ML20148U057

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards NRC Oversight Panel Meeting Summaries of Meetings Held W/Zion Station within Past Months & Open to Public Observation.Encl 2 Contains Handouts Provided During Meetings
ML20148U057
Person / Time
Site: Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 06/23/1997
From: Grant G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Mueller J
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 9707100026
Download: ML20148U057 (85)
v • d • e


Text

_ _ . _ _ , _ . .._

4 . June 23, 1997 C Mr. J. H. Mueller Site Vice President Zion Station r[S'f Commonwealth Edison Company  !

101 Shiloh Boulevard [

Zion, IL 60009 '

SUBJECT:

NRC OVERSIGHT PANEL MEETING SUMMARIES

Dear Mr. Mueller:

i Several NRC oversight panel meetings have been held with Zion Station management within the past few months. These management meetings were open to public observation. Previously, meeting summaries were incorporated into routine inspection reports covering the period during which the meetings occurred. To ensure higher public visibility with regard to these specific meetings, we have decided to issue the meeting  ;

summaries as separate documents. Enclosure 1 is a compilation of meeting summaries for  !

those meetings already held. Enclosure 2 contains the handouts provided to the NRC i oversight panel by Commonwealth Edison during the meetings.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC's l

Public Document Room.

i Sincerely,

/s/ G. E. Grant for l Geoffrey E. Grant, Director Division of Reactor Projects ,

Docket Nos.: 50-295; 50-304

]  !

Enclosures:

1. Compilation of Meeting Summaries i 4
2. Meeting Handouts j DOCUMENT NAME: R:\LTR S 2 LI C\C E C O \ZI O N\BI G L ET.ZIO To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach / encl "E" = Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy OFFICE Rill E Rill ff Rlli NAME Hills /co p e+ Parker 4g[J GrantCD A

DATE 6 9/97 6/4/97 9 6ft%9h OFFICIAL RECORD COPY l 1

9707100026 970623 h.hk.hkh PDR ADOCK 05000295 P PDR

  1. I

/

J. H. Mueller  !

cc w/ encl: T. J. Maiman, Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations Division ,

D. A. Sager, Vice President, Generation Support H. W. Keiser, Chief Nuclear >

Operating Officer R. Starkey, Plant General Manager R. Godley, Regulatory Assurance Supervisor

1. Johnson, Acting Nuclear i Regulatory Services Manager Richard Hubbard Nathan Schloss, Economist Office of the Attorney General Mayor, ..ity of Zion State Liaison Officer, WisNnsin State Liaison Officer Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission Document Control Desk-Licensing j Distribution: I Docket File w/enct Project Manager, NRR w/ encl i PUBLIC IE-01 w/enci DRP w/enci OC/LFDCB w/enci Rlli PRR w/ encl SRI Byron, Braidwood, CAA1 w/enci (E-mail) ,

Zion w/ encl Deputy RA, w/enci )

A. B. Beach, w/enct RAC1 (E-Mail)

Rlli Enf. Coordinator, w/ encl DRS (2) w/ encl TSS w/ encl S. Collins, NRR w/enci j F. Miraglia, NRR w/enci R. Zimmerman, NRR w/ encl j L. Gerke, OCA w/enci B. McCabe, OEDO w/enci l J. Roe, NRR w/enci '

i l

1

a e.

Enclosure 1 Public Meeting Summaries NRC Oversight Panel for Zion Station April 8 Manaaement Meetina Summary:

The licensee presented information contained in the applicable handout in Enclosure 2.

During the licensee's presentation, the licensee provided clarification in response to NRC questions and comments. In addition, meeting participants discussed the scope of the licensee's restart plan, including the need for performance measures; operator assessments and training: more strict controls implemented on operating evolutions; and needed efforts to improve operability assessments, work scheduling, and the corrective action process.

Attendees:

l NRC i

G. Grant, Director, Division of Reactor Safety M. Dapas, Chief, Division of Reactor Projects Branch 2 A. Vegel, Senior Resident inspector D. Hills, Project Engineer S. Orth, Radiation Specialist D. Calhoun, Resident inspector E. Cobey, Resident inspector C. Shiraki, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Commonwealth Edison T. Maiman, Executive Vice-President J. Mueller, Site Vice-President R. Starkey, Plant General Manager i j

T. O'Connor, Restart Manager R. Godley, Regulatory Assurance Manager ,

T. Bergner, Training Manager T. Kirwin, WCC Superintendent C. Winters, Shift Engineer D. Smith, Nuclear Communication L. Holden, Nuclear Iicc.ising Administrator lilinois Deoartment of Nuclear Safety R. Schulz, Resident Supervisor J. Yesinowski, Resident inspector 1

. - - . . . , .- . - . - . - . - =.. - .. - . - __ .

. i i

Enclosure 1  ;

April 28 Manaaement Meetina 1

l l Summary:

The licensee presented information contained in the applicable handout in Enclosure 2. '

l During the licensee's presentation, the licensee provided clarification in response to NRC questions and comments. In addition, meeting participants discussed the methodology  ;

and results of the operations department reassessment process, the scope of the operations high intensity training, and it'c objectives and elements of the licensee's 4 recovery plan. .

Attendees: '

NRQ G. Grant, Director, Division of Reactor Safety l R. Capra, Director, Project Directorate 111-2, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l M. Dapas, Chief, Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 2 i A. Vegel, Senior Resident inspector S. Orth, Radiation Specialist i D. Calhoun, Resident inspector E. Cobey, Resident inspector i C. Shiraki, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i Commonwealth Edison J. Mueller, Site Vice-President R. Starkey, Plant General Manager T. O'Connor, Restart Manager G. Vanderheyden, Operations Manager R. Godley, Regulatory Assurance Manager T. Bergner, Training Manager T. Kirwin, WCC Superintendent Illinois Deoartment of Nuclear Safetv J. Yesinowski, Resident inspector June 2 Manaaement Meetina Summary:

The licensee presented information contained in the applicable handout in Enclosure 2.

During the licensee's presentation, the licensee provided clarification in response to NRC questions and comments. In addition, meeting participants discussed the objectives and development of the licensee's recovery plan including fulfillment of the commitments 2

A

. , t i E a 5 4 . .

< I

.J Enclosure 1  !

l i

  • contained in the confirmatory action letters, and recovery plan status including the results  ;

' achieved thus far. At the conclusion of the meeting, the NRC requested the licensee to -  ;

broaden f'uture meetings to include discussion of significant restart issues and performance l

2 improvement actions.  ;

, ' Attendees:

< (

j NRC i n

- t A. Beach, Regional Administrator, Region lli -

i G. Grant, Director, Division of Reactor Projects i R. Capra, Director, Project Directorate 111-2, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  ;

M. Parker, Acting Chief, Division of Reactor Projects Branch 2 i

1 A. Vegel, Senior Resident inspector '

, Z. Falevits, Reactor Inspector .  !

S. Orth, Radiation Specialist ll . D. Calhoun, Resident inspector ,

l E. Cobey, Resident inspector '

C. Shiraki, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactoi Regulation Commonwealth Edison r

J. Mueller, Site Vice-President 1 l  !

R. Starkey, Plant General Manager l  !

T. O'Connor, Restart Manager i

l G. Vanderheyden, Operations Manager  !

R. Godley, Regulatory Assurance Manager i T. Luke, Engineering Manager f i T. Kirwin, WCC Superintendent '

i i lilinois Deoartment of Nuclear Safety  !

t J. Yesinowski, Resident inspector 5 j  !

i j.

i e

i n

l 4

l V i i

e i-e 3  :

l' 1

4 h

> - - , , , - - , - - - - . . _ _ . . . . - . _ _-..o

o.

i.

t ..

t f

i i f 1

Enclosure 2 A

f Commonwealth Edison i' Management Meeting Handouts 1

i 4

t i

i l

i 4

1

u J m . .e A --.a w .+r J J4- 2AE e. .sa. Ea 6 -_m.4 .AW.2._4A4 _.2an-J_.__d..4 . .s o4.e_A4 m4 _.&meLAm.a.m.M M.-,4m.4e.44 m_

s i

k '

y i

or 5

i 1

! )a .

o i @

j !a

! f Q O s l4 l

em

@ G

' m

d. Q) on
I i

i:

ii j i

ii!

1 -

O M

&. a 11 a

11  %

Q <C I

O i N.

i b

i

a . uss- auma a m eA mm-----um-rw-- acm,, s4A4,d. a. , e_ -, iAA.gA.__4- a MA am,--lA - - -em,, essa,,ea, 2 m ,k..,_,A4s,_,- __.4, L_s,s.,_4-xaL,.r -mAnA,,,,A6AAn

. a, am a d

ji i

a i

i x

h 1 la

+'

f g!! C i i Q O i

8 i-

.o ' 32 e

i l~i 9a O O ,

L i

I C i 3 D 2 8 O .-

lalF e.u. +

L ,> .

e i

p  % e -

f @

i 1

i I

a I

i 1

b- .

i

'!l 4 m i

O u > > c u i

O O ce C 0

o

i I

a o

a x-M .y Vo o e

a

)

i Q s w20 .

