ML20149K052

Forwards Proprietary Test Results for Giraffe Helium Tests H1 & H2.Attachment 1 to Ltr Provides List of Instruments Included on Computer Disk.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)

ML20149K052
Person / Time
Site:	05200004
Issue date:	02/15/1996
From:	Quinn J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:	Quay T NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML19355C665	List: ML20149K052
References
MFN-018-96, MFN-18-96, NUDOCS 9602210110
Download: ML20149K052 (7)

Text

., , < ,Q

(

L GENuclearEnergy J. E. Quinn. P cts Manager GeneralElectric Company LMR and SB Programs 175 Curtner Avenue, WC 165 San Jose, CA 95125-1014 408 925-1005 (phone) 408 925-3991 (facsimile)

February 15,1996 MFN 018-96 Docket 52-0(M Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555 Attention: Theodore E. Quay, Director Standardization Project Directorate

Subject:

SBWR - DATA TRANSMITTAL FOR GIRAFFE HELIUM TESTS H1 & H2

Reference:

1. Letter from J.E. Quinn (GE) to T.E. Quay (NRC), SBWR - Updated Status of Test Documentation Submittals, MFN 125-95, July 24,1995 The attachments to this letter supply the test results for the GIRAFFE Helium tests HI & H2. This transmittal satisiics item no. 30 of Reference 1.

The test results for each instrument are provided in the attached nine computer disks. l Attachment I to this letter provides a list of the instruments included on each computer disk.

Attachment 2 to this letter provides tables and figures which describe the instru.nents and show their exact location in the GIRAFFE test facility in Kawasaki City, Japan.

Please note that the attachments contain information of the type which the General Electric Company (GE) and its associates maintain in confidence and withhold from public disclosure.

The information has been handled and classified as proprietary to GE and its associates as indicated in the attached affidavit. We hereby request that this information be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with the provisions of 10CFR2.790.

Should you have any questions concerning the attachments please contact Maryann Herzog of our staff on 408-925- 1921.

Sincerely,

- . ./,

/>t -

WT*D h l James E. Quinn/[F 9602210110 960215 PDR ADOCK 05200004 A PDR Attachments: GIRAFFE Helium Tests HI & H2 Data Computer Disks (9)  ;

Attachment 1: Tests HI & H2 Data Transmittal File Contents i Attachment 2: Tables & Figures providing the identification and location of instruments J

nocst G4a g o

e M .ht\v r/*/ & ___

J

c O

GENuclearEnergy MFN 018-96 cc: P. A. Boehnert (NRC/ACRS) (2 paper copies plus E-Mail of transmittal letter only)

I. Catton (ACRS) (1 paper copy plus E-Mail of transmittal letter only)

S. Q. Ninh (NRC) (1 paper copies plus E-Mail of transmittal letter only)

J. H. Wilson (NRC) (1 paper copy plus E-Mail of transmittal letter only)

D. Scaletti (NRC) (1 paper copy plus E-Mail of transmittal letter only)

A. Drozd (NRC) (1 paper copy w/ attachments plus E-Mail of transmittal letter) r i

i

.. 1

O GENuclearEnergy MFN 018-%

bec: (E-Mail of transmittal letter only except as noted)

J. A. Beard R. II. Buchholz T. Cook (doe) (2 paper copies plus E-Mail of transmittal letter only)

R. T. Fernandez (EPRI)

J. N. Fox P. C. Hecht M. IIerzog J. E. Leatherman J. E. Quinn T. J. Mulford (EPRI) (2 paper copies plus E-Mail of transmittal letter only)

F. A. Ross (doe)

B. Shiralkar R. Srinivasan (EPRI)

J. E. Torbeck S. Yokobori (Toshiba) (1 paper copy w/ attachments)

GE Master File (1 paper copy plus E-Mail of transmittal letter only)

SBWR Project File (1 paper copy plus E-Mail of transmittal letter only) i

. ..- l, I

General Electric Company 1

AFFIDAVIT I, Michael A. Smith, being duly sworn, depose and state as follows:  !

(1) I am Michael A. Smith, Manager, Safety Evaluation Project, General Electric Company

("GE") and have been delegated the function of reviewing the information described in pa,ragraph (2) which is sought to be withheld, and have been authorized to apply for its withholding.

i (2) GE is an owner of the information sought to be withheld. This information is contained in t!.e proprietary electronic file copy of the SBWR GIRAFFE Helium tests HI & H2 data on nine computer disks and the Attachment 1 and 2 tables and figures describing the data and the instrument locations. The proprietary information is delineated by bars marked in the margin adjacent to the specific material. The computer disks'are labeled with a proprietary marking.

