ML20140D529
| ML20140D529 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 12/16/1985 |
| From: | Farrar D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| 1014K, NUDOCS 8602030051 | |
| Download: ML20140D529 (2) | |
Text
e-h@
o.C ['
Comm:nwsith Edison
/ One First ;Jabonal Plaza, Chicago. Ilknois g/'
O Address Reply to Post Office Box 767 Chicago Illinois 60690 December 16, 1985 Mr. James G.
Keppler Regional Administrator Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Il 60137
SUBJECT:
Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2 Supplemental Response to Inspection Reports Nos. 50-456/84-07 and 50-457/84-07 NRC Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457 REFERENCE (a):
R.D. Walker letter to Cordell Reed dated July 20, 1984 (b):
D.L.
Farrar letter to J.G.
Keppler dated August 20, 1984
Dear Mr. Keppler:
This letter is provided to supplement our Reference (b) response to Item of Noncompliance D in the Subject Inspection Report.
Should you or your staff have any questions regarding this supplement, please contact this office.
Very t uly you, D.
L. Farrar Director of Nuclear Licensing Enclosure cc:
NRC Resident Inspector Braidwood 1014K DEC ll DO O
6 G
i 3Est s
1 i
f~
COMMONWEALTil EDISON COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORT 456/84-07; 457/84-07 Item of Noncompliance D (456/84-07-06: 457/84-07-06)
The Reference (b) response to Item of Noncompliance D stated that the work of those inspectors certified by Napoleon prior to the issuance of Procedure #8 (approved on July 18, 1980) would be addressed as part of our Braidwood Quality Control Inspector Reinspection Program (OCIRP).
The OCIRP review of Napoleon has determined that acceptance inspections performed prior to July 1980 are non-recreatable.
The only final inspections performed by Napoleon were in the areas of reinforcing steel placement and post tensioning material installation.
Because these areas cannot be reviewed under QCIRP, a review of the educational background and training of each of the Napoleon Quality Control inspectors employed at Braidwood prior to July 1980 has been performed.
This review determined that the Napoleon Quality Control inspectors in question did have sufficient educational backgrounds and training to perform their assigned duties acceptably.
In addition, had the Napoleon certification procedure existed prior to July 1980, these inspectors would have met the requirements for certification.
1014K i