ML20140D097
| ML20140D097 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 02/27/1986 |
| From: | Harpster T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Kowieski R Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8603250579 | |
| Download: ML20140D097 (25) | |
Text
. - . . - . _- . . . . _ . . . . .-. .. . . . . - .-
i 1 1 j o
! FEB 2 71986 I i :
I i Mr. Roger Kowieski, Chairman
- Regional Assistance Committee
{ Federal Emergency Management Agency
! Region II 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278 l
Dear Mr. Kowieski:
i The Emergency preparedness Staff has reviewed the remedial action schedule for i
the Ginna Post Exercise Assessment. The enclosed schedule contains our comments and evaluations on each of the items.
t
- If you have questions, please call Charles Amato at FTS 488-1394.
I Sincerely, i
Orisinal Signed By:
- Terry L. Harpster, Chief .
Emergency Preparedness Section ;
- Division of Radiation Safety
- -and Safeguards i
i
Enclosure:
Remedial Action Schedule for Ginna i t i
i bcc w/o encl:
i W. Lazarus. ,
W. Thomas bec w/ encl:
C. Amato File Ginna
]
4 3 C2eg j
< RI:DRSS Smith RI:DRSS Amato JWHd L r l
] 2f,f/'86
/ 2h//86 2/)y86 j
- 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 4
i 8603250579 860227 J PDR ADOCK 05000244 '
! F PDR I th
~
l.. +
a +
T *
% 1 e
,a. - , o y ?. * %
~[4 , 1 y
w
~
.s
- e'
- r S (f
)[l V
. m
-l. '
- in w
- g;- -
~ . . .
,L . - .
W ,;
s
' je ;7 ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - RcMEDIAL ACTION MT l
. is September 26, 1965 and PreviN s fxercises r b. W,
- 4
.New York State LOC Page I
of
.'jf* ,
I M A/R C' A ~Z 2/ /t.zh6
. ,e 1 g jj Ado- State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FEMA Evaluation of StateCounty Responst Rerullal (M? ' ' g-3 NURE Ele.
RAC Evaluation quate-A Inade-(Action) jected Response Adequate. Action
'!3 ,
Date of (A) Cocplete
)) l N[JI .% ment quate-1 Cce- Inade- (C)
- ;; 4 ' 4 pletior quate Inconpletc rgQ , (I) (I)
, : < - ace { G
-.4;8
Some EBS messages referred to telephone E.7 A March.1985 agreement among the Complett d
" As J.10. < books for additional information. counties, State and FEMA does MQ Complete infomation was not available in the latest Rochester telephone book not require that the location of E -9 y-p the telephone book information be 2 . a) and was very difficult to find in the included. Based upon the 15 .[: . g '5 M 1983-84 telephone book for Wayne County minutes time requirement extraneoi s s 3 References to telephone books and information need not be included h@MX .
ii pubile information brochures in EBS in the E85 messages. messa rs should be reviewed. The EBS
. :l @' e:* :. zr# . lj mssages should describe the location Dc7 M j of the information in the telephone Y .
book well enough that it can be found quickly, [ g 5";! .d M E.7, The statement, "This is not a test". All messages were reviewed for Completed 1 J.10r in EBS messages nue ered 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, consistency of "This is a test" yJ rQ' n;@@g ~
; %'[ '
8, and 9 conflicts with the statement, "This is a test," in messages numbered statements, and the new messages were used in the Septed er 1985 g ' "
-4 , 2 and 3. The messages should be re. exercise. This wording was
, ,y .g viewed and a single statement con. vertfled by a review of the 1985
'i ,
sistent with the requirement of the exerc are EBS messages. .. g l state REPP should be chosen for all
" messages.
- i [
}}
6 Y',
~
J.ll Maps of crop distribution should be Crop dis;ribution maps are in the Completi d M '
' available at the SEOC. SEOC and were demonstrated in the
./ 5 9/85 Ginna and 11/85 Nine Mile UMh NSnp + d
', 1.10.e The decision to include or exclude raptive populations under the state's Point Exercises.
f$jQy KI policy should be made, This matter was discussed and demonstrated in the 9/85 Ginna Completed A 6 . I
l ggg i
and 11/85 Nine Mlle Point
} Exercises.
i y _
c.-
...s..:; 0.r y - .'
fy 9 thy f3 ;@. ; s*.- 4 . , 2: ~C'( : ~ y cwm my-Me v., %. N-
.M,y bYk$5b$S$-,
y& gr 3 ;, , y-
~y3h*DikiL?lk::: s '
w
- J.@. sm&y C,cm
.nw .
s J V.r R '.f:: 8 4;a 2.j2 l ~
;;.f! O %,[Qlw y. s
&:.G.Q .R ,
jy~w ig y
/b?
