ML20147D128

Reports Receiving Following Documents from Counsel for Appl: Collision Study for Lng Tankers Dtd 670717,Risk Assessment of Lng Marine Opers for Raccoon Island,Nj, & Unconfined Vapor-Cloud Explosions

ML20147D128
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek, 05000355
Issue date:	10/05/1978
From:	Skrutski R NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:	Black R, Buchsbaum P, Conner T CONNER, MOORE & CORBER, NEW JERSEY, STATE OF, NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
References
NUDOCS 7810130244
Download: ML20147D128 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ ___-______

,8 '9 UNITED STATES f

p'.  ;'$

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

• j y ,j .

%***'** #' October 5, 1978 NRO PUBLic DOCMfENT ROOM Richard L. Black, Esquire @ 4 Office of the Executive Legal Director #

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ##(#c Y 9

hp' Washington, D. C. 20555 g 6 g j

\

l Peter A. Buchsbaum, Esquire g

g ,

I Department of Public Advocate J Division of Public Interest g s Advocacy m P. O. Box 141 520 East State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esquire Conner, Moore & Corber 1747 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, D. C. 20006 Re: Public Service. Electric and Gas Company and Atlantic City Electric Company  ;

(Hope Creek Generating Station, Units 1& 2) Docket Nos. 50-354 and 50-355

Dear Sirs:

The Appeal Board has received from counsel for the applicant and the staff copies of the following documents, which were

. requested by the Board at or after oral argument:

(1) Collision Study for LNG Tankers, dated July 17, 1967, prepared for the Marathon Oil Co. by [

V. U. Minorsky.

ti (2) Risk Assessment of LNG Marine Operations for Raccoon Island, New Jersey, prepared for the Federal Power Commission by Science Applica-tions, Inc. (both the draft and final reports). ..

l

-l 1

7Fs/0/ 302 W

. n

October 5, 1978 313 l' (3) Unconfined Vapor-Cloud Explosions, by Roger A.

Strehicw (Fourteenth Symposium on Combustion (1973)).

The Board understands ~that the parties have copies of these papers in their possession and are probably already fully familiar with them, most (if not all) having been referred to in testimony or used by counsel in proceedings below.

The Board is of the view that it would be desirabic to supplement the record with those documents in the interest of completeness. The parties are therefore asked to respond to the undersigned, by letter mailed by October 20, 1978, whether there is any objection to this being done. Those responses may'also include comments on the substance of those documents, or invite the Board's attention to any portions of the record which may bear upon them. (It is assumed that Mr. Caccia is being represented by Mr. Buchsbaum on this appeal) .

Sincerely yours,

'}- C'

\ 6 m[/e M.

l Romay Skrutski Secretary to the Appeal Board 1

,