ML20147B936

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99900331/78-02 on 780626-30 & Assoc Notice of Deviation
ML20147B936
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/16/1978
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Brooks L
EXELCO DEVELOPMENTS, INC.
Shared Package
ML20147B887 List:
References
REF-QA-99900331 NUDOCS 7812180096
Download: ML20147B936 (2)


Text

UNITED STATES

, g Esgg#o w

3 g o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV

~)' 5-

  • Wp y

611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SulTE 1000 AR LINGTON, TEXAS 76011

,l , ** 16 AUG 1979 Docket No. 99900331/78-02 Excelco Developments, Inc.

ATTN: Mr. L. A. Brooks President Post Office Box 230 Silver Creek, New York 14136 Gentlemen:

l This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. W. M. McNeill '

of ~ this office on June 26-30,1978,' of your facility at Silver Creek,  !

New York, associated with the fabrication of spent fuel shipping casks l and to the discussions of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.  !

l This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA Program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a ,

' customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product,  !

component or service provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others. You should therefore not conclude that '

the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.

Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

Please provide us within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this report a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.

18121800 %

m

.~. s -

4 F

Excelco Developments, Inc. o 'In accordance with Section 2 790 of the Commission's " Rules of Practice "

- Part 2, Title .10,: Code of Federal Regulations, a-copy of-this letter with _ enclosure.and your-reply, together with the enclosed inspection -

report will be placed.in the Commission's Public Document ~ Room. If' this ' report contains any ;information' that 'you believe to be proprietary, it is'necessary that you make a written application within thirty (30)-

days: to this. office .to withhold such .information from public disclosure.

. Any such-application must include a full statement of the reasons'on the basis of:which it is claimed that the information is proprietary, and should be' prepared so that proprietary information: identified in' the application is contained in a separate part of the document. If we do not hear from.you in'.this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed'in the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection,.we will be-pleased to discuss.them'with you.

Sincerely, O

f . ,

,  : t,.

$v2LQ U. Potapovs, Chief.

Vendor Inspection Branch

~

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Deviation
2. Inspection Report No. 99900331/78-02

?

4 - , - . ~, y , , .- v... E