|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML19210E6371979-10-24024 October 1979 Forwards Response of Greene County Et/Al to Util 791016 Rept Re Status of Application ML19224D6911979-06-0505 June 1979 Forwards Greene County,NY,790605 Joinder to Appeal Termination of Proceeding by Presiding Examiner ML19224A6411979-04-24024 April 1979 Comments on Federal-State Authorities & Cooperation in Nuclear Power Plant Licensing:Outlines Changes to Ny Siting Law & Attempts to Eliminate Duplication of Regulatory Processes Between Federal & State Agencies ML19289E1581979-03-27027 March 1979 Provides Results of Review of Fes.Agrees W/Nrc Recommendation Against Cemeton,Ny Site.Raises Concern Re Potential for High Fishery Impingement & Entrainment Losses. Believes Seven Alternative Sites Are Superior ML19273B3231979-03-16016 March 1979 Forwards Transcript of Testimony Re Application for Nuclear Facility ML19263E0841979-03-14014 March 1979 Forwards Ja Nickolitch 790312 Testimony Re Land Use Issues ML19312B6101979-03-12012 March 1979 Forwards Testimony Before State of Ny Board on Electric Generation Siting & Environ & Before ASLB ML19284A7011979-03-12012 March 1979 Fes Incomplete Until Requirements of Natl Historic Preservation Act of 1966 Section 106 Are Met ML19254D5251979-03-0808 March 1979 Comments That Fes Is Inadequate Re Economic & Radiobiological Effects of Class 9 Accident on Surrounding Area & Population.Requests Suppl to Fes or Justification for Denial of Request ML19276E4921979-03-0707 March 1979 in Response to NRC 790131 Ltr,Plant Will Be Designed & Constructed to Implement Design Options Prior to Final Decision on ATWS Issue ML19291A0621979-03-0505 March 1979 Objects to Util'S Interrogatory 36 & to Greene County,Ny, Interrogatories 32,34,55 & 57 ML19276F6741979-03-0202 March 1979 Forwards Prepared Testimony of Hk Flad,A Gussow & DC Huntington Re Aesthetic Impacts of Facility.Submitted on Behalf of Columbia County Historical Society,Friends of Olana,Greene County & Hudson River Conservation Society ML19261C7481979-03-0202 March 1979 Forwards Testimony Re Transportation,Meteorological Impacts & Socioeconomic Impacts,On Behalf of Green County,Ny, Municipalities ML19282C4361979-02-27027 February 1979 Forwards Cementon Civic Association'S Motion for Extension of Time ML19296A4781979-02-27027 February 1979 Requests Extension of Time to Make Discovery Requests Re Testimony & Proposed Exhibits ML19282C2731979-02-23023 February 1979 Forwards Request for 2-week Extension of Time in Which to File Testimony & Exhibits on Behalf of Lehigh Portland Cement Co ML19261C6231979-02-21021 February 1979 Belatedly Forwards Testimony of Re Henshaw Re Terrestrial Ecology ML19282C3991979-02-20020 February 1979 Would Like to Know Why Fes Is More Reduced in Size than Other Statements ML19263C5281979-02-16016 February 1979 Informs NRC That Applicant Will Respond to NRC 790131 Ltr Concerning ATWS Commitment by 790309,allowing Time for Consultation ML19263D1341979-02-0707 February 1979 Is Opposed to Proposed Nuclear Power Plants in New York State.Favors Development of Solar Energy ML19289D0801979-01-23023 January 1979 Ref 790105 Order Resetting Dates for Further Proceedings, Case 80006,appeals for Intervenor Status in Proceeding,Due to Geographic Proximity to Proposed Site ML19273A9791979-01-23023 January 1979 Analysis of Addl Costs of Constructing Plant at Athens,Ny, Rather than at Proposed Cementon Site.Total Addl Const Costs Are $364 Million (32-month Delay Before Operation) & $591 Million (42-month Delay) ML19270F4621979-01-17017 January 1979 Requests Limited Appearance at Hearing ML19263B4481978-12-28028 December 1978 Urges Issuance of Fes in Jan 1979 to Avoid Necessity of Abrogation of Joint Federal-State Protocol in Favor of State