ML20147B386

Responds to 781012 NRC Ltr & Forwards Mods to Tech Specs as Rev Append a to lic(R-23)renewal Appl of 770531.Tech Specs Rev to Incl ANSI N378-1974 & Reg Guide 2.2 Guidance

ML20147B386
Person / Time
Site:	Texas A&M University
Issue date:	12/11/1978
From:	John Miller TEXAS A&M UNIV., COLLEGE STATION, TX
To:	Reid R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7812150258
Download: ML20147B386 (30)

Text

, .

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843 (713) 845 2217 Office of Tile PRESIDENT December 11, 1978 Mr .- Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Operating Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory-Commission '

Washington, DC 20555

Dear Sir:

Per your request of October 12, 1978, we have carefully revised the Texas. A&M University AGN-20lM Reactor Technical Specifications. originally submitted on September 19, 1978 to incorporate the suggested changes. The modified technical specifications were thoroughly reviewed and approved by our Reactor Safety Board on November 6, 1978.

Please consider the attached amended technical speci-fications as the revised Appendix A to our license (R-23) renetial application dated May 31, 1977.

Si erely, h 4d .

Jarvis E. Miller P hsident l

Enclosures:

22 copies, Texas A&M University AGN-20lM l

Tech. Specs. dated November 14, 1978 j 1

l Subscribed to.and sworn to'before me this }l Q day.of 'hD M A , 1%78. 6 N"

J Notjary Public

%Y Brazos County 1

0 0%

7812150a*T 5 i

9 y40 l

f

4

., APPENDIX A LICENSE NO. R-23 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY AGN-201M REACTOR (SERI AL #106)

DOCKET No. 50-59 DATE: November 14,1978 AS MODIFIED TO INCLUDE ANSI N378-1974 AND REGULATORY GUIDE 2.2 GUIDANCE l

l

\

l l

I

-l

. \

l TABLE OF CONIENTS  !

PAGE

O 1.0 DEFINITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 [

2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS. . .. 4 2.1 Safety Limits . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . -4 2.2 . Limiting Safety System Settings . . . . . . . .. .. . 4 3.0 LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION. . . . . . . . . . . . 5:

3.1 Reactivity Limits . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 5 f

.3.2 Control and Safety Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 j 3.3 Limitation on Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 f 3.4 Radiation Monitoring, Control, and Shielding. . .. 10 1

4.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.

4.1 Reactivity Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2 Control' and Safety Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ~

4.3 Reactor Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 f 4.4 Radiation Monitoring and Control... . . . . . . . . 13 j 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 I 5.1 Reactor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.2 Fuel Storage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 5.3 Reactor Room, Reactor Control Room, Accelerator Room 15 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 6.1. Organization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 j 6.2 Staff Qualifications. .. . . . . . . . . -. . . . . 19 6.3 Training. . . . . .. .. . . .-. . . . . . . . . . 19 6.4 Reactor Safety Board. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 6.5 Approvals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 l l

6.6 Procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 i 6.7 Experiments .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 l i

6.8 Safety Limit Violation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4 I

6.9 Reporting Requirements. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 22  ;

6.10 Record Retention. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 l

1 l

l

)

1.0 DEFINITIONS  ;

The terms Safety Limit (SL), Limiting Safety System Setting (LSSS), l and Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCO) are as defined in 50.36 of 10 CFR part 50.

1.1 Reactor Shutdown - The reactor shall be considered shutdown whenever

a. either: 1. All safety and control rods are fully withdrawn from l the core, or

2. The core fuse melts resulting in separation of the core, and:

b. The reactor console key switch is in the "off" position and the key is removed from the console and under the control of a licensed operator.

1.2 Reactor Operation - Reactor operation is any condition wherein the reactor is not shutdown.

1.3 Measuring Channel - A measuring channel is the combination of sensor, lines, amplifiers, and output devices which are connected for the purpose of measuring or responding to the value of a process varie.ble.

1.4 Safety Channel - A safety channel is a measuring channel in the reactor safety system.

1.5 Reactor Safety System - The reactor safety system is that combination of safety channels and associated circuitry which forms an automatic pro-tective system for the reactor or provides information which requires manual protective action be initiated.

1.6 Reactor Component - A reactor component is any apparatus, device, or material that is a normal part of the reactor assembly.

1.7 Operable - Operable means a component or aystem is capable of performing its intended function in its normal manner.

1.8 Operating - Operating means a component or system is performing its intended function in its normal manner.

1.9 Channel Check - A channel check is a qualitative verification of acceptable performance by observation of channel behavior. This verification may include comparison of the channel with other independent channels or methods measuring the same variable.

1.10 Channel Test - A channel test is the introduction of a signal into the channel to verify that it is operable.

1

1.11' channel Calibration - A channel calibration is an adjustment of the channel such that its output responds, within acceptable range and accuracy, to known values of the parameter which the channel measures.

Calibration shall encompass the entire channel, including equipment, actuation, alarm, or trip.

1.12 Experiment - An experiment is any of the following:

a. An activity utilizing the reactor syscem or its components or the neutrons or radiation generated therein;

b. An evaluation or test of a reactor system operational, surveillance, or maintenance technique;

c. The material content of any of the foregoing,. including structural components, encapsulation or confining boundaries, and contained fluids or solids.

1.13 Secured Experiment - Any experiment, or component of an experiment is deemed to be secured, or in a secured position, if it is held in a stationary position relative to the reactor by mechanical means. The restraint shall exert sufficient force on the experiment to overcome the expected effects of hydraulic, pneumatic, bouyant, or other forces which are normal to the operating environment of the experiment or which might arise as a result of credible malfunctions.

1.14 Unsecured Experiment - Any experiment, or component of an experiment is deemed to be unsecured whenever it is not secured as defined in 1.13 above. Moving parts of experiments are deemed to be unsecured when they are in motion.

1.15 Movable Experiment - A movable experiment is one which may be inserted, removed, or manipulated'while the reactor is critical.

