ML20141C603
| ML20141C603 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 06/24/1997 |
| From: | Chandu Patel NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Dugger C ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9706250334 | |
| Download: ML20141C603 (4) | |
Text
-
June 24, 1997 j
Mr. Charles M. Dugger Vice President Operations Entergy Operations, Inc.
P.-0. Box B Killona, LA 70066
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE SPENT FUEL P0OL l
RERACKING AT WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 j
j (TAC N0. M98325) l
Dear Mr. Dugger:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is reviewing your letter dated March 27, 1997, requesting to increase the spent fuel storage capacity at the 1
Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3.
As discussed in the enclosure, f
additional information is required from Entergy Operations, Inc., in order for the staff to complete its review regarding the criticality aspects of the i
request.
i We request that you provide response within 30 days from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:
l Chandu P. Patel, Project Manager i
Project Directorate IV-I Division of Reactor Projects III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-382
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information l
cc w/ encl:
See next page DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File PUBLIC PD4-1 r/f h[M C. Patel C. Hawes OGC J. Roe T. Gwynn, RIV ACRS u
l E. Adensam (EGAI)
Document Name: WAT98325.RAI l
OFC PM/PD4_1,,
LA/PD4-1 i
CPatelkh CHawes6fl)d NAME DATE 6 /1997
[4/N/97 COPY YES/N0 YES/N0 th d
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 90034 9706250334 970624 PDR ADOCK 05000382 PDR
p uruq p
UNITED STATES g, j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s*
Q**4b_4)g WASHINGTON. D.C. 20066-0001 g
June 24, 1997 Mr. Charles M. Dugger Vice President Operations Entergy Operations, Inc.
P. O. Box B Killona, LA 70066
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE SPENT FUEL P0OL RERACKING AT WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 (TAC NO. M98325)
Dear Mr. Dugger:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is reviewing your letter dated March 27, 1997, requesting to increase the spent fuel storage capacity at the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3.
As discussed in the enclosure, additional information is required from Entergy Opsrations, Inc., in order for the staff to complete its review regarding the criticality aspects of the request.
We request that you provide response within 30 days from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely, 0
0?Y Chandu P. Patel, Project Manager Project Directorate IV-1 Division of Reactor Projects III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-382
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/ enc 1:
See next page
m.
Mr. Charles M. Dugger Entergy Operations, Inc.
Waterford 3 cc:
Administrator Regional Administrator, Region IV l
Louisiana Radiation Protection Division U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 32135
'611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Baton Rouge, LA 70884-2135 Arlington, TX 76011 Vice President, Operations Resident Irispector/Waterford NPS Support Post Office Box 822 l
Entergy Operations, Inc.
Killona, LA 70066 l
P. O. Box 31995 I
Jackson, MS 39286 Parish President Council St. Charles Parish Director P. O. Box 302 Nuclear Safety & Regulatory Affairs Hahnville, LA 70057 Entergy Operations, Inc.
P. O. Box B Executive Vice-President Killona, LA 70066 and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.
Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway P. O. Box 31995 l
P. O. Box 651 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 l
Jackson, MS 39205 Chairman l
General Manager Plant Operations Louisiana Public Service Commission Entergy Operations, Inc.
One American Place, Suite 1630 P. O. Box B Baton Rouge, LA-70825-1697 l
Killona, LA 70066 Licensing Manager Entergy Operations, Inc.
P. O. Box B Killona, LA 70066 Winston & Strawn 1400 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005-3502 i
l o
l 1
B REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WATERFORD 3 SPENT FUEL POOL RERACKING 1)
The amendment request discusses an increase in the maximum fuel enrichment to 5.0 wt% U-235 for allowed storage in the spent fuel pool.
i Have the fresh fuel storage racks been analyzed for the enrichment increase? If not, a restriction should be placed on fresh fuel storage in the new fuel vault. Discuss where the higher enriched fresh fuel j
will be initially stored.
j 2)
TS 5.6.2, which discusses dry storage of new fuel for the first core loading in the spent fuel storage racks, is obsolete and should be revised to reference the fresh fuel storage pit and both the k greater than 0.95 if fully flooded and the k,, no greater than,#d.no98 for aqueous foam optimum moderation conditions.
3)
Since the criticality analysis accounted for fuel enriched to 5.0 + 0.05 wt% U-235, would it would be more appropriate to refer to 5.0 wt% as the maximum nominal enrichment in TS 5.3.1?
4)
What does " normal" k,,, refer to in TS 5.6.1?
l l
I l
l l
l a
ENCLOSURE