ML20147G600

Requests Addl Info to Determine Fee Categories for License SNM-1227 & Appropriate Fees for Previous Licensing Actions. Info Requested as Soon as Possible in Order to Respond to Exxon 860711 Request for Review of License Fee Categories

ML20147G600
Person / Time
Site:	Framatome ANP Richland
Issue date:	02/17/1988
From:	Holloway C NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
To:	Rouse L NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20147E986	List: ML20147E981 ML20147G600 ML20147G606 ML20147G630
References
NUDOCS 8803080274
Download: ML20147G600 (2)

Text

0 9, \

p y

i j UNITED STATES l

g

/ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655 FU '  :

Docket No. 70-1257 1

\

MEMORANDUM FOR:

FROM:

Division of Industrial and Medical y, HMSS Nucl C. James Holloway Jr. , Chief License Fee Manage, ment Branch, ARM /DAF  !

SUBJECT:

CLASSIFICATION OF LICENSE SNM-1227

~

By letter that we r dated July 11, 1986, copy enclosed \

license.Also eview theislicense enclosed a copy offeeour Jul categories ass,igned to the subj William Crow requesting his review of 31, 1986 Exxon'y memorandum to Since we did not receive aorresponse e fee purposes. to our July Doug Weiss of this office contacted George Biddi

,1986 memorandum, 1987, to request a meeting to discuss the issu nger on February 27, 1 Mr. Biddinger indicated that a meeting was not es raised by Exxon.

plutonium was "clearly for storage only"necessary since the However, issued Septemberafter10, reviewing 1987, the license documents Therefore, we would ap we find that further clarifi, including the renewal tion on the following:preciate receiving from you or your staff informacat -

1 storage pending disposal?Does theonium license authorize the pos only for 2

authorization originally granted?If the response to 1. ab storage only" 3

If the authorized use for plutonium includes acti i i storage only, is it in unsealed fannvin constitute a critical quantity as defined in t escombination other than a would th t 4 5150 11?

Did the license ever authorize use of plutonium i combination that would constitute a ncritical 5150.11? unsealedquantit fonn in 5

y as defined 1.n If the response authorization? to 4. above is yes, what were th e dates of the 8803080274 880229 gDR ADOCK 0700 7

FEB : 7 1988 Leland C. Rouse, Chief 6. Do Items A., B., and C. fall within the definition of fee Category 1A or 1B of 5170.31, 10 CFR 170?

The information requested above is needed in order to detennine the fee categories for the current license and the appropriate fees for previous licensing actions.

We are anxious to resolve this matter as soon as possible in order to respond to Exxon's July 11, 1986 letter and to make any necessary adjustments in the fees that have been paid. Therefore, we would appreciate a response at your earliest convenience.

0 C ames 1 oway, Jr. , hief i ense Fee Management Branch ,

D vision of Accounting and Finance I Office of Administration and l Resources Management

Enclosures:

1. Exxon Nuclear Ltr dtd 7/11/86

2. Memo dtd 7/31/86 to Bill Crow

._ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ . __.- . ~ _ _ _ _