ML20148C430
| ML20148C430 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/16/1988 |
| From: | Edgeworth P, Rodehau T NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM), SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. (FORMERLY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148C409 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-02-87-004, CON-NRC-2-87-4 NUDOCS 8803220383 | |
| Download: ML20148C430 (6) | |
Text
_
34 r
- I AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION / MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1
2 I
- 4. HEQUIS4 TION / PURCHASE REQ. NO.
- 5. PROJECT NO. (t/ opp (de,61ef 3.EFFt})TIVp OAT E NMS-87-004 dtd. 10/15/87 & ?2'/21/87
- 1. AMENOMENT/OOOaFICATION No.
- 3 f l,/ M
~
Fifteen (15)
- 7. ADMitelSTEREO DY (l/other than Jtem d)
CODE) 8
- 6. 65$UEO OY.
i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Contracts Washington, DC 20555 e.NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACTOR (No
.reet, county. State and Zip code).
g 5,A. AMENOMENT 7F SOLICtTATlON NO.
-Science. Application International Corporation j
Environmental Technology Group
- 90. DATED (ssssrsu sJi l
1710 Goodridge Drive, MS G-6-1 McLean, VA 22102 toA. MOOlFICATION OF CONT R ACT/ ORDER NO.
j x
NRC-02-87-004 i
CODE lFACIUTY CODE 1O/lO/R6 11.THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS is extenda$.
is not ex.
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
.nded.
Of firs must acknowledge receipt of this asmendment prior to the hour and date specified in the soUcitation or as amended, by one o copies of the amendment: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the of fe submitted: or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the soHeitation and amendment numbers. F A (a) By completing items 8 and 15.and returning MENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECElPT OF OFFERS PRIOR T IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted,such change ma lettTr,provided exh telepm or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment,and is received prior to th
- 12. ACCOUNTING AN D Al'8ROPRI ATION OAT A (1/ req uired)
B 6 R 50-19-03-0Z FIN D1080-8 Approp.
31X0200.508
$217,000.00 J
- 13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS / ORDERS, IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT / ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14 (Specify authorary) THE CHANGES 5ET FOR TH IN IT EM 14 ARC M ADE IN THE CON.
g A. THIS CHANGE ORDER 15 455UEO PURSUANT Tor T R ACT OR DER f40. IN IT EM 3 0A.
i
- 8. THE ABOVE NUMOERED CONTR ACT/ORoER IS MOOsFICO TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTR ATIVE CHANGES (such as chang appropriation dete. etc.) $ET FoRTH IN ITEM,14. PURSUANT TO T H.E AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.lo3(3),
)
C. T HIS SUPPLEMENT AL. AGREEMEN T 15 ENT ERED INTO Puf45U ANT TO AUT HORIT Y OF Paragraphs G.1 and G.10 of the contract, and mutual agreement of the parties.
x 8803220383 880316 D. O THe R <specity type of moa.c.t.oa.nd.uthonty) i PDR CONTR NRC-02-87-OO4 PDR 3
Copics to the issuing of fiCc.
b is required to sign this document and return E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not.
Ti'OESCRseisoN OF AuENOuCui/uoOsF eC AT <ON fortenised by vcr ecce.on heainsa, snetudsne sones'tatsonicanfract uusieet matter w This modification definitizes Task Order No. 012, "Safety Review of p'UTECH, Inc., Topical Report for a Dry Modular System Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation", and provides additional funding under the contract.
1.
Pursuant to paragraph G.10, Task Orders, the contractor is authorized to perform Task Order No. 012 in accordance with the November 13, 1987 proposal which is incorpvated herein by reference as revised during telephonic negotiations of February 19,.1988, and with the attached Statement of Work.
