ML20148H075

Nonproprietary Rev 0 to WCAP-8587, Equipment Qualification Data Package,Atws Mitigating Sys Actuation Circuitry (AMSAC) in Std Seismic Cabinet

ML20148H075
Person / Time
Site:	Summer
Issue date:	02/29/1988
From:	Rygg D WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML19302D360	List: ML20148H055 ML20148H070 ML20148H075
References
EQDP-ESE-68A, WCAP-8587, WCAP-8587-R, WCAP-8587-R00, NUDOCS 8803290306
Download: ML20148H075 (17)

Text

. _ . . -- __ _ . _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 e

O EQDP-ESE-68A Rev. 0 2/88 O

EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DATA PACKAGE This document contains information, relative to the qualification of the equipment identified below in accordance with methodology of WCAP-8587 and WCAP-9714.

The Specification section (Part 1) defines the assumed i limits for the equipment qualification and constitute '

interface requirements to the user.

ATWS MITIGATING SYSTEM ACTUATION CIRCUITRY ,

(AMSAC) IN STANDARD SEISMIC CABINET O 1 l

l APPROVED: 8 D. E. Rygg, Wandgdr RCS Engineering O l I

l O Westinghouse Electric Corporation P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh PA 15230 0

4124R/194R880301:50 8803290306 880324 PUR ADOCK 05000393 P DCD

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 s

WCAP-8587 Supp. 1-ESE-68A ,

Revision 0 ATWS MITIGATING SYSTEM ACTUATION CIRCUITY (AMSAC) IN STANDARD SEISMIC CABINET ENGINEERING R 4 y

~

(/

h. W. Berringer, Engineer

%)~W 00&L J. E. Drexler, Engineer Class 1E Systems Equipment Qualification and Testing Author Author N. =- A 2 $ s n m e.) 1 - '

R. H. Jab G Engineer 5. Channarasappa, Engineer' Class 1E Systems Equipment Qualification and Testing Reviewer Author bOf R. B. Miller, Engineer '

bl.

s .. J'. Hartmann, Engineer Instrumentation & Control Equipment Qualification Technology Systems Licensing '

Reviewer Reviewer YYhM&

Approved:fe. G. Morris, Manager Approved: W. V. Cesarski, Manager Class 1E Syst us Equipment Qualification and Testing O

O O

\

4124R/194R880229 50 i

); - -- _ . . _ . - _ - - - - _ -

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 PART 1 - SPECIFICATIONS O

1.0 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS 1.1 Electrical Requirements

\ 1.1.1 Voltage: 118 VAC 110% Single Phase

1.1.2 Frequency

60 Hz 1 5%

1.1.3 Load: Steady state - 10 amp AC 1.1.4 Electromagnetic Interference: N/A l l

1.2 Installation Requirements:

Westinghouse outline and installation Drawing 1854E64 Rev. 4.

O 1.3 Auxiliary Devices: tlone 1.4 Preventative Maintenance Schedule:

No preventive maintenance is required to support the equipment qualification.

This does not preclude development of a preventive maintenance program designed to enhance equipment performance and identify unanticipated equipment degradation as long as this program dees not corrpromise the qualification status of the equipment.

1.5 Design Life: 40 years 1.6 Operating Cycles (expected number of cycles during design life, includingtest): Continuous duty.

O '

4124R/194R880301:50 1 i

, .,_n- - - - , - . - , - - - - . , - - - - - . - .- . . - , - . - . - - . - - - , - , - . - -

I T

E m

y 1.7 Perf ormas se Reque r er.ents f or .c . i on( b )-

ra O

y Cont ai runent DP.E CoMi t1ons(a) Post DBE Condationsta)

N Normal Abnormal Test Para eter Cor dt t t ons fondsttons Condittons t i. 8/h 8 LOCA Setsmic F t 8/518 LOCA Setsmic 1.7.1 T1me requirement Continuous 12 t-~ r ! -- N/A N/A N/A Event N/A N/A - * %t inuous dura t i orlt N/A N/A N/A As normal N/A N/A f 1.7.2 Perforsmance Note d As normal ' As reOrmal m M

reoutrement s

- Z (b) O 1.E . Envis < -. mental condi tions f or Same Funct ion r O

c Ln Note c N/A N/A N/A Ambtent N/A N/A Ambient M 1 4 g T empera t u" t- . *e ) 60 - 104 re o

r-1.8.2 Pressure .Asto) O O h/A N/A N/A O N/A N/A O h M

1.8.3 H imidity (% RH) 20 - 70 Note c N/A N/A N/A Arbi ent N/A N/A Ambient t.8 d Radt at t on ( R ) < 400 Nont N/A N/AI N/A None N/A N/A None t.8.5 Chemica1s None None N/A N/A N/A None N/A N/A Pene 1.8.6 Vit atton Note None N/A N/A N/A None N/A N/A None 1.8.7 Accel erat ion ( g ) None None N/A N/A See Fig. 2 N/A N/A Nc,r.e and Fig. 3 Notes: a. DBL is the Design Basts [ vent.

