ML20147B624
| ML20147B624 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 02/23/1988 |
| From: | Whittier G Maine Yankee |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| GDW-88-47, GL-88-02, GL-88-2, MN-88-20, NUDOCS 8803020140 | |
| Download: ML20147B624 (2) | |
Text
I
?;,e 9
t 3 e
MaineYankee REUAtp.t ELECTRCTY FOR MAiP E SINC 41972 EDtSON ORfVE AUGUSTA, MAINE 04330. (207) 623-3521 february 23, 1988 HN-88-20 G0H-88-47 United States Neclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Doecment Control Desk Hashington. 0 C.
20555
References:
(a) License No. OPR-36 (Docket No. 50-309)
(b) USNRC Letter to HYAPCo dated January 20,1988 (Generic Letter 88-02)
Subject:
Response to Generic Letter 88 Integrated Safety Assessment Program II Gentlemen:
Attached is our response to Reference (b) regarding your Integrated Safety Assessment Program. Maine Yankee has considered the possibility of participating in the Integrated Safety Assessment Program II and has decided that we are not interested at this time.
Please feel free to contact us if you should have any questions.
Very truly yours, MAINE YANKEE G. D. Whittier, Manager Nuclear Engineering and Licensing GDH/bjp Enclosure cc: Mr. Richard H. Nessman Mr. Hilliam T. Russell Mr. Pat Sears h
Mr. Cornelius F. Holden O'
kg l
8803020140 880223
\\
PDR ADOCK 05000309 P
ppg 9620L-LHO l
MaineYankee L
ATTACHMENT A Integrated Safety Assessment Program (ISAP) II Resconse Format to Generic Letter 88-02 Facility Name: Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station Utility: Maine Yankee Atomic Power Comoany Individual Contact Name: G. D. Whittier Phone Number: (207) 622-4868 An expression of interest will not be considered a commitment to participate on the part of the utility.
1.
Hould you be interested in participating in ISAP II? If so, in what time frame?
At this time, Maine Yankee is not interested in participating in ISAP II.
2.
Do you believe that an industry /NRC seminar consisting of a brief discussion by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial prior to making a decision?
We do not believe that a seminar would provide any further information to aid in the decisionmaking process.
3.
Would you be interested in a one-on-one meeting with the NRC to discuss your particular facility or facilities?
No.
4.
If you remain undecided regarding participation, what additional information do you need in order to make a decision?
Not applicable 5.
Do you have any potential concerns about participating in ISAP II?
Not Applicable 6.
Do you have any suggestions for program improvements or changes?
No, we do not.
9620L-LHO
....