ML20148E135
| ML20148E135 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Black Fox |
| Issue date: | 10/30/1978 |
| From: | Edgar G GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7811060122 | |
| Download: ML20148E135 (2) | |
Text
.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Q
) g gl.fQ I
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4NN 0%
IN THE MATTER OF
)
)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF
)
Docket Nos.
OKLAHOMA, ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC
)
STN 50-556 COOPERATIVE, INC., and
)
STN 50-557 WESTERN FARMERS ELECTRIC
)
COOPERATIVE, INC.
)
)
(Black Fox Stations,
)
Units 1 and 2)
)
NOTICE OF SPECIAL APPEARANCE Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney herewith enters a special appearance in the above-captioned matter on behalf of the General Electric Company in connection with the General Electric Motion to Quash Intervenor's Subpoena Dated October 18, 1978.
In accordance with 10 CFR S 2.713(a), the following information is provided:
Name:
George L. Edgar Address:
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Suite 700 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Telephore Number:
(202) 872-5121 Eligibility:
Admitted to practice before the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 7 8 1 ',.', b D I }
l
i
(
-2 Name of Party Appearing Specially:
The General Electric Company Respectfully submitted,
// '-
/
G ge L.
dgar Special Counsel fo The General Electric Company 1800 M Street, N.W.
- Suite 700 Washington, D.
C.
20036 Dated:
October 30, 1978 i
n 9
NOV 9 1977
.g.
Considerable smoke evolved from the PE/PVC cables in tray llos.1 & 14, but no flaming occured on the unexposed side of the test specimen.
A small amount of water (I estimate less than one gallon) was on top (cold side) of the sealant material following the hose ateam test.
I estimate about two (2) inches of material was consumed during the test.
There wan some discussion following the test relative to the passage of water thru the test specimen. While I have seen no official conclusions from either UL or GE, my opinion is that the assembly satisfied the requirements form both 3-hr. expsure and hose stream 1
tests.
David P. Notley Auxiliary Systems Branch Division of Systems Safety l
1 j
i 1