ML20148F289

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Unusual Event:During ECCS Two Train Pump Flow Review, Accident Analysis Assumptions Not Supported by Data. Operation at or Below 11.6 Kw/Ft Will Maintain All Safety Margins.Westinghouse Investigating Problem
ML20148F289
Person / Time
Site: Yankee Rowe
Issue date: 12/11/1974
From: Heider L
YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
WYR-74-52, NUDOCS 8011040743
Download: ML20148F289 (3)


Text

m

,,,. , n . s , n YAN/WE MOMiG ELECLIC COMPANY h

WYT. 74-52 r__7__'*

20 Turnpske Road Wessborough, Mossochusetts 01581

%% /bbYe .s.

Deceinber 11, 1974 E,_- . U '"

. .,. .. .w.

Unitod States Ator.ic Ir. orgy Consnission ~

Directorate of P.egulatory Cperations .

Region I G31 Park Avenue k

King of' Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

  • 8 .

~

Attention. James P. o'neilly, Director THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS neference, ueense so. DPR-3 (Docket No. 50-29)

D*ar Sir: ~

[

In accordance with Section E.2.b, Appendix "A" Technical Speelfications of the Reference License the following Unusual Event is reported. k I

A review of ECCS two train pump flow indicated that the data did not support the assumptions used in the accident analysis. In fact, the flow ((

~

for two of the three trains as determined from s;hield tank cavity level change followst and the average flow as measured by the flow instrumentation is as . .

L..

cavity Level change Ins trurwnta tion I

[

Tratna 1 ard 2 2290 vpm 2100 gpm 1-Trains 2 and 3 2278 gpm i Trains 1 and 3 2220 gra -

2271 gpa 2320 gpn hse VCues are consistent with the initial design criteria .

energency core cooling system. However, for the

[

Westinghouce in the Eccs analysis was 2400 gpm.theThis two was trainanpump input flow used by error. }

The taxh allovable peak linear heat generation rate calculated for the Yankee Rove core using this erroneous value was 13.06 kv/ft.

When this error was veri.fied, the plant was administratively derated to 90 % o f f ull powe r (a resultant power level of $40 MVt) as a conservative (

wacure pending further investigation. This investigation by Yankee Atomic Eloctric Corpany has concluded that operation at er below 11.6 kv/f t will conservatively r.aintain all safety margins previously indicated in the Et"TS cnalyses.

In-core teeasurnments at the plant verity that the 11.6 kw/f t linear heat generation rate lini,t will not be exceeded by operation at 1004 plant output (600 MWt). Plant output was accordingly increased to icos on December 9,1974.

h Directorate of Licensing was inforr.ed of the i

$-N S o n oso 7(( 3

.) - '*

  • h k.

t;'

j .

United States Atonic Energy Cersnission Deceanber 11, 1974 Attns James P. O'Reilly, Director page Two probica and Yankee Atoetic Electric coespany inmediately began preparation of a cupplerent to our Proposed Change No.117 to account f'or the error.

A review of Core M' operating data confirms that the peak linear heat generation rate did not exceed 11.6 kw/f t durin7 that cycle. During the i period. between Septear.ber 9,1974, and Decociser 6, 1974, the conservative

  • I limit of 11.6 kw/f t was exceeded at some points. -It should be recognized E that until the results of a revised ECCS analysis are available, it cannot i be concluded that the operating conditions during that period were such l that the applicable ICCS criteria were, in fact, not met. , l We are currently discussing the problem with Westinghouse and desire to have a revised analysis perforr.ed as soon as possible. The resulta vill be submitted to the Directorate of Licensing as soon as they are -

availcble and we shall keep the Dire ctorate of Licensing inforned as to r.chedule . .

.Very truly yours, .

~

YAMKEE ATONIC ELECTRIC ANY -

L. H. Raider Asst. Vice President.

DVk9 .

e e

e 8

' ** EC DIST, UTIDN FOR ? ART 50 DOCKET .1kRI AL, (T E T.;F O R A R Y. F O R T.;) l CONTROL NO: 127h3 FILE: m  !