d ^l 7 3 {d. ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION e September 26. 1985 and Previous Exercises New York State EOC Page 2 og22 0 ob AWC A 1- 2/ 2h5 Ade- State (5)/ County (C) Response Pro- FEMA Evaluation of StateMounty Responst. Remtdial MJREL RAC Evaluation quate-A (Action) jected Response Adequate! Action Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Corplete ment quate-I Core- Inade- (C) pletior quate Inconplett (!) (I) J. loa Wayne County followed procedures to re- The State will ensure that county Completi d d fAM M4 Me ###5 A 6 K.4 quest authorization from DOH for field monitoring data is 4 exposures to emergency workers in considered in the decision process A#I ###* "Y M # excess of EPA protective action guides. to authorTze the use of KI and 2 0s/4 u //g s ge eg s tuuo Based on data available to the state worker exposures in excess of PAGs g Np U S * #F N_T /5 MDsterab' at that time, the authorization was This was amply demonstrated in the denied. Upon receipt of the original November 13. 1985 exercise for request for authorization to exceed Nine Mile Point. protective action guides, the state should have contacted Wayne County for the information and data needed to support a reconsnendation for author-Izing the excess doses, and it should have moved more quickly to authorize the precautionary use of K! for the one Wayne County field monitoring team that received a 5 Rem whole body dose. i The state should fully utilize the county field monitoring data and coordinate more closely with the counties in deciding whether to author-12e the use of KI and worker exposures ) in excess of protective action guides. l l K.S.b Members of the ingestion pathway Sampling team ment >ers will be Complet ?d sampling team should have protective provided with protective gear when clothing, particularly hand and foot r.ecessary and to the extent that A ( coverings, available. State determines them to be necessary. 1 a - . - _ - _ _ - . .. . . . _ _ _ -
, r,, . - - , , , . .
. g' ,
- . , ~_',
b ,
^
+; ~
; t-s .. .
-m' ~
s , t
- w. - .
4
.s . ~
4 . g,
- Nh..x' 2 . ,
3-~,.
' f
.,T =
.1b -- - _---- - . . . .
m .
, ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION
. 1 -
4 September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises
; M;. , 3 : ,
t, Western District Page 3 of 22
~
i D&nY A'A*C A'.I ///u /rC
, -
- t \
' l Ade- State (S)Abunty (C) Response Pro. FEMA Evaluation of StateRounty Responst Remedial
. t> H g NURgr RAC Evaluation quate-A (Action) jected Response Adequate Action ie , g Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Ccxrplete
.# ' ' ~
ment quate-I Com- Inade- (C) Pletior quate Incorrpletc
~ . . .
Z /{ s (I) (I) 4 A -M. G
*1 F.1.d There was interference between the local government radio and RECS The interference was corrected lomplete1 f C
-( 4 " . u 6 and was demonstrated during the dedicated land line at the WDEOC. The 1~".. ? "I'
~
scarce of interference needs to be 9/85 Gtnna exercise. located and eliminated. F.1 The unreliable and outdated radio 4 1 Equipment for upgrading the SEMO :ontinui ,g
' .* A ;
system, which caused problems during radio system is being purchased the 1983 exercise, is still a potential and will be installed before the _. source of comunication problems, end of 1986. i :- T A new radio system should be purchased
.~' . and installed at all applicable 4 locations.
- a. , u:. e<
..'. ... t t
f; a F.1 There are an inadequate nunber of tele- If and when funding is made :ontinuirig A 7 9%;W' -
-=
( phone Ifnes and telephone equipment available, additional telephone
,7' t i available at the WDEOC. Additional will be installed.
~ . -Q telephone lines and equipment should AL ?- E '
be secured for the WDEOC.
,:~ .*;
.} ,
- w , , ,
, s' fy : ,,1 1
.s y_a
?b e
1 5 . [ 4
*g 4 4 yr N , j,,,
i . / . [ t e, , Fm ,,. , 4 g n. y h3' q P-"
.g . p.
- y .
.n ,
b9' . . i' s
+
w e- -
- . ~ . ._. . - . .
.". ., s 1' ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR P0kER STAT!0f4 - REMEDIAL ACTION ji .
September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Lake District 4 og22 py.
, %.rs Yl hkb W? S/f/2,/S
' Ade- State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FEMA Evaluation of Statetounty Responst Remediai NUREC RAC Evaluation quate-ti (Action) jected Response Adequatt Action j, Ele. Inade- Date of Corm-(A)
Inade-Conplete inent quate-I (C) plettor quate Inconplete (I) (1)
-j F.1 There are an inadequate number of If and when the necessary funds Continu ng v cocinercial telephone lines at the LDEOC. are made available, additional +1 2
,j Additional telephone lines should be installed for use by the emergency telephones will be installed.
. "', 4 3 staff.
o 4 "y n s. 1 j i n w j . 1 L3 ~.y
*4. + ,
s v. . * ,
- ,\ .
9 . V i m , H
-4 3e .
.h
i L 4 3* ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION Septent>er 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Joint News Center page5 og22
&A$(
d'<C AZ <'//f2/fC Ade- State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FD1A Evaluation of State / County Req m so Rerredial NURD: RAC Evaluation quate-A (Action) jected Responso Adequatt Action Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Couplete j sent quate-I Com- Inade- (C)
; pletior quate Inconplett 3 (I) (I)
E.5 Some EBS messages did not contain complete instructional information. The sample EBS messages have been reviewed and now reference Complete d 4 c EBS messages should specify both the both the calendars and telephone telephone book and calendars are book ads. Completed 9/30/85. sources of information for emergency procedures. i J.10. d, The phone number given for use by Staffing and training for the Continu ng 4 ,te 4 pe upss M greo rp d 7 E.7 mobility-impaired persons in need of mobility impaired telephones for assistance for evacuation was not the two counties is an EOC 6F # # 'M N7 f 7" staffed by trained personnel. responsibility. EOC operations j)c r fp 4 eg4 4, A nguro Training should be provided for of ficer will give additional operations of the mobility-impaired training. C c' M cre telephone numbers.
-i
)'
- n U . ., -
$Qk. ' / _ - j' '
s -
,,. y . ,
% ~~
,}' e.~ * *
+ - -
, , n\ .y 3
. - 7 , .
V. ' ~,ag-s wr_ _ _ _
-{ .
ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION
'1 September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises 6 22 l } Emergency Operations Facil.ity Page d I
} Yx trh AWC A'I 2///.7/?&~
/
I Ade-l State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FD1A Evaluation of State / County Resronso Remedial l jl NUREr RAC Evaluation quate-7, (Action) jected Response Adequatt Action Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Corplete I ment quate-I Com- Inade- (C) i pletior quate Inconpletc (I) (I) F.1.d Delays were observed in obtaining Monroe County has ind'cated 3/86 /sf475 F #4o.ZZr u 7pr information and receiving answers to procedural changes to facilities
/~pA'4( SN(u t o Mr FA >r s o M 2 questions from the state and utility data transmissions from the EOF over the RECS line, which was located to the County Assessment area.
in the dose assessment room at the Part II of the State Radiological Monroe County EOC. Scme utility field- Assessment Data Form has been monitoring data transmitted via the revised (1/86). The importance RECS line were in error and data con- of transmitting rad assessment cerning ground deposition and fodine data by hard copy (telefax) to release infor1 nation were not received minimize potential errors and in a timely manner. The cause for misinterpretation of technical these problems should be reviewed by data will be stressed. The the state and counties and the licensee held a training session appropriate training of staff should for EOF dose assessment staff be accomplished to improve the accurac; on 10/10/85 to review all items and timeliness of information trans- needing improvement based on the mitted to the counties via the RECS critt aue of the exercise. line. Additional review and revision of licensee procedures is under-way and is scheduled for com-pletion by 1/31/86. l \ , f, 5
~.A.,
1 3 t b i ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION
!f
- September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Monroe County ,g A $o* W d5 //////EW 7
4
- Ade- State (S)/ County (C) Response. Pro- FEMA Evaluation of Statestbunty Response Remedial j NUIE RAC Evaluation quate-A Inade-(Action) jected Date of Response Adequate Action (A) Conplete g Ele-ment quate-1 Com- Inade- (C)
Pl ettor quate Inconplete l (I) (I) K.3.a, Local police assigned to traffic After reverifying distribution Continu ng 4 . - - control and route alerting were of 0-5 R dosimeters inventory,
, equipped with high-range dosimeters they are available to all police only. 0-5 R dosimeters should be departments within the EPZ.
1ssued to all emergency workers, Additional training will stress as specified in the plan, the importance of both types of dosimeters for the people on road patrol at all future drills and exercises. Response included in Appendix F 9/85 i C J.10. Tests of the completed siren system should include sound level measure- of the FEMA-43 report by Rocheste '
- c. Gas and Electric, ments made throughout the EPZ to establish the adequacy of the warning.
E.6 Messages should be prepared for The messages were prepared and 1/20/86 8 C-use with the mobile public-address demonstrated in the Sept. 26, i units in the event that this backup 1985 drill. Attached is a copy is needed, of the messages.
.. - _,a - -- - -- - - ~ + - - - - - - - -
\
5*55 '55/05/03 21:48 -.. m3U"3 ALERT 1*tG PROCEDGAIS ( When cotified that a siten has f ailed and thereby causing
~~
the publio locate 6 in the vacinnsy of the siren to not be preperly notified, the Director of Escrger.cy Preparadress will request the ROC Law Enforceme'it repropentative to dispatch a police vehicle to the ases and to take the following actions
- 1) Co to a denlynoted starting point, in the area.
21 The dispatcher will direct the operator of the RE V'
*IVED police vehicle to follow a prescribed route
- and to give the following acssages using a megaphone, a JAN 24 1986 bull horn, or the venicia public addresar ayates.
- UDtWICAL EMERGE!C => curing a drill or emeretse the- ocewp.ns of PREPAREONESS G OUP me veuere w111 ne reqmes 9 drin sne s
- prescribed rcute and simulate giving the b message in (b) telow.
bl During an acual aadiolegical Emergercy "Mr. Lucien t'arin, the County twecutive, has . , . , ' ordered that the CIN% muc, lear tower plant - roernency Notification System be activeted becauge cf a recogtes imeMent et the plant._ S L'see the s kren in t.ble eroe did not a t: P.iv at,,e, please torn y,our radice to wy (1160-7.50 or witC (14.9 Nt to recalve e gr seney brendesata reseases,en conditicae at the plant.* This !s fiot a drill.
*The sterif f *e dispatchers and tho wens *.or police will have schematic diagrame of the reaJs that the vehicles will use im each b
mires area. These diagrama will have a dealgnetsi startiny psant and whil show a resta that in to Le followed by ven4 ele to insure that the entire area can be covered by voice.
s i { ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Monroe County Page8 of22 VR ' klAl /V5 .2/k~7/W Ade- State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FD% Evaluation of StateNounty Respons( Remedial NUIC RAC Evaluation quate-A (Action) jected Response Adequatt Action Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Ca plete ment quate-I Cte- Inade- (c) i Pletior quate Incw plett I (!) (1) l G.1 Additional education of the public is This is a continuous project. Continu ng Z needed concerning notification The yearly brochure and other A methods and responses such as turning public information tools keep
'on the radio and/or television to the EBS instructions in front get the EBS messages when the strens of the public. Monroe County are so nded. Based on spot checks of Office of Public Information the general population, most people writes and distributes news were interviewed on the day of the releases to all local media l exercise, either did not remember before and after any esercise I l' receiving a public information regarding all instructions to brochure or believed that the strens be followed in the event of an were a signal to evacuate the EPZ accident.
rather than a signal to tune to the local E85 station. Based on these field observations, continuing
. public education efforts are recommended. A C
.g .
