ML20149J316

Notice of Nonconformance from Insp on 970514.Nonconformance Noted:On 961108,maint Personnel at Licensee Discovered That Control Wires on Terminals 12 & 13 of Power Shield Trip Unit Were Reversed on Breaker S/N 51817A-107073

ML20149J316
Person / Time
Issue date:	07/23/1997
From:	NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149J311	List: ML20149J307 ML20149J312 ML20149J316 ML20149J320
References
REF-QA-99901281 99901281-97-01, 99901281-97-1, NUDOCS 9707280159
Download: ML20149J316 (1)

Text

- . . . - - - . - . .. . -.

Enclosure 2 NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE 4 ABB Service Docket No.: 99901281 Cleveland, Ohio Based on the results of an inspection conducted on May 14, 1997, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance with NRC requirements.

Criterion X of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, " Inspection," requires, in part, that a program for inspection of activities affecting quality be established and executed by or for the organization performing the activity to verify conformance with documented instructions, procedures, and drawings for accomplishing the activity.

Contrary to the above, two safety-related K-Line breakers that had been returned by ABB Service, Cleveland, to a licensee after being refurbished were not properly inspected to verify their conformance to documented drawings, specifically: (99901281/97-01-02)

On November 8, 1996, maintenance personnel at the licensee discovered that the control wires on terminals 12 and 13 of the Power Shield trip unit were reversed on breaker S/N 51817A-107073.

=

On April 28, 1997, maintenance personnel at the licensee discovered that the power sensor on phase "C" was inverted (i.e., it was installed

-upside down) on breaker S/N 518170-211135.

Please provide a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Chief, Special Inspection Branch, Division of Inspection and Support Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Nonconformance. This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Nonconformance" and should include for each nonconformance: (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items; (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence; and (3) the dates your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland e

this 2 3

• day of July 1997 9707200159 970723 PDR GA999 EMVC-E 99901281 PDR