ML20141K471
| ML20141K471 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 01/08/1986 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141K463 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-482-85-43, NUDOCS 8601220538 | |
| Download: ML20141K471 (1) | |
Text
..-
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF DEVIATION Kansas Gas and Electric Company Docket:
50-482 Wolf Creek Generating Station License: NPF-42 i
Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted during the period of December 2-6, 1985, it appears that one of your activities was not conducted in conformance with your commitments to the Commission. Based on the results of the inspection and in accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, (1985), the following deviation was identified.
The Environmental Report-0perating License Stage (ER-OLS), Section 6.1.5.5, summarizes the preoperational environmental monitoring program in Table 6.1-17, and the detection capabilities for environmental sample t
analysis in Table 6.1-18.
Table 6.1-17 contains a commitment to analyze,.
by means of gamma isotopic analysis, monthly samples of.broadleaf vegetation.
Table 6.1-18 lists the maximum value for the lower limit of detection (LLD) for the analysis of iodine-131 in food products to be 60 pCi/kg.
In deviation from the above, the NRC inspector determined on December 6, 3
1985, that the results of 3amma isotopic analysis to identify iodine-131 in broadleaf vegetable samples exceeded the maximum specified LLD in samples obtained on August 21 and November 30, 1984, at location S-4 and on August 21 and October 9, 1984, at location 0-2.
j Kansas Gas and Electric Company is hereby requested to submit to this office,
}
within 30 days of the date of this Notice of Deviation, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) the reason for the deviation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (3) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further deviations; and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown I
J Dated at Arlington, Texas, this 8thday of January 1986
?
i