1.16 Removable Experiment - J removable experiment is any experiment, experimental facility, or component of an experiment, other than a perm- l anently attached appurtenance to the reactor system, which can reasonably l be anticipated to be moved one or more times during the life of the i reactor.

1.17 Experimental Facilities - Experimental facilities are those portions of the reactor assembly that are used for the introduction of experiments into or adjacent to the reactor core region or allow beams of radiation to exist from the reactor shielding. Experimental facilities shall in-clude the thermal column, glory hole, and access ports.

1.18 Potential Reactivity Worth - The potential reactivity worth of an experi-ment is the maximum absolute value of the reactivity change that would occur as a result of intended or anticipated changes or credible malfunc- I tions that alter experiment position or configuration.

2

~*

1 The evaluation must consider possible trajectories of the experiment

-in motion relative to the reactor, its: orientation along each trajectory, 'I and circumstances which can cause internal changes such as' creating 1 or. filling of void spaces or motion of mechanical components. For re-movable experiments, the potential reactivity worth' is equal to or '

greater than the static reactivity worth. q l

1.19 Static Reactivity Worth - The static reactivity worth. of an experiment l is the value of the reactivity change which is measurable' by calibrated control or regulating rod comparison methods between two defined termi-nal positions or configurations of the experiment. For removable ex-periments, the terminal positions are fully removed from the reactor and fully inserted or installed in the normal functioning or . intended l position.-

1.20' Explosive Material - Explosive material is any solid or liquid which is

~

~

categorized as a Severe, Dangerous, or Very Dangerous Explosion Hazard in " Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials" by N. I. Sax, Third Ed.

(1968), or is given an , Identification of Reactivity. (Stability) index of - '

2, 3, or 4 by the National Fire Protection Association in its publication 704-M,1966, " Identification System for Fire Hazards of Materials," also enumerated in the " Handbook for Laboratory Safety" 2nd Ed. (1971) published by The Chemical Rubber Co.

3

. - - - - - - - . ~ . - . ..- - . . , . - , ,.- . - -. - , _ . -- . - . . . , .-

4 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIWYTING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS V

2.1 Safety Limits y Applicability This specification applies to the maximum steady state power' level and maximum core temperature during steady state or transient opera-tion.

Objective To assure that the integrity of the fuel material is maintained and all fission products are retained in the core matrix.

Specification

a. The reactor power level shall not exceed 100 watts,

b. The maximum core temperature shall not exceed 2000C during either steady state or transient operation.

Bases The polyethylene core material does not melt below 2000C and is expected to maintain its integrity and retain essentially all of the fiscion products at temperatures below 2000C. The Hazarus Summary Report dated February 1962 submitted on Docket F-15 by Aerojet-General Nucleonics (AGN) calculated a steady state core average temperature rise of 0.44 C/ watt.

Therefore, a steady state power level of 100 watts would result in an average core temperature rise of 440C. The corresponding maximum core temperature would be below 2000C thus assuring integrity of the core and retention of fission products.

2.2 Limiting Safety System Settings Applicability This specification applies to the parts of the reactor sefety system which will limit maximum power and core temperature.

Objective l

l To assure that automatic protective action is initiated to prevent a safety limit from being exceeded.

Specification

a. The safety channels shall initiate a reactor scram at the following limiting safety system settings:

4

. _ _ . . . __ _ __ _ . - - ~_

. . .. - - . . - - - . ..- - ~

2 Channel' Condition LSSS. i Nuclear Safety-#2 High Power < 10 watts-Nuclear Safety.#3 HighiPower { 10 watts bi .Th e' core t hermal fuse shall melt when heated to a temperature of

~

f.

'1200C or less resulting.in core separation and a reactivity loss greater than 5% 6k.

Bases:

, Based on instrumentation response times and scram tests, the AGN Hazards

- Report concluded that reactor. periods in excess of 30-50 milli-seconds- ,

.would be adequately. arrested Enr the scram system. Since the. maximum avail- ~

+

able excess reactivity in the reactor is.less than one dollar the reactor '

cannot become prompt. critical and the corresponding shortest possible period is greater :than. 200 milli-seconds. The high-power LSSS of 10 watts in conjunction with' automatic safety-systems and/or' manual scram capabili-ties wi11' assure that the safety limits will not be exceeded during steady state or as a result of the most severe credible transient.

In the event of failure of the reactor to scram, the self-limiting charac-teristics.due to the high negative temperature coefficient, and the melt-ing of the thermal fuse at a temperature below 12000 will assure safe shutdown without exceeding a core temperature of 20000.

3.0 LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION 3.1 Reactivity Limits Applicability This specification applies to the reactivity condition of the reactor and the reactivity worths of control rods and experiments.

Objective To assure that the. reactor can be shut down-at all times and that the safety limits will not be exceeded.  !

Specification j

a. The available excess reactivity with all contro,1 and safety rods fully inserted and including the potential reactivity worth of all '

experiments - shall not exceed 0.65% A k/k' referenced to 20 0.0

b. The shutdown margin with the most reactive safety'or control rod j fully inserted shall be at least 1% 6 k/k.

c. The reactivity worth of the control and safety rods shall ensure sub- I criticality on the withdrawal of the coarse control rod or any one safety rod.

5 1

v- . e,.., 4-, ---.,w..E.+,,--r m.--e r eg, . , . ,,v,m _- - ,,r,+.,-A.%~.w.. .

%--r.~,,o...,.--.,. x,-.- . . + , . .

1 l

l l

Bases The limitations on total core excess reactivity assure reactor periods of sufficient length so that the reactor protection system and/or operator action will be' able to shut the reactor down without exceeding l any safety limits. The shutdown margin and control and safety rod  !

reactivity limitations assure that the reactor can be brought and maintained suberitical if the highest reactivity rod fails to scram and remains in its most reactive positions.

3.2 Control and Safety Systems Applicability Sese specifications apply to the reactor control and safety systems.

Objective To .specify lowest acceptable level of performance instrument set points, and the minimum number of operabic components for che reactor control and safety systens.