Statutory Obligations ML19322A0661978-12-26026 December 1978 Forwards Data Re Total Zinc Surface Area & Mass Inside Containment.Confirms Values to Determine post-LOCA Hydrogen Generation ML19263B4381978-12-20020 December 1978 Anticipates That Ny Dept of Public Svc Staff Will Recommend Rejection of the Cementon Site in Favor of an Alternate on Land Use,Socioeconomic,& Aesthetic Grounds ML19322A0361978-12-0707 December 1978 Dept of Environ Conservation Moves That Dept of Public Svc Motion to Incorporate Previous Testimony in 149-b Proceeding,Case 27319-Phase II Be Granted.Advantage of Favorable Ruling Is Organized Resource Allocation ML20147J0481978-12-0606 December 1978 Forwards Answers to NRC Staff Interrogs H1 Thru H11.Answers Were Prepared by T Brenke of the Managing Bd of Heidelberger Zement ML19256A3321978-11-30030 November 1978 Legal Proceeding Between Lehigh Portland Cement Co & Util Re Proposed Facility Drags on & On.Lehigh Cannot Expand Cement Plant at Cementon W/O Major Expenditure of Labor & Money ML20150D3231978-11-29029 November 1978 Responds to 780803 NRC Ltr Requesting Design Commitments to Be Implemented for Reactor Coolant Pump Tests.Util Will, If Results Are Not Positive,Provide Safety Grade Instru to Initiate Automatic Protec Action Re Seal Degradation ML20147C7461978-11-29029 November 1978 States Util Will Redesign Fuel Bldg as Requested in 781020 NRC Ltr.Expects This Will Resolve Outstanding Item 24 in SER Suppl 1 Section 1.8 ML20150D1041978-11-27027 November 1978 Responds to Issue 23 as Identified in Safety Eval Rept Suppl 1,Sec1.8.States Commitment to Mod Design for Cold Shutdown.Fully Agrees with & Supports B&W Comment Re Reg Guide 1-139 ML20197D4291978-11-22022 November 1978 Forwards Util Response to Motion by Lehigh Portland Cement Co to Quash or Modify Authority'S Subpoenas Duces Tecum. W/Encl Affidavit of Svc.W/Encl Response ANO:7811280302 ML20148K0321978-11-0909 November 1978 Returns 3 Computer Tapes Containing Site Meteorology Data Documented by Util in ML20148T5671978-11-0808 November 1978 Forwards Documents That Reflect Rev to Prefiled Util Testimony:Security Contention Testimony,Engr Safety Contentions,Radiological & Exclusion Area Testimony & Emergency Procedures.Util Will Introduce FSAR at Hearings ML20150C9461978-11-0707 November 1978 Forwards Motion on Behalf of Lehigh Portland Cement Co to Quash or Mod Subpoenas & 781010 & Requests Exemption from Disclosure for Info Requested 780908 by NRC ML20148M5411978-11-0707 November 1978 Forwards Suppl Responses & Testimony of NRC Staff on Radiological Health & Safety Matters as Raised by Intervenors,Per 780801 ASLB Request ML20148L1781978-10-31031 October 1978 Updates Status of Lehigh Portland Cement Co'S Responses to NRC Staff'S Interrogs & Request for Production of Documents. Interrogs M1-M4,L1-L11 & 01-011 Have Been Answered & Proposed Answers to H1-H11 Have Been Submitted to Bd ML20148K8741978-10-31031 October 1978 Forwards Copy of Amend to Appl for Dept of Army Permit(Corps of Engineers Permit) for Info.Barge Slip Will Be Reduced in Width from 100 to 60 Feet ML19256A1081978-10-31031 October 1978 Forwards Util Application for Amend to Dept of Army Permit Sent to Nrc.Amend Covers Reduction in Width of Barge Slip from 100 to 60 Feet to Reduce Dredging & Rock Excavation Concerns ML20204B9751978-10-27027 October 1978 Forwards Notices of Appearance for Lewis & B Smith of Neld Staff as NRC Counsel in Proc Re Subj Facil.Cert of Svc Encl ML20148J6331978-10-27027 October 1978 Forwards Responses to Interrogatories M1-M4,L1-L11 & 01-011 Propounded by NRC to Lehigh Portland Cement.H1-H11 Will Be Sent Later ML20148K1461978-10-26026 October 1978 Forwards 780929 Memo from HR Denton to Commission Discussing Results of Fire Protec Res Test Conducted by