Escept as provided f erein. all terms and condit4oris of the document referenced la item 9 A o< IC A. As heretofore changed, tem 41ns unchanged an and ef fect.
it,A. NAM E AN D T I T LE,OF CON T R AC TING OF FICER (Type or pnn t) 15 A. N AME AND Te1LE OF StGNE R (Type or printf 84 Ocurer buom;Vc Paul J. Edgeworth bM d h
150. COf4 ila AC IoufOs r 09 O At E 5:GNt O 16 ts.
tO5 iLS ME R8CA 16C. OA Y L siGNI.D ISane e a: person euthurac4 to oesn o-.. -._.
h U'
h f
.. A OG N.
ngnet to I nt Of fscers
$f ANoARO FORM 30 tRt v.10 e 2 30 305
'NSN 7S40-01 IS 4070 55 ext. bed Dy GSA PREVIOUS COaf aON UNUSAEAE F AR tee CF R) 53.243
Q',
NRC-02-87-004 J'
Modific&ti'on No. 15 Paga 2'of 2I
~
'The following. changes were made telepign.ically to the cost proposal:
Proposed Revised Fringe Benefits *
$25,840.96
$25,517.79 G&A-19,513.00 16,307.00 Fee 19,767.00 17,084.00 Task Order No.'012 shall be in effect:for a period.from the effective date of this task order through September 30,1988.
'The. key personnel considered essential to the performance of this task order are:
~
Dr. F. - Wimpey, Mr. J. Stokley, Dr. T. Albert, Dr. D. Prelewicz, Mr. R. Sievers, Dr. D. Stahl, Mr. R. Belanger.
The Contractor agrees 'ha't such personnel' shall not.be removed.from the t
effort under the task order withdut compliance with Contract Clause H.1 Key Personnel.
.The total' cost ceiling of,this task is $211,223.00 of which $194,139.00 represents the total estimated cost and $17,084.00 represents the fixed fee.
Under Section G - Contract Administration Data, paragraph G.1, Contract Ceiling Amount, the second sentence is revised to read:
"The amount of funds.available for-performance under this contract is increased by
$217,000.00 f rora $719,800.00 to $936,800.00."
4 D
d l
4 L
l l
t l
t l-i L
... ~
,_._..._______.m.
.,__,.,,.,_,__,.._,__m,__
.m.
._.,,m_,.__..._.__._____.
- . t. :
(.
(
n.-
l TASK DESCRIP110N FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE REVIEW 0F NUTECH, INC.
DRY MODULE INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION TOPICAL REPORT B&R N0. 50-19-03-02.
FIN D1080
1.0 Background
NUTECH, Inc. is expected to submit for review in January 1988 a Topical Report (TR) for a dry concrete module and stainless steel canister system independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) design.
2.0 Work Required This task is to provide assistance to the NRC in the safety review of the ISFSI design TR submitted by NUTECH.
The scope of the review is principally based on 10 CFR Part 72. The review is a multidisciplinary activity culminating in written record that will clearly demonstrate the applicant's compliance with the requirements and criteria specified in 10 CFR Part 72.
The written material furnished by the Contractor should be suitable for inclusion in the NRC's Safety Evaluation Report.
3 2.1 Staffing The principal investigators represent the technical expertise provided by the Contractor and provide technical continuity during the entire review process.
~
They should have professional credentials in the technical areas assigned to them that will qualify them as expert witnesses for testifying at public hearings. They should have a clear understanding of the depth of review generally required by the NRC and specifically required by the tyre of activity proposed by the applicant for the disciplines they repre;ent.
In areas that can be best accomplished by less experienced persotinel, the principal investigators may act as overseers, providing contract 3r quality control to task activities.
The reviewers will be responsible for a timely technical review of discrete areas within the entire review effort.
Reviews can be performed by any qualified support staff member, but may be performed by a principal investigator or even by the project manager.
The reviewers wh.o perform the actual work shall provide detailed technical records of the methods useJ to evaluate all aspects of their areas of responsibility. Upon completion of an evaluation, the reviewer or responsible principal investigator will distill this record to suitable documentation for inclusion in NRC reports.
(
~- -
(.