0 2

1  !

w m f

i. -

h 1

i o

ll ll ohC o

(g u

W A

O_

e 1 l

!  !! O@ i i '! C o Qw Oc O b i e

i  !! c X m > c i L O m c oE O 9

i L

o F- .9 ot ocn 0o m

! ]

a c EoG c 1 .2 1

O .9 Q- 3e o__ 5C o i

.c

{ D oOO2 O o E < e e e N l O 1

e 1

~.*

a l

ll A

\

\

\

\

ge

~a o

$ " m, I, .

f E

h ft Z  ;

li O

  • N

$1  %

O k

a

\

\

a 1

OPERATIONS

__.-...,-.........,....:. , ,_.mggggmyyaypyg;g __, _ , _ ___ _ _ _ __ ;pgmmyggygggyyyyyyagggyggy;yagggm e Completed Team Training for all shifts e Completed Standards Evaluation for all slifts e 3-Way communication expectation firmly established e Concurrent / peer verification consistently .

performed e Formalized access to Control Room I

- l

OPERATIONS

' ^

'""'"*~*"*"-

M : : -11 f_ "" _29Ei.m._-.m__

_ . , y _m . c, . - ..

e sol's & Non-Routine Periodic Tes~:s (pts} are reviewed anc revised arior ~:0

use e Procedure Writer available to the Shift 7-cay /wk,24 hr./ day e Established 30sitive control on evolution scheculing

i II i 3 l l $ a c c o l c ._

r l =

o -

c

~

! o .~

o 3

le d c o l l C o E c
9 o E o i r/2 #" o > E i p o -

o o 9 -

o -

as > o

O  ;!q .E = .s e

! M i j

u e

'o -

i H h+o C 2 4

<ss ce c) ._

q) ~

C l Q m 2 @ E l M E $.E S 0  !

l 1

4

[c s i

li a o M Q.

o C

3 o

C l 2g i

ll!

f mE 5 5  ;

i C

o E 2 L i .- ' c) *o i, "O  % ('g oC CU j! o E ,_ D) y 2 :5 o m > o o i, o o o_ o u 2. m E E m

!! 2 E O o. O l-- w w e S e 9

SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS u--+- u-------

e Evaluated all Open U2/UO Operabi.ity Assessments e Engineering Assurance Team e Long Term Temp Alts significantly

reduced e Operator Workarounds significantly reduced e Failed Annunciators addressed 1

i

i..,

t l

l -

i i

i SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS mem==w-mm-mme-w~ 33 _ ammm --em-es==w-===mw  !

e Dept. Surveillance Coordinators established & trained Timely Surveillance Closecuts

e Implemented 12 week Rolling Schedule e Improved quality of controlled P&lDs e Installed PsPI modification on U2

^

l MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS  ;

E=g _ g;p:lti?'MDWMMMMMMW M MMMMM*MMMMMMR e TSC used to reduce Control Room aurden Weather Balloon Event Loss of U1 SAT 2

o Corrective Actions Process improvements Management PIF Review SCAQ Collegial Review Common Cause Analysis Effectiveness Reviews e Safety Review Board reconstituted e PORC Improvement Plan e 1996 Performance Improvement Plan

,Y m-# , )' ,,s ye g

{

^

t, $

~ e g '

A Q

W l\ O f /

g% Q O

g}' k e

' M e

\a Y

\

o 9

t ZION RECO. ER PROGRAM .

% .c ... E\ M e Step Change in Operations performance Operators i

N anagement e Selected management systems e Readiness Programs e Oversight i

OPERATIONS ~!

IMPROVEMENTS e Selection of best operators e Training "or performance improvements e Implemented higher standards e Improvements in Operations support e Improvements in operator's environment e Reduction of challenges to operators l

I e Material condition and system reaciness

! e Demonstration of higher performance standards

STAFFING PROCESS

- =- ,em -

. Define accountabilities and capabilities e Select individuals e Define standards / expectations for crew performance e Assign crews e Transition and assimilation e Remediation and training e Demonstration of capabilities i

4 l

REMEDIATION AXD

~

TRAISISU PROGRAM

e Theory, with emphasis on reactivity control -

e Normal operation--new standard of conduct o" operations e Emergency and abnormal operation e Training includes classroom and simula:or e Shift management and non-management participate in training

. . .. - l~~

. . . ., I i

I OPERATIONAL READINESS

_______=__z_______

e Demonstration of performance to new standards ,

e Surveillances, normal and infrequent '

evolutions and pre-startup tests e Independent validation i e Observations and oversight of performance e Mentoring by supplemental operators

i i

9 MANAGEMEST S STEMS hwumanuscwAmrm77 _ . . . . . . . . . . . .

_.,+;::ma::memer= --.

m""2 2EEmmanoK4cawmewaarasmTumuss, l e Corrective action 1

e Engineering and technical support e Getting work done e Management interaction with shift I i

t I

6

____m.___.._ __ _. _____._.____.-.____--_____.___________._-____.______..__m_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ____ ___.____ _ _ _

~

READINESS PROGRAMS l

e Department readiness - self 4

assessments and associated corrective ,

actions e System readiness - assessment by Systems Engineers of selected systems and screening of backlogs e Shift Manager and Operations Department affirmation of operations readiness

l i; iIr ! 1 i!: lj;' ijl  !:: !t l :i ,li

. 0

- 1 m

E 3

% n n R

M R i o t oi o 3w t a Z s

n a

mt n mfo h

3 a e a 3

f f

K f

og r

t ess T

t o m e

"d n e C )

m s

f nr l n

Tw w

m i

oP p oi J t i

d I

I F

G

?

ay r m Za c ed n e i

e -

G 5

'?*.

i f

i r

v n o sr I

S e o c a (

n s v e n e R {:.

E B

t nR a t

ns es E! 5 l

p ef ma t

I of VW M T

d ns o s gt ely ON es pe ws e a n enin e n e d e ve adn i

nv i t

ev r i t

mep VcBcDe e Qff RfeOd n f

SeSeNi e e e

ea . - - 4 _ J .- _ -

_d , _ _ a _ . me.m . A O

e t i 4 -

' l

~. J l

l

. 1 Pi

$ Is l 4

e f

C

! l

j!

O _

e e Nf i 6

i f!

.i' M

! 0,.

y O 1.1 O a:

l h a

d h  ;

'A 31 I h

?

1 i

i.;

1 i

k i

i i

e April 28,1997 Meeting i

i l

4

. :9

+

j 4

i t1 3

k a

^d.

-)

n ,

lh,

<f'1 w' .

I!!

~)

g I 1

?! *"

i U) Q 1 f

N G  !

$M i!

D O N :2l 3 0

$ 3  %

$ 2 k !! c 0 O E

$,- 4 .-

2 C 0

..;f1 N

Oi ~

0 g'l

g. .m i

L eg s y g e; ~; w ta ,

hgggE228**#

?.-i

,m~ 1. .,

kh $IIf-M's gfgauw+ a-

{

huA 4y 1:1i 1

w1 3

lj a

N e,i d

R a

4 a

1 *m 3

' M

$ OC

,- su e

E::

    • .m B 3 m a

g " 3 9> e m .e a

o Ct m u >

6 a b 4 e X e o >

t, m x

u o

$a 0 m E e

z

% .c

~ u si c 0 m e

s V C eo o e

.t

~

m u

O t

8

.O

~

xe (o l~ 0-0 C u u u D

D. $ O u O O a > d u e%um e.~ c e a

a xbet o c mu e >

R M

8 skS

<n >o c e e a mo ta mo O

9g .

ox O

.2~%,:; %am,csw-

,, g g

w, w e =ray, a . p p.

. ya s .

f jj > .

eds! gun @ 9 N gg63 l .

iss i' Lr

^74i265 hss i! KWl mugg$g!I$pfM .w_t1 -

_aa,mmagem,

9

-11 ,

, .g l,

a u)

W j .Q)

W ,

i

-  % $e C y 3 E 2 i D i 4;

e { i A E g i M  % e , o q) o 'E gO n C .q) 5 q *% Q) ..Q

. %' C .-

4

>-. .c-3ll, e 'E E

  • O w

B

~

O m E a E

? Q- E O u

E 3

o O O D) q3 o a o D m a oO c q)

% 1 o ~x t $E Eo e a

@5-e E

o .q)'hE) 80 t 2OEEo

' o W ik OO- Q eO g S g$ t ~C g

~;j E) m ) Q G) 1 5 'O O T ~q) x Q-) E

  • M D 4 Q)

.C e

o%

o5

  • x o 'm a t

O c-) u) m w ~

U

==) u) M E C n a$o Q)

D * -o Q) a u -EC M u

k m Q._ l' W o_ eo Q q O C q) g k Yn g . . .