Underwriters Lab.W/Encl ANO 7810050359 & 7810050373 ML20150B3441978-10-25025 October 1978 Advises That NRC Has No Plans to Conduct Public Meeting in Saugerties Re Facility,In Response to .Mayor Turner of Saugerties Has Forwarded Comments on Facility to NRC ML20150B3241978-10-20020 October 1978 Responds to Re Requirements for Cold Shutdown. Further Clarification,Based on Discussions W/B&W & Staff Position on Requirements for Seismic Category 1 Fuel Bldg & Mod Required Encl ML20148D4721978-10-18018 October 1978 Opposes PASNY Application to Const Nuclear Plant at Cementon Based on Fact That Util Is tax-exempt Institution ML20148D4791978-07-24024 July 1978 Ack Receipt of Ew Hyland Re Summary of 780406 Meeting.Opposes Const of Nuclear Power Plant at Cementon Since Const Would Deprive Lehigh of Chance to Develop Site for Producing Cement ML19350D0351977-07-20020 July 1977 Discusses Review of Facility Foundation Conditions.Number of Density Control Tests During Const Should Be Specified ML19282C4101976-04-30030 April 1976 Comments on Des:Depth of Analysis Is Far from Conclusive, Athens & Cementon Sites Have Different Characteristics & Environ Alternatives to Proposed Transmission Lines Should Be Explored ML19282C4131976-04-29029 April 1976 Offers Comments on Des.Believes Schools in 5 Mile Radius of Plant Are Too Close in Case of Accidents.Hudson River Water Will Be Used as make-up Water for Cooling Towers & Will Be Returned Sterile of Life 1979-06-05
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML19224A6411979-04-24024 April 1979 Comments on Federal-State Authorities & Cooperation in Nuclear Power Plant Licensing:Outlines Changes to Ny Siting Law & Attempts to Eliminate Duplication of Regulatory Processes Between Federal & State Agencies ML19289E1581979-03-27027 March 1979 Provides Results of Review of Fes.Agrees W/Nrc Recommendation Against Cemeton,Ny Site.Raises Concern Re Potential for High Fishery Impingement & Entrainment Losses. Believes Seven Alternative Sites Are Superior ML19273B3231979-03-16016 March 1979 Forwards Transcript of Testimony Re Application for Nuclear Facility ML19263E0841979-03-14014 March 1979 Forwards Ja Nickolitch 790312 Testimony Re Land Use Issues ML19312B6101979-03-12012 March 1979 Forwards Testimony Before State of Ny Board on Electric Generation Siting & Environ & Before ASLB ML19284A7011979-03-12012 March 1979 Fes Incomplete Until Requirements of Natl Historic Preservation Act of 1966 Section 106 Are Met ML19254D5251979-03-0808 March 1979 Comments That Fes Is Inadequate Re Economic & Radiobiological Effects of Class 9 Accident on Surrounding Area & Population.Requests Suppl to Fes or Justification for Denial of Request ML19276E4921979-03-0707 March 1979 in Response to NRC 790131 Ltr,Plant Will Be Designed & Constructed to Implement Design Options Prior to Final Decision on ATWS Issue ML19291A0621979-03-0505 March 1979 Objects to Util'S Interrogatory 36 & to Greene County,Ny, Interrogatories 32,34,55 & 57 ML19276F6741979-03-0202 March 1979 Forwards Prepared Testimony of Hk Flad,A Gussow & DC Huntington Re Aesthetic Impacts of Facility.Submitted on Behalf of Columbia County Historical Society,Friends of Olana,Greene County & Hudson River Conservation Society ML19261C7481979-03-0202 March 1979 Forwards Testimony Re Transportation,Meteorological Impacts & Socioeconomic Impacts,On Behalf of Green County,Ny, Municipalities ML19282C4361979-02-27027 February 1979 Forwards Cementon Civic Association'S Motion for Extension of Time ML19296A4781979-02-27027 February 1979 Requests Extension of Time to Make Discovery Requests Re Testimony & Proposed Exhibits ML19282C2731979-02-23023 February 1979 Forwards Request for 2-week Extension of Time in Which to File Testimony & Exhibits on Behalf of Lehigh