Specification

a. The total scram withdr'aval time of the safety rods and coarse control rod shall be less than 200 milliseconds.

b. The average reactivity addition rate for each control or safety rod shall not exceed 0.065% A k/k per second.

c. The safety rods and coarse control rod shall be interlocked such that:

1. Reactor startup cannot commence unless both safety rods and coarse control rod are fully withdrawn from the core.

2. Only one safety rod can be inserted at a time.

3. The coarse control rod cannot be inserted unless both safety rods are fully inserted.

d. Nuclear safety channel instrumentation shall be operable in accordance with Table 3.1 whenever the reactor control or safety rods are not in their fully withdrawn position.

e. The shield water level interlock shall be set to prevent reactor start-up and scram the reactor if the shield water level falls 10.5 inches below the- highest point on the reactor shield tank manhole opening.

f. The shield water temperature interlock shall be set to prevent reactor startup and scram the reactor if the shield water temperature falls below 1500.

6

I l1 l

J l

4 q

TABLE 3.1 1

l Safety Clutnnel Set Point Function Nucicar Safety #1 l Low count rate > 10 cps scram below 10 cps l Nuc1 car Safety #2 High power 1 10 watt scram at power >10 watt

-12 low power > 1.0 x 10

._ amps scram at. source levels

< 1.0 x 10-12 amps Reactor period > 5 sec scram at periods < 5 see Nuclear Safety #3 (Linear Power) liigh Power < 10 watt scram at power >10 watt low power > 5% full scale scram at source levels

< 5% of full scale Wunual scram -------------

scram at operator option g.- The seismic displacement' interlock shall be installed in such a manner to' prevent reactor startup and scram the -reactor during a seismic displacement.

h. A loss of electric power shall cause the reactor to scram.

Bases The specifications on scram withdrawal time in conjunction with the safety e system instrumentation and, set points. assure safe reactor shutdown during the'most severe foreseeable transients. Interlocks on control'and safety '

rods assure.an orderly approach to criticality and an adequate shutdown capability. The limitations on reactivity addition rates allow only relatively slow increases of reactivity so that ample time will be avail-able for manual or automatic scram during any operating ' conditions.

-The neutron detector channels (nuclear safety channels 1 through 3) assure that reactor power levels'are adequately monitored'during reactor startup andLoperation. . Requirements on minimum neutron levels will prevent. reactor  ;

startup unless channels are operable and responding, .and will cause a scram in the event of instrumentation failure. 'The power level-scrams initiate redundant automatic protective action at- power level scrams low enough to assure safe' shutdown without exceeding any safety limits. The period' scram conservatively limits the rate of rise of reactor power to' periods which are manually controllable and will automatically scram the reactor in the event of unexpected large reactivity additions.

The AGN-201's negative temperature coefficient of reactivity causes a reactivity increase with decreasing core temperature. The shield water temperature interlock will prevent reactor operation at temperatures below 15 C thereby limiting potential reactivity additions associated with temperature decreases.

Water in the shield tank is an important component of the reactor shield and operation without the . water may produce excessive radiation levels.

The shield tank water level interlock will prevent reactor operation with-out adequate water levels in the~ shield tank.

The reactor is designed to withstand 0.6g accelerations and 6 cm displace-ments. A seismic instrument causes a reactor scram whenever the instru-ment receives a horizontal acceleration that causes a horizontal displace-ment of 1/16' inch or greater. ~The seismic displacement interlock assures that the reactor will' be scrammed and brought to a suberitical configura-tion during any seismic disturbance that may cause damage to the. reactor or its components.

The manual scram allows the operator to manually shutdown the reactor if an unsafe or otherwise abnormal condition occurs that does not otherwise scram the reactor. A loss of electrical power de-energizes the safety and coarse control rod holding magnets causing a reactor-scram thus assuring-safe and immediate shutdown in case ~of.a power outage.

8

_ _ . - . . - - . _ . . , , , . . . _ . . _ ~ _.- _ _ _ _ _ - . - ._._._ _ -. _ _.. _ . . _ .--.-.._ . _ '

1 I

3.3 Limitations on Experiments

' Applicability This: specification appl es to experiments installed in the reactor and its experimental facilities.

Objective To prevent damage to the reactor or excessive release of radioactive materials in the event of an experimental failure.

Specification

a. Experiments containing materials corrosive to reactor components or which contain liquid or gaseous, fissionable materials shall <

be doubly encapsulated.

A

b. Explosive materials shall not be inse.rted into experimental f acilities of the reactor.

c. The radioactive material content, including fission products of any experiment shall be limited so that the complete release of all gaseous, particulate, or volatile components from the experiment will not result in doses in excess of 10% of the equivalent annual' doses stated in 10 CFR Part 20 for persons occupying (1) unrestricted areas continuously for two hours starting at time of release or (2) restricted areas during the length of time required to evacuate the restricted area.

d. The radioactive material content, including fission products of any doubly encapsulated experiment shall be limited so that the complete release of all gaseous, particulate, or volatile components of the experiment shall not result in exposures in excess of 0.5 rem'whole body or 1.5 rem thyroid to persons occupying an unrestricted area continuously for a period of two hours starting at the time of release or exposure in excess of 5 rem whole body or 30 Rem thyroid to persons occupying a restricted area during the length of time required to evacuate the restricted area.

Bases These specifications are intended to reduce the likelihood of damage to reactor components and/or radioactivity releases resulting from an experi-mental failure and to protect operating personnel and the public from excessive radiation doses in the event of an experimental failure.

i i

9 l

. . . ~ . , . . - - . - - ,, --_ n . - , . . ,, , , - - .. ~ , - , ,

a 3.4 RADIATION MONITORING. COffrROL. AND SHIEIDING Applicability This specification applies to radiation monitoring, control, and reactor shielding required during reactor operation.

Objective The objective is to protect f acility ' personnel and the public from radia-tion exposure.

