ML20148S358
| ML20148S358 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/12/1988 |
| From: | Rubenstein L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Mauck J, Rosa F, Stewart J NRC |
| References | |
| PROJECT-675A NUDOCS 8804180335 | |
| Download: ML20148S358 (9) | |
Text
.
April 12, 1988 Project NO. 675 MEMORANDUM FOR: Distribution -(see attached list)
FROM- ' ester S. Rubenstein, Director Standardization and Non-Power 9eactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects
SUBJECT:
DOE ADVANCED REACTOR SEVERE ACCIDENT PROGRAM (ARSAP) TOPIC PAPERS - RESPONSIBILITIES AND STATUS The DOE ARSAP topic papers are being submitted by Combustion Engineering on the System 80+, CESSAR-DC docket. In general the review responsibility rests with RES. However, NRR has oversight and concurrence responsibilities. The review status including the identification of the papers, dates of submittals, reviewers, responsible NRR branch chiefs and secondary reviewers and milestone dates of significant events are identified in the enclosed REVIEW STATUS REPORT OF ARSAP TOPIC PAPERS. Also cnclosed is the flow chart showing the proposed method of handling the topic papers.
Ir general we have allowed 60 days for initial review, 60 days for CE responses to RAI and 60 days for preparation of draft SER to the project manager. We expect these issues will be of interest to the ACRS subcomittee on Standardization and when we discuss our review with the ACRS subcomittee, I we will involve the RES reviewers. -
When RES assigns reviewers to these issues, we will upgrade the status report accordingly. If there are any questions regarding the ARSAP topic papers, please direct them to Guy Vissing, x21101.
Original Signed Byl Lester S. Rubenstein, Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate livision of Reactor Projects III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear P.cactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated DISTRIBUTION:,
' Docket File . } J. Mauck A. EL-Bassoni cc: L. Shao NRC PDRs J. Stewart L. Cunningham J. Richardson PDSNP Reading F. Rosa T. Essig A. Thadani GYissing 0. Chopra R. Erickson G. Vissing EHytlon J. Knight B. Mendelsohn R.W. Houston Tad Marsh J. Craig E. Butcher C.Y. Cheng J. Raval B. Giardina '
Martin Hum J. Wermiel A. Beech J. Rajan W. Hodges J. Spraul Horace Shaw L. Kopp B. Regan U C. McCracken T. Collins G. Lapinsky PD P65] Frank Witt D. Mathews S. Wiess ing LRubenst in G. Bagchi R. Barrett H. Vandermolen 04/C./88 04/l2/88 N. Romney J. Murphy R. Van Niel D. Jeng G. Kelly E. Che111ah 8804100335 880412 6 PDR
G cec oq 8 k UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[5 , g(
3
- j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
/
('.v .s Project No. 675 April 12, 1988 MEMORANDUM FOR: Distribution (see attached list)
FROM: Lester S. Rubenstein, Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects
SUBJECT:
DOE ADVANCED REACTOR SEVERE ACCIDENT PROGPAM (ARSAP) TOPIC PAPERS - RESPONSIBILITIES AND STATUS The DOE ARSAP topic papers are being submitted by Combustion Engineering on the System 80+, CESSAR-DC docket. In general the review responsibility rests with RES. However, NRR has o/ersight and concurrence responsibilities. The review status including the identification of the papers, dates of submittals, reviewers, responsible NRR branch chiefs and secondary reviewers and milestone dates of significant events are identified in the enclosed REVIEW STATUS REPORT OF ARSAP TOPIC PAPERS. Also enclosed is the flow chart showing the proposed method of handling the topic papers.
In general we have allowed 60 days for initial review, 60 days for CE responses to RAI and 60 days for preparation of draft SER to the project manager. We expect these issues will be of interest to the ACRS subcommittee on Standardization and when we discuss our review with the ACRS subconinittee, we will involve the RES reviewers.
When RES assigns reviewers to these issues, we will upgrade the status report accordingly. If there are any questions regarding the ARSAP topic papers, please direct them to Guy Vissing, x21101.