Portland Cement Co ML19261C6231979-02-21021 February 1979 Belatedly Forwards Testimony of Re Henshaw Re Terrestrial Ecology ML19282C3991979-02-20020 February 1979 Would Like to Know Why Fes Is More Reduced in Size than Other Statements ML19263C5281979-02-16016 February 1979 Informs NRC That Applicant Will Respond to NRC 790131 Ltr Concerning ATWS Commitment by 790309,allowing Time for Consultation ML19263D1341979-02-0707 February 1979 Is Opposed to Proposed Nuclear Power Plants in New York State.Favors Development of Solar Energy ML19273A9791979-01-23023 January 1979 Analysis of Addl Costs of Constructing Plant at Athens,Ny, Rather than at Proposed Cementon Site.Total Addl Const Costs Are $364 Million (32-month Delay Before Operation) & $591 Million (42-month Delay) ML19289D0801979-01-23023 January 1979 Ref 790105 Order Resetting Dates for Further Proceedings, Case 80006,appeals for Intervenor Status in Proceeding,Due to Geographic Proximity to Proposed Site ML19270F4621979-01-17017 January 1979 Requests Limited Appearance at Hearing ML19263B4481978-12-28028 December 1978 Urges Issuance of Fes in Jan 1979 to Avoid Necessity of Abrogation of Joint Federal-State Protocol in Favor of State Statutory Obligations ML19322A0661978-12-26026 December 1978 Forwards Data Re Total Zinc Surface Area & Mass Inside Containment.Confirms Values to Determine post-LOCA Hydrogen Generation ML19263B4381978-12-20020 December 1978 Anticipates That Ny Dept of Public Svc Staff Will Recommend Rejection of the Cementon Site in Favor of an Alternate on Land Use,Socioeconomic,& Aesthetic Grounds ML19322A0361978-12-0707 December 1978 Dept of Environ Conservation Moves That Dept of Public Svc Motion to Incorporate Previous Testimony in 149-b Proceeding,Case 27319-Phase II Be Granted.Advantage of Favorable Ruling Is Organized Resource Allocation ML20147J0481978-12-0606 December 1978 Forwards Answers to NRC Staff Interrogs H1 Thru H11.Answers Were Prepared by T Brenke of the Managing Bd of Heidelberger Zement ML19256A3321978-11-30030 November 1978 Legal Proceeding Between Lehigh Portland Cement Co & Util Re Proposed Facility Drags on & On.Lehigh Cannot Expand Cement Plant at Cementon W/O Major Expenditure of Labor & Money ML20147C7461978-11-29029 November 1978 States Util Will Redesign Fuel Bldg as Requested in 781020 NRC Ltr.Expects This Will Resolve Outstanding Item 24 in SER Suppl 1 Section 1.8 ML20150D3231978-11-29029 November 1978 Responds to 780803 NRC Ltr Requesting Design Commitments to Be Implemented for Reactor Coolant Pump Tests.Util Will, If Results Are Not Positive,Provide Safety Grade Instru to Initiate Automatic Protec Action Re Seal Degradation ML20150D1041978-11-27027 November 1978 Responds to Issue 23 as Identified in Safety Eval Rept Suppl 1,Sec1.8.States Commitment to Mod Design for Cold Shutdown.Fully Agrees with & Supports B&W Comment Re Reg Guide 1-139 ML20197D4291978-11-22022 November 1978 Forwards Util Response to Motion by Lehigh Portland Cement Co to Quash or Modify Authority'S Subpoenas Duces Tecum. W/Encl Affidavit of Svc.W/Encl Response ANO:7811280302 ML20148T5671978-11-0808 November 1978 Forwards Documents That Reflect Rev to Prefiled Util Testimony:Security Contention Testimony,Engr Safety Contentions,Radiological & Exclusion Area Testimony & Emergency Procedures.Util Will Introduce FSAR at Hearings ML20150C9461978-11-0707 November 1978 Forwards Motion on Behalf of Lehigh Portland Cement Co to Quash or Mod Subpoenas & 781010 & Requests Exemption from Disclosure for Info Requested 780908 by NRC ML19256A1081978-10-31031 October 1978 Forwards Util Application for Amend to Dept of Army Permit Sent to Nrc.Amend Covers Reduction in Width of Barge Slip from 100 to 60 Feet to Reduce Dredging & Rock Excavation Concerns