ML20147B133

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Description of Util Efforts in Identifying FSAR Periodic Requirements
ML20147B133
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 02/27/1988
From: Gridley R
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
NUDOCS 8803010475
Download: ML20147B133 (3)


Text

.c TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 374ol SN 1578 Lookout Place FEB 271988 f

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk-Washington, D.C.

20555 Gentlemen:

In the Matter of

)

Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority

)

50-328 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN) - FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (FSAR) PERIODIC I

j REQUIREMENTS

Reference:

TVA letter to NRC dated January 20, 1988, "Design Baseline and Verification Program (DBVP)"

i During a recent visit to SQN, Gary Zech met with SQN Site Licensing to discuss I

the FSAR periodic requirements. TVA agreed to provide a letter explaining the efforts that have been completed and those that are ongoing to ensure that FSAR periodic requirements are being met. The enclosure describes TVA's 1

efforts in identifying the FSAR periodic requirements. This letter is provided as information only; no new comitments are being made.

4 If you have any questions, please telephone M. R. Harding at (615) 870-6422.

l l

t Very truly yours, I

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY O ne J' /g R. Cridley, Director Nuclear Licensing and i

Regulatory Affairs j

l Enclosure cc: See page 2 l

1 i

OY i

i 8803010475 880227

~

PDR ADOCK 05000327 P

DCD An Equal Opportunity Employer f

~

e-7 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission cc (Enclosure):

Mr. K. P. Barr, Acting Assistant Director for Inspection Programs TVA Projects Division Office of Special Projects U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. C. G. Zech, Assistant Director for Projects TVA Projects Division U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint, North t

I Rockville Maryland 20852 Sequoyah Resident Inspector

)

Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 2600 Igou Ferry Road 4

Soddy Daisy Tennessee 37379 P

L i

1 l

l 4

i

~

. - ~. _ - -

i 4

.r SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN)

I FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS RgPORT (FSAR)

PERIODIC REQUIREKgNTS

]

{

The unit 2 -Nuclear Performance Plan (NPP) outlined TVA's comunitment to enhance 4

the maintenance program to improve the preventive maintenance activities.

The reviews included technical specifications, references to vendor manuals, FSAR

]

requirements, and existing periodic maintenance activities (such as Preventive l

Naintenance Instructions, Surveillance Instructions (SI), etc.) versus the Critical Structures Systems and Components (CSSC) equipment list to identify potential omissions from the preventive maintenance program.

Equipment i

identified as not being in_the existing program is being added in accordance with the unit 2 NPP comunitments.

i t

The Restart Test Program was developed to ensure that system design functions were adequately proven through testing. These functions tested included safe shutdown, accident monitoring, and noriaal operation equipment.

The scope of

]

the program encompassed systems or subsystems defined under the Design Baseline and Verification Program with the addition of the flood-mode borabion I

and rod control systems. As stated in TVA's response to.NRC observation 6.16 I

(identified in the referenced letter). TVA will evaluate control loops identified by the Restart Test Program's Functional Text Natrix that were validated by other than sis to determine which control loops should be added l

to the periodic test program.

~

a Also, an enchancement program is being developed by the Plant Operations f

2 l

Review Staff (PORS) that will identify SQN site procedures described in the FSAR. This program will enhance the 10 CFR 50.59 process by identifying the procedures that require an unreviewed safety question determination (USQD).

)

l It will elso aid in reporting of 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations in that only j

revisions to those procedures described in the FSAR will have a USQD performed.

During this review, any plant procedure requiring revision will also be identified for correction. This program will consist of two parts:

1 l

1.

Identify the portions of the FSAR requiring a procedure.

2.

Identify the plant procedure and systems that at: relative to a specific section of the FSAR and identify proceduc9s requiring revision.

The plant will revise procedures identified by PORS in I

accordance with plant instructions.

l The present schedule for completion of this program is May 31, 1988; however, j

this schedule may vary depending on priorities.

In addition, as part of the SQN FSAR verification program to be completed by October 15, 1988 TVA is in the process of identifying the requirements and/or

]

commitments contained in the FSAR. An evaluation of these requirements / commitments will be made to determine the feasibility of the i

requirements /connaitments.

Providing the requirements /connaitments are practical, the requirements / commitments will be incorporated into the appropriate plant procedure. Through the efforts of these programs TVA will ensure that the periodic requirements identified in the FSAR will be met.

~

i i

)

l J

c n z

ri