ML20151C832
| ML20151C832 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/05/1988 |
| From: | Grimsley D NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| To: | Weiss E HARMON & WEISS |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151C834 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-87-714, REF-GTECI-A-43, REF-GTECI-ES, RTR-NUREG-0313, RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-0800, RTR-NUREG-0801, RTR-NUREG-1169, RTR-NUREG-313, RTR-NUREG-737, RTR-NUREG-800, RTR-NUREG-801, RTR-NUREG-CR-4330 NUDOCS 8804130212 | |
| Download: ML20151C832 (4) | |
Text
.
U.S NUCLEAfbREGULATORY COMMISSION Nac soim knoutst Nvustmisi
){/r F0!A-87-714 g,'p as%
d h,
!g
- issosse twe p
5 R ESEO N'!>E FREE M OF I "
MI ""^'
i
\\e
/
INFOHMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST s.ee au oocaat wusia s> vrw==
erg o Jggg AEOutsttR Ellyn R. Weiss Esquire s
PART 1.-RECORDS RELEASED OR NOT LOCATED (See checked bones!
No agency records subpset to the request have been located.
No addatonal egency records subrect to the roovest have been located.
Agency records mbrect to the roovest that are ioentified in Appendia are alrosdy avalable for pubhc irspecten and cop #g in the NRC Pibhc Docurrent Room.
1717 H Street. N W., Washegton, DC.
Agency records subpect to the r*3uest that are identtfed in Appendia are being made evadable for pubhc inspecten and copyeg in the NRC Pubhc Document X
Room,1717 H Street, N W., WasNngton. DC, e a folder under the FolA number and requester name The nonprogetary verson of the proposaHel that you agreed to accept in a to'ephone conversation with a member of rny staff a now boeg rnade avalable for pubhc mopecten and coveg at the NRC Pubnic Document Roorn.1717 H Street, N W, WasNngton, DC, in a folder under the FOtA numter and requester nerne.
Enclosed a mformaton on how you rnay obtae eccess to and the charges for copyeg receeds placed in the NRC Pubhc Document Room,1717 H Street. N W., Washegton, DC.
Agency records subsect to the reo.est are enclosed Any apphcable charge for cop.es of the records provu$ed and par ent procedu es are noted in the comtnents secton.
a r
Records subpect to the request have been referred to another Feder.1 agencytes) for revew and direct response to you.
In www of NRC's response to the roovest, no further octon es beeg taken on appeat letter dated PART ll.A-INFORMATION WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Certae informaton in the roovested records a boeg withheld from pub'ac d1sclosure pursuant to the FOtA esemptons desenbod e and for the reasons stated 6n Part II. sec-tone B. C, and D. Any re6 eased portene of the documents for we.ch only part of the record a beeg vnthhed ere becg made s,edabe for pubhc inspecten and copyeg e a
e y
the NRC Pubhc Document Room,1717 H Street. N W., Washegion. DC. m a foeder under the FOIA number and reovester name.
Comments s'
o-aicion orvs ass a e
aos 8804130212 080405 PDR FOIA WEISS87-714 PDR l
N'.C FORM 464 m ti 4 Cs.
FREEDOM CF INFO MATION ACT RESPONSE FOtA NUMBEmSt. 07"7l4 OATE:
m a----
FART il 8-APPLICABLE FOf A EXEMPTIONS N"
N Records sub ect to the request that are desenbod in the onclosed Appendicas 0
t
_ are b,,n, withnetd in the., enii,ety, in pa,t unde, FOIA Esemptions and for the reasons set forth below purs ant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and 10 CFR 9Sa) of NRC Regulations.
- 1. The wthheld informat on is propedy ceaseded pursuant to Esecutree Order 17356 (DEMPTION 11
- 2. The wthhe6d informason rotates solely to the etemal personnel rules and procedwss of NRC. (EXEl/PTION 21
- 3. The wthhe6d information a speedca#y enempted from public deciosure by statute irdcated; (DEMPTION 3)
Secten 141146 of the Atorme Energy Act whsch prohitwts the declosure of Restreted Data or Formody Restncted Data 442 U.S.C. 216121651.