ML20148L1781978-10-31031 October 1978 Updates Status of Lehigh Portland Cement Co'S Responses to NRC Staff'S Interrogs & Request for Production of Documents. Interrogs M1-M4,L1-L11 & 01-011 Have Been Answered & Proposed Answers to H1-H11 Have Been Submitted to Bd ML20148K8741978-10-31031 October 1978 Forwards Copy of Amend to Appl for Dept of Army Permit(Corps of Engineers Permit) for Info.Barge Slip Will Be Reduced in Width from 100 to 60 Feet ML20148J6331978-10-27027 October 1978 Forwards Responses to Interrogatories M1-M4,L1-L11 & 01-011 Propounded by NRC to Lehigh Portland Cement.H1-H11 Will Be Sent Later ML20148D4721978-10-18018 October 1978 Opposes PASNY Application to Const Nuclear Plant at Cementon Based on Fact That Util Is tax-exempt Institution ML20148D4791978-07-24024 July 1978 Ack Receipt of Ew Hyland Re Summary of 780406 Meeting.Opposes Const of Nuclear Power Plant at Cementon Since Const Would Deprive Lehigh of Chance to Develop Site for Producing Cement ML19350D0351977-07-20020 July 1977 Discusses Review of Facility Foundation Conditions.Number of Density Control Tests During Const Should Be Specified ML19282C4101976-04-30030 April 1976 Comments on Des:Depth of Analysis Is Far from Conclusive, Athens & Cementon Sites Have Different Characteristics & Environ Alternatives to Proposed Transmission Lines Should Be Explored ML19282C4131976-04-29029 April 1976 Offers Comments on Des.Believes Schools in 5 Mile Radius of Plant Are Too Close in Case of Accidents.Hudson River Water Will Be Used as make-up Water for Cooling Towers & Will Be Returned Sterile of Life 1979-04-24
[Table view] Category:LEGAL/LAW FIRM TO NRC
MONTHYEARML19273B3231979-03-16016 March 1979 Forwards Transcript of Testimony Re Application for Nuclear Facility ML19276F6741979-03-0202 March 1979 Forwards Prepared Testimony of Hk Flad,A Gussow & DC Huntington Re Aesthetic Impacts of Facility.Submitted on Behalf of Columbia County Historical Society,Friends of Olana,Greene County & Hudson River Conservation Society ML19261C7481979-03-0202 March 1979 Forwards Testimony Re Transportation,Meteorological Impacts & Socioeconomic Impacts,On Behalf of Green County,Ny, Municipalities ML19282C2731979-02-23023 February 1979 Forwards Request for 2-week Extension of Time in Which to File Testimony & Exhibits on Behalf of Lehigh Portland Cement Co ML20147J0481978-12-0606 December 1978 Forwards Answers to NRC Staff Interrogs H1 Thru H11.Answers Were Prepared by T Brenke of the Managing Bd of Heidelberger Zement ML20150C9461978-11-0707 November 1978 Forwards Motion on Behalf of Lehigh Portland Cement Co to Quash or Mod Subpoenas & 781010 & Requests Exemption from Disclosure for Info Requested 780908 by NRC ML20148L1781978-10-31031 October 1978 Updates Status of Lehigh Portland Cement Co'S Responses to NRC Staff'S Interrogs & Request for Production of Documents. Interrogs M1-M4,L1-L11 & 01-011 Have Been Answered & Proposed Answers to H1-H11 Have Been Submitted to Bd ML20148J6331978-10-27027 October 1978 Forwards Responses to Interrogatories M1-M4,L1-L11 & 01-011 Propounded by NRC to Lehigh Portland Cement.H1-H11 Will Be Sent Later 1979-03-02
[Table view] |
Text
,-
. c.. . .. - -
1
. ri -
'1
.p , ,
a l
JoMNT.o$omaPF Da GRAFF, For, CONWAY AND HOLT HARRIS ALosa c.weaaien wiwau r. cowwa, -
s**= s. we6t naaers. se - ATTORNzvS AND COUNSzLORS AT IAW camao6Ls usatsv-4 sown v. os amarr, sa. NINuTv STATz STRzer o,,, a,. .. us e .
reinas.6asc=
- d* AnnANY, New Yonx leeo7 " ', * * ",,']" "J",*,"'"
,, "",*, ' "'g "'*,'
Tatspuown (ste) 4ee 5001 aossaw n.issM4N
'"* "' "'* ",*;"d",*
, *'" wie wact t. wattr uot a
. atoino r. wwits.sa.
. micua 6 o. nacaum va atwet J. otviwt (
micuac6 r. catv Tuomas s. west oaosur w. eav 0eos sen>
ggBln 1(BQ T N lg i October 27, 1578 h
- Ifd s.% -
%1 4_.