D'L J.9 Procedures for the disposal of contaminated wastes (e.g., clothing) Procedures exist in the Monroe 1/20/86 C /EN A M f ve,Ur/c# refs Co. REPG Plan !!! K Att 5 collected into glastic bags at the V.8.4 and addresses this issge
.a decontaminating centers should be for both Reception / Congregate developed. Care centers and Emergency Worker Personnel Monitoring centers. Training will
. continue.
. Q ,e.
. . - {,6
.=
M-m2 - ~ _ - . . _ _ __ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ - -
l l s { ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION 1 September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises l Monroe County Page 9 of,,,22,
$77t? Y bW[ A1 A Y/2 k b Ado- State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FEMA Evaluation of State / County Respons( Remedial NURE RAC Evaluation quate-A (Action) jected Response Adequatt Action l Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Conplete ment quate-I Ccm- Inade- (C) pletior quate Inconpletc J
(I) (I) K.5.a The low-range dosimeters (0-5R) used Modification made. See Monroe 1/84 A b during the exercise were not sensi- County Radiological Emergency tive enough to detect the low levels Preparedness Plan !!! K Att. 4 of exposure which, according to III B. procedures in the Monroe County
, plan, require emergency workers to contact their supervisor when , they have received an exposure of 100 mR. Consideration should be given to raising the minimum reporting level to at least 500 mR, which can be more easily read on the existing low-range dosimeters.
J.9 The initial recomendation of the radiological officer to evacuate The implementation of the evacua- 3/86 tion order was timely and 8 1 ERPA's M1 and M2 was not implemented evacuation was completed without by the official in charge. A sub- exposure of evacuees to sequent recommendation to evacuate airborne plume. This will be was implemented. The delay in solidified by a new evacuation implementing an evacuation order tire study now underway. The could have led to unnecessary official in charge will be exposure of evacuees to the airborne briefed more often by the plume. The official in charge should radiological officer, be frequently briefed on the findings and recomendation of the radiological officer.
.t
h.19M. k [ M h..'n: b_hd " J
.c we g .s s va a ,c
. . . , m. , u. [h -[,1 ,..
+ - .
*I 1n -
4,g., q [~w.Js @- . x l,_'"* e; m h%r. 4.u m.y " * *
.-
- r =
.m : y,; ~ .g; ,W.,3 . ' - -
m 3
,n w
D ' Pi; M N T.iG~ ' g
.M~ . -
- .s w5 m .s ,
n.w,o apQ m. it e%' ,,1s.. e
,- - i .# 32 y- .e s U. n n.,
d.,;; y q.x .:;,r 4'7 .. .- ,. r.; w . .
.-f,,. .
a,t .%s
?Q/, *
. , 4' . - N, p .f. f%.3,
- a. -w j.. 39
',";% rcr -lO.. .' ; .
. ,. y~ ;p ~ . >, , ;;;
_-.--- .,2- ,,. , e
<w:
ROSERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Monroe County Page L of g
/
Mk AW [ & I///2/@ d Ade- State (S)Abunty (C) Response Pro- FD% Evaluation of StateA00unty Respons( Remedial NURfr RAC Evaluation quate-f (Action) jected Response Adequate Action Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Corplete ment quate-I Com- Inade- (C) pletior quate Incopplett (!) (I) F.1.d Efforts by the Monroe County liaison County has initiated procedural 3/86 I## W O '# N/" 4 officer at the EOF to expedite the changes to facilities data fW Eh5 C 4- W '/C W - Z M f4 -O F 7 flow of plant data were largely transmissions from EOF to 7gf3 cg4 gy gc,9 o g o
- unsuccessful. The Monroe County County Assessment area. <.'.. radiological officer should identify U 86I"*N####'
- J_ the cause of the delay in the (*//.,9 4C c 5 if gsr Ait'r 5/* Cirwo 29 . transfer of plant data, and should gg g g g y 7,,,g, q f fN develop procedures to assure that ae 4 4 4 er c.
this infomation is promptly re-
.(r cetved. ..
- v I.8 The dose assessment staff compared projected and measured dose rates.
Modifications are being investigated to insure data 3/86 g y The number of comparisons was coordination between Wayne limited by the lack of positive "ounty, Utility Monroe County field monitoring data. The county .Y teams and the respective y,, radiological officer should deploy assessment areas. Further,s field monitoring teams to obtain specific methodologies are a more complete definition of the being changed for field team t plume, so that an adequate number deployment in order to verify of comparisons between projected potentfal/ actual release data. and measured dose rates can be made. These comparisons are needed in order to verify protective action recommendations. d
~^
? .
- _b.'
_____A______-__________________________-____________ -
s.. i . 4 s c i- ROBERT E. GitmA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION j Septenter 26. 1985 and Previous Exercises Monroe County Pagell of 22 - l
#Rc R1 2//n/W Me- State (S)/Coun*y (C) Response Pro- FEMA Dialuation of StateACounty . Respons Renxilal '.i f MJREE RAC Dialuation quate-A (Action) jected Response Adcquatt. Action Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Cowlete l ment quate-1 Ctn- Inade- (C) f, pletior quate Inconplet<
t (!) (t) I
!.8 The field monitoring teams did not- Further training sessicns will Continu ng // I check their equipment adequately emphasize this and other * . before going into the field. topics for field team Field monitoring teams should operations.
i thoroughly check their equipment against the list in the plan before i leaving their deployment area. g ~ v
!.9 The procedures used to measure Appropriate training is being Continu ng radiciodine concentration deposited provided on a continuous basis, in the filter media were not consistent or reproducible.
