ML20147B838

Order.* Staff Response to Atty General of Massachusetts 880107 Motion for Directed Certification of Certain ASLB 871116 & 18 Rulings Re Offsite Emergency Planning Due on or Before 880125.Served on 880114

ML20147B838
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	01/13/1988
From:	Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
References
CON-#188-5345 OL, NUDOCS 8801190015
Download: ML20147B838 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ _

I ,

00LKETE0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 096C NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD 'M JAN 14 M1 :41 Administrative Judges: O RICE Le 3r dM e v OOCKETNU 4 SE0VICI.

Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman January 13, 1996H Thomas S. Moore Howard A. Wilber 3 SERVED JAN 1 4 1988 In the Matter of )

)

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY CF ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL. ) 50-444-OL

)

(Seabrook Station, Units 1 ) (Offsite Emergency Planning) and 2) )

)

ORDER On January 7, 1988, the Attorney General of Massachusetts filed a motion for directed certification of certain November 16 and 18, 1987 rulings of the Licensing Board in the offsite emergency planning phase of this operating license proceeding. The certificate of service that accompanied the motion reflects that counsel for the applicants in Boston (the same city in which the Attorney General is located) were served on January 7 through the use of an expedited delivery service. The same mode of service was not employed, however, in the capo of counsel for the NRC staff, who is located in the Washington, D.C.

metropolitan area. Instead, according to the certificate of service, a copy was sent to him, by ordinary first class mail, on January 8.

8801190015 880113 qf DR ADOCK050Dogg3 0

8 2

Thus, the responses of the applicants and the staff to the directed certification motion are currently due on January 19 and 28, 1988, respectively.1 In the interest of expediting our disposition of the motion, however, we are directing that the staff's response be filed on or before January 25, 1988.2 It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE APPEAL BOARD O_. b 5 b- _

C. J # n Shoemaker SecrMary to the Appeal Board I

See 10 CFR 2.710, 2.730 (c) .

I 2

See 10 CFR 2.711(a).

I L