. The possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any previously evaluated in the Final Safety Analysis Report is not created because the loss of detector voltage annunciator functions in the same manner.

C The margin of safety, as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification has not been reduced because: Technical Specifications do not address the Loss of Detector Voltage l Setpoint.

Eddy current testing on Unit One and Unit Two steam generators was the only testing done at Zion Station. . .

j No experiments were conducted at Zion Station during 1987.

V. Challenges to primary system power operated relief valves and safety l valves.

There were no Challenges mada to either relief or safety values at Zion in 1987.

10420

o ,

Commonw:alth Edison Zion G:n:r: ting St: tion O Zion, Illinois 60099 101 Shiloh Blvd.

Telephone 312/746 2084 March 20, 1988 To: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Att: Document Control Desk, Washington, D. C. 20555

Subject:

Zion Station Annual Report for 1987 Enclosed is the subject report.

k' G. . Pliml Station Manager Zion Station GJP/jlc cc: M. Holzmer R. Cascarano G. Trzyna W. Stone F. Lentine Master File

3T

\\

l