ML20149L007

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Request for OMB Review & Supporting Statement Re 10CFR50, Domestic Licensing of Production & Utilization Facilities. Estimated Respondent Burden Is 6,336,079 H
ML20149L007
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/29/1997
From: Levin A
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149K999 List:
References
OMB-3150-0011, OMB-3150-11, NUDOCS 9707310038
Download: ML20149L007 (2)


Text

o' O PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of inis torm, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Suppor*ing Statement, and any additional uocumentatir en to: Office of information and Replatory Affairs.

Office of M - ;m and B4et, Docket Library, Room 10102,72517th Stra.et NW. Washington DC 20503

1. Agency / Subagency originating rt, quest 2. OMB control number 3150-0011 b. None U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission X a.
4. Type of review requested (check one/
3. Type of information collection (check one/
a. Regular submission c. Delegated
a. New collection X
b. Revision of a currently approved collection b. Emergency - Approval requested by (dateh X
5. Will this information collection have a a. Yes
c. Extension of a currentty approved collection significant economic impact on a _
d. Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved substantial number of sman entities? X b.No collection for which approval has expired
e. Roanstatement, with change, of a previously approved a. Three years from approval date collecten for which approval has expired Requested 6' expiration date X b. Ottwr (Specifyh 07/31/97
f. Existing collection in use without an OMB control number
7. Tate 10 CFR 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities
8. Agency form number (s) (if app # cable /

NA

9. Keywords Antitrust, fire protection, nuclear, power plants and reactors, radiation protection, reactor siting criteria, i

reporting and recordkeeping requirements l

10. Abstract Proposed rule,10 CFR Parts 50 and 73, Frequency of Reviews and Audits for Emergency. Preparedness Programs, Safeguards Contingency Plans and Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors would reduce information collection burden on reactor licensees by increasing the audit frequency from one to two years when no significant changes have been made in the programs.  !

l t 2. obligaten to respond Asat 4.u, we *P* amt af erhws ther es# wM K*J

_1,t; Affected public Asare penary we viamt as erners inst auvW wm *x*/

d. Farme s. Voluntary
a. Indtviduels or households
e. Federal Governenent b. Requwed to obtain or retain benefits P b. Ekssiness or other for-profit
f. state. Local, or Tribal Govemment P c. Mandatory
c. Not-for-profttinstitutene " e/ shers/
14. Annual reb,ii..g and recordkeepeng cost burden 6e ti- l
13. Annual reporting and recordkeepmg hour burden
e. Total annuahzed cap <tal/startup costs
a. Number of respondents 178
b. Total annual responses 9,836 b. Total annual costs to&M)
c. Total annuenzed cost requested O
1. Percentage of these responses conected electrorucelly
d. Current OMB inventory
e. Difference O
c. Total annuel hours requested 6,336.079 6,336,o79 f. Esplanation of difference ,
d. Current oMe inventory
1. Program change l
e. Difference o
2. Adsustment l
f. Explanation of difference
1. Program change O O l
2. Adjustment
18. Frequency of recordkeeping or reportm rCheck a# that apply 1
15. Purpose of informaten collection b. Third-party disclosure IMert peknery Mth *P* end en oeers that apply Me *X*) X a. Recordkeepmg
e. Program plannmg or management X c. Reporting
s. Application for benefits 2. Weekly 3. Monthly
f. Research X 1. on occasion
b. Program evolustion o Annually
4. ouarterty X 5. seme-annually X
c. General purpose statistics p g. Regulatory or comphance
7. Biennially 8. other (desenbel
d. Audit Agency contact toerson who can best answer questens regarding the t7. statistmalmethods ,y' contentof this submission)

Does this infortnation collection employ statistical methods?

Name: Dr. Sandra D. Frattali Yes No phone: (301) 415-6261 10/95 OMB 83-1 9707310038 970729 PDR ORO EUSOMB PDR

= ,

19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions l

}

On behalf of this Federni agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOM: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3), appear at the end of the instructions. 1he certsfication is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisionr ar setforth in the instructions. l

'Ibe following is a =====y of the topics, regardmg the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper p.L - ? of agency functens; f

~ (b) It avonds =======y "_, ' =+;

(c) It rodsoes burden on smaali ame=*im, (d) It mass pinin, coherent, and - ",, - +5 terminology that is understandable to r=paarlaa*=;

l (e) Its : , ' - - ^ = will be canaistant and compatible with cumet reportmg and recordesping practices; (f) It indscates the retention penods for recordkeeping requirements; (g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3):

(i) Why the information is being collected; (ii) Use ofinformation; (iii) Burden estunate; (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

Nature and extent of confidentiality; and (v)

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number; (b) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective

====g====* and use of the information to be collected (see note in item 19 of the instnutions).

(i) It uses effective and effleient statistical survey methodology; and

0) It makes apprepnate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in item 18 of the Supporting Stssement.

f f

i 5 Date Signature of Senior Official or designee 1 L? ~ I 10/96 Oest 83-4