ML20151A693
| ML20151A693 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 03/03/1987 |
| From: | Lauer E AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Chilk NRC |
| References | |
| FRN-52FR6980, RULE-PR-50 52FR6980-00150, 52FR6980-150, NUDOCS 8807200091 | |
| Download: ML20151A693 (2) | |
Text
] b Wf h Q5 U'" ' ~ '
.r]
~ ~~
ee
}%
J.3. "uclear 2eculatory Connission MAR - G G^75 i
.iachington D.C.'20555
~
ci..
s.j
.cn F2Veh 3rd.1987 i
Jear Fr. Chilk, I an vehenently~ocposed to 9 decrease in"t7ie size of the energency clanning zone (SFZ) of sny nuclear cower olant and I sn shocked that Sea-brook is up for a nine nile decrease in its EFZ from ten riles to one nile.
I oppose All site srecific SPZs and recuest there be no waiver for Scabrcok.
I feel that:
1)la ten mile zone is too sr.all and the mininun should be' a twenty to tuonty-five nile zone,.<ith expansion possibilities but nc zone decreases dlowed.
2.) rulom should not b3 chanced %ecause a private energy cenp nv (Sca-broo) runs into leg 21 snags. She :'?.C has nor11 and Iced obli~ations te mrk for nublic safety interests.
3.) if passed, the prorosed rule change rould set 2 recedent an!
concs around other nuclear pover pl1nta ec'ild also be iecreased.
!;. ) the probabilit" of a serious accident at n nuclear rewer plant is derendent on nany factors, hunan error included ani even if tns nuclear in-dust: / s assess-ent of low accident mbability is accepted, tho 'caf 2ty" easure of a ten nile evacuation cone is alreadv 2 tc!mn measure when ene conterplates ".nv serious nucle'.r accident.,Chernobyl sprin'e to nind. ) ihe idea is to try to nininize the horrendous -hysica and genetic consequercas of i nuclear nishao. Any.ny, in 1985 the '7RC rated tha chance of a care melt-doun accident by t"e ve,r 9C07 at hfi.
- 3. ) "e,brcol ' m eroble, is re?itie d sm thic rul, ch1ncinc atte.rt is a Fract renronso te a at,t,'s re"us'l te swreve an :naccent:ble evactmtien cl'n. State 's richtn are M ntWe here. And which is more Lvertart, tb accrenic welfar? cf the nucle tr induntry or the health 'nJ. safety or the Jaeric2n ro-ulation?
8807200091 870303l
/),3 / d '
=.
Therefore lot it ba known that I r. onposed to petition 50-h5 and to sit, sencific ST2s, and feel that ten =ile GZ are inadcoucte for all nuc-loir rower plants in the U.S. I offer my surrort for F.'R 5c-h5 which..ould exmni existin~ 'JZs and the fifty mile inc:stion rathway, and,lse increases star.c 's rights re.'ardin.? onercency nlans.
23spoetfully, nizabeth lauer 1