  • o * , .

4 q ,ep,a kwar g

kEi&dME

4 -. -e.-a _ a p. - - - 9 m

o

,3 h 1

.' a 3 l

A 3 i r)

s

- g  ;

@ C

% e o g *! o x O si h -Q a

% .e e ___

U C  % @

D h 9 e C O W C

% C

??

%e Q Q *

? a k e.

$t e %e q N

N a% e o h e De  !

!!  % O Z m a

4 D  %

% 'o k  % ~

Q q 5 Qh w  % D a a Q -

g s ~o o. ~e e cn meb e e iI B tu bhTC e obD CD

'5 4

C $

o R E2m h m@.tt.h l
  • e e o t s

% R D

a 5

SE$E@e$ .e5e Ea

$LU M LLI% -J >M N g a e m

Q . . . . .

b e

4-p,me - e_,a. ,~A. } w-, +A e -L,-e- s s.4 s a .a w,._ , _ _ _ .a 4o._a

}

e # ,

9 A

  • i]q i

.f{ '

9 t

j3 Q

3

$1 t)

- m j LT 3 C i

& O t Q) 'c  !

Q m L  ;

N L q) '

v o i m D O h, t C Q) u o> - 9 O \

$a m m .c_) O

p 5

u Q)

M v>

u -

ia i?3 ou Q O %m D

i

<- o fy -e &

w i

o k D uO i; s e 4:

a c

e O

~- t e Eee c i s

r4 mt u

o mk e e3 v3

~ q) h 1 If D Q) t c m '

t a

CL t 0) @ C o e q)  ;

- V,) O q)

g M S E C Z n-C .

q) -

a> co '

ii .

9mg c m) o>

e O cc oe 0) t O y) g e ,

h C t M 3 4 g$s O O O

e- h w 1

L

? Oov m QvO a) e N $ N w c) w NZ CL y e e e O .

  • m N v "

N ,

ZION RECOVERY PLAN carmw=rrammmaaneggggggmrw~ -=

NEW ORGANIZATION New Position Descriptions for Each Position ,

4 OperatlNkdarager }

} She Operatums Stgervisorl l Assistart SOS L s I A I

,}l L I

! Shm Manager Shm Manager .l l. Shm Marager jl Shift ManaDer ) l, She Marager j! Shm nager

[. I

]

I I I SupeMsors SuppMsors 1 U1 Urd Supervisor SRO #M SupeMsor - SRO hbnit SupeMsor SRO hbnN SupeMaor SupeMsors SupeMaors SRO SupeMsors f SupeMsors iU2 Una Supervisor- SRO b Supervisor SRO bntt Supervisor SRO U2 LHt SagrMsor - SRO U2 Unit Supervisor SRO U2 LHI SupeMsor- SRO U2 Uht SupeMsor SRO U2 Unit Supervtsor- SRO NLSS - SRO NLSS MSS-SRO l

{ M.SS NLSS I I I

{ NLSS I I I Nuclear Sta6an Operalors Nuclear StationOperators Nudent Station Operators

' Nuclear Stadion Operators Nuclear Stauon Operators Nuclear Station Operators U82 RO Us2 RO us2 RO LF2 - RO U82 RO us2- RO Us2 RO Us2- RO us2 RO Us2-RO Us1 RO Us1 RO us2 RO Us2 RO usi - RO Us1 RO Non4.)ce Operators Operators Non-Uc dOperYa ors] [Jorv Operators Operators 'Non.Ucers Operators 7 8 8

(( 8 8 7 i

STAFFING PLAN 6 Crews to Accomodate Training 2 Crews at a Time 4

l l

1 4 Crews Manning the Plant '

Overtime to Cover Shortages / Plan Complies GL 89-12 Supports Remediation Plan

4 a

s e

e o
. -C

- Q si x t 1y 3

t o b:: o e e a

ia

?

e Q q) s:

O Q g ~g Q e 4

oJ a

4 :3 a u e m e2 9 @% C cc o a

n a -t b s

l t ooo C

1 %2 o 'e he eo l i b u k O e t@

0 o

a h~6.s e -@E u q O ,% O a

y ti

~

O .to C0 e x) o c2 8  %

u m 2 p~ %

d a

l o e ea 2 t3 e e t

~

Qo .

  • e y e8 l o

be E0So Ai e

oC e o l

e e

c e .e 2 o$-

g g

g ..

w !!t g

k q

e Q -t a Oh Qg oe 6ek Q ae

,.C 9: m O O O O lo le-.OQ

'g[ m ggreg a ===

3 3

$g E idesii@Elb 3;l

.v.: ro m e e$$ t zlSiu -

4, -

Ih

,;$$_i?@@ i! . lh hkh@?U

., h i hhff !lk .3,,gggggggggggfQgggggjjjg{n$3

ai,e, - .4d. .--<.45- .<A .p e e ..d-a . ,e4 ,m. ' of u W' 4.a p S#A $ .J.4 , -JJ .das..- m *hJ a. mea.u m A .,. s% .u _u.4 ...~,ea 4 .: >

1 j

i d 1 i

a 3

t d:1 0

n ~@

! t i l  % ',

! @

  • Q D  !

y  !! C D L i

! g i; U

O @ e$e 3 ,

! W 3 e

Cb 9e oe@

E'C a .a b oC i

j!

M B

is O

3 C e Q g t m o Os ee e O QOg b E CD l

Pl ~

e Q, D T *O D i.t y

$l e Q heO O C0 C sq g i g

Eheo 20% e .o

  • h r

.h 0 0 c5 l Sq =

b b C 0 o li g

et e eeq e0 d  % 020 ~

  • t 04b e b. $ %e i w

O %e %3 ~t $ca t D s qo e o '% ~

e l w 5 D 5 0 6 q g

3 D .{. h ee S&D g 8 2 O O Q Q D O q @o

~~y

. d.aw.n -

amm u -

.g w; fi$,. o. ,. f l_,h _ - - - -

M'[ , [fjh N ,47 II sh f*5D _IN b t :1~ .., if ) ,. 33! =* ng '

gg

. '* n g6 ~eggy .

jg g,g

1 .

'Y y,. ,

.--i

,. . ' .)

- f

1

'<f

Jq f

'I',

R

~

I a

k

~

u Q

D O A

h

b  %@

B, A

. Q C

=

n 4 .

is Y

e  %

5 D -

.D.:'.j'

{

U4*- ,-

_ [>

3 g

').s

~< *7 (y 9 24

+ sy{gsih X.%: h ;.g:.;A A.j;%.3v g 9*5f;@pg;f;g{g$Cglmgj

1 ~+ nai @y!;gifgj

, r.,b.:w m~x

~ -- r w i.

s

. +. ~

Oxs.

m..;

- 3 p).nd.:.a;

< . ,3' js;~ g p, j

,,4.'....4,. -

,v g.j ..:, ,g , g~'-

4Ifif' y' .:1.Y:';d e '

f- h$$fhMf N '@ M' '-9 T. N'

- . g s.. .! . < ', i. i n, a n. .. euwam

m a m ,m .m a a mmmw m e m a 9r 2,whew-e wAa m m> e e*
-va

- - m l

i

e t

4 .,

?:)

Eis h

?:.

?'f 9"-

4

fi fh w

st bh

-[ N r -

u O

s k(( N

,. 3 s!

E

.Q m

% u O

(O Q

4 1 Q M $ e

!. O $

2 - ~

$ + D O C C0

.h b U O b s e e .x E.

4 9 g 2D C s! xo ekD o O R c >ba

% a ca

%y $-

Q RMC

~

k  ?

llll l'

- ~nu, aan . ,

-C a 2f$g :q < f:gl c, gyp , ll

.: a ,

m ,

nw e' ,

jy ,j );s h! l lEIh 4  %. ?f.c QS:4;::- 5EA.k- "'"m47"" _

-<A

' ' ' , (6 #Sof:,

, . S hk?;. T- _ r ,

Yh

!fra h: [ ;lyg g ; g h ![ h ([Ih, h e

Ej$
  • f ))$$@%@

e

-u -

n$dckground aaWO/1 n -- - wa-m- mananans-=~na~ ~

W, uyen nan 11his

~ .

---~w a:

ms@wav$$~M8 Pre-eventAnalysis Mf2W ' ~

?!

e

~

December 1996 y *~= f - Reviewed ~ 1.5 years of assessment data

{m - Reviews of Draft SOER 96-01 f Conclusions Fit into 8 Categories

? - Mgmt not accountable for standards enforcement

,N

$j k - Standards not implemented as prescribed

[i - Professionalism / Pride / Ownership lacking y - Control room roles / responsibilities not clearly defined s

L

, - Control room formality inferior m

1 - Procedures not consistently complied w '

? - Crews lack self-assessment culture

- Knowledge and skills deficiencies exist

t i ;i ,

. s 7

_ 9

/ _

8 2 _

_ /

3 gs r o

e i nw t a

netr n u l

_ i a c e m -

v Trd e mi +

w t eS c

Rle n on

_ Ppa Oo n o mh n _

I Z cEi a t _

e c

~

inggl i

__ di nl nd e p p _

_ ei a wA t _

l r ol s

__ g uT s ni l -_

emKk al al S n

___ Re o _

d sTi c cai t a

n i ni u m

wh g s t u _ , ye r c a a cl e r v o

r

_ g l

aCTPE n _

g g A - - - -

k c __

g

0ill

,d -

b#

?W

?

e@t b xl _ Ek

?