Appropriate equipment and procedures should be provided to assure controlled and reproducible
. measurement of airborne radiolodine }}
ll concentrations. Field monitoring teams should be trained on an I ongoing basis in the measurement of radiolodine samples. j f, j; J.10 , Traffic control point #1 was
- j. established only af ter a significant They will be properly briefed from EOC and this procedure Continu ing /f h
5 delay, which resulted from will be stressed in ongoing
!j > significant confusion regarding training programs.
; its location. Police officers j; should be briefed on TCP locations when being dispatched, jl i! ;
t
9 O rm c
. i- ',
[ . - p.. _ ___ _ . . _ . . _
.3 e.
$^ ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION l September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises
.. . i Monroe County pagel2 of 22 e
s 0Wm1 i Sk[ A5 Af/l.2 W < r 3 , Ade State (S)Kounty (C) Resp mse Pro- FDIA Evaluation of State / County Respms Renxlial
. NUREC RAC Evaluation gute-t (Action) jected Responso A&q2 ate: Action 0
Ele- Inado- Date of (A) Cor:plete
' '1 f went quate-1 Com- Inade- (C)
O pletior quate inconplett
-TC (I) (I) b K.3.b In several instances, emergency workers were not aware of the dose Continued training will be provided.
Continu ng N 7 K.4 at which they should call in, or
'were not familiar with the
~' '
frequency at which readings were i to be taken. Training of emergency
" ~ workers in exposure control l
,'1 procedures should be conducted on
+;s an ongoing basis, e.
"l
.q W
v i b%
+ .
, fti-'
i c. -t a -
'{ 'g I
1 1 3 d ,. 1
A. N m .-,,, ..,.4 g 3' .; j ;;q,y j 1 QA. ( ppt; y-g-- ,3.1. bg .{., _4 , ' - 7.7 ~ g ,y p q- ;op3 5 p y , gem - g. g -
-r - ~ , , .~ , . , . _ _ p .x g g. _. . .
., , g .v c 7- 4 3 q pq.y -
,, ~ . q,
(, 4 ~ e
- - si :+
1,{ ( M , : . gg w. ;
' .' N: - . . - ,
g's r + - - - p~ - *
'- *^
i, m Vht g . 3 k (nlN p g{ -
- .1 k
if $Q; f%- , g p% p* ! . ,.; y
- ht , WW. ihk s r
og - 3,
. - a .-s.
- y yli!
I . Wh&P* am y a. w. .; rda:9 5 s'i[f.I
*p C ROBERT E. GINNA POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION
. September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises
. I.x q /'* i Wayne County
@ y Page 13 of 22
..aa
- ~ , j
+
#kl A5 0ENksh AYM/8$
r < a i
)) NUREC Ele-RAC Evaluation qua e A g FD% Evaluation of Statetounty Respons t Remedial
?
3 Inade- Date of ' " [l %g s 17
-t
,j ment quate-I Com- (A) Corplete Inade-g (C)
- 4W W ..
W. - 1 Pletior quate Inconpleto (I) (I) H.3 The operations and dose assessment The Wayne EOC is an underground WA<M. 4 M. _ rooms of the Wayne County EOC were bunker constructed in 1%4 with 3 1 [gl6 crowded and ventilation was poor. Federal funding for Civil Defense . . - WA - ' Ventilation in the existing The county is obligated to main- ' 4;N ; g facility should be improved, tain it for 25 years (1989). _ W&rf Extensive improvements were made 3{pJtf -@' H.3 The EOC operations area continues (1982, 83, 84 & 85) at con-d to have a limited working space and siderable expense. This includec
?*J : poor ventilation. Prolonged use ceiling fans and portable floor i AF ' '
of this facility would reduce the fans. It is agreed that with id Q @, -) efficiency of emergency response personnel. The Wayne County EOC the number of personnel occupyint i the EOC that ventilation is a j . c d' T. j facility should be relocated to a problem. Also during an exercist / r A2 rb g i new facility or the existing drill more individuals are preser t P;DW M : facility should be substantially than one would expect in a real
- 7% /; -
upgraded. emergency. The County has con-
.m ;A sidered several options all of f;
-4 which will require considerable expense. Options included
~ d ' Federal funding on a pro-rata basis. At present, the county
- - d superintendent has been re-i" -Td ouested to see if the ventila-I tion system can be improved. , y We are aware of the problem and will do whatever is possible
[, f within available funding. At this time it is not feasible for
, +4.
the County to abandon the e factitty until at least 1989, t P; 1 M . We request that this element not o
.A 't be further comented upon.
l1.= w: M,M
- q. '
't
i v
~
# . .5 s
P k f_ i: ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION f'
- September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Wayne County p.g.14 og 22
%, a
, (
2KJY ANl A-.Y- SY/If/Y s i Ade- State (S)/toonty (C) Response Pro- FDR Evaluation of StateRounty - Respons< Remedial j m RAC Evaluation quate-A (Action) jected Response Adequatt Action
. Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Couplete ment quate-1 Can- Inade- (C) i pletior quato ' Inconpletc (I) (I) 9 i F.1.d The RECS speaker disrupted communica- The licensee was made aware of 11/85 # C i ' tions on the RECS line. Interference the recurring problem. Employees 1 on the RECS line also occurred when of AT&T and the NY Telephone f ' another telephone in the' dose Company spent considerable effori
* ' assessment room was used during RECS' as late as June 1985 and corrected transmissions. RECS should be a fault in the NY Telephcne Lyons j reviewed to identify and eliminate Central Office. At the present
- 1 sources of interference. time there is no interference
. and the RECS is operable. AT&T
$ F.1.b The RECS line at the Wayne County has furnished a contact person
! EOC was subject to interference with telephone number for I from another telephone within the emergency service. We will i EOC and from a pitch-tone internal continue to monitor this problem to the line. The RECS Ifne at the and should it reoccur. AT&T
'. personnel will respond.
