ML20138Q919
| ML20138Q919 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/06/1985 |
| From: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| To: | Dircks W, Plaine H NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO), NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 M851003A, NUDOCS 8511180333 | |
| Download: ML20138Q919 (2) | |
Text
t
' IN RESPONSE, PLEASE
- 2 tta REFER TO: M851003A
- N vy% UNITED STATES 4 8
~,
n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 g
g .E November 6, 1985
%* ..
- M CFFICE OF THE SECRETARY MEMORANDUM FOR: William J. Dircks, Executive Director
,for Operations Herzel H.E. Plaine, Gener Counsel FROM: Samuel J. Chilk, Secreta p
SUBJECT:
STAFF REQUIREMENTS - STAT Jk OF INTERPRETATION OF APPENDIX R - FIRE PROTtOTION, 2:00 P.M.,
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1985, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, D.C. OFFICE (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)
The Commission met with staff to discuss the status of the implementation of fire protection requirements, the fire protection rule contained in 10 CFR 50.48 and Appendix R and the staff's recommendations regarding implementation of Appendix R contained in SECY-85-306.
The Commission requested a report from the staff on current fire protection enforcement actions as well as a suggested schedule for affected licensees to comply with Appendix B requirements.
(IE/NRR) (SECY Suspense: 11/29/85)
Chairman Palladino urged the Commissioners to vote promptly on SECY-85-306. Additionally, he would like to see the staff incorporate a license condition in each facility license to ensure enforceability of fire protection programs. This should be done in addition to incorporating fire protection programs into the next edition of the FSARs. The license condition should allow flexibility which permits modifications of fire protection programs in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59.
l Commissioner Asselstine requested that OGC provide its comments on staff's reply to the Trubatch memorandum on Appendix R requirements.
(OGC)
(Subsequently, on October 24, 1985 the General Counsel provided .f a response to the Commission.) Jfdg l 3 gl8 l -
8511180333 851106 PDR 10CFR PT9.7 PDR I J
2-Commissioner Asselstine asked the staff to send to him the cost-benefit analysis required by the backfit rule of the new or different interpretations of Appendix R. If such cost-
- benefit analysis does not now exist, he asked that the required backfit analysis be performed and sent to him before any new or modified interpretations are transmitted to licensees.
(NRR) (SECY Suspense: 11/29/85) cc: Chairman Palladino Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Zech Commission Staff Offices PDR - Advance DCS - 016 Phillips i
i T
f 1
I e
1 4
t I
.