- i

b. Margin is not included in the parameter? of this section.

c. Figure t. envelope 3. For plants having r. Class 1E HVAC f or the area in whtCh the AMSAC Cabinet is located, tN abnormal extremes are the same as the norssal spectfted above.

d. Saf et y f unct ?on is to isolate the AMSAC process signal f ram the protection f unct ion and matntain structri a) integrity.

S 9 9 9 9 9 e & e

, WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 I. : 's l 1.9 Qualifitd Life:

l

@ The currently demonstrated qualified life is 20 years based on material ,

analysis and seismic test conditions identified in Figures 2 and 3. >

1 L 1.10 Remarks: None p .

l P

i @

)

.i i

1 1

]

I-6 l

i e

i' l l

l@

l .

l l 4124fU1942880301:50 3

! .- . . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ - _ . . - . _ _ _ . . _ _ . . ~ _ _ _ . _ . . _ . - _ _ _ _ - _ . _ . . . _ _ . -_. _ ._ _._-_ _ _ . - - _ -

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 SECTION 2 - QUALIFICATION BY TEST O

2.0 TEST PLAN Isolation relay seismic tests were performed at the Wastinghouse seismic test facility at Large, Pennsylvania.

2.1 Equipment Description P

The ATWS System Actuation Circuitry (AMSAC) system is a microprocessor based system that senses a potential loss of normal feedwater or a loss of electrical load. This system is not safety-related. However, it provides output signals to safety-related systems. The output relays that isolate the nonsafety signals of the microprocessors from the safety related systems are the components that are safety-related.

AMSAC is installed in a floor mounted cabinet. This cabinet and the devices it contains must maintain structural integrity during a design basis seismic d event. The cabinet and some devices it contains are qualified on the basis of testing reported in References 1 and 2'.

The isolation relays and sockets that were seismically tested are shown below, l

RELAY PART NUMBER SOCKET PART NUMBER )

Latching 405A11H01 405A13H01 l Noniatching 405A10H01 405A12H01 I O- Reference 3 describes the results of the relay seismic testing.

2.2 Number Tested Three latching relays and three nonlatching relays and their mounting sockets were tested in this program.

1 O

l 4124R/194R880301:50 4 l

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3

,1 2.3 Mounting Reference 3 describes the mounting configuration for the relays testeo.

2.4 Connections Tha connections used for the relay test are described in Reference 3. Ol 2.5 Aging Thermal aging was acdressed by analysis and the relays were mechanically aged as described in Reference 3.

l 2.6 Service Conditions Simulated By the Tests l

The service conditions simulated by the relay test program were seismic l conditions. The required response spectra for the AMSAC cabinet with relays installed are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Figure 2 is the required response i spectrum for cabinet enntaining both unrestrained nonlatching and latching relays in the same cabinet. Figure 3 is the required response spectrum for a cabinet with unrestrained nonlatching relays only or restrained nonlatching I and latching relays in the same cabinet.

2.7 Measured Variables Electrical isolation between the coil and contacts of the relay was monitored. ,

The coil to contact leakage and contact bounce of the normally open and normally closed contacts of the relays were monitored. These were the only parameters of significance to this test.

2.8 Test Sequence Preferred This section identifies the preferred test sequence as specified in WCAP-8587.

2.8.1 Inspection of Test Item 2.8.2 Operation (Normal Condition) 4124R/194R880301:50 5

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 2.8.3 Operation (Performance Specifications Extreu.u, Section 1) 2.8.4 Simulated Aging O. 2.8.5 Seismic 2.8.6 Operation (Simulated High Energy Line Break Conditions) 2.8.7 Operation (Simulated Post HELB Conditions) 2.8.8 Inspection O

2.9 Test Sequence Actual This section identifies the actual test sequence which, constitutes the O qualification program for the AMSAC isolation relays. The actual test sequence for the Plant Safety Monitoring System (PSMS) devices is described in Reference 4. The actual sequence test for the cabinet is described in Reference 2.

