ML20141K471

Notice of Deviation from Insp on 851202-06

ML20141K471
Person / Time
Site:	Wolf Creek
Issue date:	01/08/1986
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20141K463	List: IR 05000482/1985043 ML20141K460 ML20141K471
References
50-482-85-43, NUDOCS 8601220538
Download: ML20141K471 (1)

Text

. .- .. , . - . _ . - - -

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF DEVIATION Kansas Gas and Electric Company Docket: 50-482 Wolf Creek Generating Station License: NPF-42 i

! Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted during the period of December 2-6, 1985, it appears that one of your activities was not conducted  ;

in conformance with your commitments to the Commission. Based on the results  ;

of the inspection and in accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, (1985), the following deviation was identified.

The Environmental Report-0perating License Stage (ER-OLS), Section 6.1.5.5, summarizes the preoperational environmental monitoring program in  :

Table 6.1-17, and the detection capabilities for environmental sample t

analysis in Table 6.1-18. Table 6.1-17 contains a commitment to analyze,.

by means of gamma isotopic analysis, monthly samples of.broadleaf vegetation. Table 6.1-18 lists the maximum value for the lower limit of detection (LLD) for the analysis of iodine-131 in food products to be 60 pCi/kg. '

3 In deviation from the above, the NRC inspector determined on December 6, *

1985, that the results of 3amma isotopic analysis to identify iodine-131 in broadleaf vegetable samples exceeded the maximum specified LLD in

, samples obtained on August 21 and November 30, 1984, at location S-4 and ,

on August 21 and October 9, 1984, at location 0-2.

j Kansas Gas and Electric Company is hereby requested to submit to this office,

} within 30 days of the date of this Notice of Deviation, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) the reason for the deviation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (3) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further deviations; and

! (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown I

J Dated at Arlington, Texas, this 8thday of January 1986

?

i