ML20147C839

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report - Cycle 7
ML20147C839
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 12/28/1987
From: Sieber J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To: Russell W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NUDOCS 8803030174
Download: ML20147C839 (3)


Text

f* 0 A t

V g

'Af Duquesne UJ1t

1. _ 4, --

%m., c%g P O Ba s e 5%p.eg per t P A, *iC f 7 4)od December 28, 1987 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:

W.

T. Russell, Regional Administrator Regicn I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406

Reference:

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report - Cycle 7 Gcnticmon:

Enclosed are the Cycle 7 Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report and T

p vs.

Axial Height During associated

graph, Maximum (F providokel) q in accordance with technical Normal Operation.

This is specification 6.9.1.14.

A copy of this letter and attachments have been forwarded to the

Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.

S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission as stated in the above technical specification.

Very truly yours,

/

b-

/J.

D. Sieber pVicePresident, Nuclear Attachment cc:

Mr. J.

Beall, Sr. Resident Inspector Dr. T.

E. Murley, Director Office of NRR Mr.

P. Tam, Project Manager Document Control Desk 1

8803030174 071220 PDR ADOCK 05000334 P

pon i

L 4

BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 i

CYCLE 7

]

RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT f

I j

This Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance j

with paragraph 6.9.1.14 of the Beaver Valley Unit 1

Technical Specifications.

}

i The Fv limits for RATED THERMAL POWER within specific core planes x

for Cycle 7 shall be xy 1 1.71 for all core planes containing D-BANK f

1.

F RTP a

2.

For unrodded core planes:

1 Fxy 1 1.68 from 1.8 ft, elevation to 2.6 ft. elevation l

Fxy 1 1.62 from 2.6 ft. elevation to 4.6 ft. elevation Fxy 1 1.63 from 4.6 ft. elevation to 6.6 ft. elevation i

Fxy 1 1,68 from 6.6 ft, elevation to 10.2 ft, elevation These F

)

limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot xYa(c: tor j

channel Fg(:)

will be limited to the Technical Specification

[

values of:

t Fg(t) 1 (2.32) (K(2)) for P > 0.5 and, l

P i

h F (:) 1 (4.64) (K(:)) for P 1 0.5 9

assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to

{

result from the insertion and removal of control banks C and D during i

i operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon

)

and power distribution as described in the "Power Distribution 4

Control and Load Following Procedures," WCAP-8385, September, 1974.

I Therefore, these F

limits provide assurance that the initial I

conditions assumed x$ntheLOCAanalysesaremet, along with the ECCS

]

acceptance criteria of 10 CFR50.46.

l l

4 i

i t

i 8

\\

1

e t

9 5

e e

t 1

l I

24 h

l 4g. !

l A

00 4 4 A Ay,44 l

.A at g

O e

i l

A 00g&

&&g" g&h g g

A A

i 2

e

}

i

&l e

i 4

f i

'l

,1 t

16 1

2 l

4 L

e i

t i

i "o g ;,a Bast $ Fry k

i

~

1.68 from t.6 to 2.6 feet elevation 4

i t

3 l

5 t 62 from 26 to 4 6 feet elevotton

,__ g _

h i

I.63 from 4.4 to 6.6 feet elevotton a

1.60 from 6.6 to 10.2 feet elevetton i

I 9

I I

._.._.._.A j

i i

(

1 4

i i

i i

r l

i i

l t

l l

i i

j 00 2

e 6

8 9

12 CGE 4 04 (feet) l i

t 4.

I L

Te PREL) VS AXtAL CORE HEIGHT M AXIMUM (Fg DURING NORMAL OPERATION i

i l

j a

l J

1 J

i