Wayne County EOC should again be J' re-inspected to eliminate this j , , equipment problem.
. . , s.
I J.10. - Tests of the completed stren system Response included in Appendix F 9/85 sf C
} c should include sound level measure- of FEMA 43 Report by Rochester ments rade throughout the EPZ to Gas and Electric.
l! establish adequacy of the warning.
}
>3
- ~
ii 1 e i' i i i <
S 1 ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDI AL ACTION September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Wayne County jj p g , lI , A ANC dZ 2/,/O,/gC
' J00- State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FDW Evaluation of StateNounty Response Remedial NUREC RAC Evaluation quate-A (Action) jected Response Adcquate Action Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Corplete ment quate-I Com- Inade- (C) j pletior quate Incocplett
]
(!) (!) l i G.1 Additional education of the public The utility, in coordination with Contint ing j) J l is needed concerning notification both counties, has distributed 1 methods and responses such as turning caiendars, brochures, posters, on the radio and/or television to news letters, telephone inserts, get the EBS messages when the sirens etc. The Director has been j are sounded. Based on spot checks of very active in seeking out speak-I the general population, most people ing engagements, etc. The
! who were interviewed on the day of training efforts include i the exercise, either did not practically every volunteer
; remember receiving a public informa- fireman in the EPZ. School tion brochure or believed that the staf fs and bus drivers, ambulance
]
i sirens were a signal to evacuate the attendants, farmers, etc. have
! EPZ rather than a signal to tune to been traine L We will continue i the local EBS station. Based on to offer public information these field observations, continuing programs and will continue our l
, public education efforts are efforts to educate the public.
recomended. 4 9 Md a __ .______ - .. .. . .. .
T
+. ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Wayne County i i 054KY NAC 2///.L SS
/
Ade- State (S)Aounty (C) Response Pro- FD1A Evaluation of Statehty Responsc Remedial NURfr RAC Evaluation quate-ti (Action) jected Response Adequatt Action i Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Corplete rnent quate-I Conr- Inade- (C) f'. pletior quate (I) Inconpletc (I)
} H.7 One of the field monitoring teams was unable to measure radiolodine This pertains to 1983 exercise.
Since that time 5 complete sets
- omplettd g C
]
in the plume due to an equipment of monitoring equipment has been failure. Wayne County should purchased. See Wayne REP, identify sources of backup Appendix J, pages J2-1 thru radiological monitoring equipment. J2-3. Distribution and storage is as indicated. Should replace-ment be necessary, teams report this to the field team coordinatt r. (para. 7.5.1 and 8.2 of Attachment 11. Procedure 9.) J.9 Methods for disposal of the con- Public Health, Procedure 3 Complett d // ( taminated wastes collected at the Att.13, para. 9.1.3 addresses decontamination centers need to be this issue. provided. 4 K.4 Not all bus drivers and police officers were certain of the exposure Training does and will continue to emphasize radiation exposure Continu ng 1986 f(/g f Sr// dr r y /9sc f A ~1-limits specified in the plan or with limits. A card was included in procedures for requesting packets for the September 85 l authorization to receive excess exercise. (Seecopyattached.) ( exposure. Training of emergency 4 j workers should emphasize radiation
. exposure limits. A card should be inserted in the exposure control kit as a reminder, t
i I ' _: a za > . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
s ,
., , _ _ . . - ~ - . - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ " ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
+ '
.Q '
l '
-w . [,
y k l- . , 1
\
b=s REPORT 00$1 METER READINGS OF 1R OR GREATER TO YOUR luMEDIATE SUPUM50R. REQJEST INST 7UCTIONS. FOLLOW INST 10CTIONS ANO PROCEDURES. .
- read dosimeter of ten bhty PA3 3R Report 4adty eNpment I ~
FeSPAG 25R '* 'OC N ' P ' * * * * ~ * ' ' are'avau. there l Thss packet should contaen: 10-200R self-reading dosemeter 10 5R or 0 20R setf reading dosemeter 1 thennolussenescent dosemeter in holder 1 bottle (14 tablets) potasssium iodede 1 redestion esposure record ' s 1 advesory notice on potassium eodede ~ Pfocedure:
- 1. Fall in your name & other information as necessary to complete the radastion esposure record g
- 2. Check your self readeng dosimeters & sero giem if they read more toen 50% of full scale
- 3. body C10trunt, all dosimeters to clothing on any area representat.ve of the main
- 4. Don's take any potassiwn 6cdide unless instructed- ,
g
.fi.p. ,
- r. I :,
L : ( ,# . N u
< t~n w . .. v 7 _, . , , , ,
l
,: M . w - >. w C w f .-
m w(e. w_. , - g y, , *4 hse w
. w- -
,, J ,
.,3, a:4 , ; We * ,,:.N- .
;g 4;/%W s .A~ 1 in
> < q. r > a r.. . ,% s s q, .
A kii,W k
& mW;:*'N. .
[ ' ,[.[? [ " ' - r, ,-@?)
.).,
- ru* %%. s ' ... . . .,,~
- / '
)
i'ygW ag 1 ryj * .