8 Lester S. Rubenstein, Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Divisien of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated cc: L. Shao J. Richardson A. Thadani G. Vissing R.W. Houston
lage No. 1
)4/11/88 REVIEW STAR.i REPORT ON ARSAP 10P!C PAFERS
- SET 70Plc FAPER SET TOPIC PAPER SUEM11TAL NRR RES SECONDARY RAI RAI SER SER TO R!MBER DATE RESPONSIBLE REVIEWER REVIEWER RESPONSE TO PM ACRS BRANCH CHIEF (NRR)
A RESOLVED IDCOR/NRC REACTOR C00LAhi 11/24/87 W. H00SES C. FERREL L. KOFP 05/30/88T 07/30/881 09/30/881 10/30/86 ISSUES APPLIC GILITY SYSTEM NATURAL 10 ALWRS CIRCULAT10N(IDCOR ISSUE 2)
A RESOLVED IDCOR/NicC IN-VESSEL STEAM 11/24/67 W. H0DSES C. FERREL L. KOPP 35/30/88T 07/30/881 09/30/88T 10/30/81 ISSUES - EIPLOS10h3 AND ALFHA APPLICAllLITY TO M]X FAILURE (!DCOR ALWRS ISSUE 7) 1 DESOLVED IDCCR/hRC EI-VESSEL HEAT 11/24/87 W. H0DGES C. FERREL L. LOFP 05/30/88T 07/30/881 09/30/881 10/30/86 ISSUES- TRANSFER MODELS FROM AFitICABILITY TO MOLTEN CORE TO ALWRS CChCRETE (IDCOR IS3UE 10) 1 RESOLVED IDCLR/hRC FIS$10NFRODUCI 11/24/67 L. CUNNih5KAM C. FERREL T. ES$!6 05/30/88T 07/30/88T 09/30/88T 10/30/8E (
ISSLES - RELEASE FRICR TO APPLI U ILITY 10 VESSEL FAILURE ALWRS (IDCOR ISSUE 1) 1 RESOLVED IDCOR/h5C RELEASE MCDEL FOR 11/24/87 L. CUNNINGHAM C. FERREL 1. ESS!6 05/30/881 07/30/881 09/30/881 10/30/8E '
ISSUES - CONTROL R0D APFLICABILITY TO MATERIALS (!DCOR ALWRS ISSUE 3) l 1 DESOLVED IDCOR/NRC FES$10N FRODUCI AND 11/24/87 L. CUNNIN6 HAM C. FERREL 1. ES$16 05/30/88107/30/88T09/30/88110/30/8(l ISSUES - AER050. tEPOSITICN !
APFt!LABILITV 10 IN RCS AhD ALWRS CONTAINMENT (IDCCR ISSUES 4 5 12) ,
i KESOLVED !DC0F./NRC El-VESSEL FISSION 11/244 L. CUhMINSHAM C. FERREL T. ES$16 05/30/881 07/30/88T 09/30/88T 10/30/81 ISSUES - PRODUCT RELEASE AFPL!rABILITY10 (DU91NS CORE -
AlkRS CONCRETE thiERACTICNS) I!DCOR ISSUE 9) 1 RESOLVED IDCORINRC REVAFORilA110N OF 11/24/87 L. CUhMINSF.AM C. FERREL 1.ESS16 05/30/881 07/30/881 09/30/68T 10/30/81 ISSUES - Fl!$10NFR0 DUCTS APPLICABILITYTD (IDCOR ISSUE 11)
ALWRS 3 RESCLVE IDCORINRC $!C04tARr 11/24/87 J. CRAIS C. FERREL J. RAVAL 05/30/88T07/~0!$2T09/30/2811 ISSUES - CONTAINMENT APft!CASILITY TO FERFORMANCE(IDCOR ALWR$ !! SUE 16) l
.~ _