Specification

a. An operable. portable radiation survey instrument capable of detecting-gamma radiation shall be immediately available to reactor operating

. personnel whenever the reactor is not shutdown,

b. The reactor room and accelerator room shall be considered restricted areas whenever the reactor is not- shutdown. ,

c. The accelerator room shall be considered a radiation area whenever the reactor is not shutdown.

d. The reactor room shall be considered a radiation area whenever the reactor is operated at a power level less than 0.9 watts.

e. Whenever the reactor is operated at a power level equal to or greater than 0.9 watts the reactor room shall be considered a high radiation area and the reactor room entrance shall be equipped with a control device which shall energize a conspicuous visible and audible alarm signal in such manner that the individual entering the reactor room and the reactor operator are made aware of the entry, or the reactor room entrance shall be maintained locked except during periods when access to the area is required, with positive control over each entry.

f. The following shielding requirements shall be fulfilled during

~

reactor operation:

1. The reactor shield tank shall.be filled with water to a h'ight e' within 10 inches of the highest point on the manhole opening.

2. The thermal column shall be filled with water or graphite except during a1 critical experiment (core loading) or during other ap-proved experiments requiring the thermal column to be empty.

Bases Radiation surveys performed under the supervision of a qualified health physicist have shown that the total gamma, thermal neutron, and fast neutron radiation dose rate in the reactor room, at the closest approach to the s reactor, is less than 100 mrem /hr at reactor power levels less than 1.0 10

. -, _ ..= _ . .

i l

watt, and that_the total gamma, thermal neutron, and~ fast neutron dose-rate in the accelerator room is less than 15 mrem /hr at reactor power levels less than or equal to 5.0 watts and the thermal column filled with water.

The! facility shielding in conjunction with radiation monitoring, control, and restricted areas is designed to limit radiahion doses to facility personnel and to:the public to a level below 10 CFR 20 limits under operat-ing conditions, . and to a level .below criterion 19, Appendix A,10 CFR 50 reconnendations' under accident conditions.

4.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Actions specified in this section are not required to be performed if during the specified surveillance period the reactor has not been brought critical or is maintained .in a shutdown condition extending beyond the specified surveillance period. However, the surveillance requirements- must be fulfilled prior to subsequent startup of the reactor.

4.1 Reactivity Limits

• Applicability This specification applies to the surveillance requirements for reactivity limits.

Objective To assure that reactivity limits for Specification 3.1 are not exceeded.

Specification l

a. Safety and control rod ' reactivity worths shall be measured annually, but at intervals not to exceed 16 months.

b. Total excess reactivity and shutdown margin shall be determined annually, but at intervals not to exceed 16 months.

c. The reactivity worth of an experiment shall be estimated or measured, as appropriate, before or during the first startup subsequent to the experiment's insertion.

Bases The control and safety rod reactivity worths are measured annually to assure that no degradation or unexpected changes have occurred which could adversely affect reactor shutdown margin or total excess reactivity. - The shutdown margin and total excess reactivity are determined to assure that the reactor l

can always be safely shutdown with one rod not' functioning and that the maximum possible reactivity insertion will not result in reactor periods shorter than those that can be adequately terminated by either operator or automatic action.

Based on experience with AGN reactors, significant changes in reactivity or rod worth are not expected within a 16-month period.

11 1

i 1

e - -,, + . r w er-- --

r.c . s - ----e.-rs.-- -

es - *-r.r, vn,+.~ . . w er .sv., one,w.,-c. -r -Sw,, c . r e, e e." .%-- 4w -sy ..---r-~w ,

1 1

4.2 control and Safety Systems;.

' Applicability

.This specification applies to the surveillance requirements of the reactor control and safety systems.

Ob _iective To assure that the reactor control.and safety systems are operable as

~

required by. Specification 3.2.

Specification a- Safety and control rod scram times and average reactivity insertion rates shall be measured annually, but at intervals not to exceed 16 months.  !

b. Safety and control rods and drives shall be inspected for deterioration at intervals not to exceed 2 years.

~

c. A channel test of the following safety channels shall be performed prior to the first reactor startup of the day or prior to each' reactor operation extending more than one day:

Nuclear Safety #1, #2, 'and #3

d. A channel test of the seismic displacement interlock shall be performed semiannually.

e. A channel check of the following safety channels shall be performed daily whenever the. reactor is in operation:

i Nuclear Safety #1, #2, and #3

f. Prior to each day's reactor operation or prior to each reactor operation extending more than one day, safety rod #1 shall be inserted and scrammed to verify operability of the manual scram system.

g. The period, count rate, and power level measuring channels shall be .

calibrated -and set points verified annually, but at intervals not to exceed 16 renths.

h. The shield water level interlock and shield water temperature. interlock shall be calibrated by perturbing the sensing element to the appropriate set point. These calibrations shall be performed annually, but at intervals not to exceed 16 months. i 12

,. , - .- , , , , - - .: , _ . . .:_ - .. - _ , - -..- - . -.. ., _ . _ ..-.~ .-

7 Bases The channel t'ests and_ checks required dail) or'before each'startup will-assure that the safety channels and scram f tetions are operable. _ Based-on operating 1 experience with- reactors of this type,. the annual scram measurements, channel ca..brc.lons, set point verifications, and' in-

.spections are of sufficient frequency to assure, with a high. degree of >

confidence, that the safety system settings will be within acceptable drif t tolerance for operation. -

4.3 Reactor Structure Applicability This specification applies to surveillance requirements for reactor components other than control and safety rods.

Objective The objective is to assure integrity of the ' reactor structures. (

Specification

a. The shield tank shall be visually inspected every two years. If apparent excessive corrosion or other damage is observed, corrective .

measures shall be taken prior to subsequent reactor operation.

b. Visual inspection- for water leakage from the shield tank shall be per-formed annually. Leakage shall be corrected prior to subsequent reactor operation.

Bases Based on experience with reactors of this type, the frequency of inspection and leak test requirements of the shield tank will assure' capability for radiation protection during reactor operation.

4.4 Radiation Monitoring ani Control Applicability This specification applies to the surveillance requirements of.the radiation monitoring and control systems.