__tQ-si 2

k l4g .,N !

i i

uh h ,& _

=.$ $$

?

(W ,

A

. , ii,Jg. .

r  ; ,:  : .i ;ll. t : i > s !

e g

i. _

- t _

E .

n g

w m

s o e n o .

t M s d io o _

R f

n at _

g n M

r _

J ns i

o e l o

A t

p pt t r _

UA t _

n m

o W

e ss u ed r

- u s i e C _

n u e e

M s H

- s ae A qN e

.s gi _

d _

u sn d ReR n _

e E

i n ei

- s _

ePg s ci n c e .

y

%z 4

s t

cO d dr a _

faaf uI l e e

l t r r _

a i

a r e n

e#

w e d ndo ZwdteT n n r t

n m

n aI t oI E o _

A C eKt s t e

W e

a t

M W

s ir mla S omlu gm A"4 dr f c s om n a r

sa a on ni oRiM n

e v E

o ch i St if v 9 m

s B e c r -

t a tr l

ogh E

e m l e e nSk a M

n s

e g:

ART r

ni r p ouf f- e t- O OCDOw 2

s s e r

y s

Q, ms m 4 i

~

,-ww

~

a a %~^

m js an? A

~

3 9

l,le  ;, lll4gm e $

E

a O

O 9

!?

3

^'

g l4 q

.%  %- a u o

% d (y

?

Q

.% B b $ D Q _w$ L{IJ bt

% N @

% i

$ D S t

% $a < M

%g R 9 se '$ o u

t g .

M.

  • cc t8oM52ae o f Q ;is o Ee:

k e 3

o ab

pi e 'o el Eo e

.a 4 m e u o kE

'i L 3 O c e e N- 3 LL. % Q. % U)

% s o g  ; o. . . .

q w- i;ssa sagaer 7w C ; ' .gpewy' .

9m my

<* g  :

paf=:yg'

, n;;g.y 2-x ,::. m,,

it ; 'fAdfjgf ' j :- ,;Qy@Q:'

S 7 ~.,,

c:a.. 2 .

,,._...x ;y ,,

%m ,3gj;m g a 5  !

_ _. _ .japs;i

_ _l)[h<)[$i[ m'_ hj s _ h _ _;a' a e _ ,

t kkBh we,oenix Course DescriP tion emem3, em

,:fffyg;yc '

aIQ:$ @

m.m -- mm mmmem : emmmmmmme , ~ mm mm. . m i4 gSdhi$sf w$$ wwm Wel9 desaM y

c e w$, Fundamentals (Licensed PersonnelbJ

?!

e n

- Reactor Kinetics Neutron Sources Xenon y

3 t

?

9 11

- React. Cooef. Burnable Poisons OpPhysics

&; pts e!!$p5i .

- Control Rods Reactivity Tmr.

m 9 Wf 2. ,

- Basic Energy Fld Statics /Dyn Heat Xfr fl i - Thermal Hydaulic Hot ChannelFtrs Brittle Frctr Wi w - - Vessel Stress Components Power Dist.

lpi - Lecture and Self Study Sessions uk

  • e ^l

- Written Examination 0em,*.

s a

.w t

~]

1 q oet e

6O

1

=( C w

'x O e e

N E b C 13' a S

'M o ;S

  • %g e ~8 m B C Q m D h-p D I' b m

\

% Jn e S

..  %  ; a mD

$ a C 'C Q. A

% O zws @2E.3 i 3 '

ct. m~

S::

A %e e, e D $$

a  %

m D $5 C9 o cc C

Q S ee oh to >

tu<

p $ b (xEb

  • d t e .

'c a s E

?! 'O -5 C C 2 C L @u@.a uO 5'5 'e

% a

, 3 . .

Ag

" t,!a

! ';&T .

ydpt uw@gE g @,,;;p mea

h, '

ggg c3 %=waa- - q. pgggg;g}gyhfdi$[!((hhkfh5hs p

\ i

.. a * . - 4 w.;

h

.m i

k O

9 m 5

$ O a

x o

0Dg  !

C a e g a_ q) o E l

i

~

D @ kc O

% O >

k M 2 6 o 0 9

\

g o i

$i LLI t

Mk8a e

% 4 e o e 8  !

D 3 o

(13 O M

% ann,0 g ,, >

a \

%o A

0 a

Q u

o

$ha 3O e

e ,

' -t O A

,ll1 $ C M -

'O

-o O M 'o t D 9 th' . 'o s

a %R uO uO k

'o t uO 5

" 3 Lm O *O O 2

(t}

L Z 3 9

8 g -

Q o) DDUm}- m

%e %O q) C 5 C s- '6 o S S t co y 3 ou g g. . . . .

ua We a ises.

p su augy[ 3; n,,

' s' ' hb '

-[. _ w , _g_ } ,

j

[fdy$$$%)/[{g,,;jgggj$f;g$gMgggfj@!@@%5i J

n ,

.1

. .s  ;

A s

I A I

jj 1 3 A  !

f O i i C

, C i D

.Q Ch

% . t 4

% O %e e

A

W e D !l D O

% a t t &o

-'  % y a

CD 0 o

%m e

S f ~~~'.

ae k .c e

3 9 qs '3 o o- 3

% 'O

A L  %

%. e  %

O A ?y O t Ch (9 e O D 1 C M 3mO g a

c D .

Q CO O O a e =g oO g C e Ch '=

9 4

$k o M

? '3 m o u

n 4

CD.DoO

t. o 3 3 3 .c

%e ~3

.Q g

m gO 'O u O Co 0 Co. l i l l i O e; .~ a t

? f f%f4% ~ '

?dfdWAle y

  1. ~A[h \?h!%g$ ag p

$f? $

d 4cm x -

\

>b. {: se$j ,,,.

g lls$$)

A R =h= f x idbh e$. ;bbENdhd

--- _ggwoe

- $~- p$$Ny!Ase5s

.-- Amsi $.nssst@@_dsj@,@%lljidn%$$$[d@$${$j@j

- + .

I d

1

.k

~d; N {

q o \

a 9

eg  !

o

~ a ' 9

%  ?,

o %m D u, 3

C 3 D e%

4

$ Q M 3

(  ?.

a > .V)

M V~)

$ ~

IO ~

4 i G3 O C C

S tn E

2" G3 kb ae .S -

u) e b

e Q O c q

%  ?

S A

e E

u O %speat b83

-t 'g o $

llll1 W C O en y t ~

C u 5 Q :u TL C e e.

e a

q) 2 0

'4 J Cn .-

t M

v>

o Eun nv *=.==

O 'O e37 C

s 8

6O

' O 'O LLI i

U)

~

l

-J i I I I q m O k %

e za-Am n y.;

<As a

$~ Q S <,lf. -t?, . D[~g '

i;:@s , ,:[lE ,,

  • ,t I

-alw _ _ -.

w 'E hid i

e 6

x~e 1hoenix

. ms ~

,a Course Descri P tion

'$$ ![? k'E TiMyydi_TAEiWW '45N?AN55 Ws -^ E#!OINE5s*Nbd

'EENAf$~*$d $5I' E d iS5$N 'MY N SA15 S i + A N 5 + ISb- ~ -

  • MA:Ldde ~

k$hh!$ 5 1hY ~

^

$ssi%

%n%a s$m% w:w;ii Normal,

?

,o m R

em and Emergency Abnormal, tic g w_ s Procedures lll6khle Additionalshift burden events e

1%

i

- Vessel headinner sealleak a

$ - Chemistry concems

%sgi -Faulted maintenance activity

-letdown leak Bl!

9t$

$ Integration of new operating standards 58 a,,,s

~

p3 9

3

-M

]

m 3

M 18 3

m 0

.c g

  • m 5

% .?l1 O  % D

~ .t U

    • d M X_

C CD x

.c t cc A 3 q "q)

Q '! Q E O M

% M g) S .cD

-. Q n&a O

@ ~t m O ~

u)

Q n ~~

C t

D .:o

% x?! D "(/) D '~~ O t Q E -Q t o Q D M m O O C O O C

"7 Ci)

M b 'c O O) .C O cc 'c

(%

g 0

9 o$0 QO .h 'c (a ccN O C 4 cc C 'c (U

D x o g

L O ,O IU ' b o

% L'-  %* 3 is g (c O Q *q) .C e

it C L q)

M  % O 2 O b

.% a - t q -o h--  :.-  %-. $

g i t C e O E o m

o i!

y.om0000 . . . - - -

' ')&4m%"g n.-

.pg

$ mk i 2

'(hi$

= m bhh(

3 % _ _ _ _ , ,.

