ML20140E172

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards SER in Which Staff Accepts for Referencing WCAP-13524 & WCAP-13524,Rev 1, Apollo-A One Dimensional Neutron Diffusion Theory Program. Staff Proposes That Review by CRGR Be Waived
ML20140E172
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/09/1997
From: Holahan G
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Martin T
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
Shared Package
ML20140E177 List:
References
NUDOCS 9706110262
Download: ML20140E172 (1)


Text

_

pe "*cy

[1 4

UNITED STATES g

,j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

t WASHINGTON, D ' 20555>VC1 j

%..... /'

June 9, 1997 i

MEMORANDUM T0:

Thomas T. Martin Associate Director for Inspection and Technical Assessment j

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

)

FROM:

Gary M. Holahan, Direct <

Division of Systems Sa ety and Analysi Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

WAIVER OF CRGR REVIEW FOR WCAP-13524, AND WCAP-13524.

REVISION 1, " APOLLO-A ONE DIMENSIONAL NEUTRON DIFFUSION THEORY PROGRAM"

REFERENCES:

Memorandum from E. L. Jordan to T. E. Murley "CRGR Consideration of Topical Reports", September 29, 1989.

Attached is the safety evaluation report (SER) prepared by the Division of

)

System Safety and Analysis in which the staff accepts for referencing i

WCAP-13524 and WCAP-13524. Revision 1. In accordance with the suggested revised procedures referenced above, the staff proposes that review by the Committee to Review Generic Requirements (CRGR) be waived.

WCAP-13524 and WCAP-13524 Revision 1. describe the APOLLO computer code and the first revision to the APOLLO computer code.

APOLLO is a one-dimensional, two-group diffusion code that was evolved ' rom the NRC ap] roved computer code

" PANDA".

APOLLO is used for nuclear design analyses whica do not require three-dimensional methods.

The calculational accuracy of the APOLLO code for predicting the reactivity and axial power shapes is comparable to the three dimensional code " Advanced Nodal Code" (ANC).

According to its charter CRGR should review each staff approval of topical reports.

However, the staff believes that CRGR review is not necessary because WCAP-13524 does not present a new staff position. If you agree that a CRGR review is not necessary, please so indicate by signing below.

Otherwise.

the staff will prepare an appropriate CRGR package.

Attachment:

As stated 1

Thomas T. Martin Approved:

CRGR review is not necessary. S

$7 M MO g p' CONTACT:

A. Attard. SRXB/DSSA Y

L'j""4%

415-2876

% : ("

9 7-H5' 97061102 2 970609 h

PDR TOPRP ENVWEST C

PDR