The DBE is simulated by the Seismic Test sequence of Section 2.9.1. The HELB Tests (Section 2.8.6 and 2.8.7) have been excluded because the AMSAC system is not exposed to a harsh environment due to its location. The abnormal extremes were addressed by analysis. The aging of the isolation relays was addressed by analysis.

2.9.1 Seismic Test Sequence 2.8.1 2.8.2 2.8.5 2.8.8 2.9.2 Environmental Test Sequence Environmental test sequence for the relays was accomplished by analysis.

2.9.3 Aging Test Sequence Aging is addressed by analys'is as described in Subprogram C of Appendix B to WCAP-8587 and reported in Reference 3.

4124R/194R880301:50 6

WEST!NGHOUSE CLASS 3 2.10 Test Data 2.10.1 Objective O\ l I

The objective of the relay test program is to demonstrate, employing recommended practices of Reg. Guide 1.89 (IEEE 323-1974) and Reg. Guide 1.100 (IEEE344-1975), the capability of the AMSAC isolation relays to complete their safety function ac described in EQDP Section 1.7. The test objectives for PSMS devices are detailed in Reference 4. The test objectives for the cacinet are detailed in Reference 2.

2.10.2 Equipment Tested 2.10.2.1 Relay environmental qualification was by analysis as described in Reference 3.

2.10.2.2 Relay seismic tests reported in Reference 3.

2.10.2.3 PSMS seismic tests reported in Reference 1. Westinghouse Standard Seismic Cabinet test are reported in Reference 2.

2.10.3 Test Sumary 2.10.3.1 Relay Tests l

l Contact-to-coil leakage current, and voltage across the normally open and j normally closed contacts of the relays were monitored before, during, and after the seismic simulations.

I 2.10.3.2 Relay Seismic Tests i The single design basis event capable of producing an adverse environment at the equipment location is a seismic event. The seismic testing reported in i Reference 3 was completed on relays that had been mechanically aged. The 9

4124R/194R880301:50 7

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 4

relays were subjected to simulated triaxial multifrequency testing as suggested in IEEE 344-1975. This testing demonstrated that the relays do maintain isolation between the coil and contacts during a simulated design basis seismic event.

The relay normally closed contacts experienced bounce in excess of 2 milliseconds. The results of contact bounce do not pose a significant safety concern for their application within the AMSAC System.

2.10.3.3 PSMS Device Seismic Tests The results of the seismic testing performed on PSMS devices that are part of the AMSAC system are detailed in Reference 1.

2.10.3.4 Cabinet Seismic Tests The results of cabinet seismic testing are detailed in Reference 2.

f 2.11 Conclusions Based upon the results reported in References 1, 2, and 3, the AMSAC system mounted in the Standard Seismic Cabinet is qualified for operation in mild environments.

2.12 References

1. "Equipment Qualification Test Report, Plant Safety Monitoring System,"

WCAP-8687, Supplement 2 - E53A (Proprietary), Pittsburgh, PA.

2. WCAP-10763, "Design, Qualification, and Application of the Westinghouse Standardized Cabinet (WESCAB)" (Proprietary), Pittsburgh, PA.

O l

l 4124R/194R880301:50 8

MESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3

3. Berringer, B. W., S. Channarasappa, and J. E. Drexler, "ATWS Mitigating i System Actuation Circuitry, Standard Seismic Cabinet, Qualification Testing and Analysis", WCAP-8586 Supplement 2 - E68A, Rev. O, 1988.

h '

(Proprietary),Pittsburgh,PA.

d. WCAP-8587, "Equipment Qualification Data Packages, Plant Safety Monitoring System", Supplement 1, ESE-53, Rev. 2, 1987, Pittsburgh, PA.

O l

h 9

l O1 i O

O 4124R/194RS80301:50 9

WESTING!iOUSE CLASS 3 SECTION 3 - QUALIFICATION BY EXPERIENCE O

Westinghouse does not employ operating experience in support of the qualification program for AMSAC.

O O

O I

O O

O 4124R/194R880229.50 10

. em -

.4 i

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 l

\

l SECTION 4 - QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS O  ;

4.1 Environmental The environmental qualification was by analysis at Westinghouse NSID, -

Monroeville, PA.  !

The environmental qualification of the isolation relays is based upon an J

analysis of the Arrhenius properties of the non-metallic materials of the relays and mounting sockets.