Objective To assure that the radiation monitoring and control systems are operable and that all radiation and high radiation areas within the reactor facility are identified and ' controlled as required by Specification 3.4.

13

- . - *we,< ,w-6. . , - - -yw s , e-, c -w er --w,w*=e- -r er-* y y ea*a -

1. +---*rt 9 'e v w +rW- r e -+e-r"= 'a - ir +vw-ewyw " #=---r w -v<-

s l

l

.l l

l S pecification 1

a. All portabic radiation survey instruments assigned to the reactor facility shall be calibrated under the supervision of the Radiological l Safety of fice annually, but at intervals not to exceed 16 months.

l

b. Prior to each day's reactor operation or prior to each reactor opera-tion extending more than one day, the reactor room high_ radiation area alarm (Ref 3.4e) shall be verified to be operable.

c. A radiation survey of the reactor room, reactor control room, and accelerator room shall be performed under the supervision of the Radiological Safety Office annually, but at intervals not to exceed 16 months, to determine the location of radiation and high radiation areas corresponding to reactor operating power levels.

Bases The periodic calibration of radiation monitoring equipment and the surveil-lance of the reactor room high radiation area alarm (Ref. 3.4e) will assure that the radiation monitoring and control systems are operable during reactor operation.

The periodic radiation surveys will verify the location of radiation and high radiation areas and will assist reactor facility personnel in properly labeling and controlling each location in accordance with 10 CFR 20.

5.0 DESIGN FEATURES 5.1 Reactor

a. The reactor core, including control and safety rods, contains approxi-mately 660 grams of U-235 in the form of 20% enriched UO 2 dispersed in approximately 11 kilograms of polyethylene. The lower section of the core is supported by an aluminum rod hanging from a fuse link.

The fuse melts at a fuse temperature of about 12000 causing the lower core section to fall away from the upper section reducing reactivity by at least 5% o k/k. Sufficient clearance between core and reflector is provided to insure free fall of the bottom half of the core during the most severe transient.

b. The core is surrounded by a 20 cm thick high- density (1.75 gm/cm3)-

graphite reflector followed by a 10 cm thick lead gamma shield. The core and part of the graphite reflector are sealed in a fluid-tight aluminum core tank designed to contain any fission gases that might leak from the core.

c. The core, reflector, and lead shielding are enclosed in and supported by a fluid-tight steel reactor tank. An upper or " thermal column tank" may serve as a shield tank when filled with water or a thermal column when filled with graphite.

14

1

d. The 6 foot' diameter,L fluid-tight- shield tank is filled with water constituting a 55 cm thick fast neutron shield. The fast neutron

shield.is formed by filling the tank with approximately 1000: gallons of water. The complete. reactor shield'shall limit doses to personnel" in unrestricted areas to levels less than' permitted by 10 CFR 20 under operating conditions.

e. Two safety rods and one control rod (identical in-size)Leontain less than 15 grams of U-235 each in the same form as the core material.

These rods are lifted into the. core by electromagnets, driven by reversible DC motors through lead screw assemblies. Deenergizing the magnets causes a spring-driven, gravity-assisted scram.. The fourth rod or fine control rod (approximately one-half the diameter of the other rods) is driven directly by a lead screw. This rod may contain' fueled or unfueled polyethylene.

5.2 Fuel Storage Fuel, including fueled experiments and fuel devices not in the reactor, shall be stored in locked rooms in the nuclear engineering department laboratories. The storage array shall be such that K is no greater ff than 0.8 for all conditions of moderation and reflection.

5.3 Reactor Room. Reactor Control Room. Accelerator Room

a. The reactor room houses the reactor _ assembly and accessories required for its operation and maintenance.

b. The reactor control room houses the reactor control console.

c. The accelerator room is directly above the reactor room and a hole in the accelerator room floor provides access to the thermal column.

d. The reactor room, reactor control room, and accelerator room'are. .!

separate rooms in the Zachry Engineering Center, constructed with. '

adequate shielding and other' radiation protective features to limit doses in restricted and unrestricted areas ~ to levels no greater than i permitted by 10 CFR 20, under normal operating conditions, and to a level below criterion 19, Appendix A,10 CFR 50 recommendations under accident conditions.

e. The access doors to the reactor room, reactor control room, and accelerator room shall contain locks. ,

a 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS k 6.1. Organization The administrative organization for control of the reactor facility and its operation shall be as set forth in Figure 1 attached hereto. The '

authorities and responsibilities set forth below are designed to comply wit'n the intent and requirements for administrative controls of the reactor facility as set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

15

. l 1

i FIGURE-1 -l

.1 Administrative Organization of the Texas ASM University MN-201M '

Reactor Facility NRC License'R-23 '

l l

President Texas A6M University I

j Radiological Dean Reactor Safety Board College of Safety Boa'rd l Engineering i i l

I I

l I

l .-

1 i Head i L - -. - - - - - -

Department of ---------J Nuclear Engineering Reactor

!...._ Supervisor *'

Reactor Operators **

_ . . . . . . . _ _. 1

• Requires NRC Senior Operators License Requires NRC Operators License except where exempt per 10 CFR 55 paragraph 55.9 16

1

. I i

l

.6.1.1 President I

The President is the chief administrative officer responsible for the l University and in whose name the application for licensing is made.

6.1.2 Dean, College of Engineering The Dean of Engineering is the administrative officer responsible for the operation of the College of Engineering.

6.1.3 Head. Department of Nuclear Engineering The Head of the Department of Nuclear Engineering is the administrative officer responsible for the operation of the Department of Nuclear Engineering, including the AGN-201M Feactor Facility. In this capacity he shall have final authority and ultimate responsibility for the operation, maintenance, and safety of the reactor facility within the limitations set forth in the facility license. He shall be responsible for appointing personnel to all positions reporting to him as described in Section 6.1 of the Technical Specifications. He shall seek the advice and approval of the Radiological Safety Board and/or the Reactor Safety Board in all matters concerning unresolved safety questions, new experi-ments and new procedures, and facility modifications which might affect safety. He shall be an ex officio member of the Reactor Safety Board.