;b Qf. g [. .- : ,
_ I
, ,%f - % s. -j .,. .
- I 3, ., f
~
0, 1
~ ..
a'2 A >:; W ~4 ~, l< u, y >*h e.v, ,, . j l^k ); pjgs Q,.;.lV - p ::. ;** w
. r , -
- " $r e #ye< h.. a . #'
1 .' ~ . 4M,,r* '
, M i-.
' ~ k, * ~ 4 da 0C" s
?.. h* ;Q -y>+-~ ~ ~ -^& f MN ~ * '. ^ ' .
L
*
- ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION i s,' I
- September 26. 1985 and Previous Exercises Wayne County 7 .
Page 17 of,,J,2,, d - ' 0 % m W P M 4-c .y/a /gf r f d. . n { f
*: t s. * . Ade- State (S)A ounty (C) Response Pro- FD% Evaluation of StateNounty Pesponst Remdial
., f l
- j NUR!1 RAC Evaluation quate-? (Action) jected Response Adequate Action
,g Ele- Inade- Date of (A) Corplete
, <, ' l.
ment quate-1 cca- Inade- (C) pletior quate Inconpletc 1 ,,
'j? }
. , g
(!) (I) n t i J.12 Staff at the personnel monitoring center need additional training. The engineering staff of Ludlum Continu:ng Measure'nents Inc. Confirm that 1986 g l r e il
; Survey instruments were used with protective caps that reduce senst-there is some (up to 30%
attenuation from the plastic cap { n tfvity and the instruments lacked used on the pancake probe to
. 'I calibration tags or stickers. In protect the mylar membrane of th,!
dl addition, a better traffic flow G-M tube from accidental per- l 4 1 pattern needs to be developed for foration. However, they also r ,s a returning pMentially contaminated indicate that at one inch from
;f in*1viduals to the personnel an lodine 131 source the thresho' d i monitoring areas. Staff at the level of detection amounts to 42 micro rems per hour with the g
. _h personnel monitoring center needs 1:F '< jt additional training. An improved cap in place and using the model Jt traffic flow pattern needs to be 3 ratemeter as at Palmyra. They k.l established for movement of further indicate that a 0.1
- l. potentially contaminated individuals milltrem per hour source at a n 4 (
r 7 from the vehicle contaminatica area distance of once inch would be to the personnel monitoring area. found with ease as it would show q a meter reading of approximately
- J, '
900 cpm above background. taking [ ' O into account attenuation and y efffctency. Since the cap pro. i
' vides assured protection from l puncture which would render a
~
I l ,
- f probe useless and still allows 1 g ,,
for the detection of todine 131 sources well below the 0.1 o millf rem per hour level, we felt p" ' E , that it was and is important to y ' cG ' '
,M '
j protect our limited supply of good detection instruments from ('( accidental puncture, and this is especially true during practice l (continuednextpage)
>>8 5-.-.__________ . .__
h$ LW L
, . yw vv.
i w d
~ ^ Q' .
j E. .' ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STAi!ON - REMEDIAL ACTION September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises j, Wayne County Page 18 of 22 ia i C5hwk fec sr z//sz/W 1 Me- State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FD% Evaluation of StateSounty Respons( Remalial NUREI RAC Evaluation quate-t (Action) jected Response Merpatr Action
! Ele- Inade. Date of (A) Corplete
,1 i ment quace-I Com- Inade- (C) pletior quate Inconplett
. 1,: 1
(!) (I) h J.12 Continued drills. The instruments used were new and had been calibrated 4 at the factory before shipping.
. j It was our impression that we
'
- j were not required to have calf-i bration stickers in place nntil "r after the instruments were a
>gg } year old and in-house calibratfor Q
^ L. '
had been conducted. Regardless, we have since put appropriate ~T- q stickers on the referred to
~ si i i
instruments. Additional study
! will be conducted to improve
~ 1.; $ i ,l traffic flow pattern for return-2 e ing contaminated individuals.
.F ; Additional training will also be i provided to all personnel, i
or. J.10. The Ontario Fire Department did not In the past we have not had the A e have KI available for their field personnel assigned to route alerting. responsibility of training the 2/1/86 [
, , Ontario fire Department as
,' .n Individuals were sent into the field emergency workers but rather
, without KI which could not have been their training was accomplished
; administered promptly, once the under a consultant contract (fire i decision had been made to do 50, service and ambulance) by the
~ "
, 1 K! should be made available to the licensee. Contact has been made Ontario Fire Department for all staff
.- with them through the licensee
,! involved in Field activities. Pro- and a date established to provide j cedures should be in place for the this training. The licensee has
, prompt administration of KI should been made aware of additional
'l the need arise, equipment needs if we are to be responsible for outfitting all
. fire companies in 10 mile EFZ with emergency workers' kits to be u>ru ror route notirication.
m h %g
s I s l ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR PDWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION
, September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Wayne County p.9,19 or y f ngY AW 41 d//M/Sb Ade- State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FD% Evaluation of State /Cbunty Respons< Pemedial NUREr RAC Evaluation quate-A (Action) jected Response W pate action Ele- Inado- Date of (A) Corplete snent quate-1 Cw Inade- (C) pletior quate Incwpletr l
(I) (I) l 4 K.3.a The Ontario Fire Department Staff tha participated in route alerting
- This will be corrected as we begin to provide emergency 2/1/86 p C activities did not know correct worker training on a yearly q ~ exposure limits. Moreover, personnel basis.
