ML20150C730
| ML20150C730 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 03/15/1988 |
| From: | Thomas C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20150C720 | List: |
| References | |
| A, NUDOCS 8803210217 | |
| Download: ML20150C730 (2) | |
Text
. _ _ _ _ _ _
0 7590-01 i
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. ET AL; REQUEST TO SUSPEND THE PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ANTITRUST LICENSE CONDITIONS - TIME FOR FILING COMMENTS __ EXTENDED On September 18, 1987, the Ohio Edison Company (Ohio Edison) requested the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation to amend the antitrust license conditions that are attached to the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (Perry) operating license, No. NPF-58. Although the Perry operating license was issued to Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., Toledo Edison Co., Duquesne Light Co.
and Ohio Edison, Ohio Edison's amendment requested suspension of the antitrust license conditions only as they apply to Ohio Edison.
Notification of receipt of this amendment request was published in the Federal Register (Vol. 52 p. 48473) on December 22, 1987 and coments were sought from the public within 45 days.
By motion dated January 29, 1988, American Mur.icipal Power-Ohio, Inc. (AMP-Ohio) requested an extension of time until March 7,1988 in which to file its coments on Ohio Edison's amendment request.
Staff granted AMP-Ohio's initial request for a time extension on February 4, 1988.
By letter to the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation dated February 29, 1988, AMP-Ohio has requested another time extension to file its coments in the captioned proceeding. Counsel for AMP-Ohio indicated in its request that its client and Ohio Edison "...were close to a comprehensive, long-term power supply and interconnection agreement which would significantly alter the relationship between Ohio Edison end many of AMP-Ohio's municipal electric menbe.s (and thus the nature of AMP-Ohio's coments in this t O 3 A I O 3 I h W)
,y g;.,
2 docket)." The agreement in question has yet to be finalized and AMP-Ohio has requested a 30-day extension until April 6, 1988, in which to file its comments.
Given the apparent progress in the AMP-Ohio /0hio Edison negotiations to date and the prospects for resolution of the issues that exist between these two parties if the comment period is extended,) staff hereby grants AMP-Ohio's request (which is unopposed by Ohio Edison and extends the time for coments j
from the public on Ohio Edison's amendment until April 6, 1988.
Staff hopes this time extension will contribute to a timely resolution of the issues that remain outstanding between AMP-Ohio and Ohio Edison.
Any person who wishes to express views pursuant to the antitrust issues raised in this amendment request, should submit said views by April 6, 1988 to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Chief, Policy Development and Technical Support Branch, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/s/
Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Policy Development and Technical Support Branch Program llanagement, Policy Development i
and Analysis Staff Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation I
DISTRUBUTION l
Docket File 50-440A I
NRC PDR
-PTSB rf 4
PTSB sf C. Thomas B. Yogler, OGC T. Colburn, PM D. Nash W. Lambe M
OFC :NRR/PTSB
- NRR/P 5
- Pl1
- 0Gr.
\\:NRR/PTSB
.....:............:.....f./ p.:...........:.....
....:..... y.:............:...........
NAME :WLambe/jb
- DNas
- TColburn
- BVog r p
DATE :03/'7/88
- 03/' /88
- 03/15//88
- 03 88
- 03// 88 OfficTAl 8f00RP COPY a