ML20149N029
| ML20149N029 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 02/19/1988 |
| From: | Musolf D NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GL-88-02, GL-88-2, NUDOCS 8803010007 | |
| Download: ML20149N029 (3) | |
Text
'.
Northern States Power Company 414 Nicoffet Man Minneapohs. M,nnesota 55401 Telephone (612) 330 5500 February 19, 1988 Generic Letter 88-02 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PIANT Docket Nos. 50-282 License Nos. DPR 42 50-306 DPR-60 NRC Integrated Safety Assessment Program II Attached is the completed response form related to the NRC Integrated Safety Assessment Program (ISAP) II requested in Generic Letter 88-02.
Please contact us if you have any questions related to the information we have provided.
Dj ih.
David Musolf Manager Nuclear Support Services Regional Administrator, Regic,n III, NRC c:
h1C Sr Resident Inspector NRC Project Manager G Charnoff Attachment 0
'\\'
3803010007 880219 PDR ADOCK 05000282 P
Integrated Safety Assessment Procram (ISAF) 11 Response Format to Generic Letter 88-02 Facility Name:
Prairie Island 1 & 2 Utility: Northern States Power Company Individual Contact Name: David Musoif Phone Number: r Ain 117-9n30 An expression of interest will not be considered a coninitment te participate on the part of the utility.
1.
Would you be interested in participating in ISAP !!? If so, in what time frame?
Yes - September, 1992 This is based on our current schedule for completion of Level 1 PRA (see attached schedule).
2.
Do you believe that an industry /NRC seminar consisting of a brief discussion by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial prior to making a decision?
Yes 3.
Would you be interested in a one-on-one meeting with the i:PC to discuss your particular facility or facilitiss?
Not at this time 2
4.
If you remain undecided regarding participation, what additienal information do you need in order to rake a decision?
Not applicable.
5.
Do you have any potential concerns about participating in !!AP !!?
Yes, but advantages appear to outweight disadvantages.
6.
Do you have any suggestiens for progran improvements or changes?
Nothing specific at this time.
emAR mP i
c1 uL sE anD eI i
Y 2
9 I
9 1
1.
i 1
s 9
e I
A 9
oR i
1 iP t
mL.
v i
1 1
i W
I t
E c
A 13/I
('
AR 2
1 P
/E P
I I
P 0
S 9
N I.
s 9
u y
1 e
su K
n r
I pi e
o s
o f
a u
A 2
T i
n e
/
t l
w 2
nn u
g a
d o
n e
e e
n u
/
s h
T 2
a
/a s
c I
n i
4 0
1 1
S mu m
l 98 i
a a
r re I
9 n
1 A
e
'l_
- t T
G A
D I
'" i O
R o
E i
S I
mo N
a h
m Yl
(*
I e
tP A
T a
A 7
n 8
A D
s/
m 0
8 e
I o
1 9
a 1
1 P
C 1
41 o
14 n
0 n
8 3
I a
c
/
n 2
4 g
a m
/*
/a 4
2 8,
2
/
3 2'
7 A
8 1
I 2
9
/
og l
0 1
1 I
-