. 'age Ns. 2 14/11/8B REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON ARSAP TOPIC PAFERS SET TOPIC PAPER SET 10PIC PAFER SUBMlifAL NRR RES SECONDARY RAI RA! SER SER TO
,PM ER DATE RESPONSIBLE REVIEWER REVIEWER RESPCNSE 10 PM ACES BRANCH CHIEF (hRR) 1 RESOLVED IDCCR/NRC MODEL!h5 0F 11/24/07 W. HDDGES C. FERREL L. KOFP 05/30/88T 07/30/89T 09/30/88T 10/30/88 ISSUES - EMERSENCY RESPONSC AFPLICABILITY10 (!DCOR ISSLE 14)
ALW'is 2 PLAhi RESPONSE UNDER IN-VESSEL HYDRO 6EN 04/30/88 C. MCCRAttEN F. Wili 06/30/881 08/30/6BT 10/30/881 11/30/88 SEVER ACC! TENT GEhERATION (IDCOR CONSlilCNS ISSUE 5) 2 PLANT RESPCNSE UNDER CORE MELT 04/30/88 W. H0DGES L. K0" 06/30/8BT 08/30/B9T 10/30/69T 11/30/80 SEVERE ACCIDENT PROGRESSION AND CCNDll!0NS VESSEL FAILURE (IDCOR ISSUE 6) 2 PLANT RESPONSE UNDER DIRECT CONIAlhMENT 04/30/88 J. CRAIS J. RAVAL 06/30/88T 08/30/631 10/30/661 !!/30/88 SEVERE ACCIDENT HEATIN3 BY EJECTED CON 0!TIONS CORE MATERIALS (IDCOR ISSttE 8) 2 PLANT RESPChSE UNt!R CCNTAIMMENT 04/30/28 J. CRAIS J. RAVAL 06/30/88T 06/30/68T 10/30/SBT 11/30/68 SEVERE ACCitENT PERFORMANCE (IDCOR CON 81TIChS. ISSUE 15) 2 F1AND RELSONSE - HYDROGEN 16N111CN 04/30/28 C. MCCRACKEN F. Wili 06/30/8BT 08/30/631 10/30/631 11/30/85 UN ER SEVERE AhD BURNING tIDCCR ACCichET CONDIT!CNS ISSUE 17) 2 PLANT RESPONSE UhDER DEBRIS C00LABILliY 04/30/B8 W. HOISES L. KOFP 06/30/SBT 08/30/881 10/30/881 11/30/66 SEVER ACCIDENT (IDCOR ISSUE 10)
CONSITICh5 3METHCt0LC6HFRA EITERNAL EVENTS 05/30/68 R. BARRETT 6. KELLY 07/30/SBT 09/30/83T 11/30/881 12/30/85 3 GETHODOLOSH FRA SUCCESSCRITERIA 05/30/29 R. BARRETT 6. KELLY 07/30/88T 09/30/68T 11/30/691 12/30/85 3 GETHOD X CSi FRA ACCIDEhi SEQUENCE 05/30/68 L. CUhNINSHAM 1. ESSI6 07/30/GBT 09/30/68T 11/30/6BT 12/30/2E SELECTION 3 QETHODOLOSY PRA HUMAN RELIABILITY 05/30/88 W. RESAN G.LAPINSKY 07/30/63109/30/23T 11/30/93112/30/81 ANALYSIS 3 GETHODOLOGY FRA COMEN CAUSE FAILUFE C5/30/EB R. BAFRETT 6. KELLY 07/30/88T 09/30/88T 11 00/831 12/30/61 4 SEVERE ACCitENT ESSENTIAL EQLlPMEhi 07/30/88 J. CRAIS J. RAVAL 09/30/681 11/30/581 01/30/89T 02/30/81 PERFCRMAACE FEFFCRMAkCE litCOR ISSUE 18) 4 SEVERE ACCIDENT CRITERIA FOR SAFE 07/30/28 W. H0DGES L. K0PP 09/30/SBT !!/30/681 01/30/891 02/30/65 PERFORMANCE STABLE STATES
$ age No. 3 .