6.1.4 Reactor Supervisor The Reactor Supervisor shall be responsible for the preparation, promulga-tion, and enforcement of administrative controls including all rules, regulations, instructions, and operating procedures to ensure that the reactor facility is operated in a safe, competent, and authorized manner at all times. He shall direct the activities of operators and technicians in the daily operation and maintenance of the reactor; schedule reactor operations and maintenance; be responsible for the preparation, authenti-cation, and storage of all prescribed logs and operating records; authorize all experiments, procedures, and changes thereto which have received the approval of the Reactor Safety Board and/or the Radiological Safety Com-mittee and the Head of the Department of Nuclear Engineering; and be re-sponsible for the preparation of experimental procedures involving use of the reactor.

i j 6.1.5 Reactor Operators l

Reactor Operators shall be responsible for the manipulation of the reactor controls, monitoring of instrumentation, operation of reactor related equipment, and maintenance of complete and current records during operation of the facility. Reactor Operators who are exempt from holding an NRC license per 10 CFR 55 paragraph 55.9 shall only operate the reactor under the direct and immediate supervision of a licensed Reactor Operator.

17

6.1.6 ' Reactor Safety Board The Reactor Safety Board shall be ' responsible for, but not limited to, ,

reviewing and approving safety standards ^ associated with the use of the reactor facility; reviewing and approving all proposed experiments and procedures and changes thereto; reviewing and approving all modifica-tions to the reactor facility which might' affect its safe operatiin; de-termining whether proposed experiments, procedures, or modifications '  ;

involve unreviewed safety questions, as defined in 10 CFR 50 paragraph 50.59 (c), and -are in accordance with these Technical Specifications; conducting periodic audits of procedures, reactor operations and main-tenance, equipment performance, and records; review all reportable occurrences and violations of _ these Technical Specifications,' evaluating che causes of such events and the corrective action taken and recommending measures to prevent reoccurrence; reporting all their findings and recom-mendations concerning the reactor facility to the Head of the Department of Nuclear Engineering.

6.1.7 Radiological Safety Board -

The Radiological Safety Board shall advise the University administration and the' Radiolog'ical Safety Officer on all matters concerning radiological safety at university facilities.

6.1.8 Radiological Safety Officer The Radiological Safety Officer shall review and approve all procedures and experiments involving radiological safety. He shall enforce all federal, state, and university rules, regulations, and procedures relating to radiological safety. He shall perform routine radiation surveys of -

the reactor facility and report'his findings to the Head of the Department J of Nuclear Engineering. He shall provide personnel dosimetry and keep records of personnel radiation exposure. He shall advise the Head of the '

Department of Nuclear Engineering on all matters concerning radiological safety at the reactor facility. The Radiological Safety Officer shall be ,

an ex officio member of-the Reactor. Safety Board. I 6.1.9 Operating Staff ~

a. The minimum' operating staff during any time in which the reactor is 4 not shutdown shall consist of: {

1. One licensed Reactor Operator in the reactor control room. I

2. One other person in the reactor room or reactor control room certified by the Reactor Supervisor as qualified to activate manual scram and initiate emergency proce'dures. '

3. One licensed Senior Reactor Operator readily available on call.

This_ requirement can be satisfied by having a licensed Senior' Reactor Operator perform the duties stated in paragraph 1 or 2 a-bove or by designating a licensed Senior Reactor Operator who can be readily contacted by telephone and who can arrive at the reactor facility within 30 minutes.

18 l

. _ - , , , . , . . . . , y ,_ . , , . . . , _ , m., . . _ , . - . , . . _ , . . - _ . _ . . . . . . . . _ . . - , ~ _ _ _ m _ m,

b. A licensed Senior Reactor Operator shall supervise all reactor maintenance or modification which could affect the reactivity of the reactor.

'6.2. Staff Qualifications The Head of the Department of Nuclear Engineering, the Reactor Supervisor, licensed Reactor Operators, and technicians performing reactor maintenance

- shall amet the minimum qualifications set forth in ANS 15.4, " Standards for Selection and Training of Personnel for Research Reactors". . Reactor Safety Board members shall have a minimum of five. (5) years experience in their profession or a baccalaureate degree and two (2) years of professional experience. Reactor Safety Board members will generally be University faculty members with considerable experience in their area of expertise.

The Radiological Safety Officer shall have a baccalaureate degree in bio-logical or physical science and have at least.two (2). years experience in health physics.

6.3 Training The Head of the Department of Nuclear Engin'eering shall be responsible for directing training as set forth in ANS 15.4, " Standards for Selection and Training.of Personnel for Research Reactors". All licensed reactor operators shall participate in requalification training as set forth in 10 CFR 55, 6.4 Reactor Safety Board 6.4.1 Meetings and Quorum The Reactor Safety Board shall meet as often as deemed necessary by the Reactor Safety Board Chairman but shall meet at.least once each calendar year. A quorum for the conduct of official business shall be the chairman, or his designated alternate, and two (2) other regular members. At'no time shall the operating organization comprise a voting majority of the members at any Reactor Safety Board meeting.

6.4.2 Reviews The Reactor Safety Board shall review:

a. Safety evaluations for changes to procedures, equipment or systems, and tests or experiments, conducted without Nuclear Regulatory Commis-sion approval under the provision of 10 CFR 50 paragraph 50.59 to verify that such actions do not constitute an unreviewed safety question.

b. Proposed changes to procedures, equipment or systems that change the original intent or use, and are non-conservative, or those that involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in 10 CFR 50 paragraph 50.59.