Secten 147 of the Atorne Energy Act wNch prohituts the deciosure of Unclasaded Safeguards informaton L42 U S.C. 21571.
- 4. The wthheid in'or-r. econ is a trade secret or commeroal or financel information that is boeg ethheid for the reasonis) indicated. (EXEMPTION di The informaton is cons.dered to be confeent.al bummess (proonetary) informaton.
The informaton is consdered to be propretary eformaton pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(d)(1).
The bformaton was outmtted and recorved in corddence from a foregn source pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(dK21.
- 8. The ethhe6d irdormaton conosts of eteragency or mtrangency records that are not sveilobie through decovery anno Irtgaton. Dociosure of predeciserinalinformation would tend to inhatwt the open end frank euchange of ceas essent.al to the delberstyve process. Where records are wthheed in thew entroty, the facts are eneutricate intertunned eth the el informeten. There aseo are no reason esgrogetse factual portons because se roleets of the facts y culd permrt an r
brarect enouwv eto prooecuenal procoes of tN ogency. (DEMPTiON
=
- 6. The withheid eformoson is esempted from pubiec deciosure because ets deciosure would resutt in a cseady unwoner. red invason of personal privacy. (EXEMPTIO
- 7. The MtShe6d informe'xn conosts of invoetgetory records compied for low enforcement purposes er'1is bemg eetend for the reasontal indicated. (DEMPT)ON Dociosure would interf eth an enforcerwrit proceedeg becoves se could reveel the scope. dwecten,6md itcus 01 enforcement e+ forts, and thus could poesitity allow them to take acten to shised potentel wrongdoing or a votaten of NRC toovirynents from emetgators. (EXEMPTION 7(AH Deciosure would constrtute an unnerranted irrveson of personal prmacy (EXEMPTION 7tCl)
The informaton consets of names of indredvais and other beormaton the cecicours of wNeh would rewat es trues of confide PART fl.C-DENYING OFFICIALS Pursvent to 10 CFR 9 9 and 'or 915 of the U S. Nucteer Regulatory Commason reguietons. M has teen detennned that the reeston wthrend e enormt from producten or 6scicours, and that na producten ce deciosure e conFary to Ibe put;iec mterest. The persons responsatze for the denial are those offcase identded below as denying of Orveen of Ruese and Records. Offee of Aemnetreton, for any dene4 that may be appea6ed to the Executrve Dvoctor for Operations stoot.
DENY NG OFFCAL TITLEtOFFICE RECORDS DEN 1ED APPEu. ATE OFFICLAL st Ce tT Am y too Edward Jordan Director Office of the App. 0 X
s Analys1s ano tvaluation of Operational hta i
l l
i PART ll 0- APPEAL RIGHTS The denial by each denying officialident5ed h Part ll.C may be appeved to the Appeitate Official identfed in that section. Any sucn appeal rnust be in
{
woting and must be made within % days of receipt of this response, Appeals must be addressed as sporoprote to the Executive Directof for Operations or the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20565, and should clearty state on the envWope and in the lette that et is an "Appeal from en inenal FOtA Decision.
Nac Fonu as4 iPen 31 FOlA RESPONSE CONTINUATION U.S. NUCLEAR REQULATORY COMMISSION is asi
Re: F0!A-88-714 APPENDIX N i
RECORDS TO BE PLACED IN PDR i
1.
Undated to the Minutes of CRGR Meeting No. 80 USI j
A-43 Containment Emergency Sump Perfonnance.
(21pages) 2.
Undated to the Minutes of CRGR Mceting No. 82 Review of Proposed IE Bulletin Motor-Operated Valve (MOY) Comon i
Mode Failure During Plant Transients Due to Improper SwitchSettings.(17pages) j 3.
Undated to Minutes of CRGR Meeting No. 84 Proposed Broad-Scope Revision of General Design Criterion 4 (Leak-Bafore-Break).
(26pages) 4.
Undated to the Minutes of CRCR Meeting No. 98 Review of Proposed Rule Change to 10 CFR 20 for Per:;onnel Dosimetry Processor Accreditation. (10 pages) 5.
1/17/86 Memo for Bernero, Jordan, Cunningham, Ross, Heltemes and Scinto thru Schwink from Conran, subject: Sumary and Issue Identification for CRGR Meeting No. 84. (6 pages) 6.
