ML20149M956
| ML20149M956 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 02/22/1988 |
| From: | Robert Williams PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| GL-88-02, GL-88-2, P-88079, NUDOCS 8802290315 | |
| Download: ML20149M956 (3) | |
Text
i O
h Public Service ~
nh
" S 'cYorot<so d
R.O. WILUAMS, JR.
E[t$85[dres February 22, 1988 Fort St. Vrain Unit No. 1 P-88079 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissior.
ATTN: Docunent Control Desk Washington, D.C.
205S5 Docket No. 50-267
SUBJECT:
PSC Response to Generic Letter 88-02 (G-88018)
Gentlemen:
Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC) provides the enclosed response regarding the information requested in Generic letter 88-02 for the Fort St. Vrain (FSV) Nuclear Generating Station.
If there are any questions, please c.utact Mr. M. H. Holmes at (303) 480-6960.
Very truly yours, R. O. Williams, Jr.
Vice President.
Nuclear Operations 8002290315 080222 PDR ADOCK 05000267 P
PDR tt k
February 22, 1988 o
P-88079 Page 2 R0W/WMD:bre Enclosure cc: Regional Administrator, Region IV ATTN: Mr. T. F. Westerman, Chief Projects Section B Mr. Robert Farrell Senior Resident Inspector Fort St. Vrain l
l l
i Enclosure i
February 22, 1988 P-88079 i
i Facility Name:
Fort St. Vrain Utility:
Public Service Company of Colorado Individual Contact Name:
M. H. Holmes Phone Number:
(303) 480-6960 l
1.
Would you be interested in participating in ISAP !!? If so, in what time frame?
t i
See Response to Question 2.
[
i 2.
Do you believe that an industry /NRC seminar consisting of a brief i
discussion by NRC followed by a question and answer period would i
be beneficial prior to making a decision?
j i
Yes.
l 3.
Woule you be interested in a one-on-one meeting with the NRC to i
discuss you particular facility or facilities?
i i
Yes.
The unique design of the Fort St. Vrain High l
Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor necessitates such a meeting.
4 If you remain undecided regarding participation, what additional information do you need in order to make a decision?
I Information on issues such as:
the time frame requited for i
completion of a Level 1 P.R.A.,
the resources NRC could devote to the unique characteristics of the HTGR in problem resolution, and the utility resources estimated to make ISAP II a reality at Fort St. Vrain.
5.
Do you have any potential concerns about participating in ISAP i
II?
[
Yes.
The ability to perform an accurate Level 1 P.R.A.
i (with existing methodologies) for the HTGR.
i 6.
Do you have any suggestions for program improvyents or changes?
l Not at this time. However, PSC will be prepared to provide comment on ISAP II after an initial discussion with members t
of the NRR Staff relative to Fort St. Vrain.
I 1
1 i
l
.- - - J
_