ML20147H377
| ML20147H377 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 02/29/1988 |
| From: | Straus D SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20147E818 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8803080463 | |
| Download: ML20147H377 (3) | |
Text
__ -
i
- 6. n a UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE DIRECTOR, NUCLEAR REACTOF REGULATION In the Matter of
)
)
OHIO EDISON COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-440A
)
(Perry Nuclear Power Plant,
)
Unit 1)
)
REQUEST FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING COMMENTS With the consent of Ohio' Edison Company, and pursuant to 10 CFR S 2.711, American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc. ("AMP-Ohio"),
which moved for intervention and a 30-day extension of the comment period in this docket on January 29, 1988, 1/ hereby requests an additional 30-day extension (or until April 6, 1988) for the filing of comments on Ohio Edison's request for suspension of antitrust license conditions.
In our previous request for extension, we explained that AMP-Ohio and Ohio Edison were close to a comprehensive, long-term power supply and interconnection agreement which would significantly alter the relationship between Ohio Edison and many of AMP-Ohio's municipal electric system members (and thus the nature of AMP-Ohio's comments in this docket).
'While additional progress toward an agreement has been made, and a comprehensive 1/
Although the undersigned has not received a copy of an order, we understand that the January 29 motion was granted, extending the comment period until March 7, 1988.
8803000463 800 40 PDR ADOCK O ppp M
., - J
_y_
draft is being reviewed by AMP-Ohio's and Ohio' Edison's management, finalizing of the agreement for filing at the FERC now appears to be unlikely prior-to the end of the extended comment period.
Accordingly, AMP-Ohio respectfully requests an additional 30-day extension, or until April 6, 1988, for the.
filing of comments.. Counsel for Ohio Edison has authorized the
~
undersigned to state that Ohio Edison does not oppose the requested extension.-2/
Respectfully submitted, A
YR. St rhus Of Counsel:
Attorney for American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc.
John Bentir.a, Esq.
Bell & Bentine Spiegel & McDiarmid 33 South Grant Avenue 1350 New York Avenue, N.W.
Columbus Ohio 43215-3927 Washington, D.C.
20005 614-228-0704 202-879-4000 February 29, 1988 2] 'In a similar vein, AMP-Ohio has again granted its consent to a delay in an Ohio Edison tariff filing which would otherwise be due later this month.
- O' a
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Request For Further Extension of Time For Filing Comments have been served on the following by first-class mail, or by hand, this 29th day of February, 1988.
Debra B.
Bauser, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street, N.W.,
Third Floor Washington, D.C.
20037 Russell J. Spetrino, Esq.
Ohio Edison Company 76 South Main Street Akron, Ohio 44308 Janet Urban, Esq.
United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division, Room 9816 JCB 555 4th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20001 Reuben Goldberg, Esq.
Goldberg, Fieldman & Letham, P.C.
1100 Fifteenth Street, N.W.,
Sutra 200 Washington, D.C.
20036 June W. Wiener, Esq.
City Hall, Room 106 601 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Office of the General Counsel Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street, N.W.
10th Floor Washington, D.C.
20555 Mr. Nelson E. Summit City Manager 222 N. Main Street Clyde, Ohio 43410 Gregg D. Ottinger, Esq.
John P. Coyle, Esq.
Duncan, Allen and Mitchell 1575 Eye Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20005 A
W
{avYd'R. Striu&