ML20141E944
| ML20141E944 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/27/1985 |
| From: | Berkow H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141E947 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8601080433 | |
| Download: ML20141E944 (2) | |
Text
._- . .- _ _-. . - . -
December 27, 1985 Mr. Walter H. Dardenne DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Licensing Engineer iCentral File- RDiggs Safety and Licensing Operation ~SSPD Reading REmch General Electric Company PDR JLee 175 Curtner Avenue DCS
< San Jose, California 95125 PNoonan HBernard
Dear Mr. Dardenne:
HBerkow
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING 0F LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT e NEDE-30878, " TRANSPORTABLE MODULAR AZTECH PLANT" We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by J
the General Electric Company (GE) by letter dated February 8, 1985. We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed.' The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only.to the matters
- described in the report.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that GE publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, GE and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation, j Sincerely,
, Original signed by
! Herbe'tr N. Berkow, Director Standardization and Special Projects Directorate Division of PWR Licensing-B
Enclosure:
/J, As stated g?pv sed
- ac
-De HBefk SSPD DPgpSeD HBer h 5
12[])/5 12/3 /85~
8601080433 851227 l PDR TOPRP EMVQENE i
C PDR L
i p as
+ o, UNITED STATES 8 'n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$ : WASHING TON, D. C. 20555
'% , , , , , + #a December 27, 1985 Mr. Walter H. Dardenne Principal Licensing Engineer Safety and Licensing Operation General Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, California 95125
Dear Mr. Dardenne:
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING 0F LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT NEDE-30878, " TRANSPORTABLE MODULAR AZTECH PLANT" We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by the General Electric Company (GE) by letter dated February 8, 1985. We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that GE publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and
~
the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, GE and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.
Sincerely, erbert N. Berkow, Director Standardization and Special Projects Directorate Division of PWR Licensing-B
Enclosure:
As stated
__ __ __ __ _ _ _ . . _ .- - _. .~