3 a; M ;% # M@Mh 8 EG!E

I .

l e i I

i t

1 l

t si!

s Q

' a O

~ L I.ff M q) 1 I$ N c[k =Q 'C M

9 C k C C

%{

't' y q) en mQE

$ Q 'Oe u o a D O C m .O D

^

% .~

g O) o nm

  • i ^

5 O 0 O 4 3 m' i

w a q) c)

g EO C 2 3C O %

C E" %

t e <w a o q) t C o e Q l m .9  %~ tt -C ~g C k 11 u>

i o q) Co  ::: co 'C x '

u

~5

!h e@PoOoO2h

$u$ $ it: O i

~$

g

a. . . . . ,

M_ B a s - .

e. a l
1

. es

. :s

/g q3 -

) i m%

@s O vO a

, C

.O to a *_ u A &

o

. -Q C O u

O

'~ v CD D

B i!,

D <;

L cn Q

C CU O. L CD o C-  % O

!! 4 O  %

O O 3 to uL 3 D O N ~t t

% c Man r 3 C

  • O C ~

cC -

CD cc Q D D hk 3 C W k

m M' ec k g O

. LLI -

oDkDm t ', oz Q ^

C , , , ,

I

_ 1888##""#

a - -.u -

a, . _ . . - +,~,u r .-a + _ . - .--.-a-- , a. 2 - . . en_ .a. , . _ _ . -

A

? .

4 4

.4 J

J i

hfh @

, C D a 2 L b m

L

!! e e b a,

D b c D s .sC a

.:O O C i g -: t -

i C -Q O  %

em t

a %g 0  % .

s!! @ U) -D i' b e Q e b .S D t i e o> 9e &e

> 2 3 -Q 2.:: -

m 1

a ea aa D

e @ m2 q~

~

  • e i a xe oo m.

Eec O e oy e 0

! t 'C h -*S D) 4@ 3

  • : o m 'O s t

-R i m C M e 6 m C~~ q ~~

O e Q i 4 -- C g( ;

O O O L J @ O hO10 O oo 7,gtg me txa ggp -

m -

a mns b (

x

[' b k hh{hh!

%ggi / i.. __

_ gggggggggspeses

-- 7-. -

m- --it --aa.A& -

a ~- +&- _ -_aA4 a m n s - , ,

As- m . n e

G Q

-m c

~ i l

o u g b 8 o O. l c O g

4 a V a E c

- a O m u ,

e k

c l

($

1 0 D W l u

I e -t' s

O

$a W

c ~

m O

i. ._

O (O m E

! l yu ~O m

0 6 m il W C m c O ' O

!] O_ W B 5 -

33 S

O

  • m " 5 s c 0 c u c -

y) O 8

O g (U a - - o,

?

o e CU (O .g

% 8 o v .~ O

, 0) c W m U) h

  • 4 N

L e

8 m

r c

U) is U)

(g .O c cgs C

Q ed R O .-o >, O

- 6J CU O O 4

CD u a o_

5

! o-$ $ o E ooe O_

a

  • de o O- e yag ef gqc$ ge m maptil i Q&g O O M (o

' u._ Jap As A P 1 m LL M fj

  1. (Nkkhsh{

ms kwmh$$ks# -

i -

2 5 (f
?

. l{,jgrLgl[;

{ p g,] Ikff l fff;ffkhfhiji?fffffff!(

ZION RECOVERY PLAN t & a ua d a .w z1"4 2 1 m"x w n a m (Q Q @ Qgg gLyga, xx- a me_

i RECOVERY PLAN ELEMENTS l 1

l Zion Recovery Program I '

Recovery Scope Oversight &

Management Guideline Independent l Validation g g Readiness Programs Operation Additional Performance

, improvement Action Plan e, I

I l g System l Readiness i Operations Staffing .

Corrective Action l

l Department l

Operating Standards l Readiness Management i Operator Training & Employee  ;

Remediation Communicadon .  !

Getting Work Done I '

I g NRC Operational Communication Engineering &

Readiness Technical Support Start-up & Power l Ascension l

}

4

  1. -m,_ g, ,,

9 4

l 1

o

~

  • M i

j i d 4  : u Y

D lli O C

=

to (U N ,

O Q O) l k y 0) i "

I a

h (U w -

l l . 2  % @

z a

'i ~d O7 l di & E l!! C/D Z i ti il! *H O l

@)u 3

1l t

i:

I

f .- ..

i AGENDA h ;gi:g:m;gggggggggg0Mf.MW( ^

.mm.

_sw _.wwff 4 "M@ilyM M @pygggyg g%

e Introductiori ,

e Recovery Plan Overview t

e CAL issues .

e CAL Commitments e CAL Issues Matrix l

e Recovery Plan Progress and Results u e Summary  :

I

A n 4 as mooum-= 4 aLA a,._a_. g.,s m .J ea-A a_as.,, .4,,msakAa8 _- 4 e s.w,_ m a _a ,x_a4--e,. Ame .a__, Jay _a_a s s, 9 ee i

d I  !

i d

lL fs -

o M L-.

y g m

3 4

t ,

llEi

p n

kfl [

is  ;

ilu H n:

N b

s ,

sa a

5

- ...l,

~

1 l

l l

Recovery Plan Objectives B

Step Change in Operations Performance e

e Implement Improvements :o the C/A Program e Validate Equipment / System Readiness e Reduce Operator Challenges e Demonstrate Operations Improved Performance  :

e Demonstrate Management Effectiveness e Oversight for Assurance of Results t

[

i

.a= , ,,

{ 1997 OPERATION PLAN f 1. Conduct of Operations i

l i

,/ 2. Perforrnance irnprovement Management

3. Getting Work Done ISA_J f 4. Engineenng and Technical Support i / HRC_!rispestlom / -*

5 Management and Personnel, Development INPO. Evaluation

/ ,/ 6. Design Basis Management

- l EEBRUARY 21 EQCMS  !

PIF - - * - - - Imp e nts

^ 1997 OPERATIONAL PLAN Le  :  :

Continuous improvment DECISION AIT Findings Corrective Action Program t

.. . _ . - . . - - [

1P RECOVERY PROGRAM SCOPE PERFORMANCE QP_ERATIONS Selection DEPARTMENT READINESS m

camw Acson Standards SX3IEMBEADINESS T e s e en Training 1P STARTUP POWER ASCENSION

CAL issues

-nn ___=---

e inadequate Standards of Operations Performance ,

Plant Staff Safety Focus Supervisor Oversight Control Room Decorum and Distractions

! Communications within Crew and in Operations Human Performance Failure to Pre-Plan the Shutdown Procedure Quality and Adherence e Licensed Operator Knowledge & Training Deficiencies Operator Understanding of Expectations for Reactivity Control e Deficiencies in Engineering Support To Operations e Material Condition issues Affecting Start-up

e CAL Commitments

- _ _ g y m m g r _ _ _ _ _ ;_ -

e Place Unit 1 in Cold Shutdown - Complete e Maintain Unit 2 in Cold Shutdown - Ongoing e Remove involved Operators from Licensed Duties - Complete e Establish a team to determine Root Cause - Complete e Evaluate Results of Event Assessment / Develop Remediation Plan - Complete e Establish Quantitative and Qualitative Criteria to Assess / Monitor Effectiveness of Recovery Plan - Complete ,

e Transmit Plan to NRC for Formal Public Docketing - Pending e implement Remediation Plan Steps prior to Start-up of either Unit - Pending e Document Longer Term Actions with projected Implementation  !

dates - Pending  :

Training Staff Deficiencies

_ - - , - - ._ _a, e Independently Assessed (Level One Investigation) 6 Instructors Evaluated Tested Knowledge & Application of Reactor Fundamentals Found "The knowledge of the instructors was toward

the higher end of the scale and of sufficient level to
provide effective training."

e Conclude that Upgraded Training of Training Staff is not necessary prior to Restart

\  :

l

W re e

~

e i

X tnemssess A di.oces tcudnoC 79 X sroivaheb derised niafpxe ot

  • X X 49 X X X noitalupop tnemeganam tfins-ffo enifeD 29  !

i seicnetepmoc eartnoc & dn.o , nsilbatsE 9

(

.tORTNOC 9

& DNAMMOC TNEMEGANAM TFIHS-FFO X X X X snoitarepO dna X X X X X X ES neewteb tnemeergA ecafretnI eraperP 226 erudecorp wen WAI snoitanimreteD ytilibarepO nepo lla esiveR 516 erudecerP noitammeeteD ytilibarepO j yldnenf retsu erom a eussi dna eraperP 416 X smyrnimreteD ytilibarepO weiveR 216 X