(3) In making this application for withholding of proprietary information, GE claims to have an unrestricted right to dissemination of this information and has a royalty-free license to any patent relating to this information, as defined in the contract with its associates. GE relies upon the exemption from disclosure set forth in the Freedom of Information Act

("FOIA"), 5 USC Sec. 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act,18 USC Sec.1905, and NRC regulations 10 CFR 9.17(a)(4),2.790(a)(4), and 2.790(d)(1) for '" trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential" (Exemption 4). The material for which exemption from disclosure is here sought is all " confidential commercial information", and some portions also qualify under the narrower definition of " trade secret", within the meanings assigned to those terms for purposes of FOIA Exemption 4 in, respectively, Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commiccion. 975F2d871 (DC Cir.1992), and Public Citi7en Health Research Group v. FEA,704F2d1280 (DC Cir.1983).

l (4) Some examples of categories of information which fit into the definition of proprietary l information are: I

a. Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including supporting data I and analyses, where prevention of its use by GE's competitors without license from  !

GE constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies; l

b. Information which, if used by a competitor, would reduce his expenditure of l resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, l installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product;

)

P U:\SBWR-BB\stdamd. doc Amdavit Page I

9

c. Information which reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of GE, its customers, or its suppliers;

d. Information which reveals aspects of past, present, or future GE customer-funded

' development plans and programs, of potential commercial value to GE;

e. Information which discloses patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection.

The information sought to be withheld is considered to be proprietary for the reasons set forth in both paragraphs (4)a., (4)b. and (4)d., above.

(5) The information sought to be withheld is being submitted to NRC in confidence. The information is of a sort customarily held in confidence by GE and its associates, and is in fact so held. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by GE and its associates, no public disclosure has been made, and it is not available in public sources. All disclosures to third parties including any required transmittals to NRC, have been made, or must be made, pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence. Its initial designation as proprietary information, and the subsequent steps taken to prevent its unauthorized disclosure, are as set furth in paragraphs (6) and (7) following.

(6) Initial approval of proprietary treatment of a document is made by the manager of the component to whom the work was provided, the person most likely to be acquainted with the value and sensitivity of the information in relation to industry knowledge. Access to such documents within GE is limited on a "need to know" basis.

(7) The procedure for approval of external release of such a document typically requires review by the staff manager, project manager, principal scientist or other equivalent authority, by the manager of the cognizant marketing function (or his delegate), and by the Legal Operation, for technical content, competitive effect, and determination of the accuracy of the proprietary designation. Disclosures outside GE are limited to regulatory bodies, customers, and potential customers, and their agents, suppliers, and licensees, and others with a legitimate need for the information, and then only in accordance with appropriate regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements.

(8) The information identified in paragraph (2), above, is classified as proprietary because it contains detailed results of the Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (SBWR) tests. GE is under contract to the Department of Energy (DOE) for development of the SBWR, This SBWR test program has been under development by GE and its associates for more than seven years at a total program cost of tens of millions of dollars. A substantial effort has been expended by GE and its associates to develop this information in support of DOE and the SBWR program.

UASBWR-BB\stdamd. doc Amdavit Page 2

)

(9) Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to GE's competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities. The information is part of GE's comprehensive BWR technology base, and its commercial value extends beyond the original development cost. The value of the technology base goes beyond the extensive physical database and analytical methodology and includes development of the expertise to determine and apply the appropriate evaluation process.

The research, development, engineering, and analytical costs comprise a substantial investment of time and money by GE and its associates.

The precise value of the expertise to devise testing and an evaluation process, and apply the correct analytini methodology is difficult to quantify, but it clearly is substantial.

GE's competitive advantage will be lost if its competitors are able to use the results of the GE experience te normalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an equivalent understanding by demonstrating that they can arrive at the same or similar conclusions.

l The value of this information to GE would be lost if the information were disclosed to the '

public. Making such information available to competitors without their having been required to undertake a similar expenditure of resources would unfairly provide competitors with a windfall, and deprive GE of the opportunity to exercise its competitive advantage to seek an adequate return on its large investment in developing these very valuable analytical tools.

J l U:\SBWR-BB\stdatTid. doc Afridavit Page 3 l I

i i

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

) ss:

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA )

Michael A. Smith, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

That he has read the foregoing affidavit and the matters stated therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief.

Executed at San Jose, California, this /6 day of I 1996.

MN \

Michael A. Smith General Electric Company Subscribed and sworn before me this // day of [A 1996,

>hm A &A Notary Public, State of California

--m . . .. , , , ,

.. '- MARY L. KENDALL COMM. # 987864 3 l.g23.

h , Notary Public - California ~$

j .

SANTA CLARA COUNTY r' I_ My Comm. Expiros MAR 26.1997

---

,,,,,,,,)

U:\SBWR-BB\stdamd. doc Amdavit Page 4

,