ML20151B488
| ML20151B488 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saxton File:GPU Nuclear icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/27/1988 |
| From: | Shanbaky M, Weadock A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151B484 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-146-88-01-MM, 50-146-88-1-MM, NUDOCS 8807200384 | |
| Download: ML20151B488 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000146/1988001
Text
-_
_ _ _ .
%
'
.
,
.
-,.
. , - -
.
!..
L
U.S. NUCLEAR' REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Meeting Report No. _50-146/88-01
Docket No.
50-146
Category
0
License _No.
OPR-4
Priority
' --
Licensee:
Saxton Nuclear Experimental ~ Corporation /GPU Corporation -
-Facility Name:
Saxton Reactor-
Meeting At: NRC Region I, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
Meeting Date: June 6, 1988-
(M17!f8
Prepared by:
[I.[
d+
A~. Weadock, Radiation Specialist
date ~
b
b27!8S
O
Approved by:
M. Shanbaky, Chief, FaM11 ties Radiation
date
Protection Section
Meeting Summary:' A Management Meeting was held at the request of the NRC on
June 6 1988 at the NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Topics discussed included deficiencies identified during NRC Inspection No.
50-146/88-01 and the current radiological status of the Saxton site soil and
the' licensee's plans for additional soil characterization.
The meeting was attended by NRC Region I Management, NRC Headquarters '.taff,
and licensee management. A representative from the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources was also in attendance.
,
G
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
_I
,
.
'
.
.
.
.
DETAILS
1.0 Participants
1.1 General Public Utilities (GPU)
M. Roche, Saxton Vice-President
G. Baker, Saxton General Manager
R: McGoey, Manager, PWR Licensing
J. ~ Auger, PWR Licensing Engineer
T. Grace, Environmental Licensing Engineer
D. Lucas, GPU Governmental Affairs
1.2 NRC Personnel
J. Allan, Deputy Regional Administrator
R. Bellamy, Chief, Facilities Radiological Safety and
Safeguards Branch
L. Bettenhausen, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch No.1
M. Shanbaky, Chief, Facilities Radiation Protection Section
C. Cowgill, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 1A
A. Adams, Jr. , NRR Project Manager
W. Baunack, Project Engineer
M. Miller, Regional State liaison Officer
A. Weadock, Radiation Specialist
1.3 Other Attendees
M. Reilly, Bureau of Radiation Protection, Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Resources
2.0 Background
NRC Inspection No. 50-146/88-01 identified several deficiencies associated
with the decontamination and release survey effort conducted at the Saxton
site.
Specific deficiencies included the lack of approved procedures for
instrument calibration and for conducting release surveys, the lack of a
formal, documented training program for surveyors, and overall poorly
documented surveys (see NRC Inspection Report No. 50-146/88-01). The
deficiencies identified were noted to be indicative of a lack of an appro-
priate level of managtment pre ploi..-iaa and nuersight of the Saxton site
activities.
The licens3e was requested by NRC Region I management to
formally respond to defi;iencies identified in the report in a Management
Meeting.
The licensee was also requested to provide a summary of the
radiological status of the site soil.
[- g
-
is
-
-
'
s
,.
,
.
...
.
3
-
-
,
3.0 Discussion
3.1 Resolution'of Management Deficiencies
The licensee stated that performance of additional facility release
-surveys at the Saxton site had been' temporarily suspended pending
the completion of specific prooram upgrades. The licensee stated
the following steps would be taken prior to the resumption of the
survey effort.
The SNEC organizational structure will be modified to provide the
Saxton Radiation Safety Officer (RS0) with a direct reporting'line -
to the Saxton Vice-President.
Currently, the Saxton RSO reports to
the Saxton General. Manager, who in turn reports to the Saxton
,
Vice-President.
In the future, a qualified Radiological Controls Supervisor will be
-present at the Saxton site when final or release surveys are being
performed.
Formal procedures to control instrument calibration and direct the
performance of the release surveys will be approved prior to the
resumption of survey activities.
A formal training program, with specific performance criteria, will
be developed for personnel performing release surveys.
The licensee also stated additional efforts were being. undertaken to
improve planning and communications associated with the Saxton
site. A formal schedule is being-generated to project future site
activities.
The licensee intends to hold weekly planning review
meetings among the principals of the Saxton staff. More general
monthly meetings involving Saxton project staff and GPU licensing
and communications staff are also being planned to improve overall
communications on site activities.
3.2 Characterization of Site Soil
Residual contamination levels (primarily Cs-137) above background
levels have been identified in the soil within the Saxton site fence
and in discrete areas outside the Saxton fence but within the PENELEC
fence (see NRC Inspection Report No. 50-146/88-01). During the
current meeting, the licensee summarized radiological surveys made
to date and future plans for future characterization.
The following
points were made.
_
--
- - -
.
4
Contamination is tightly adhered to the dark, flyash soil
-
present on site.
This flyash suil is distributed in discrete
areas within the site fence and was also apparently used as a
covering on the Filled Drum Storage Bunker (FDSB).
The licensee conducted interviews of former Saxton operations
-
personnel to identify possible mechanisms for the site soil
contamination. No previous practices were identified which
would have resulted in this contamination.
The licensee stated
the distribution of contamination onsite did not suggest a
meteorological dispersion method as a potential method of
contamination.
Surveys performed outside the Saxton fence but within the
-
PENELEC fence in 1986 identified discrete areas with soil
activity above background concentrations.
Surveys performed
outside the PENELEC fence have identified no activity above
background concentrations.
The licensee is currently contracting to have more widespread
-
radiological and geophysical characterization studies performed
on and around the site. The purpose for these studies will be
to verify the results of the licensee's previous radiological
surveys and identify potential origins of the site contamination
based on its physical and chemical characteristics.
These
studies are expected to be concluded within 4-5 months.
The representative from the State of Pennsylvania Department of
-
Environmental Resources stated that radiological surveys
outside the PENELEC property would shortly be conducted by a
contractor at the request of the State.
4.0 Concluding Remarks
NRC management stated that licensee efforts in this area would be closely
monitored and that proposed licensee actions based on the results of planned
studies would be reviewed.
The agenda provided by the licensee for the June 6, 1988 meeting is
included as Attachment 1 to this report.
,7 ..
.
._.
.
-
.
.
,
.
\\
'
Attachment 1
SAXTON (SNEC)/NRC MEETING
KING OF PRUSSI A
JUNE 6. 1988
AGENDA
I.
INTRODUCTION
II.
SNEC MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT
III
CHARACTERIZATION OF SITE S0IL/ MATERIALS
s
HISTORY OF SURVEYS
'
e
RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION
e
CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION
e
FUTURE EFFORTS
IV.
OTHER ITEMS
V.
SUMMARY
l
l
l
.
n
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
Attachment 1
-
SAXTON (SNEC)/NRC MEETING
KING OF PRUSSI A
-
JUNE 6, 1988
,
AGENDA
I.
INTRODUCTION
II.
SNEC MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT
III
CHARACTERIZATION OF SITE S0IL/ MATERIALS
e
HISTORY OF SURVEYS
e
RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION
'e
CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION
e
FUTURE EFFORTS
-
IV.
OTHER ITEMS
V.
SUMMARY
.-