ML20148M431

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Denies Motion of St of Ri Seeking Order Directing Applicant Ne Pwr Co to Provide Further Info.Denial Based on Fact That NRC Staff & Not ASLB Determines Whether Environ Rept Contains Sufficient Data to Enable Staff to Issue Des
ML20148M431
Person / Time
Site: New England Power
Issue date: 11/14/1978
From: Mark Miller
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
References
NUDOCS 7811220018
Download: ML20148M431 (2)


Text

e b l

NRC PUPLIC DOCUMENT E00M 3 I/@p

N&j 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA h, m, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION k.,;4 % g8/

4e 8 g s

In the Matter of ) _

8

)

NEW ENGLAND POWER COMPANY, ET AL. ) 2.scket Mcs.: STN 50-568

) STN 50-569

(_NEP-1 and NEP-2) )

ORDER DENYING MOTION OF STATE OF RHODE ISLAND FOR ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER INFORMATION (November 14, 1978)

By a motion dated October 13, 1978, the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations (State) sought an order directing the Applicant New England Power Company "to produce for Staff and intervenors further data and information than is provided in the Environmental Report." Obj ections and answers to the motion were filed by the Applicant, the Staff and Intervenor LAMP, et al.b/

As the objecting parties point out, this motion in effect is a request for rather extensive discovery. By our Order of February 21,1978 (7 NRC 271, 294) , we provided that the dates of the discovery period would be fixed by the Board after an 1/The State failed to serve copies of its motion on the members of the Licensing Board, contrary to our regulations, and we were unaware of its existence until copies of responses filed by the objecting parties were received. In addition, counsel who signed the motion has not entered an appearance for the State or otherwise been designated to represent the State, contrary to our Order regarding intervention entered May 25, 1978.

7811220 M

i evidentiary hearing to consider the Douglas Point criteria.

No dates for discovery have been fixed, and such requests will not be granted.

l There is an even more fundamental vice in this motion.

As we pointed out in our Order of February 21, 1978, the Staff is independently responsible for the preparation of environ-mental statements (DES and FES) required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and " licensing boards have no role or authority in their preparation" (7 NRC 271, 279) .

However, the Final Environmental Statement prepared by the Staff is subj ect to review and amendment by the Board in an adjudicatory setting. Accordingly, it is for the Staff and not this Board to determine whether the Environmental Report contains sufficient data or information to enable the Staff to issue a DES, including an analysis of alternative sites.2/

The motion of the State of Rhode Island for entry of an order requiring further information is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

- FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Dated at Bethesda, Maryland Marshall E. Miller, Chairman this 14th day of November 1978.

2(Public Service Company of New Hampshire (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2), CLI-77-8, 5 NRC 503, 525 (1977); Boston Edison Co. (Pilgrim Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2, ALAB-479, 7 NRC 774, 792 (1978) .

_ _ _ _ __ .__ _ _ ___