ML20140F335

Notice of Issuance of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206. Director of NRR Taken Action Wrt 941028 Petition Re Plant, Units 1,2 & 3

ML20140F335
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	04/29/1997
From:	Collins S NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:
Shared Package
ML20140F294	List: DD-97-11, Forwards Director'S Decision DD-97-11 & FRN Re 10CFR2.206 Petition.Petition Requested That Accelerated EA Be Taken Against Northeast Utils for Violations at Plant Involving Procedure Compliance,Work Control & Tagging Control ML20140F302 ML20140F335
References
2.206, DD-97-11, NUDOCS 9705020244
Download: ML20140F335 (2)

Text

__ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ . ~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ _.._ ..-.. _ .. _._.

7590-01-P l UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i NORTHEAST UTILITIES t

MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION. UNITS 1. 2. AND 3 i:

DOCKET NOS. 50-245. 50-336. 50-423 l ISSUANCE OF DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CFR 2.206 l Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor i Regulation, has taken action with regard to a Petition dated j . October 28, 1994, as supplemented January 15, February 8 and 20, and I October 14, 1995, submitted by Mr. Anthony J. Ross. The Petition pertains to 4

i Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3.

j in the Petition, the Petitioner raised concerns regarding violations at l

! the Hi11 stone Station involving procedure compliance, work control, and l

}

t tagging control and requested that " accelerated" enforcement action be taken I l

against Northeast Utilities for these violations. As grounds for this request, the Petitioner asserted violations in these areas had increased j

[

significantly, that many of these violations had never been assigned a j severity level by the NRC, and that when these violations are considered i

collectively, escalated enforcement action is warranted because of the

repetitive nature of the violations.

f The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has granted the j Petition, in part. In other respects, the Petition is denied. The reasons '

l for this determination are explained in the " Director's Decision Pursuant to i

i 10 CFR 2.206" (DD-97-11), the complete text of which follows this notice and 1

is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC and at the local ')

i i 9705020244 970429 PDR ADOCK 05000245 O PDR  ;

4

public document room located at the Learning Resources Center, Three Rivers Community-Technical College, New London Turnpike, Norwich, Connecticut, as well as at the temporary local public document room located at the Waterford Library, ATTN: Vince Juliano, 49 Rope Ferry Road, Waterford, Connecticut.

A copy of the Decision will be filed with the Secretary of the Commission for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206(c) of the Commission's regulations. As provided for by this regulation, the Decision will constitute the final action of the Coemission 25 days after the ,

date of issuance unless the Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the Decision in that time.  :

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this29th day of April 1997.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e .LN rector Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ]

i I