O-MOOZ esiveR 116 enoitanimreteD ytilibarepO 14 snoitca eNtcerroc erutuf etaulavE X .seicneicifed deton lla tcerroc dna gniniart 65 XINEOHP ni sPOA detceles esicrexE snoitca X

evrtcerroc erutuf etaulavE .seicneicifed

  • 9"'" *
  • 55 XINEOHP ni sPOG detceles esicrexE margorP gni." iarT dna noitaidemeR rotarepO eht otni snoitatcepxe ei..vv y 25 20 003PAZ l

X otni etaroprocni dna ecnerehda dna esu 15 erudecorp rof snoitatcepxe nettnw esiveR SERUDECORP S efudehcS i X X X X X X X X X X X X X devorppa htiw ecnadrocca ni MARGORP 44 SSENIDAER LANOlTAREPO tcudnoC SSENIDAER L ANOIT AREPO 4 x sdradnatS eseht gnitaroprocni qmniart h X X X X X X X X X rotalumis dna i .vv salc iamrof tcudnoC g

x X swerC qnttarepO X X X X X X X g eht rof gniniarT enriT-ni-tsuJ tcudnoC x X X X X X X sdradnatS g X X X lanoitarepO eht hsilbup dna etalumroF SNOITATCEPXE DNA SDRADNATS S'NOITAREPO x x x x x X X X X X gniniarT taidemeH eht tnemelomi 51 2 X X X stnemeriuqer gnimart )TIJ( tratseR hsilbatsE 31 2

) )snoitarepo ycnegreme dna lamronba

,lamron ;slatnemadnuf( slanetaM poleveD

.lennosrep x X troppus s'noitarepO rof )snoitpircseD X X X 62 noitisoP( seitilibisnopser & selor poleveD x lennosrep tfihS s'noitarepO rof )snoitpneseD X X X X X 52 MARGORP GNINIART DNA NOlTAIDEMER ROTAREPO

y EjL

=33 59 $$

ag a tr$ !E 5$ 5$ !5 !  ! $- 5 h sa a $

s >- ni ra e - . e 03 w$ ! sY--

d !v gil^ a :ps !{-

2g

!-a?v! d  :

L a  ;

r3 - a- 5 - 3 3

-3 :j g- 3 3 a i,"=a; h a

} 3 3$

y g- EI {a uv 3 6 i 8 o - - $ $

h E n o' 8 3g z* da2 Q 3 8 - a w 1 s

  • S rebmuN EUSSILAC m.n m.n nalP noitcA XIRTAM EUSSI LAC

y nuewssessy pic3es pnpuoO A6 t . sacsAeyaq peJ!sep useldxe on

.. X X X O tuame6euetu usus-go ylim suoisses pnpuoO X X X uuneindad nuewe0eustu grys-go eueJed ge X X L0 me=*= lofluo3 9 puawwo3 ysisgels3 10MANO3 6

T ONVWWO3 IN3W30VNVW idHS-d30 i

suoqesedO pue X X X X X X X X X X as usemseg luaweeJ6y ocepetus eJedeJd ET9 eJnpocoJd meu myi X

suorteuauuste0 41sgeJedO undo lie essAe8 STg

~~

eJope30;d uoqeusuueneo AnttigeJedo X

Alpusus Jesn eJous e enses pue eJedeJd tT9 X suorgewusene0 MiiQeJedO meena8 ETg X 01NOOZ esaAew t6g euottsutuusteo AnstigeJedo vg suoipe eAlpenoa eJnnni egenteA3 X secuacijap pelou lie pouos pus Outure4 gg YIN 30Hd un edoy popees esoJera suospe SAlpauo3 SJnnng elenleA3 'secueogep X II pelou lle peso 3 pus Suluss4 Jmer au!s X N30Hd un sdOO pel3 eses escJax3 weJ5cJd Du!useal pus uonsspeweg X II Jonesedo out otus suonepedre eleJodJo3ul ZQ 00CdV2 X clui enexidaoous pue acus;eype pue een tg eJnpe3oJd Jos suonepedxe usuum estAe8 S3MflO33OMd S einpey3s

.x X X X X X X X X X X X X X poMudde ytim acueoJoose ut WVWOOWd t'y SS3N10V3W 1VNOl1VW3dC pnpuoO S$3N10V3W 1VNOt1VW3dO F

  • spJepuens esey: = Mm DuqueeJa l X. X X x X x X X X x ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,",,,3,,,,,,,ng cc x '"*'3'"**

X X x x x x x x x X zc out Jos SuruleJ1 auAl-ul-Isaf $3npuoO x X spJepuels X X X X X X X X X VE leuoneJedo Sul usipand cue oneinuuod SNotiV133dX3 g i

' GNY SOUVONV19 S.Not1VW3dC r X X x X X X X X x SueuseJ1:e&=u oy4 P"""' S L 'c X X X sluemeJinbeJ Susus4 (llr) 3Jenseg ys!lqsts3 g6 g W ( (suoneaedo A3ue61 ewe pus lsuuouQe X X X X X X X X X X

  • ="= smuawepung) sleuenen eq leuuosJed X X X X X IJoddns s.uoneJedO Jos (suondu3soo gg uoitisod) segeteortuodsSJ T seios doseAec euu sJedisNs s.u nasado Jo;(suogdu3sec l r X X X X X .g r uomsod) se$ligesuodseJ T setoJ doteAe0 i

WVWOOWd DNINIVW1 ONV NOl1VIO3W3M WO1VW3dO

!5 $$ 35 3E E$$5 h3 $$ 33 53 5 l ld I 3 $

EF Om fR Eh I c) fe E!! RE 5 -

1  %

!! N 1; te k5o a  !$ blQ55 8

.,m.6- k*l .a l$

lA .* 65 gg

[  !, '; -S S g k

i Q %

  1. ;2 g ,

- g d g .O , , y j e 59 g , -

e 39 2 <-

o a y <

E g_. 8 2 s; F = at m -  !. E g k 2

  • p 9> n -

E r

  • s S

l' 3 3 9

4 35 ?

95 1 g

g 6 9 I

JugaunN 30SSI7V3 =au wu veld uoppy XIhf1VW 3OSSI 7VO t g y , -- -.- e- -

. ~~ _ . - . - . . _ . m.....m_. . _ . - -, . - .- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

c llI r

e

' f i P" $ F s3 ['

]

r 9 i . . 9.< .

i 1,

  • I 13 s i . ,

s r > -

6s E

$ 5 n

R(3 l 9 3

( 5 so 5 i

.m l *I .g rs. SUPERVISOR OVERhiGHT X

CREW COMMUNICAT ONS O

PROCEDURE ADHERENCE & >

X X QUAUTY t PLANI SI AFF 5Af E TV FOCUS @ *

> M CONTROL ROOM DECORLes $ '

urt.7* TOR EXPECI AllONS

~~ >

-4 F OR REpC TMTV CON TROL g 3 y X i

" ^

COMMANO s CONTROL By F OPERATONS CIPERVISION g  ;

~

COMMUNICAItONS A' ,

QPERAYONS TTl i PREPLAN SHUIDOWN EVOLUTON {

LICENSE OPERAIOR l KNOWLEDGE & TRA4NING DEFICIENCIES 4 (d necessayl TRAINING STAFF  ;

HUMAN PERFORMANCE OF ,

M OPERATONS ENGINEERING $UPPORT TO M M OPERATONS h4AIERIAL CCNDITtONS x x M AFFECT STARTUP COhiROL ROOM atSTRACTONS t

8 g 3 t

- - . - - _ . . _ - . _ - - . - - - . _ . . .- - . _ . . - ~ - - - - . . - . _ - - . . - _ . ., _ . . - _ . _ . - _ - _ - _ . - - . - . . _ . . -__. - - . _ ~ . _-_ _ . -._ . - _ , - _ . _ .. . . . _ . _ - - _ - _ . _ - - . _ _ _ - _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ - - . _ - - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ . _ _ _ _ . - _ - _ . _ _ - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - - - -

t l

  • ZION STATION UNIT- 2 .

i RECOVERY PLAN '

I 4 CREWS COMPLETE  ;

6G0 l7jg4 l ,

Operations Crew Remediation  ;

l Resolve Diesel Generator Liners l6/13 l S3 stem Tumover / Readiness

-l7/3 l - i Department Assessments l7fg l Corrective Action Closcout l7/20 l d

Operations Demonstration (Testing and validation) l7/3 l .l8/7 l_ ,

  • r 9

0 Management Decision for .

Restart  ;

i i

I a

_..;.-__..___.m__u=m_._____m.__.__-m.-_m._._m_-_m_.__-___m___._____.._ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ ______>_2_

Recovery Plan Progress

____ ____m _ __z,__._____ _

e Action Steps in Closure 2.5 - Develop Roles & Responsibilities (Position Descriptions) for Operation's '

Shift personnel 2.6 - Develop Roles & Responsibilities (Position Descriptions) for Operati6n's Support personnel 2.9 - Develop Training Materials (fundamentals, normal, abnormal, & emergency operations) 3.1 - Formulate and publish Operational Standards .

i Recovery Plan Progress

____y=ys -,__3____ _ .

e Action Steps in Closure l

3.2 - Conduct Just-In-Time Training for the Operating Crews 4.0 - Operational Demonstration Plan & Scope  !

