ML20147B959
| ML20147B959 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07000033 |
| Issue date: | 11/11/1978 |
| From: | Devlin J, Ladun R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20147B930 | List: |
| References | |
| 70-0033-78-14, 70-33-78-14, NUDOCS 7812180101 | |
| Download: ML20147B959 (1) | |
Text
_.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O',
0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report No.
70-33/78-14 Docket No.
70-33 Safeguards Group:
1 UR License No. SNM-23 Priority 1
Category Licensee: Texas Instruments, Incorporated 34 Forest Street Attleboro, Massachusetts Texas Instruments HFIR Facility ame:
Inspection at:
Attleboro, Massachusetts Inspection conducted:0ctober 18-20, 1978 Inspectors:
/2,[
6/d d,/
// v JF
/
Richard H. Ladun, Physical Security date signed Inspector date signed I
date si ned Approved by:
[// A 4 'I
//
//
'/
[
ames W. Devlin, Chief, Security and date signed Investigation Section, Safeguards Branch i
Inspection Summary:
Inspection on October 18-20,1978 (Report No. 70-33/78-14)
Areas Inspected:
Unannounced routine physical security inspection of the imple-mentation of Approved Security Plan dated February 25, 1974 and Section 9.0 of Materials and Plant Protection Amendment MPP-1 revised and issued in its entirety on November 30, 1976 including:
Access Controls; Keys, Locks, Combinations; Detection Aids; Response Controls; Central Alarm and Communication System; Testing and Maintenance; SNM Protection; and Reports of Incidents.
Licensee action on previously identified items of noncompliance related to Security Organization (78-10-01); and Detection Aids (78-10-02); and licensee action on previously identified unresolved items related to Central Alarm and Communication Systems (78-10-03 and 78-06-03) and Access Controls (78-06-04).
The inspection was initiated during regular working hours and involved 16 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC. regional based inspector.
7812180101 Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
7 Inspection Surmiary 2
Results:
Of the eight areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance were identified in six areas; one apparent item of noncompliance was identified encompassing two areas:
(Infraction - failure to maintain proper key and lock control, Paragraph 4 and failure to protect the response duress code, Paragraph 6).
l i
O r