\\- s\
bs
~
.c3 t- V g Vicki Harding, Esq. pk*p+
3"'
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission A Washington, D. C. 20555 My Attention: Greene County Nuclear Power Plant Section Re: NRC Docket No. 50-549
Dear Ms. Harding:
. Enclosed herewith are our responses to-Interrogatories M1 through M4, L1 through L11, and 01 through 011 propounded by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff to Lehigh Portland Cement Company. I have not' enclosed responses to Interrogatories H1 through H11 as I have not yet received those documents from Heidelberg,. Germany.
Very truly yours, DeGRAFF, F0Y, CONWAY & HOLT-HARRIS t
Algi d F. White, Jr.
AFW:kar-Enclosures
- . cc
- .All parties w/. enclosure 7 gj7 g g l .
i L
i-
- l. Y
t GREENE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
' APPLICATION TO THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A CERTIFICATE OF. ENVIRONMENTAL. COMPATIBILITY t
INTERROGATORY:NO. . M1 '
REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF L DATED:. September 2'2, 1978' INTERROGATORY:
What is Lehigh's approximate share of the Northeast cement market for each of the 1.sst three years?
RESPONSE: 1 I
Lehigh's approximate share of the Northeast cement market for aach
, of the last three years is 15%.
,f as %3 f/UeeCummings[
U e
'f l
{ ..
i i .
GREENE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
- APPLICATION TO THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A CERTIFICATE OF ENVIRONMENTA"L COMPATIBILITY INTERROGATORY NO. M2
' REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF DATED: September 22, 1978 INTERROGATORY:
What percentage of Lehigh's national cement sales does its Northeast sales comprise for each of the last three years?
RESPONSE
The percentage of Lehigh's national cement sales which are Northeast region sales is approximately 127.. ;
1
. e
....' 2/ AhmusnD ee Cdafiiings ~ /
v i
l 1
I i
f 4
l
GREENE C0'UNTY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT APPLICATION TO THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A CERTIFICATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY INTERROGATORY No. M3 REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF DATED: September 22, 1978 INTERROGATORY:
What percentage of Lehigh's national cement earnings does its Northeast earnings comprise for each of the past three years?
RESPONSE
Lehigh's Northeast region did not contribute significantly to Lehigh's national cement earnings in the past three years.
.lt' .c un w D
}ee)Cumdtags /
. 3. . ,
a 4
GREENE COUNTY NUCLIAL POWER PLANT. .
APPLICATION TO-THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING.AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A CERTIFICATE OF. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY I
INTERROGATORY NO..M4
. REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULAT011Y COMMISSION STAFF
~
i DATED: Sep t ember . 22, '.19 78 ~
i 1
-INTERROGATORY:
What relationship.does Lehigh's Northeast market performance have to Lehigh's overall market viability?--
RESPONSE
Lehigh's Northeast market performance has an important relationship to Lehigh's overall.. market viability-because it is Lehigh's goal to remain a national cement. pro'ducer having no less than 5 operating
~
cement plants located throughout the United States. l
/
' df Ab?w)w D
/ /
/ ) lee' Chrymings 3
0 s
L .
..m.-
o . . . . .- ,:
GREENE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT APPLICATION TO THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR' A CERTIFICATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY INTERROGATORY NO. L1 REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF DATED: September 22, 1978 INTERROGATORY:
Has the Lehigh board of directors given any consideration either in.
formal or informal proceedings to the loss of its facilities at Cementon as a result of the construction of the Greene County Nuclear Plant (GCNP) at the Cementon site? ,
RESPONSE
The Lehigh Board of Directors has given extensive consideration to the loss of its facilities at Cementon as a result of the construction of the Greene County Nuclear Plant at the Cementon site.
OD. $/YY
~
Edwa'rdW.plitnd'
., u. .~ .
)
i a
GREENE COUNTY. NUCLEAR POWER PLANT APPLICATION TO THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A CERTIFICATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY INTERROGATORY NO. L2 REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF DATED: September 22, 1978 INTERROGATORY:
In the event that the GCNP is built on Lehigh property at Cementon, has the Lehigh board of directors determined either formally or in-formally that its production facilities at Cementon must be closed !
permanently?
RESPONSE
The Lehigh Board of Directors has not formally determined that in the i event that the GCNP is built on Lehigh property at Cementon that its l production facilities at Cementon must be closed permanently. The ;
subject of the intrusion of the GCNP on operations of the. Lehigh !
