ML20149N029

Forwards Util Response to Generic Ltr 88-02, Isap Ii. General Schedule for Key Ipe/Pra Activities Encl

ML20149N029
Person / Time
Site:	Prairie Island
Issue date:	02/19/1988
From:	Musolf D NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
GL-88-02, GL-88-2, NUDOCS 8803010007
Download: ML20149N029 (3)

Text

'

Northern States Power Company 414 Nicoffet Man Minneapohs. M,nnesota 55401 Telephone (612) 330 5500 February 19, 1988 Generic Letter 88-02 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PIANT Docket Nos. 50-282 License Nos. DPR 42 50-306 DPR-60 NRC Integrated Safety Assessment Program II Attached is the completed response form related to the NRC Integrated Safety Assessment Program (ISAP) II requested in Generic Letter 88-02.

Please contact us if you have any questions related to the information we have provided.

Dj ih.

David Musolf Manager Nuclear Support Services c: Regional Administrator, Regic,n III, NRC h1C Sr Resident Inspector NRC Project Manager G Charnoff Attachment 0

'\'

3803010007 880219 PDR ADOCK 05000282 P DCD

Enclosure 2 Integrated Safety Assessment Procram (ISAF) 11 Response Format to Generic Letter 88-02 Facility Name: Prairie Island 1 & 2 Utility: Northern States Power Company Individual Contact Name: David Musoif Phone Number: r Ain 117-9n30 An expression of interest will not be considered a coninitment te participate on the part of the utility.

1. Would you be interested in participating in ISAP !!? If so, in what time ,

frame?

Yes - September, 1992 This is based on our current schedule for completion of Level 1 PRA (see attached schedule).

2. Do you believe that an industry /NRC seminar consisting of a brief discussion by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial prior to making a decision?

Yes

3. Would you be interested in a one-on-one meeting with the i:PC to discuss your particular facility or facilitiss?

Not at this time l

2

4. If you remain undecided regarding participation, what additienal information do you need in order to rake a decision?

Not applicable.

5. Do you have any potential concerns about participating in !!AP !!?

Yes, but advantages appear to outweight disadvantages. l l

6. Do you have any suggestiens for progran improvements or changes?

Nothing specific at this time.

e mAR mP i

c1 uL sE a

nD eI i

Y 2

9 I 9

1 1 .

i 1

9 s I

A e 9 oR i t

1 iP 1 i 1

v mL.

i I W t E

c A

1 3

/I (' A 2 ' R 1

P

/

E I

P I

P 0 S .

9 N 9

I. s y 1 u s e u K I

n r s pi e o

o f

a u A

T 2

i n e

/ t l 2 n w n u o

n e g a n

e d

e

/s s h I

u n

m i a 4

1 2

/a 0

1 T

' S c .

u m l 9 a a 8 I i

r r 9 e _

' n 1

1. t

' A T

e .

1. A G I ' 'l_ D

'"' i - O R

o E S

i I _

m o

N

(*

a I he m t

P A T

' Yl

• 7 a

n A 8 s A D

/ m 0 8 I e o 1 9 a P

1 1

C 1

41 o 4 n

n 1

0 8

a I 3

' c

/

2 n a

m _

4 g  : _

2 8,

/*'

4

/a '

2 3 /

2 7

8 I 2 1

A og

/

9 0 1

l 1

I

-