ML20147H556
| ML20147H556 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 12/21/1978 |
| From: | Pilant J NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | Ippolito T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7812270328 | |
| Download: ML20147H556 (4) | |
Text
_
GENER AL OF F ICE Nebraska Public Power District
'" fcfh?ncTAW0!%^i
" ^ " " '
..e
-.--.=.n.-
- - - = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = = =
~ = =
December 21, 1978 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Operating Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Addit ional Information Quality Assurance Program Cooper Nuclear Station NRC Docket No. 50-298, DPR-46
Dear Mr. Ippolito:
This letter is in response to your letter to the District dated December 5, 1978 which requested additional information concerning the Quality Assurance Program for Cooper Nuclear Station. Our response to this request is con-tained in Enclosure I.
Should you have any comments, or require additional information, regarding the Quality Assurance Program, please do not hesitate to contact me.
In addition to one signed original, 39 copies of this information are also submitted.
Sincerely, W
$+
^:
1 Pilant Director of Licensing and Quality Assurance
/cmk Enclosure i
h+\\
78122703Ns t
Thomas A. Ippolito December 21, 1978 Page 2 STATE OF NEBRASKA )
) ss PLATTE COUNTY
)
Jay M. Pilant, being first duly sworn. deposes and says that he is an authorized representative of the Nebraska Public Power District, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Nebraska; that he is duly authorized to submit this information on behalf of Nebraska Public Power District; and that the statements in said application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
3M Q y VI. Pilant' Subscribed in my presence and sworn to before me this N/ 46 day of December, 1978.
Ak
/_
/NOTARYPUBLIC
_ M. /,
[h My Commission expires _.
SlHIAL HTAtt State el Nebraska MAR 8.YN R. H0HNDOfW:
4shamso,om,34,: o
Enclosure I Page 1 of 2 Response to Request for Additional Information Cooper Nuclear Station (FSAR Amendment 39) 6A.
Item 6 was apparently not clear.
The item was meant to question the change from " audits and inspections" to " management overviews," not to question the organizations involved.
Please clarify by either reverting to " audits and inspections" or provide a description of " management overviews."
Response
The phrase " audits and inspections" will be reinserted in place of
" management overviews" in Section 2.2.
14A.
It is the staff position that the TIP should be under the Appendix B quality assurance program because, among other things, proper operation of the TIP is required to assure that the CNS is operating within safety limits established by the Technical Specifications.
Otherwise the response to item 14 is acceptable. Please reinstate the TIP in Table 1 or provide further justification for not doing so for our assessment.
Response
The TIP will be rainstated in Table 1.
15A.
The response to item 15 is not clear.
Please indicate the proposed wording for both the top of page D-9-52 and the bottom of page D-9-75 as questioned in the original item.
Response
(1) The words " Table 1" in Section 3.2.4 will be changed to read "Section 4.1.3".
(2) The word " file" will be reinstated in the third paragraph of section 6.0.
This word was inadvertently removed during document revision.
18A.
The ultimate response to item 18 (that the language and commitments stated in approved Amendment 37 have been reinstated) is acceptable.
However, we disagree with the first paragraph of the response.
It is the staff position that the CNS QA Program does include the QC activities at CNS, based on the introduction to Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.
Please eliminate the first paragraph of the response or provide justification for not'doing so for our assessment.
~
Enclosure I Page 2 of 2
Response
NPPD concurs with the NRC "Staf f Position" that the CNS QA Program does include the QC activities of CNS, therefore, the first paragraph j
of our previous response should be considered deleted.
S I
I J
i
\\
l 4
1 1
a 1
J; i,
1 I
1 l
1 1
(
4 I
I 1
1 i
a i
i c
+-,
s~-w r s
m'*