ML20141F129
| ML20141F129 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 04/07/1986 |
| From: | Belisle G, Moore L, Wright R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141F092 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-424-86-15, NUDOCS 8604220471 | |
| Download: ML20141F129 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000424/1986015
Text
- .,
n Etto
UNITED STATES
a
. .
s
./
'o
NUCLEAR REGULATOaY COMMISSION
'
.['
,$
REGION 11
j
Ij
101 MARIETTA STREET.N.W.
t
ATLANTA. GEORGI A 30323
\\,%.* /
-
Report No.: 50-4'24/86-15
Licensee: Georgia Power Company
P. O. Box 4545
Atlanta,~GA 30302
Docket No.: 50-424
License No.:
CPPD.-108
Facil.ity Name:
Vogtle 1-
Inspection Conducted: January 28-31, 1986
Inspectors:
[ _
, / er~ I-
d[7 /N
R. W. Wright "
.
Date Signed
I
bn-
dl,!%
,,
-s
-
L. R. Moore ~
/
Date Signed
,
!
[$ b
' #7/6
Approved by:
e
G. A. Belisle, Acting Section Chief
Date Signed
Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY
Scope: .This routine special announced inspection involved 54 ' inspector-hours on
site.in the areas of Readiness Review Appendix D, Document Control.
Results:
One violati.m was identified - Inadequate Pullman Power Products
drawing control corrE.ctive action.
'
8604220471 860411
ADOCK 05000424
G
,_
.
.
REPORT DETAILS
1.
Persons Contacted
Licensee Employees
- C. Belflower, Quality Assurance (QA) Site Manager, Operations
L. Blocker, Mechanical Engineering Section Supervisor
J. Boddie, Site Document Supervisor
- R. Conway, Senior Vice President Nuclear Power
- D. Foster, Vice President and General Manager Vogtle Project
- M. Googe, Project Contruction Manager
- S. Haltom, QA Engineering Support Supervisor
- B.' Harbin, Quality Control (QC) Manager
- N. Harris, Assistant Manager, QC
- C. Hayes, Votgle QA Manager
R. Johnson, Operations Records Supervisor
- R. McManus, Assistant Project Construction Manager II
L. Mikulecky, Construct Engineer, Readiness Review
Team Member - Module 4
R. Powell, Construction Records Supervisor
Other licensee employees contacted included engineers, technicians, QA/QC
personnel and office personnel.
Other Organizations
- A. Nakashima, Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC), Readiness Review,
Discipline Manager (Appendices)
T. Pacifico Pullman Power Products (PPP), Engineering Manager
- W. Ramsey, Southern Company Services (SCS), Readiness Review, Project
Manager
K. Weiss, PPP, Chief Field Engineer
NRC Resident Inspector
- H. Livermore
- Attended exit interview
2.
Exit Interview
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 31, 1986, with
those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described the
areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings listed
below. No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
Violation, Inadequate Pullman Power Products drawing controls
corrective action, paragraph 4.
-
--
-
_______________
_ _ . .
.
'
1
f
2
(
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to
(
or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters
This subject was not addressed in the inspection.
4.
Readiness Review Implementation
a.
General Information
The complete details concerning the NRCs evaluation of Appendix D,
l
Document Control, for the Vogtle Readiness Review Program can be found
l
in Region II's Inspection Report No. 50-424/85-61.
'
The purpose of this report is to document and further define a
violation that was identified by the NRC inspectors during the above
Appendix D readiness review evaluation.
b.
Inspection of Document Control Audit Personnel (DCAP) Activities
The inspectors examined Georgia Power Company (GPC) DCAP findings
concerning their audits of controlled drawings, procedures, and
specifications assigned to the following site contractor organizations
during 1983 - 1985, where applicable.
PPP - Piping System Fabrications and Installation
Williams Contracting Inc. - Coatings Application
Walsh Construction Company - General Contractor (Civil)
Pullman /Kenith-Fortson - HVAC Installation
Ingalls Iron Works Co. - Miscellaneous and Structural Steel
Fabrication and Installation
'
Three of the five contractors listed were predominately rated (highly)
acceptable by GPC DCAP during this period.
One contractor was
generally rated unacceptable between April 1983 and April 1984, but
effective corrective action was evident in that this contractor has
been rated acceptable-to-distinguished since.
PPP drawing controls
were generally rated unacceptable between March 1983 and August 1985 by
GPCs acceptance criteria.
GPCs Instruction DC-DT1-A-01, R3 specifies
that a drawing error rate above 5% is unacceptable.
Although
appropriate levels ' of management were informed and corrective actions
were implemented throughout the period, generally consistent
unacceptable error rates continued.
A meeting was conducted on site
January 29, 1986, between NRC inspectors and knowledgeable,
responsible, licensee and PPP personnel to discuss this issue. The NRC
inspectors concluded by discussion, review of the contractors
.
.
..
_____ - __.
--
.
.
3
i
procedures, and the various in-process checks conducted that the
possibility of using outdated drawings for installation of PPP
hardware was very slight.
The inspectors determined that the licensee
should not depend on other programmatic checks and balances to catch
errors in the PPP document control program.
Each portion of the-QA
program i.e., proper distribution and posting of controlled drawings
and changes thereto has to meet acceptable standards.
Consequently the ' licensee was subsequently notified by telephone on
February 7, 1986, that this failure to take effective corrective action
to preclude repetition is identified as a violation (424/86-15-01).
Inadequate-PPP Drawing Control Corrective Action.
- -
1
i
.
b.