6.1.2 - Review Operability Determinations

Material Condition - System Readiness FReviews and Work Scope i

i I

I I

i

l

> 11

)!t  !:ltl.l ;l l ;! 1I:

s

- r dr e a

- t n dn e at s Ct S n n

l o e o r /y e t t i m i t

s m nl a e a l

t a__ _

o C rmof v ic u

s gk o r

p i

t n

e. ._

i n r F o I me d R n_

a n

iWml a o o I

e m

r s ot r p s

T n n o

=em xi oR o c _

m m

m

- i n a t l oCS r tr k k

- e r r

- o e n o o e- h p o _

POCWW c.

a o e e e e l

System Readiness Reviews and -

Work Scope System Affirmation -Initial Scope o 16 plant systems affirmed by the assigned System Engineer e 12 system reaffirmation's (originally done in January)

= 4 additional systems selected by Operations System Affirmation - Process 0 Backlog review and detailed team system walkdown o Backlog review of affirmed areas since initial affirmation 0 Meeting the Restart Committee screening criteria .

I o Presentation to Restart Committee ,

________-____________-____________--_______.b _

.. .\

System Readiness Reviews and .

Work Scope System Review Guideline o Backlog Review AR's reviewed WR's reviewed i

ER's reviewed  :

PIF's reviewed  :

Operator Work Arounds reviewed  :

Temp Alts reviewed Degraded equipment reviewed o Commitment / NTS Open items o AR's written from System Walkdown o WR's processed from System Walkdown o Overall assessment / analysis of items found during walkdown  !

o Significant issues requiring attention -

l o Overall health and reliability of the system i

System Readiness Reviews and -

l Work Scope

___, y g _ .

Additional Areas Reviewed by the Restart Committee e Red Window Systems ,

e Plant Ventilation Systems e Radiation Monitoring System

All Temporary Alterations e ' All Operator Work Arounds j e All Operability Assessments e All Design Changes e All Engineering Requests e Fire Protection System

l e Various Station Programs

.._~_.._._._._____.______.._._.___.____.____.___________._____m___ ___________m________.______m-___ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _____ __

System Readiness Reviews and -!

Work Scope

+, a s m e aw.a .. -

Conclusion

. Management establishes expectations for System Ownership e System Engineers like the process: discuss issues with j Management e No generic issues were identified

. Significant Restart issues uncovered e Final walkdowns be performed and a signed system affirmation be presented to the Restart Committee prior to restart .

1

I Strrtegy Unit 2 Restart Definition:- -- T -- Operability Assessments- - - - - - - - -

Actior. Plas:

Title:

Restart Scope Management Guideline & Criteria ..

Objective Measureti. Operability Assessments requinng closure for Unit 2 restart Indicator [isscriptior,:

Goal = h 8 Open Operability Assessments Plan Owner: Bryant Giffin 24 of the total station 46 will require actions applicable to U2 complete prior to restart

-*-Scheduie U2 Existin2 Operability Assessments # gc,,,, hd / hWC Curves may fluctuate as new OA's are 40 generated; present progress satisfactory 35 ---- -- ------- ----- - ------ ------------------------------------ -

~ Actions to Correct:

24 of 30 related to Unit 2 will be closed (for U2) prior to startup 30 ----- - --

s The 6 remaining open (for U2) cre:

1. 9500530 - Pressure locking of

~

i 25 ------- -------- -----

i$k,,-,9.- 2MOVSI9011 Mb8s

, 2. 9504435 - Pressure locking of 2MOV-

'I M ,

CS0049 & 0050 20 --------

- -------------- ---------------------------- M W -

' ' 3. 9504439 - Pressure locking of 2MOV i ]'} M W

~ " ' ~

S18812A

4. 9604802 - RCFCs susceptible to SW 15 ------------------ ------- ---------

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f - F -; - - - - waterhamnier(Generic Letter 96-06 4- ., 5. 9606789 - GL 96-06 heating of pipes and

. CIVS inside containment ,

to _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - --------

6. 9701032 - Rerofl of S/G tubes s -----------------~~~------------ ------~~~--------------------' ~~-------

O S " "

S $ S S S a w - c $ a a $" $

U 5 S S S " E E

  • K:\U2RestartiU2indi xts 6/2/9710:11 AM Revised: 5/27/97

w Strategy Unit 2 Restart ~~ m Definition: An equipment deficiency Action Plan

Title:

Restart Scope Management Guideline & Criteria ~. .

Objective Measured: Operator Work Arounds significantly affecting or potentially affecting operations or causing operators to perform Indicator

Description:

significant compensatory actions.

_Q_qal = $_10 Operator Work Arounds on Plan Owner: George Vanderheyden Unit 2 & Common Unit i

esmowA's adds ~ 7-; z n r _ _ _2 Unit 2 & Common Unit Operator Work Arounds -+--u2 a uo owxs Trend / Analysis: On Schedule Actual ~

! 40 Closed 1 OWA ahead of schedule.

f 35 --- ------------- ------------------------ -------------------------------

-~~~

Actions to Correct:

30 ------ --- - - --------- -----------------------------------------------

- Behind on closeout of OWA 221, blowdown

>J . ? t, f4 transfer pump, due to additional work scope.

< 25 --------- ------- --------------------------- -------------

--y F ~-------s Will complete by S/30/97.

l [L; ,%

a

- Putting together plans for 2 new O'NA's.

20 ----------------------------------------------------------u-hd~---~-- Scope determined by S/30/97.

, $;2 ' .

15 -------------------------------------------------------- ~- G ; '

l Goal: 510 OWA's [

10 ----------------- ------------------------ -------------------------- w>

OWA's added

, 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

i I0a sm

~ ~ ~

a a s~ a s a a s a a ~

a 8 $ a $ a a g - a a - a a $ a S 5 S ~ S S S S 5 S S E E S E S S K:\U2 Restart \U2indi xts

- - ~ -

6/2/97 933~AM news a gi;gg7

w StrateW Unit 2 Restart 7

Definit'; ion: Number of work requests and Action Plan

Title:

Restart Scope Management Guidehne & Criteria Objective Measured: Control Room Annunciators action requests against Control Room Indicator

Description:

Annunciators Goal = Less than 4 lit at 100% power Plan Owner: Bill Kurth -

--+-- Schedule Control Room Annunciator Trend I Analys.is:

--W-- Actual Deficiencies - - - - -

The total number of work requests & action -

45 :" requests for Control Room Annunciators is 45.

40 -------------------------------------------------- ---------------- - . -

Actions to Correct:

i i

35 --- --------- -------------------------------------------- ----------.

.a i - - -

4 +?

s 30 --------------- -------------------

a.e---- ----.

, -- c n"Q~U.-

- aUQ

----------------------- -------------------------- ,-- G .>M:.y: y 5 ,h---.

25  !

yy

, .Q . . Mi , . S

~

,: ' W .i.g CD 20

'"s..

~ ^'. n. '- .s WECU.

m

.:R-- a. C -j '

' .b  ;@ 44p_

~

p v,'4jg y;a mgpr4,ng, - r-

~ ~ ,

9.L.

15

~

w . . ;: .

.. ;syg. - T T m , e -v xgr: - .

-' ' . . .1,i t i. .,. " , 4

.. .. c ..

, . = ; . AVE . -

10

~~ -- , '

.i 5 --------^-----------------------'---~~--G--------------- '

1 M 2---- '

. ;y: ,  ;

p F

  • [.

s s s s s s s s s s s

  • R R R R
  • R R P A o * - B w - a5 R

m n U Q "

B U N B C C N C

  • , e B e e B s K:\U2 Restart \U2indi xts l 6/2/9710:00 AM Revised 5/27/97

Strategy ' Unit 2 Restart I Definition: open Unit 0 & 2 iaI5 ion cards Action Plan

Title:

Restart Scope Management Guideline & Criteria Objective Measured: Caution Cards indicator

Description:

Goal = < 10 at Mode 2 to 1 Plan Owner: Ray Landrum

.-w m 4 6+ -

Caution Cards Trend I Analysis:

l-+-Pmiectml L--G- Actual __ _.

70 :"

A3ons to Correct; 60 -- --- ------ - - - - - ----- ------------------------ -------------------

70 caution bards to close by 100% power t-T

26 Caution Cards are associated with 50 ------------ - . - -- . .--------- ------------------- ---.---.-----------

GOP/MI steps and will be closed accordingly.

.f'. v

, +: y _

~** h,$ ki 1 1E+1 S h -

^

40 ---------------------- --------

- - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

' .'$. ;.y. O Q?fki w-v, m p.