did not know the individual who could authorize excess exposure. The Ontario Fire Department staff who 4 are involved in route alerting j should receive additional training
; in procedures for managing worker j exposure control. They should be 1 aware of dose limitations and who can authorize excess exposure.
j j K.3.4 Loss of dostmetry capability was experienced by one radiological We will continue to emphasize correct field team monitorin9 Continu ng 1986 g j field team member and was not procedures when we train new reported to supervisory staff. teams and provide refresher Field monitoring personnel should training to current teams. be trained to report any loss of dosimetry capability to supervisory staff. 4
L . s ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION
** September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Wayne County p, og
(
-rMk N( AZ 2///k$ ! /
Me- State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FDM Evaluation of StateACounty Response Remedial NUREE RAC Evaluation quated (Action) jected Response Mequate Action Ele- Inade- Date of (A) cocplete
; ment quate-I con- Inade- (c) ! Plettor quate Inconpletr
- II)
(t) 1 I.8 Radiological monitoring Team 2 did not carry out monitoring during We will address current pro. cedures and renew emphasis on Continu' 1906 ng // 1 j transit between sampling locations, correct use of equf; pent containt i
- did not determine the appropriate in the field team kits when we
! scale multiplier for the COV-715 and conduct the yearly training of ' did not respond promptly to changing our field team monitors.
I field conditions. Radiological j monitoring staff should receive more i training to increase their ability ' to use appropriate equipment and procedures. I.8 The leader of the radiological With regard to back up equfpment Continu this county has a total of five ng g monitoring team stated that there 1986 was no back up equipment at the sets of equipment for use in Union Hill Fire House to measure making radiciodine determina-radioiodine in the plume. Also, tions. Backup equipment is not i backup field monitoring equipment maintained at the fire stations . l but rather at the EOC. This did not appear to be available at
'the East Williamson Fire Station, organization is continually awari.
Additional equipment should be made of the location of these units I available to field monitoring teams and they are regularly calibrate <' in case of equipment failure. and kept ready for use. Had the field teams been questioned further regarding equipment failure, we are confident they would have informed the observer that they were to contact the field team coordinator (see Wayne County REP, pg. R011-5, para. 7.5.1 and 8.2). Backup equipment would be transported
. to the team by either law enforcement or highway personnel .
4 it
.+ ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION
, September 26, 1985 and Previous Exercises Wayne County page21 og 22 b N C A /-> /
m W N l/2/S S / j Ade- State (S)/tounty (C) Response Pro- futA Evaluation of State,tbunty Respmse Remedial I NURDG RAC Evaluation quate-t (Action) jected Respmse M e patt Action Ele. Inade- Date of (A) Corplete ment quate-1 Ccm- Inade- (C) plettor quate Incw plett (I) (I) K.5.a Staff at the personnel monitoring The decontamination specialist Continu K.S.b center were unfamiliar with who took part in the 1985 drill 1986 ng A ~ 7 criteria for decontamination of indicated that the question aske<
. personnel, equipment and vehicles, was "what is the threshold level procedures to be followed if con- or irreducible contamination tamination could not be reduced at which you would refer a vfCtir below 0.1 mrem /hr, or procedures to alternative decontamination for handling an injured, contaminated efforts by another agency?" The patient. Additional training in one person of whom this was askec ,
decontamination procedures is correctly indicated a level of recomended. 300 cpm or 0.1 mR/hr. We con-clude this observation is in error with regard to the 1985 drill; however, we will continue to emphasize proper procedures and limits in our annual refresh < r training. See also remark for element J.12. K.3.a The Ontario Fire Department staff responsible for route alerting did This will be rectified by emergency worker training now 2/1/86 A b not take dosimetry into the field, being provided by this office.
! The Ontario Fire Department
, personnel that perfom route alerting should be given additional training in emergency worker radiological exposure control.
o 4
. ROBERT E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION - REMEDIAL ACTION September 26, i385 and Previous Exercises
; Wayne Countf Page 22 of 22 t
(TYwA / awl A 'T N//478 f Ade- State (S)/ County (C) Response Pro- FD% Evaluation of State 4bunty Resgonse Remedial NURD: RAC Evaluation quate-t (Action) jected Response Ele- Adorpato Action Inade- Date of (A) Ccrplete j ment quate-1 Can-pletier Inade-quate (C) Incorplett (I) (I) K.3.b Bus drivers from the Williamson The Williamson School District Completa d Central School drive buses that does not choose to equip all buses 4 Q were not equipped with 2-way radios, with radios. As new buses are Dosimetry readings and requests for purchased, and provided tax emergency information could not be funds are available, buses will promptly related to emergency be equipped with radios. As an managers. Buses to be used for alternative, we require a police evacuations should be equipped with escort for bus convoys when a 2-way radios, moving to the School Reception Center. Should communication become necessary the Law Enforcement Radio Channel is 3 used. Buses used to transport children are on a one-way trip l out of the EPZ. e.g., from the parent school to the reception center. (Early dismissal or evacuation.) i G.2 Some transient residents interviewed Public education efforts will be Continu ng f were not adequately aware of what actions were to be taken in a continued and contact made with the necessary personnel, to 1986 l _ 1 l radiological emergency. Public provide our transient population education efforts should be con- with information on current pro-i tinued and transient populations such cedures to follow for an inciden'
- as migratory workers should be at the county's nuclear power I included in the awareness programs. station. A listing of ali l operators of migrant camps.
A housing, and employment is main-l tained by both the representativi's of Health and County extension service. These listings will be
- used both for mailing informa-tional literature but also to
;..e L .y.. .. L :q ::
emergency. - 4}}