19

- - ~ ,. .,_ - _ . . _ . . . ._ __. . _ _ _ _ __ _ . . _ . . .. _ _ _ . -

c. Proposed tests or experiments which are significantly different from previous approved tests or experiments, or those that involve nn unreviewed safety question as defined in 10 CFR 50 paragraph 50.59.

d. Proposed changes in Technical Specifications or licenses. l

e. Violations of applicable statutes, codes, regulations, orders, Techni-cal Specifications, license requirements, or of internal procedures or instructions having nuclear safety significance.

f. Significant operating abnormalities or deviations from normal 'and expected performance of facility equipment that affect nuclear safety.

g. Reportable occurrences.

h. Audit reports.

6.4.3 Audits Audits of facility activid.es shall be performed at least quarterly under the cognizance of the Reactor Safety Board but 'in no case by the personnel responsible.for the item audited. These audits shall examine the operat-ing records and encompass but shall not be limited to the following:

a. The conformance of the facility operation to the Technical Specifica-tions and applicable-license conditions, at least annually.

b. The Facility Emergency Plan and implementing procedures, at least every two years.

c. The Facility Security Plan and implementing procedures, at least every two years.

6.4.4 Authority The Reactor Safety Board shall report to the President and shall advise

, the Head of the Department of Nuclear Engineering on those areas of I responsibility outlined in section 6.1.6 of these Technical Specifications.

6.4.5 Minutes of the Reactor Safety Board l The Chairman of the Reactor Safety Board shall direct the preparation, maintenance, and distribution of minutes of its activities. These minutes shall include a summary of all meetings, actions taken, audits, and re-views.

20

6.5 Approvals The procedure for obtaining approval for any change, modification, or procedure .which requires approval of the Reactor Safety Board shall be as follows:

a. The Reactor Supervisor shall prepare the proposal for review and approval by the Head of the Department of Nuclear Engineering.

b. The Head of the Department of Nuclear Engineering shall submit the

. proposal to the Chairman of the Reactor Safety Board.

c. The Chairman of the Reactor Safety Board shall submit the proposal to the Reactor Safety Board members for review and comment.

d. The Reactor Safety Board can approve the proposal by majority vote.

6.6 Procedures There shall be written procedures that cover the following activities:

a. Startup, operation, and shutdown of the reactor,

b. Fuel movement and changes to the core and experiments that could affect reactivity.

c. Conduct of irradiations and experiments that could affect the operation or esfety of the reactor.

d. Preventive or corrective maintenance which could affect the safety of the. reactor.

e. Surveillance , testing, and calibration of instruments, components, and systems as specified in section 4.0 of these Technical Specifica-tions. i

f. Implementation of the Security Plan and Emergency Plan. l I

The above listed procedures shall be approved by the Head of the Depart-ment of Nuclear Engineering and the Reactor Safety Board. Temporary l procedures which do not change the intent of previously approved procedures l and which do not involve any unreviewed safety question may be employed on approval by the Reactor Supervisor.

6.7 Experiments

a. Prior to initiating any new reactor experiment an experimental procedure shall be prepared by the Reactor Supervisor and reviewed and approved by the Head of the Department- of Nuclear Engineering and the Reactor Safety Board

b. Approved experiments shall only be performed under the cognizance of the Head of the Department of Nuclear Engineering and the Reactor Supervisor.

21

. i 6.8 Safety Limit Violation

- The following actions shall be caken in the event' a. Safety Limit is L violated:

a. The reactor will be shutdown immediately and reactor operation will not be' resumed without. authorization by the Nuclear. Regulatory Commission (NRC)..

b. The Safety Limit violation shall be reported to the appropriate NRC Regional Office of Inspection and Enforcement, the Director of the-NRC, and the Reactor Safety Board not later than the next: work day,

c. A Safety Limit Violation Report shall be prepared for review by the Reactor Safety Board.. This report shall describe the applicable circumstances preceding the violation, the effects of the violation upon facility components, systems or structures, and corrective action to prevent recurrence.

d. The Safety Limit Violation Report shall be submitted to the NRC, and Reactor Safety Board within 14' days of the violation.

6.9 Reporting Requirements In addition to the applicable reporting requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following reports shall be submitted to the -

Director of the appropriate NRC Regional Office..

6.9.1 Routine Reports

a. Startup Report A summary report of plant startup and power escalation testing shall.

be submitted following (1) receipt of an operating license, (2) amend-ment to the license involving a planned increase in power level, (3) installation of fuel that' has a different design, and (4) modifications that may have significantly altered the nuclear, thermal, or hydraulic performance of the' plant. The report shall address each of the tests identified in the Hazards Summary Report (hereinafter Safety Analysis Report) and shall in general include a description of the measured j values of the operating conditions or characteristics obtained during the test program and a comparison of these values with design predic-tions and specifications. Any corrective actions that were required L to obtain satisfactory operation sha11' also be described. Any addi-tional specific details required in license conditions based on other

-commitments shall be included in this report.

Startup reports shall be submitted within (1) 90 days following comple-tion of the startup test program, (2) 90 days following resumption or commencement of power operation, (3) 9 months following initial critical-i ity,'whichever is earliest. If the Startup Report does not cover all

! three events (i.e. initial criticality, completion of startup test 22 l

l i

t' ,, . , . - - , . . - _ -. - - . - - - . -, - ~ ~ - - - - - -

program and resumption or commencement of power operation),

supplementary reports shall F bmitted at least every three months until all three events have been completed,

b. Annual Operating Report Routine annual operating reports shall be submitted no later than ninety (90) days following the end of the operating year.

The annual operating reports made by licensees shall provide a comprehensive summary of the operating experience baving safety significance that was gained during the year, even though some repetition of previously reported information may be involved.

References in the annual operating report to previously submitted reports shall be clear.

Each annual operating report shall include:

1. A brief narrative summary of (a) Changes in facility design, performance characteristics, and operating procedures related to reactor safety that occurred during the reporting period.

(b) Results of major surveillance tests and inspections.

2. A tabulation showing the hours the reactor was operated and the energy produced by the reactor in watt-hours.

3. List of the unscheduled shutdowns, including the reasons therefore and corrective action taken, if any.

4. Discussion of the major safety related corrective maintenance performed during the period, including the effects, if any, on the safe operation of the reactor, and the reasons for the corrective maintenance required.