' h. . _ [: .*

. ~g.ygg g:

, ,,a 30 ------------------------------------------------------------- - b g".. ----

s-

. ' A H * <

m .as

~

20 ---~~----------------------------------------------- -------- i-+-  %---

g;{

"J&

...,~ ,

,,s

n ---------------- $ n),' a

- t:

to c >;m

.,x - _

' '* 'P

?-

li.w > ,

t-*% , yA. y ;. . * ...%,

0 s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s

  • R R R
  • R R *
  • R m m R
  • A K ,2ResGrrt\U2' i.x!s -

n - B * - E h 3 - e a - B $

g g 3 D

  • g s  :-

q N

g g -

D Gr897 9 SFAM Revised. 5/27/97

= * - + w - - . wi .- -- .e+* s--+.- c, - - , ---r_m~~- -. - -- - 7 ++ y-+ +.i - , , - - - - -----,-v- r - - - ---

6/2/97 .

Strategy Unit 2 Restart , Definit. ion: open out of Services requiring Action Plan

Title:

Restart Scope Management Guideline & Crit 2ria closure by Unit 2 restart Objective Measured: Open Out of Services '

Indicator

Description:

Identifies the number of OOS's on Unit 0 & 2 Goal = s 10 ::t Mode 2 to 1 Plan Owner: Ray l_andrum

--+-- Projected - - - - - -- -

~ - ~

-- E~

Open OOS's --S- Actual Trend / Analysis:

180 ,

160 - --- ---------- ---- ----------------------- ----- ------------------ Actions to Correct:

Baseline ODS's: 136 140 ----- --- - ---------------- ,

J-: Work in Progress: 43

- E Not scheddled: 13 1

120 --- ------ ------ ----- -------------------- --------------^-

i--+-? W--- Admin OOS: 68

g_, . _9;q Procedure Req
12

 ; iK L4; i

f L;[.~ Removed on sys S/U: 15 100 ----------------------------------------+---------

u. v ..---

NJjf g~7/

4/29/97 OOkrs: 170 80 -----------------------------------------i--------------- " - M--A* ,

, a 9 ; ;-P --

. c y ;.st .

5/6/97 0 0S's:155

e. 4 33 Y . 5/13/97 OOS's: 148 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------

-$ 5/21/97 OOS's: 156 40 ~-------------------------------------a--- ----------- ------- +-- ------

y

, ' ' s ;; z

-2: ,

20 --------------------- -- ---~~~----~~~~-----------~~-- --------r u'---- - --

~

O s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s S 8 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ S $ $ $ $ $

n - ~

B a -

B B

e  ? -

R R n a a -

B K-\etrzRestart\U2i .xls 2 0 N 6/2/97 9.54 AM Revised: 5/27/9P

Strategy Unit 2 Restart -~-~r-Definition: Number of Ter.iporary Action Plan

Title:

Restart Scope Management Guidehne & Criteria Alterations on Unit 0 & 2.

Objective Measured: Temp Alts Indicator

Description:

. = = _

Goal = 53 Open Temp Alts Plan Owner: Bryant Giffin Temp Alts

" Trend [~Enalysis:_

-e- Actual

^

9 :" -

O  : 0 Z.---_ _ - - _ . . _ . - _ . _ . _ _ _ .

s - -- ---- ---------------------------- -------- ----------------------_- Actions to Correct:

^

6 of 9 will close 7

. .; 1. Three TA's will remain open

.. U --

,93-004 Raw water leakoff line

' s - - - - - - - ----------------------------------------------------- "--'"l 95-031 Cird water pump cooling supply

. @k.r( N 96-084 2A ItCP 5

~~------~~~'-YO'.N-- .. a y' i m? > e a.

y; Y W;,; '

Closed to date = 3 4 ----_-------_-_---------------------.--L------------------m- ----

Added 4/2d/97 = 3 l Goat 53 Open Temp Alts l Left to disposition = 4

~

002 will close 6/2/97. DP fan trips 3 -------------------------------------------------------------;--------* 037 will close in Mode 4, RAPS cable 011 WC to schedule ABFDAT temp pp

014 wili ciose 6/20/97 DG vibration trips 2

007 Accumulator scaffolding

~ '

017 CC inlet valves to RHR Hx

e------------------~~- , -----

1 O

s s s s s s s s s s s s s tQU2 Rest @U2iridij @ $

8 Revised: 5/20t!f7 Sr2/97 9 55%M

Strategy Unit 2 Restart gjefinition: Any Control Room component Action Plan

Title:

Restart Scope Management Guideline & Criteria with an open work request or action request Objective Measured: Control Room Deftciencies Indicator

Description:

L__

$_0_al = < 10 Plan Owner: Dave Bump / Mark Schimmel

, . . - . _ _ - . _ . _ _-- 7 _

Control Room Deficiencies -+-- scheduw Trend I Analysis:

?^A"*! 2 completed during the week of May 19..

60 1 I

' Actions to Correct:

50 --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

56 Control Room deficiencies were initially identified.

, [G <

q., .

40 -------- --- ------------ ---------------------------------------- ----

,- - To date: 36 have been completed (including g

, c 8 awaiting PMT) 30 --------------- -------------------------------------------

'-f- .

Q-The 20 remaining are:

19 WRs -

'y Q 11 scheduled to complete by 7/2/97 2 are no longer restartissues

^

20 -------------- -------- -- ---------------------------*-----------

4 are not scheduled 3 are scheduled to complete 7/7/97, 8/4/97, and 8/7/97 l Goat: < 10 j to -------------------------------------------------------- - -------

1 AR for minor maintenance (Chlorination System painting)

~

s: .

0 '

S S S S S S S S S a 8 sm a a a 4 a a $ $

Q Q "

Q

  • Q B D" D g s K.b2Restartb2indi.xts l---6f2/97 9 M AM - --- - - - - - - - - - - - -

--- new wm

.r;. '

n n espn Ganges MentM by Action PI n Tit e tart ope Management Guideline & Criteria the Restart Committee Objective Measured: Design Changes f.idicator

Description:

Goal = Meet Schedule Dates for Plan Owner: Frank Gogliotti MAL issued.

Design Changes in Engineering Trend / Analysis:

r 35 Actions to Correct:

30 -

' N's -- --

Met with Senior Management 5/12/96.

^

's Established design changes to be included in the restart scope. Currently there are 86

\ Design Chhnges that have been identified for 3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _. . _ . _

__\A. Unit 2 Restart.

N 33 Totalin Engineering 20 - -

- - ~ - ~

'A 10- Operator Workarounds 18 - Engineering Requests

\\ -

\ ^

5 - Pending DCPs r g 53 in variobs stages of installation.

15 \ Note: 1 OWA was completed,1 DCN was

\ added by the Restart Committee i  !

's 10 k s .

' [

N 5  %

a i

- N

! I o ..

I a a S *

  • 5 S S ~

E E S *

  • I Revised: 5/27/97 3

.e...

e Y

Strategy Unit 2 Restart n oN Opn engineering requests Action Plan

Title:

Restart Scope Management Guideline & Cr.ieria requiring closure prior to Unit 2 restart Objective Measured: Open ER's Indicator

Description:

Schedule date for ER closure Goal = ZERO by due date Plan Owner: Frank Gogliotti

+ Protected Trend / Analysis:

Open Engineering Requests -*- Actual ,

-140

~

E: Actions to Correct:

. _. ,.._ a.

im . . . . s .g. g_; q;4;w . :cy.y.;. egg i a

, R2 Prioritize those impacting physical  !

. v. .ama .

M ,... 2 ng-. e:_ work in tNe plant. i ioo ._ . _ . .. .. wa% #s. . , . _. . .. . .- .,y

= < .: b;ib'$ G 3is;j 'h, .)$?

~

  • hise

""ig .:.

g ag* ~

Work with WCC to plan /prioritize so - - - - - - -., w; . . e based on upcoming work windows. t my 4 m.. .  ;

? -

hg ;qg?e g;;

35 ERs completed to date.

~

g ,m - ~ ~ ;d! -

< < ( w:

.- g . .

.; g

- c=-- s s- >

s ~ m[D.

ej .

^

do -%- ,'""'

_ . . . 1 q..~cz: , ,

.. s.;$. ^  ;

's :6. I s .

  • l

. "P

!: 4 p;:  ;

[

< + ,

4 , , .

o t  ;

s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s i e s - s sa a 8 Revised: 577/97

._.-46 e- - h - - - -a #4 A --- ^"Ai J A E -"J-" +- +- - 4 --552 44'--a-4-- - *-i----3 ---'- 't ' J'4h A--'E-- -

i e 1 ,

1 16, 1

J e s

[. i y )

1

)  ;

\

i .!

4 5

'l N '

i, d O ,

us p!.

  • O

~

~H 3

, a Z

m:d n

p h

!ie  :

!?

1

-$ l f

l 4

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20148U057&oldid=2844597"