-plant at Cementon has been extensively discussed and the Lehigh Board (
is convinc.ed that the disruptions caused by the construction of the GCNP-at Cementon will be such that they significantly impact the Lehigh production facility and will probably cause its premature closing, i Moreover, the construction of the GCNP on Lehigh property at Cementon l will deprive Lehigh of its site for a new low cost production facility which will'be necessary in the foreseeable future.
mu/DT $/$
Edward W. Hy htfd
~ ~ ~ ' ~
)
1 l
e, GREENE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER PLAhT APPLICATION TO THE NEW YORK STATE ~ BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A CERTIFICATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPAT1BILITY l l
INTERROGATORY No. L3 l
REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF DATED: September 22, 1978
' INTERROGATORY:
In the' event that the GCNP is built on the Lehigh property, and that such a development causes the closing of the facility, has the Lehigh !
board of directors given consideration either formally or informally j to what alternatives the company should take in response to this closing of its facilities?
I
RESPONSE
I The Lehigh Board of Directors has given extensive informal considera-tion to what alternatives the company should take if the GCNP is built on Lehigh property in Cementon.
1 m . 1 EdwardV.Hygsnd
_ .. . .. .;_.u r - _ . . _ - ,
g,:: , ..
I t
GREENE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ,
APPLICATION:TO THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD ON'. ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A CERTIFICATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY INTERROGATORY NO. L4 REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF ;
DATED: September 22, 1978 J
INTERROGATORY:
' In the event of such a loss of the Cementon facilities, has the
- Lehigh board of directors either formally or informally determined that it is not feasible to construct.an entirely new facility at a virgin or "greenfield" site? ,
RESPONSE
The Lehigh Board of. Directors has informally determined that it is not feasible to construct an entirely new facility at a virgin or "greenfield" site located within the Northeast region.
Sh{
Edward W. H g nd. "
L.: '
.--..x- - - .
L.;j-;n .',H N-
.;l .
GREENE COUNTY NUCLEAR PO~WER PLANT LAPPLICATION TO THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
.ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A CERTIFICATE 0F- ENVIRONMENTAL.. COMPATIBILITY INTERROGATORY No. L5 L
REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF DATED: September 22, 1978 INTERROGATORY:
'Has'the Lehigh board of directors initiated or caused to be initiated c.
in.any way a search for a virgin or "greenfield" site? If so, in what governmental jurisdiction is the site located?
RESPONSE
The Lehigh Board of Directors has not initiated ~or caused to be initiated a search for a virgin or "greenfield" site within the North- ,
Least region. . Lehigh is considering a greenfield" plant in another
. area .of the United States. The construction-of a new cement plant on this "greenfield" site is not dependent;upon any contingencies affecting Lehigh's Cementon facilities. - Lehigh has initiated the preparation'of an environmental impact study preparatory to the con-struction offa new cement production facility located on land owned p by :Lehigh immediately adjacent to the Hudson: River at Cementon. ,
19r1 & h A EdwardW.-Hylag q
l
.t> ,
$1
, 1 ' '
5< I- .
i...., j __ _____,_;;___________ _ _
_~ ~
- 3. ,
~.-
s---a......., ~..._v :
GREENE' COUNTY' NUCLEAR POWER PLANT-
. i APPLICATION.TO THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD ON ELECTRIC. GENERATION ~ SITING AND 'THE ENVIRONMENT-FOR A CERTIFICATE OF' ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY ;
INTERROGATORY NO. L6
- - m REQUESTED BY
- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF DATED: September 22, 1978 INTERROGATORY:
' In the event of a loss of-the Cementon facilities, has the Lehigh board of' directors.either formally or informally discussed _the <i feasibility of purchasing the existing (operating or non-operating) facilities of another cement manufa,cturer?
I
RESPONSE
The Lehigh Board. of Directors has not discussed the feasibility of a purchasing the existing' facilities of another cement manufacturer in the Northeast. s AMufD EdwardW.Hylg
'I 4
\
, , c 1 *( i a < , , , ,- w- -- - - - , - . .
,. a ._ ,
x .
9-a
'GREENE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT l
- APPLICATION-TO THE NEW ' YORK- STATE BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION, SITING AND THE. ENVIRONMENT l FOR A CERTIFICATE OF' ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY INTERROGATORY NO. L7 REQUESTED BY:' .
' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF DATED: Sept emb er' 22,-1978
' INTERROGATORY:
If such discussions have occurred, what candidates for such purchase have been identified, and where are they located?