DATE OF COC D ATE R EC'D LTR T'.'lX RPT OTHER FRO?.1: Yankee Atomic Elec. Co.

Westborough, Mass. 01581 X  !

12 11-7h 19-18 7h u n,, y ,, .

CC OTHER SENT AEC PDR XX ORIG To. '

1 SENT LOCAL PDR E DRO PROPINFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO: .

CLAS$ U ! CLASS 1 50-29 XXX Ltr reporting an Unueual Event ENCLOSURES:

DESCRI?TiO:::

involving ECCS two train pump flow indicated in that the data did not support the assumptions ased in the accident analysis..... n- n ,

. v0' . : +.

PLANT N A?.'E: YAEC .

FOR ACT!O .'/It.'FO Rl.! AT!O[1_ DHL 12-19-7_4__,,

EUTLER (S) SCH'JENCER (S) ZIEMAlm (S) REGAN (E)

W/ Copics W/ Copics W/ Copies W/ Copies CLARK (S) STOLZ (S) DICIIR (E) LE AR (S)

W/ Copics V/ Copics W/ Copies W/ Copies PlaR (S) VASS ALLO (S) KNIGHTON (E) SPEIS (S)

W/ Copics / Copics W/ Copies W/ Copies /

K!IEL (S) URPLE (S) YOUNGBLOOD (E)

U/ Copics W/hCopics W/ Copics W/ Conies INTER.NAL DISTi !EUTIO J .

TECH REVIEU DEIRON LIC . AS ST . A/T IND hEGFIDD GRUZS DIGGS (S) BRAITMAN t//6C PDR 6ClG0EDER GAD 11LL GEARIN (S) SALTZMAN l'000, RocM P-506-A 6.ACCARRY '

l':U TiZI!,G/ST/.FF ddi10HT dKASTNER

  • GOULEOURNE (S) B. HURT dASE dA'JLICKI BALLARD KREUTZER (E)

SPAUGLER LEE (S) PLANS 6dINGUSSO t.GHA0 MAIGRET (S) MCDONALD BOYD ($TELLCM CHAPMAN 1:00iC (S) (E'42) ddOUSTON EINIRO REED (E) .

dNOVAK MULLER SERVICE (S) UBE eminus==K DEYO NG (S) (PWR)

SNOVliCLT (S) f$0SS DICKER dEPPlaD (S) s. COUPE IIPPOLI'10 KRIGHTON S2GER (E) d,D. TEOMPSON (2)

AdOLL3R (S)

YOUNGBLOOD Sh7TH (S) U RLECKER  !

P, COLLINS TEDESCO dLONG REGAN TEETO (S) $ T SE!! HUT DE!!ISE REG OPR LLAINAS PROJECT LDR WILLIAMS (E) gM f fILC & REGIC : 7) C(SEN!a0YA __

WILSON (S)

L'T.R. WILSON L' STEl.LE tlVOLDIR HARLESS INGRR4 (S)

E Xi E R .' il DIST R:CUTION 40_gd _

't t!1-107AL PDR (1)(2)(10)-MATIONAL L/.LS 1-FDR S/."/LA/NY L1-TIC ( AIERNATHY) 1-u, p;gnn;GTON, RM E-201' G.T. 1-ER00:'J'./.?EN I:/.T LlJ !

( t SSIC(EUCP.! :lJ;) 1-CO::EULTJ5TS 1-G. ULan:ECS, 0211 1-ASLB n;t;X/jtR/ ELD 2/A03AEIXi 1- AGlID(J'Jir GUE E:.&)

1-fr'.W:' J:TRSO:: lui S-127 G.T.

- ACRS 5 T. T; LI' ASST. 1-J , nU;;,2j,n g , p;. E 2 ^

Sheppard 12-19-74 c,7,

[