2 2.2 Scope The requirements of 10 CFR Part 72 will dictate the overall scope of the review. All evaluations performed by the Contractor should be' based upon fulfilling specific requirements and criteria established in Subparts E and F of 10 CFR Part 72. Within Division '3 Regulatory Guides 'there are applicable methods acceptable to the NRC for implementing some 10 CFR Part 72 Requirements and criteria.
I.f adopted by the applicant these regulatory guides can be used to qualify discrete review areas.
Enclosed is a topical work breakdown structure for the safety-related review 4
For this task, the contractor is not responsible for the review of 4.3 Safeguards, 4.4 Quality Assurance, 4.5 Emergency Planning, and 5.0 Administration, but is responsible for all remaining areas shown on the work breakdown structure. The review of 1.0 Site will consist of assuring the range of site parameters developed and evaluated are appropriately identified.
The review of those portions of 3.1 Fuel Transfer that take place within the reactor facility will consist only of assuring general compatibility of the reactor facility equipment and operations with ISFSI requirements.
A transfer cask for onsite transfer of the spent fuel (in a stainless steel canister) along with a transfer vehicle are part of the NUTECH modular system. Therefore, the design of this cask and vehicle, which constitute components in the rodular system, are part of this review.
The scope 'of this task does not. include eny participation in a public hearing nor any additional review effort that could evolve from such participation.
~
2.3 Schedule The follr. wing schedule is based on estimates of time intervals to accomplish steps in the review process through the NRC documentation state. However, the overall senedule is dependent on the applicant's response to NRC requests for information and any outstanding concerns.
Task Start-up and Coordination Meetings 1 Week Complete Requests for Additional Infomation 6 weeks Complete Evaluation, Identifying OutstanJing Concerns 4 weeks Complete Final Evaluation 6 weeks Discrete areas within task activity should be treated on the individual reviewer level.
If e discrete area of review is satisfied by the initial submittal from the applicant, its final evaluation ana. documentation should be completed in the early stages of the review and should not wait for the review steps required for a more difficult area.
1
)
[.
[
3 3.0 Task Reports Two types of reports are required; reports on discrete areas of review and monthly reports identifying the overall progress of the task.
For each discrete review area, the Contractor shall provide details of the review method.
requests for information in a form suitable to transmit to the applicant, and
' documentation sumarizing the evaluation and findings suitable to include in NRC reports. The last of these shall be submitted in draft and final form.
Monthly reports shall be submitted in accordance with the tenns and conditions' of the basic contract.'
4.0 Travel It is expected that there will be monthly coordination meetings between the Contractor and NRC staff throughout the duration of the task. This should be readily accomodated because of the proximity of the Contractor's offices and NRC offices in Silver Spring, and Rockville, Maryland, if during the review process an area of review requires technical d'iscussions between the Contractor and the applicant, the Contractor may be requested to attend meetings with the applicant.
It is anticipated this could involve three meetings at NRC's offices in Silver Spring, Maryland. Additionally, the applicant may seek a meeting prior to submittal for guidance Contractor staff may be requested to attend such a meeting to provide support and to familiarize themselves with the applicant's. proposed design submittal.
5.0 NRC Furnished Materials-The NRC will furnish the Contractor copies of documents docketed under Project No. M-49..
6.0 Completion Date The completion date for this technical assistance task is September 30, 1988.
If required, a separate task order will be initiated to utilize selected reviewers from this task in public hearings associated with this licensing action.
7.0 Technical Direction John. P. Roberts is designated the NMSS Project Manager. Technical instructions may be issued from time to time during the duration of this task. Technical instructions shall not constitute new assignments of work or changes of such nature as to justify an adjustment in cost or period of performance.
Enclosures:
1.
Work Breakdown Structure
'(
.i 85..a i;.ww!,
Ste m;tzrv for :,afety betre es 15f18 15 51 1 0 $lte 2 0 5torage Unit
-3 Systems 4.0 Operations 1 Procedures
- 5!0Adelaistratten L-1.1 Ceology
-2.1 Criterla
- 3.1 fuel Trans fer
~4.1 Technical Specifications - 5.1 Organfrational Structu*e.