RESPONSE
Not applicable. See answer to L6.
EdwardW.Hygnd f p t b * -
e
-M ;..
+ . g.L . p. , .
= -
G.
I~.. '4 b,
s
> , .f-
,u. _
GREENE COUNTY NUCLEAR ' POWER ' PLANT
- APPLICATION TO'THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD-.
ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A CERTIFICATE 0F ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY L8, i INTERROGATORY NO. ;
REQUESTED.BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION STAFF
> DATED:- September 22, 1978 l
INTERROGATORY:"
In the event of a loss'of.the Cementon facilities, has the Lehigh l board of directors' either . formally or informally _ discussed the
- feasibility of purchasing the adjoining. properties of the Alpha and/cr Marquette companies?' )
i
RESPONSE
The Lehigh Board of Directors has not discussed .the feasibility of purchasing. the adjoining properties of 'the Alpha and/or Marquette '
companies, ;
i lnmuY$/ . hY i Bildard. W'. Hyl[d ;
e 1
4 1
( l
- ,_,. _ . _ , . , , . , . , _ . 9.., ,.m.y .W,
k ,
B .. ; : -.
4-.-- .a g
- .z .-
..r
~ GREENE COUNTY. NUCLEAR POWER' PLANT
, ~ APPLICATION TO THE NEW YORK'. STATE BOARD - '
ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE. ENVIRONMENT
. FOR A CERTIFICATE OF. ENVIRONMENTAL ~. COMPATIBILITY INTERROGATORY NO. L9.
REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF -
DATED: September 22,1978 -
INTERROGATORY: '
In the event of such-discussions, has the Lehigh board initiated or caused to = be initiated any. analysis of the feasibility of. a purchase
. of either the- adjoining Alpha or Marquette properties? ,
RESPONSE
'Not applicable.
See answer to L8.
A.
Edward W. Hyland g l
'l I
- j. ~ ~'
~ ~
p -
0..- .,: ,
3 i
, a GREENE '. COUNTY- NUCLEAR ' POWER PLANT [
APPLICATION.TO<THE'NEW YORK. STATE BOARD
. ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A CERTIFICATE '0F ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY ,
INTERROGATORY NO. L10l t
REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF DATED: September 22, 1978 l 1
INTERROGATORY:
Has the Lehigh board of directors initiated. or caused to be initiated f eny direct or indirect, formal or informal contacts with Alpha-or t i
Marquette. officials regarding'a potential Lehigh purchase of either of' the companies adjoining properti.es? ..
5
RESPONSE
Not applicable. See answer to L8.
I b.
EdwardW.Hylag 4
,S.,
e
'4
,t 4
, t ' , + - - , . . - - . . , . . , . .,r.. .-r.- . , - 3 ,-
.- . ... . . . . + . . = . u_: .w .
?
{ .
J. ,
.1 GREENE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT -
APPLICATION' TO THE NEW ~ YORK STATE BOARD *
- ON : ELECTRIC GENERATION . SITING' .AND THE ENVIRONMENT
,FOR A CERTIFICATE OF ' ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY f
INTERROGATORY'NO. L11 lL REQUESTED BY: NUCLEAR REGULATORY' COMMISSION STAFF DATED: September 22,-1978 P 7
.-INTERROGATORY:
e In the event of'the above described loss of Lehigh's production facilities at Cementon, has the Lehigh board of directors formally.
i or ' informally' determined that a purchase of the adjoining properties of Alpha and/or Marquette is not fe'asible? On what basis was such c infeasibility established for each company's property?
RESPONSE
i The Lehigh Board of Directors made no determination with respect to the purchase of the adjoining properties of Alpha and/or Marquette.
i L sDAL/
EdwardW.Hylany .
5
.. b
,, . ,, , .v.. ,
- - . ~ ~.
GREENE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT APPLICATION TO THE'NEW YORK-STATE BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT -l FOR A CERTIFICATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY INTERROGATORY NO. 01 - 011 (Part IV)
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF l REQUESTED BY:
DATED: September 22, 1978 Interrogatories Part IV, 01 through 011, are too vague to answer.
- The term " working group" is not a definitive term used within the Lehigh organization with the exception of references to the Executive Group. Executive Group discussions _of the matters inquired into in Interrogatories 01 through 011 are , covered in responses to interroga-tories L1 through Lil.
A ird F." White, Jr //
6 k
c
\
(