The environmental conditions were addressed by analysis of the Arrhenius properties of the nonmetallic components of the isolation relays.

AMSAC is located where it will not experience adverse environments resulting from a high energy line break. The aging characteristics of the relays were evaluated by analysis of the nonmetallic materials in the relays. The results of the analysis are reported in Reference 3.

4.2 Seismic The cabinet which contains the AMSAC circuitry was qualified by similarity analysis. The analysis was performed using the criteria discussed in Referenes 3. The analysis demonstrated that the cabinet will maintain l structural integrity during a design basis event (Figure 3).

The structural integrity of the mounting of AMSAC devices not included in the Reference 1 testing was evaluated. The analysis was performed as discussed in Reference 3. The analysis demonstrated the strutural integrity of the device mounting when the AMSAC cabinet is subjected to a design basis event (Figure 3).

!o 4124R/194R880301:50 11 l

._...m.____. . _ . _ . . . . _ . . _ _ . _. _. _ . _ . . . . _ ._ . _ . . . . .

.; .' i

~

0 I TABLE 1

7 ACTUAL QUALIFICATION TEST CONDITIONS I

1 f

i T QUAL

E EQUIPMENT (1) LOCATION MANUFACTURER ABNORMAL / ACCIDENT ENVIROpet[NTAL EXTREMES OPERABILITY ACCURACV(%) QUAL QUAL QUAL PROGRAM

$ SYSTEM / CATEGORY STRUCTURE / AREA TYPF/MODEL PARAMETER SPECIFIED(2) QUALIFIED REQ DEM REQ . DEM tIFE METHOD REF STATUS S-- Temperature 120*F 12 hr. - -

20 Sets. ESE-68A Completed  !

AstSAC Isolation Control -WNSID

$ Relays / Cat. C building Pressure Atmos. yrs. Test  ;

Rel. humidity 88% and Env.

~

4 5

Radiation <10 R(l) Analysts I

Chemistry Nons  ;

1 O

2-rn l Notes: e-.

Z

1. For definttton of the category letters, refer to NUREG 0588

• Interim staff Position on Environmental Qualtftcation of O Safety-Related Electrical Equipment," Appendix E. Section 2. g C

i 4

M

2. Plant specific environmental parameters are to be inserted by the appitcant.

w 'n I IV F m

V>

l (.4 i

4 e

i I

1 i

l

-s ma- m- --, a ap ..w- > uv a a a a , , g WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 s

3 8

~

Ig!!

~

o o !_!!!il , / i 3

o h ne 9 0

g .l o i . . . . . .

(IN33W3d) AllClWOH 3 Ally 13W l

O 4124R/194R880301:50 13

l WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3

. a i

f 4 -

100, h huetas i

1 i

a 10. '

7 3'

I i 2 -

5 c..; -, ,

j g,, .

. =.

q t :* ,-

{-

-.; r_ w

,1 .. .

_, . .. m 1 1. Frequency (MR) 10. 100. j l

1 J

Figure 2: Safe Shutdown Earthquake Required Response

! Spectra for AMSAC Standard Seismic Cabinet with i Unrestrained Nonlatching and Latching Relays  !'

Principal Direction d

412 mis 4maso22e so 14

g 4-WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 i I

I h Damping j too. '

- --.~2 l s ----p  : w n --

i

._=EE=E s a s :: - = RTE E+F FE ee= _ - -

_ 2 5555 m g -

555: - - - . g 5

.r1

, i l ! l !il 10.

~

3 N " " "" "

5' " 'EE E E

_m

+", C; -- - 7 d, .c'i e -~

~'2Wa4  ;

i* __

+;=Ef T r:

, L.*

M ,

w_ , .--4.0

, i i 1

- j 7.' .-'g f l

i

/ l l lll rL,1,"lC

1. , _ _

+ +

~

~~~---

". _. . ; - k

=- L _T-^?

1._ + _ _ __ _ _ _ ..

g

.._=2.

_ =: y W.4 _

_ - -- ~- -

]

~

- - .T-*- .  :  ;~ j

-5D .

_p

,1 <

1

'  ?

- I +-

llii 1 i 1 1 1 i

.1 1. Frequency (Ms) 10, 100.

I Figure 3: Safe Shutdown Earthquake Required Response Spectra for i AMSAC Standard Seismic Cabinet with Only Unrestrained Noniatching Relays or with Nonlatching Relays and Latching l Relays Fitted with Hold-down Bar-Principal Direction 4124R/194R880229 50 15 1

__._. _ - - - --_ . -