- 1.1.1 Seismology 2.1.1 Leading Comb!n.
3.1.1 Tuct Preparation 4.1.1 Systems Conditions
-5.2 Staf flag 15fil-Ct 2.1.2 Useful Life Cha rac terita t ion Moreal 5.2.1 Researce Requirements-Response Spectra 2.1.3 teak Rate
.!denti fica tion Off.ttormal 5.2.2 Ovalificattor.s Soll $tantlity 2.1.4 Interfaces Operating tilstory Upset 5.2.3 1 raining 1.'.2 foundation Eng's 2.1.5 fuel Degradation Physical Integrity 4.1.2 Correction Actions 5.2.4 Certification
- 1.2 Hyerology
-2.2 Olsensions Canning (Optional)
~ 4.2 Radiological Protection
-5.3 Decommissioning Plan 1.2.1 Surface 2.2.1 Irternal 3.1.2 Cask Freparation 4.2.1 ALAAA Floods
._ 2.2.2 Enternal Inspection Basic Considerations.
Crainage
- 2.3 Material Test 8 Verification Source Terms. Shielding 1.2.2 Subsurface 2.3.1 Properties Cleaning Olstance 5011 Charact.
2.3.2 Cualification 3.1.3 Handling
[sposure flee Agulfers
- 2.4 Thereal fuel Dose Assesseent
~ 1.3 Heteorology 2.4.1 Environmental Acceptability Procedures. [quipment 1.3.1 teep. tatremes 2.4.2 Fire Moverent 4.2.2 Criticality Ambient Temp.
2.4.3 Internal Heat Cast Assumptions Insolation 2.4.4 Heat Transfer loading Analysis
,q 1.3.2 tatreme Vlads
- 2.5 Mechanical loads Closure Monitoring 1.3.3 Prectpitation 2.5.1 [nvironmental Decontamination 4.2.3 Accident Analysis 1.3.4 Atmos. Of ffusion flood Devatering & Charging Crtdible 1.3.5 Lightalag Wind 3.I'.4 On.s t te tiovement Postulated "3.3 Support
-1.4 Demography Li htning Reactor facility Operations
-4.3 $afeguards 3.3.1 dtllities l
1.4.1 Land 11:e Missiles Transporter 4.3.1 Accountability Electrical'8 Lightning Off.$lta 2.5.2 Itandling & Hovement Inspection 4.3.2 Physical Protection Alr. lister. Steae -
Ce.5ite 2.5.3 Internal structure
. Prepa ra tion 4.3.3 Records 3.3.2 Comavalcations 1.4.2 Population 2.5.4 Pressure Operations
-4.4 Quality Assurance Operational 2.5.5 Thermal replaceeens 4.4.1 flanufacturing Sa feguards
- 2.3 Chemical (tag storage / storage Array) 4.4.2 Construction
. ["'rf'#c7 2.6.1 Importtles Off loading 4.4.3 Operationg 3.3.3 Radlelegical 2.8.2 Onygen Control System Connection
. -4.5 [mergency Plannlag Decentaelnation 2.6.3 Naterials Compat.
3.1.5 Removal from Storage vaste Treatment
~ 2.7 Muclear Handllng 3.3.4 Malaten.nce 2.F.1 Criticality Unicading 3.3.5 Instrumentatten 2.2.2 Otract Radiation Inspection sensors
. Source Terra CecontaalAation Alares Recorders shleiding Tuel Preparation Dose
-3.2 Storage Array
.3.3.6 Monitoring Actuators 2.2.3 Particulates 3.2.1 Pfiysical Characteristics Barriers Layout i
Detection Testing Access Sampling Cose Oleensions Recording g
Capacity O
Controlled Area CounJarles
[P2 Boundarles Pr:stalty to other facilities Structural foundation fencing Buildings Roads Cguloment
- m..
. Ha nd! In.g Support 3.2.2 Radiological Charac.
.Otrect Radiation Source Terms Array Shleiding
$kysh ne Dosus
$ lt -.
89undarles 1
-