ML20149E032

Rev 2 to Procedure OPGP05-ZA-0002, 10CFR50.59 Evaluations, Form 1

ML20149E032
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	06/04/1995
From:	Mark Blumberg HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20149D930	List: ML20149D926 ML20149E006 ML20149E032 ML20149E056
References
NUDOCS 9707180073
Download: ML20149E032 (3)

Text

.- __ _ - . - -- -

i>>

l i

,, l 1

OPGP05-ZA-0002 Rev.2 Page 37 O! 43 10CTR50.59 Evaluations 10CPR50.59 Screening Form (Sample) Page i Of 3

!I form 1 1' '~

UNTT #1 7 UFSARCN

~

DESIGN CHANGE I 7 OTHER

.DCP s.n 4 l D uN,T .2 BOTH l'

i CN-1980 & DCP 95 7768 4 REY.NO. 0  !

ORGINATING DOCUMENT NO.

\

j DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE

• See attached. j The attached document is a revision to a previously approved 50.59 acreering form and USOE (USOE S24022. Rev. 0). The I fortas have been updated to renect the format of the forms in he current 10CFR50.59 Evaluauons procedure. At forms refer to the previousy approved USOE which is marked up with change bare to show al changes between revision 0 and revlakn 1.J

• PREUMINARY SCREINING ,

YES *

. NO

• i -

1. Does F-* proposed change represent a change to me Plent Techrumal SpecinceSons?

2. Is an Unreviewed Safety QuesGon known to be associated with the subject change? , ,

I NOTE: If *YES* to other questions 1 or 2 refer to OPGP05.ZN.0004. , ,.

Does the proposed change represertt:

1 3. A change to only correct a typographical, editorial or drafung error 7 I 4. A change which is ident! cal to and addressed in its entrety by an existing opptrwed 10CFR50.59 ScreerWng/USQE or NRC approved licensing sthmittal?

x j

6. A spare or replacement paria:omponent change with an equhralent W,6.,~. 4..;7  !

(See Sec6on 2.3 for a defintuon of equivalent) l x

S. A configurauon change within saisting design epociscatjons7 if af answers to be above quespons are *NO' perform me Anal screening and rnark MA h the approval blocks below. l If the answer to any question p) through (6)is *YES* a Anal acreening is not necessary.

• Sign approvst blocks below and discard pages 2 and 3.

' Prov6de a )wierallon and references X any of alems Q) trough (6)is answered 'YES*.

N/A

!t 4

Prepared by: Mark Blumberg h y Mr s S/28/95 Date

. Originator O APProv*d by. WA $ .g f/ h y# W g, gg , g y Odatined Reviewer Date i

l 9707100073 970716 PDR ADOCK 05000498 PDR ,

P

. - _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____m_

i 4

d

5

.: Rev.2 Pqe 38 Of 43 OPGP05-ZA-0002 10CfR50.59 Evaluations form i 10CFR50.59 Screening Form (Sample) Pne2ofa

-rmai. scREEnma in response to tie ques 11ons below,5 tw change twohes someedng that is not descrbed ki sw SAR and k not part of the Econsing basis, the *g2' is approprieta. Hosrever Wils decision must be clearty documented with adequate technicalkotilcation l

j ,l k M pe and N mm W W e% N W W eh N M h h h

Esting of atttades and documerns for 10CTR50Je secening can be found in Addendum 5.

I j' ,

Inter <secipane Coonsnation Regdref?

N 'yn*, obtah appropriate concurrence.

X YES ]NO Riskand Asmabany Anasyeh ] Thermal Hydrades ] Reactor Engr.

I,

]cMt {uch M ] Elect ]EQ C ]Other YFA NO

t, ooes ow mmpc of this reew kwolve a change to Sw tacBty M descrtwd h tw SalWy Analysis Report? .

{

See A8achment.

d 9 fA jI

• l 1

4 9

l x

2. Does ** **>ct or this re** kneeve a change to sw precedurm = demorand in uw setety 1

Analysis Reporri Refer to OPAP01 ZA4103.

see esachnur(

f l!

c

'I -

n OPGP05-ZA-0002 Rev.2 Page 39 of 43 i 10CFR50.59 Evaluations

~

10CFR50.59 Screening Form (Sample) Page 3 of 3 Form 1 YES No 4

s. o m .e,.et et om re*w propa.e e.

s.t.iyAnere nep.t?

nduct of int a e, enen= na descreed u ~ 0- O

'I See esachmert

i

~

i l

4 i

l 4

l l

'I

4. o s m prop ed ch nge eneci con *6.ns a bases .numed in m s.wy An.wis nepat =

safety.related functons of equiptnent/ systems. even mough the proposed change does not entag x

0 any physical change in exishng structures, systems, or procedures as descreed in me SAR7 See attachment. .

4 4

l r

i r I l

l I

i

e .

4

8 If any answer la affirmative, oormlete lhe screenhg form and perform en Urveviewed Safety Question Evaluation.

l..e '

r If all answers are nogetve.no Unrovtowed Safety Question Evaluation is seguired.

I e/28/95 Prepare by'. Mark B6umberg / y

. t.

uj%, o.te 3

Appn = dty. 4/N .we, P.4 V we

, -td i

?5

1

!I a.

!i

1-

. -_. ...