3/5/86 Memo for Denton from Sniezek, subject: Request for CRGR Review of NUREG 0313 Rev. 2 (BWR Pipe Cracking - Long Term Resolution).(5pages) 7.
3/26/86 Memo for Stello from Sniczek, subject: Minutes of CRGR Meeting Number 85. (52 pages) 8.
9/9/86 Memo for Stello from Sniezek, subject: Minutes of CRGR MeetingNo.91.(35pages) 9.
9/10/86 Memo for Stello from Sniezek, subject: Minutes of CRGR Meeting Number 95. (5 pages)
- 10. 9/12/86 Memo for Bernero Starostecki, Cunningham, Ross. Heltemes and Scinto thru Zerbe from Taylor, subject: Sumary and Issue Identification for CRGR Meeting No. 96. (26 pages) 11.
10/1/86 Memo for Bernero, Starostecki, Cunningham, Ross, Heltemes and Scinto thru Zerbe from Polk, subject: Sumary and Issue Identification for CRGR Meeting No. 98, Deferred Plant Policy.
(4pages) 12.
10/10/86 Memo for Bernero, Starostecki, Cunningham, Ross, Heltemes and Scinto thru 1erbe from Bellamy, subject: Sumary and Issue Identification for CRGR Meeting No. 98. (11 pages) 13.
10/5/87 Memo for REHM from Jordan, subject: Draft Gejdenson TestimonyonBackfit.(12nages)
l 1
Re: F0!A-87-714 APPENDIX 0 RECORDS TOTALLY WITHHELD - EXEMPTION 5 1.
Undated to the Minutes of CRGR Meeting No. 90 Criteria for Establishing a Tritium Bioassay Program Regulatory Guide (OP-713-4). (2 pages) 2.
Undated to the Minutes of CRGR Meeting No. 95 of Briefing to CRGR on the Matter of Severe Accident Management Strategies for the BWR Mark I Containment. (31 pages) 3.
4/8/86 Memo for Bernero, Jordan, Cunningham, Ross, Heltemes and Scinto thru Capra from Taylor, subject: Summary and Issue Identification for CRGR Heeting No. 88, (7 pages) 4, 5/2/86 Memo for Stello from Sniezek, subject: Minutes of CRGR Meeting Number 88, (58 pages) 5.
1/9/87 Memo for Stello from Sniezek, subject: Minutes of CRGR Meeting Number 104. (4 pages) i
t HARMON & WEISS 2001 S ST R E ET, N.W.
)
Suf7C 430 WASHINGTON, D.C. eoooo ties G AIL McGREEVY H ARMON TELEPHONE CLLYN R. WEISS (202)328 3500 DIANC CURRAN DEAN R. TOUSLEY ANDREA C. FERSTER October 20, 1987 n : m.c u w i.w c e, m :er, 1
har nsquest.
Director Division of Rules and Records pg4 7p 7 Of fice of Administration
/d.
I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1
Washington, D.C. 20555 RE:
Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Sir / Madam,
Pursuant to the federal Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the following on behalf of the Union of Concerned Scientists:
1 1.
All cost-benefit or value-impact analyses done since September,1985 in connection with the consideration by NRC staff of generic or site-specific backfits.
2.
Any and all lists, compilations or other identifications of potential generic or site-specific backfits under consid-eration by the NRC staf f at any time since September,1985.
l 3.
Any and all memoranda or other documents since September 1985, f rom the Committee to Review Generic Requirements
("CRGR*) containing requer.ts or direction to the NRC staf f to perform, modify or reconsider value-impact or cost-benefit analyses regarding any potential generic or site-specific backfit.
4.
Any and all documents containing guidance, criteria or examples used by the NRC in deciding which generic or site-specific backfits are appropriate for cost-benefit analyses under the backfit rule and which are not so appropriate.
i 1
7 HAn' MON & WEISS
- i Please call r:e if you have any questions regarding this j
request.
i Very truly yours,
).I
/
Ellyn R. Weiss HARMON & WEISS 2001 S Street, N.W.
1,
Suite 430 Washington, D.C.
20009 General Counsel Union of Concerned Scientists I
i i
I i
J 1
.