ML20148H275
| ML20148H275 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/22/1988 |
| From: | Stone J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Goldwyn L PULLMAN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES, INC. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148H281 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900853 NUDOCS 8803290374 | |
| Download: ML20148H275 (2) | |
Text
s t
O o,, UNITED STATES
[ g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g ra WASHINGTO N, D. C. 205S5 8
g.....c March 22, 1988 Docket No. 99900853/87-01 1
l Pullman Construction Industries, Incorporated i ATTN: Mr. L. H. Goldwyn l President 1400 East 97th Place ,
Chicago, Illinois 60628 '
l l
Gentlemen: '
This letter addresses the inspection of your facility at Chicago, Illinois, led ,
by Mr. J. J. Petrosino of this office on December 7-11, 1987, and to the i discussions of the findings with Mr. M. A. Jarigese and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The inspection was conducted to evaluate the validity and basis of fire damper I closure tests that were conducted by Pullman Construction Industries, Incorporated (PCI) under simulated in-plant air flow conditions, and to review the implemen- 3 tation of'your QA program in certain areas. Areas examined during the NRC l inspection and cur ' findings are discussed in the enclosed report. This inspec- I tion consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, I interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector, i During this inspection, it was found that the implementation of your QA program 1 failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The NRC inspection team discovered that PCI's current method of detennining the suitability of a particular size fire damper for its application in a licensees' ventilation system is being perfonned without either procedures, reviews for technical adequacy, or QA verification and/or monitor) 1 of activities. It was determined that this and other problems associated witt 'e Appendix B requirements to 10 CFR Part 50 were caysed by PCI's failure to adequately establish its QA program in certain areas.
The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identi-fied in the enclosures to this letter.
Please provide us within 30 days, from the date of this letter, a written statement containing:
(1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items; (2) a description of steps that have been of will be taken to prevent recurrence; and ,
h 6 gf) 8803290374 880322 PDR if/ 6 )bN} G 99900853GA999 EMVPULLP-Poa g(3q I
h rj
l Pullman Construction Industries, I Incorporated !
(3) the dates your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be i completed. We will consider extending the response time if you can show 1 good cause for us to do so. j The response requested by this letter is not subject to the clearance procedures l of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction :
Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Coninission's regulations, a copy of this !
letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely
[. 4 1
James C. Stone, Acting Chief Vendor In.;pection Branch '
Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
l
- 1. Appendix A - Notice of Nonconformance
- 2. Appendix B - Inspection Report No. 99900853/87-01 l I
5 l
l i
l I
_ _ - . _