5. A brief description of:

(a) Each change to the facility to the extent that it changes a description of the facility in the application for license and amendments thereto.

(b) Changes to the procedures as described in Facility Technical Specifications.

(c) Any new or untried experiments or tests performed during the reporting period.

23

6. A summary of the safety evaluation made for each change, test, or experiment not submitted for NRC approval pursuant to 10 CFR 50, paragraph 50.59 which clearly shows the reason leading to the conclusion that no unreviewed safety question existed and that no technical specification change was re-quired.

7. A summary of the nature and amount of radioactive effluents released or discharged to the environs beyond the effective control of the licensee as determined at or prior to the point of such release or discharge.

(a) Liquid Waste (summarized for each release)

(1) Total estimated quantity of radioactivity released (in curies) and Total volume (in liters) of effluent water (including diluent) released.

(b) Solid Waste (summarized for each release)

(1) Total amount of solid waste packaged (in cubic meters)

(2) Total activity in solid waste (in curies)

(3) The dates of shipments and disposition (if shipped off site).

8. A description of the results of any environmental radiological surveys performed outside the facility.

9. Radiation Exposure - A summary of radiation exposures greater than 100 mrem (50 mrem for persons under 18 years of age) received during the reporting period by facility personnel or visitors.

6.9.2 Reportable Occurrences l

Reportable occurrences, including causes probable consequences, corrective l actions and measures to prevent recurrence, shall be reported to the NRC. j Supplemental reports may be required to fully describe final resolution j of the occurrence. In case of corrected or supplemental reports, an l amended licensee event report shall be completed and reference shall be j made to the original report date.

I

a. Prompt Notification With Written Followup.

The types of events listed below shall be reported as expeditiously as possible by telephone and confirmed by telegraph, mailgram, or l facsimile transmission to the Director of the appropriate NRC Regional '

Office, or his designated representative no later than the first work day following the event, with a written followup report within two weeks.

Information provided shall contain narrative material to provide complete explanation of the circumstances surrounding the event.

24

1. Failure of the reactor protection system or other systems subject to limiting safety system settings to initiate the required protective function by the time a monitored parameter .

reached the setpoint specified as the limiting safety system setting in the technical specifications or failure to com-plete the required protective function.

2. Operation of the reactor or affected systems when any parameter or operation subject to a limiting condition is less conserva-tive than the limiting condition for operation established in-the technical specifications without taking permitted remedial action.

3. Abnormal degradation discovered in a fission product barrier.

4. Reactivity balance anomalies involving:

(a) Disagreement between expected and actual critical rod positions of approximately 0.3%4 k/k.

(b) Exceeding. excess reactivity limit.

(c) Shutdown margin less conservative than specified in technical specifications.

(d) If sub-critical, an unplanned reactivity insertion of more than approximately 0.5% A k/k or any unplanned criticality.

5. Failure or malfunction of one (or more) component (s) which prevents or could prevent, by itself, the fulfillment of the functional requirements of system (s) used to cope with acci-dents analyzed in the Safety Analysis Report.

6. Personnel error or procedural inadequacy which prevents, or could prevent, by itself, the fulfillment of the functional requirements of systems required to cope with accidents analyzed in Safety Analysis Report.

7. Unscheduled conditions arising from natural or man-made events that, as a direct result of the event require reactor shutdown, operation ci safety systems, or other protective measures re-quired by Technical Specifications.

8. Errors discovered in the transient or accident analyses or in the methods used for such analyses as described in the Safety Analysis Report or in the bases for the Technical Specifica-tions that have or could have permitted reactor operation in a manner less conservative than assumed in the analyses.

25 l

9

9. Performance of structures, systems, or components that requires remedial action or corrective measures to prevent operation in a manner less' conservative than assumed in the accident analysis in the Safety Analysis Report or technical specifications bases; or discovery during plant life of conditions not specifically considered in the Safety Analysis Report or Technical Specifications that require remedial action or corrective measures to prevent the existence or development of an unsafe condition.

6.9.3 Special Reports Special reports which may be required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall be submitted to the Director of the appropriate NRC Regional Office within the time period specified for each report.

6.10 Record Retention 6.10.1 Records to be Retained for a Period of at Least Five Years:

a. Operating logs or data which shall identify:

1. Completion of pre-startup checkout, startup, power changes, and shutdown of the reactor.

2. Installation or removal of fuci elements, control rods or experi-ments that could affect core reactivity.

3. Installation or removal of jumpers, special tags or notices, or other temporary changes to reactor safety circuitry.

4. Rod worth measurements and other reactivity measurements,

b. Principal maintenance operations.

c. Reportable occurrences,

d. Surveillance activities required by technical specifications,

e. Facility radiation and contamination surveys,

f. Experiments performed with the reactor.

This requirement may be satisfied by the normal operations log book plus,

1. Records of radioactive material transferred from the facility as required by license.

2. Records required by the Reactor Safety Board for the performance of new or special experiments.

g. Changes to operating procedures.

26

e.

s..

6.10.2 Records to be Retained for the Life of the: Facility:

a. -Records of. liquid and solid radioactive effluents released'to the environs.

,  : b. Appropriate off-site' environmental monitoring surveys..

c. Fuel inventories and fuel transfers. ,

- d. ' Radiation exposures ' for all' personnel.:

e. Updated as-built drawings of the. facility,

f. Records!of transient:or operational cycles for those components designed for-a limited number of transients or cycles.- <

g. _ Records of training and qualification for members of the facility staff.

h. Records of reviews performed for~ changes made to procedures or equipment.or reviews of tests and experiments pursuant to 10.CFR 50.59.

i. ' Records of me;cings of the Reactor Safety Board.

t 27 r

-- r + , -.-v.#, , , y ..v .- ,.4 ..,,# , ,. , y .- , - , . . ~ .e.,--...-- .m,.,,.w-e-,. ., .,~.m. , ,,vg-, 5--,e,.. + ..,--..<,-.% .,.m,- 4 541 p-,