ML20148B421
| ML20148B421 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 03/02/1988 |
| From: | Kirsch D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148B418 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-88-06, 50-312-88-6, NUDOCS 8803210508 | |
| Download: ML20148B421 (1) | |
Text
,
i, 4
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
Docket No. 50-312 Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station License No. DPR-54 During an NRC inspection conducted January 25 through February 19, 1988, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is listed below:
A.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures or drawings and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
SMUD Materials Management Procedure MMP-0025, "Preservation, Storage,- and Maintenance of Items in Storage," paragraph 7.6.5, requires that items whose shelf life has expired shall be removed from their storage location and placed in a "hold" location.
Rancho Seco Management Information System report RSMM 0330, dated January 4, 1988, identified materials with expiration dates for the first quarter of 1988.
Contrary to the above, on February 4,1988, three safety-related RSMM 0330 gasket line items (9 pieces), with expired shelf lives, had not been tagged or placed in a hold location.
This is a Severity Level IV violation, (Supplement I), and is similar to Violation 87-06-05.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Sacramento Municipal Utility District is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Mr. A. D' Angelo, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and tne results achieved; (3) the corrective steps i
that have been taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full i
compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply 0 lot received within the j
time specified in this Notice, an order may be issu' <
> show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revok why such action as 4
may be proper should not be taken.
Consideration may oe given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION D'
Dennis
. Kirsch, Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects Dated at Walnut Creek, California this 2nd day of March 1988 8803210508 880302 PDR ADOCK 05000312 O
DCD q
q
'