ML20149E792

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Amends 88 & 75 to Licenses NPF-76 & NPF-80,respectively, Removing Requirement for Performance of Surveillance Incorporating High Toxic Gas Test Signal
ML20149E792
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 07/17/1997
From: Alexion T
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149E796 List:
References
NUDOCS 9707210071
Download: ML20149E792 (7)


Text

-

a"4 UNITED STATES g

g f

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r.,.....j WASHINGTON. D.C. 3088H001 1

HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY I

CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO i

CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY I

CITY OF AUSTIN. TEXAS i

DOCKET NO. 50-498 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT. UNIT I AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE J

Amendment No. 88 License No. NPF-76 1.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

J I

A.

The application for amendment by Houston Lighting & Power Company *

(HL&P) acting on behalf of itself and for the City Public Service Board of San Antonio (CPS), Central Power and Light Company (CPL),

and City of Austin, Texas (COA) (the licensees), dated August 15, 1996, as supplemented by letters dated October 31, 1996, and May 29, 1997, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.

The facility will operate in conformity with the application, as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of l

the Commission; I-C.

There is reasonable assurance:

(1) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.

The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.

The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

~

  • Houston Light J & Power Company is authorized to act for the City Public Service Boarc of San Antonio, Central Power and Light Company and City of Austin, Texas and has exclusive. responsibility and control over the physical construction, operation and maintenance of the facility.

9707210071 970717' PDR ADOCK 05000498 4

P PDR

. 2.

Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and Paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-76 is hereby amended to read as follows:

2.

Technical Soecifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 88, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license.

The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

3.

The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance to be implemented within 30 days of issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4N7104 8

Thomas W. Alexion, Project Ma ager Project Directorate IV-I Division of Reactor Projects III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:

July 17,1997

g#

j

'i UNITED STATES g

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 3084Ho01 i

l HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY i -

CITY PUBLIC' SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO 1

CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CITY OF AUSTIN. TEXAS DOCKET NO. 50-499 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT. UNIT 2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE 1

Amendment No. 75 j

License No. NPF-80 I

1.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that-1 l

A.

The application for amendment by Houston Lighting & Power Company *

(HL&P)-acting on behalf of itself and for the City Public Service 4

Board of San Antonio (CPS), Central Power and Light Company (CPL),

and City of Austin, Texas (C0A) (the licensees), dated August 15, 1996, as supplemented by letters dated October 31, 1996, and May 29, 1997, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules

-and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.

The facility will operate in conformity with the application, as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of j

the Commission; C.

There is reasonable assurance:

(i) that the activities authorized I

by this amendment can be coducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.

The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.

The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

  • Houston Lighting & Power Company is authorized to act for the City Public Service Board of San Antonio, Central-Power and Light Company and City of Austin,' Texas and has exclusive responsibility and control over the physical construction, operation'and maintenance of the facility.

4

-*r-

.. J 2.

Accordingly, the license is amended by charges to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and Paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NFF-80 is hereby amended to read as follows:

2.

Technical S.pecifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised i

through Amendment No. 75, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license.

The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

3.

The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance to be 4

implemented within 30 days of issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REbC' ATORY COMMISSION f

Thomas W. Alexion, Pr jec Man ger Project Directorate IV-1 Division of Reactor Projects III/IV 4

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: July 17,1997 l

i

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDHENT NOS. 88 AND 75 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N05. NPF-76 AND NPF-80 DOCKET NOS. 50-498 AND 50-499 Replace the following page of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached page. The revised page is identified by Amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the areas of change. The corresponding overleaf page is. also provided to maintain document completeness.

REMOVE INSERT 3/4 7-18 3/4 7-18 l

. -. - - - -..~ - -. -

PLANT $YSTDt$

j SURVEfLLANCE RFOUIREMFNTE (Centinued) c.

At, least once per 18 months or (1) after any structural maintenance en the HEPA filter or charcoal adsorber housings, or (2) following painting, fire, or chemical release in any ventilation zone communi-i i

cating with the system by:

1)

Verifying that the makeup and cleanup systems satisfy the in place penetration and bypass leakage testing acceptance j

' criteria of less than 0.053 for HEPA filter banks and 0.10% for i

charcoal adsorber banks and uses the test procedure guidance in Regulatory Positions C.5.a. C.5.c. and C.5.d of Regu'atory l

Guide 1.52, Revision 2 March 1978, and the system flow rate is 6000 cfm i 105 for the cleanup 4mits and 1000 cfm i 105 for the l

ankaup units; 2)

Verifying, within 31 days a

}

analysis of a representative,fter removal, that a laboratory carbon sample obtained in accor-dance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, s

I Revision 2. March 1978, meets the laboratory testing criteria j

of Regulatory Position C.6.a of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revi-sion 2, March 1978, for a methyl iodide penetration of less than 1.0% when tested at a temperature of 30'C and a relative l

humidity of 705; and i

3)

Verifying a systes flow rate of 6000 cfm

  • 10% for the cleanup units and 1000 cfm i 10% for the makeup units during systes i

operation when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1980.

d.

After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoal adsorber operation, by verifying,'

within 31 days after removal, that a laboratory analysis of a repre-sentative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory i

Position C.6.b of Regdatory Guide 1.52. Revision 2, March 1978, meets the laboratory testing criteria of.Regulato Position C.6.a of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2 March 1978, f a methyl todido penetration of less than 1.0% when tested at temperature of 30'C and a relative humidity of 705; i

a.

At least once per 18 months by:

2

~

1)

Verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA 1

filters and charcoal adsorber banks is less than 6.1 inches Water Gauge for the makeup units and 6.0 inches Water Gauge for the cleanup units while operating the systes at a flow rate of 4

i 6000 cfm i 10K for the cleanup units and 1000 cfm

  • 105 for the sakeup units; l

2)

Verifying that on a control room emergency ventilation test

. signal (HighRadiationand/orSafetyInjectiontestsignal),the system automatically switches into a recirculation and makeup air flitration mode of operation with flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks of the cleanup and makeup units;.

4.

SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 3/4 7-17

-... -,, - a: -..=

l l

l PLANT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued) 3)

Verifying that the system maintains the control room envelope at a positive pressure of greater than or equal to 1/8 inch Water Gauge at less that or equal to a pressurization flow of 2000 cfm relative to adjacent areas' during system operation; and l

4)

Verify 1.., that the makeup filter unit heaters dissipate 4.5 i i

0.45 kW when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1980.

i 4

f.

After each complete or partial replacement of a HEPA filter bank, by verifying that the HEPA filter bank satisfies the in-place penetration and bypass leakage testing acceptance criteria of less than 0.05% in accordance with ANSI N510-1980 for a DOP test aerosol while operating the system at a flow rate of 6000 cfm i 10% for the citarup units and 1000 cfm i 10% for the makeup units; and i

g.

After each complete or partial replacement of a charcoal adsorber barl by verifying that the charcoal adsorber bank satisfies the in-place penetration and bypass leakage testing acceptance criteria 4

of less than 0.10% in accordance with ANSI N510-1980 for a j

halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant test gas while operating the system at a flow rate of 6000 cfm i 10% for the cleanup units and 1000 cfm i 10% for the makeup units.

I

(

i 1

4 4

1 i

SOUTH TEXA5 - UNITS 1 & 2 3/4 7-18 Unit 1 - Amendment No. 7p8 Unit 2 - Amendment No. 75 lW

%+--da.'-sD'8'-

1.5

.d e st w

.--...