ML20149H061

Forwards Criteria Documents Which Contain Sargent & Lundy Proposed Sample Criteria for Listed Areas,In Response to Confirmatory Order Establishing Independent Corrective Action Verification Program

ML20149H061
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	07/22/1997
From:	Schopfer D SARGENT & LUNDY, INC.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
9583-100, NUDOCS 9707240193
Download: ML20149H061 (6)

Text

- -.

.~-

. -. ~ -.

/

/k g a v

n Sar geQ%Lundy'c V;f l

Don K. Schopfer Vice President 312-269-6078 '

July 22,1997 Project No. 9583-100 Docket No. 50-423 a

Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 The Confirmatory Order establishing the Independent Corrective Action Verification Program for Millstone Units 1, 2, and 3, dated August 14, 1996, and the associated Commission Paper (SECY-97-003) released January 30, 1997, require that the review include a sample of changes made to the facility configuration since issuance of the operating license through processes other than the design change processes. In order to establish a criteria for selecting these samples, it was mutually agreed that a listing of facility changes in each area of review would first be obtained form NU. Change lists have been provided to S&L for the following four areas:

1. Licensing documents

2. DCNs not associated with modifications

3. Material, Equipment, and Parts List (MEPL) Dedications

4. Procedures As discussed in our meeting of July 17,1997, we have enclosed criteria documents which contain our proposed sample selection criteria for these areas. Please provide your commems or concurrence for these criteria at your earliest convenience.

OU-j.

9707240193 970722 ll flff!b,hl!!ll ff l l

D 55 East Monroe Street

• Chicago. IL 60603-5780 USA + 312-269-2000

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission July 22,1997 Document Control Desk Page 2 We are still awaiting change lists from NU for the following past change areas:

i Temporary alterations e

• Vendor manuals Like-for-like replacements l

e L

Setpoints e

Commercial grade dedication e

l NCRs/EWRs dispositioned use-as-is (the initial list provided included only ICAVP l

sample systems)

Shortly after we receive this information from NU, we will prepare and transmit similar recommendations for the sample selections.

Please direct any questions to me at 312-269-6078.

Yours very truly, D

s l

D. K. Schopfer I

l Vice President and ICAVP Manager DKS:TJR:pah Copies:

E. Imbro (1/4) Deputy Director, ICA'T Oversight l

T. Concannon (1/2) Nuclear Energy Advisory Council J. Fourgere (1/3)NU B. A. Erler (1/0)

File (M:\\MP-ICAVMU3\\legsCorr\\97\\NR0722-Adoc)

I

u,%..o i

l Millstone 3 -ICAVP i

Programmatic Review - Past Change Review Selection Criteria Licensing Document Changes e Millstone Status:

l FSAR Change Requests ~ 900 (1986 to 1997)

Technical Specification Changes ~ 300 (1986 to 1997)

License Amendment Requests ~ 34 (1987 to 1997)

Both Technical Specification changes and License Amendments receive detailed NRC review. Therefore, ICAVP review should be concentrated on FSAR changes.

To establish the ICAVP sample, select:

1. Changes that appear to be outside the scope ofICAVP sunple systems.

2. Changes that are judged to have more significance (i.e., involving safety-related and major plant cycle systems).

3. Two FSAR changes in each year through 1996 (total 22).

4. One technical specification change in each five-year period (total 2).

I

(

-~ =.

g

-.j Millstone 3 -ICAVP Programmatic Review - Past Change Review Selection Criteria DCNs Not Associated with Modifications

• Millstone Status:

List of approximately 1,500 DCNs (1986 to 1996)

• To establish the ICAVP sample, select:

1. Seismic / Safety-related DCNs.

2. DCNs distributed among M, E and C disciplines.

3. DCNs outside ICAVP sample systems.

4.

1-M,1-E and 1-C DCN from each year (if available, and meeting first three criteria)(totai 33).

I i

i

u,,.. e...

Millstone 3 -ICAVP Programmatic Review - Past Change Review Selection Criteria Material, Equipment, and Parts List (MEPL) Dedications l

Millstone Status:

Approximately 1,300 MEPL dedications (1986 to 1997)

Dispositions include non-QA, FPQA, Radwaste QA, QA (Cat-1)

To establish the ICAVP sample, select:

e

1. Dedications outside the ICAVP sample systems.

2. Determinations that appear to be classification changes.

3. Risk / safety based classifications.

4. Three determinations for each year,1986 through 1996 (total 33).

I i

)

1 i

4 1

4 4

m...

l

~

Millstone 3 -ICAVP Programmatic Review - Past Change Review Selection Criteria l

l Procedures e Millstone Status:

l Operations Procedure Changes ~ 7,000 (1986 to 1997) i Abnormal Operating Procedures Changes ~ 84

)

(1986 to 1997)

Emergency Operating Procedures Changes - 355 (1986 to 1997)

Surveillance /IST Procedure Changes ~ 11,000 (1986 to 1997)

Maintenance Procedure Changes ~ 2,400 (1986 to 1997) i To establish the ICAVP sample, select:

e

l. Procedures not generally applicable to the ICAVP sample systems.

2. Changes from procedures which are safety-significant and/or risk significant, are complex, and had a number of revisions.

3. 20 Operations Procedure Changes.

4. 5 Abnormal Operating Procedure Changes.

5. 10 Emergency Operating Procedure Changes.

6. 15 Surveillance /IST Procedure Changes.

7. 15 Maintenance Procedure Changes.

8. These changes in Items 3 through 7 will be spread out over the 11-year period 1986 through 1996.

j.

(o:\\TJRWEUhc0714. doc) l