l 14/11/88 REVIEW STATUS REPORT ON ARSAP TOPIC PAPERS SEV TCP!C PAPER SET TCP!C PAPER SUSMITTAL NRR RES SECONDARY RAI RAI SER SER T0 (UMSER DATE RESPONSIBLE REVIEWER REVIEWER RESPONSE TO PM ACR$
BRANCH CHIEF (NRR) ;
I 5 SAFETY 60ALS SAFETY 60AL 09/30/88 R. BARRETT 6. RELLY 11/30/88T01/30/89T03/30/89T04/30 EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION -
INTERPRETATION OF 60ALS AhD USASE OF PRA RESULTS IN CCMFARISCN WITH l
60ALS,lhCLUDIN; l
lhTERFRETAllCN OF UNCERTAINTIES-5 SAFETY 60ALS UNCERTAINTIES IN 09/30/88 R. BARR;1T 6. KELLY 11/30/681 01/30/09T 03/30/891 04/30/85 '
EVALUATIONS PLANT RISK ANALYSIS 5 SAFETY GOALS MAAP-DOR CODE 09/30/E8 R. BARRETT 6. KELLY 11/30/88T 01/30/891 03/30/891 04/30/89
[?ALUA!!CN VALIDATION 6 SEVERE ACCl?ENT S/A MhAGEMENT - 10/30/68 L. CUhMINSHAM T. ESSI6 12/30/88T 02/28/69T 04/30/89T 05/30/85 GANAEEMENT PLANN!h5 6 SEVERE ACCIDENT S/A MANAGEMENT - 10/30/E8 J. CRA16 J. RAVAL 12/30/88T 02/28/891 04/30/89T 05/30/85 l QANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY !
AhD DPERATICNAL REr.d!REMETS
- 18 Total iIt 72 l
PROPOSED METHOD OF HANDLING SEVERE ACCIDENT ISSUE TOPIC PAPERS 4
COMBUSTING ENGINEERING PM/PDSNP, RES/DRAA
(' Sub. nit Topic Paper Receive ACR5 Comments
'r i F PROJECT MANAGER /PDSNP Assign TAC No. RES/DRAA/ REVIEWER Prepare Work Request Receive ACR5 comments Transmittal Prepare SER Establish Schedule a o
ir 1f RES/DRAA NRR/ADT NRR/ADT/F.EVIEW BRANCH Assign Reviewer Concurr in SER i Approve Schedule :l Provided Information Copy i I
ir RE3/DRAA/ REVIEWER l MEETING WITH CE PM/PD5NP Review and arepare RAI (If necessary)
-*~ Prepare final SER l I l
l V 1f PROJECT MANAGER /PDSNP COMBUSTICN ENGINEERING Receive RAI and send to Implement SER (l CE 1r
' COMBUSTION ENGINEERING Receive RAI and prepare response PROJECT MANAGER /PDSNP Receive res3onse to RAI i
ir RES/DRAA/ REVIEWER '
_ NRR/ADT/ REVIEW BRANCH Review and prepare Draft __
Receive Draft SER and SER provide comments if MEETING WITi ACRS Present resolution to ACRS for comments
(
't
()
ACRS ACRS provides comments
/
)~
.s THE ARSAP PROGRAM :
i y
e 1
l l
4
=@
=
g _p ..h.q. , ,+
^
,y . .f' I ^ '-
,y ', _jj' '
,y+ '"
DOE ARSAP MISSION 3
9 ASSIST IN THE EARLY RESOLUTION OF RISK SIGNIFICANT SEVERE ACCIDENT ISSUES SO THAT THEY WILL NOT BE MAJOR ISSUES FOR EVOLUTIONARY ADVANCED LIGHT WATER REACTORS DURING THE 1990'S
_ j 8.
I s
7)g DOE ARSAP OBJECTIVES S SUPPORT DOE DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM REACTOR l VENDORS' SEVERE ACCIDENT I ASSESSMENT, ANALYSES, AND l lSSUE RESOLUTION !
O PROVIDE INPUT TO, REVIEW, AND -
l SUPPORT EPRI REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT IN SEVERE ACCIDENT -
AREAS. l (3
S ACHIEVE MORE GENERIC l RESOLUTION OF SEVERE ACCIDENT ISSUES -- THAN MAY l OCCUR THROUGH SUPPORT OF VENDOR CERTIFICATION OR OF -
EPRI REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT
-- SUCH THAT THEY ARE NOT ISSUES FOR ALWR's.
O
,-------,.m . , e s--,-__