ML20138N576

Forwards Responses to NRC Region II Readiness Review Interim Review Questions,Module 5,including Clarification of First FSAR Ref 13.5.1N Re ECCS Outage Data Procedures

ML20138N576
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	12/20/1985
From:	Trudeau G GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:	Jacqueline Thompson Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8512240072
Download: ML20138N576 (4)

Text

_ _ _ _

i

. ~

m , _ ,

~ ~

esc re es seios ses ooent e a e.es g P'"o ca. cony

-,. . newss.a.m.

wepse .eemosTees asses - ~

inemene aos resetis et spMS1

s. ao ,ame es MWiE am.ee sen y/g" M Pro k ct

, ~~.

t wra to asTA s wra corre - ( vas : ( ) so m =c- a.: --- ML 2=.' ,?? "' z. #-?^

sex.acorr w e ), kg 7%tskfW - , -

in./e3/ /fl - /N1 A -- eft 2 792/

r + rtmentJ (T*Iephone BoeI snx.acort nunmann foi </t2 777/ -- AMrYpA MP, '

(n,we 50, or Abbrev. Code) (Iacation) '

-VERIFY NLBSER VERIFIE SYt' NtBIBER OF PAGM ATTRCEEDs sikikT 'KF9%&fXu -- VM/-Jsswr=- 74/7 '

. tammi tzoostion) <=t. En.)

'sFE:IAL

'EM fEDCt3 M e b f//Y $D#A ffff 4l9// d"K~ $///$

'f~//fD/ W $ fd/V H V l

~

TxLBCDFY OPERATORe Jean Wilton Yogtle EEcotrio Generating Plant B c Readinese Review 4 IS P 3 y j ggM noste 2; to 2994 e=i =

th

,n nv 5 Maynesboro, Georgia - 30830 -

l

. . Verify Number (404) 724-0114/est; 21 EUlfMEfTs

• IDENIFAX O-95 (404) 554-2749 . *p a.

031:Dt y\

L eMN -A AD - J. Knight (ltr only)

EB (BALLARD) f'), - EICSB (ROSA) i

(~

i' """"

g224 72 g0 4 e

G PSB (GAletILL)

RSB (BER W GER)

A P j ( FOB (BENAROYA)  ;

i l

r tei - re m ,we,--,-.+,w..-v-e*,.+,--- e., ,,,,.,.-,-e ,ww w w w w w -+- we w ,. -wer+-w w-a- ---e- ,-r-wr.e-

~

s-orc to *es seier oss voene e a e.es <

ATTAGRENT 2 Response to.Vogtle Readiness Review-Interia Review guesti'ons Module 5 operations Organisation and Administration naa==har seas mRAFONSES TO otmSTIONS AND CN StmMITTED BY WRC REGION II .

ON OCTOBER 29. 1985

- 1. On page 6 of the Commitment Matrix. please clarify if the first FEAR ref erence should be 13.5.1.1W cather than 13.5.1.2G. The commitment subjsct is ICCS Outage Data

, Procedures.

Reaconses Amendment 16 to the FSKR moved this commitment

.from Section 13.5.1.2G to Section 10.5.1.1N. However.

Nodule 5 commitments were identified to a licensing baseline-condition of Amendaent 14. Therefore. this commitment is vesswei an utassa en yugu e os saw ow- isawa6 massix.

2. - On page 35 of the Commitment Matrix, the cosaiteent with .

regard to 9420.5 should state that the analysis will be provided concurrent with the setpoint methodology in lieu of Lthe first quarter of 1985.

~?- c.

- v k

DEC 26 885 34886 S$3 WegfLr P e P.33 E

u,1 Resnommet guestion 420.5 and the GPC response was'y ewed-

,and it is our interpretation that the commitment is.o

.. .....,_no .._. .. .f ... - . . .... . ... .

fresponsetothisquestion[toprovidetheresults'ofthe e.

-~

analysis concurrent with.the setpoint methodologyg is 4 h/

being addressed by our Project #

j i.

t.ioensing Group. ' Yoshill' ba advised of their action soon -

i after they reach a decision.

j Q '

\

3. The commitment " settlement Monitorino Program." on name 34-

~.does not correctly reflect the agreements reached with the applicant on this subject.- The matrix should be revised to.

oorrectly identify the monitoring commitments that cover

. specific settlement markers to be monitored, frequency of earveying, need for monitoring following unusual events

-(e.g., earthquake or large fluctuation in. groundwater ~

levels), and allowable total and differential settlement limits as described in the applicant's letter of.

May 21, 1945. and in the June 1985. Sta in sections 2.5.4.4.3 and 2.5.4.5. i r.

It appears the commitment matrix should also include a

{

.; subject for permanent groundwater monitoring. The applicant 1 l

':bao seemitted to numerous features of the monitoring program

'la FSAR section 2.4.12 2.4.5 and in response to question 341.10. . In' addition to the F8AR. details of the program are also contained in the Groundwater supplement and the i

l L

l 1

,n'1, ,. ,i-,..--. , , , - , - . _ , . . - . . , - - . - . - - ~ _ . , _ . , _ , , , , _ _ , . , .

..w,,,,, . - , ..-- , . . , , - , , . ,,,-.,--n - , , - - , - , - - - - 5

t 4

osc to *es seine: ees seens e e e.ee.

' 'Geotechnical Verification Work Report trassaitted by

^

- letters, Bailey to Denton. dated May 21, 1985, and g}4sgust23,_1985, respectively.

-.<g

.c The ground water monitoring program will be controlled by a License' Condition, the draft of which is to be provided in N ,

Rannonnet Ouestion 241.19 was reviewed and it is'our-

-interpretation that the commitment was correct as stated on page 34 of the Comaltaent Matrix, at the time this matrix was assembled. The commitments in this module are based on the FSAR through Amendment 14. Any subsequent commitments made by Georgia Power Company will be factored into the

'8ettlement Monitoring Program through commitment tracking, or resolved as SEE open items or confirmatory items.

.comattaents with regard to monitoring ground water will be addressed in Module 9, as appropriate.-

T. 4 'section 3.4, "Comatteent Matrix." Table 3.0-1. " Commitments for plant Operations," page 2. ANSI N45.2.9 1972 should be debenged to read ANSI N45.2.9-1974.

Meannannt we agree with your comment. .This correction was ende in the addendum to Module 5.

. - ._ _ _ . . . - . _ . . _ - _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ , . . ~ . , - . . . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ , - . . . . _._ . . - _ _ _ . , _ . ---

r s

t

's

'i He to

• es s e e i r ses veene e e e.es ~~

5. section 3.5, " Implementation Matriz.* Table 3.0-2 $

"t,.Implementing Documents for Operations." pages 4 and 5

~

taeferesco FSAR Comaltaent 1.9.38 wttich endorses ANSI N45.2.2-1975. Page 1.9.34 of the.FSAR liste the endorsed '

ANg! Standard as N45.2.2-1972. Pages 4 and 5 of the table should be changed to reflect the correct date of 1972. "'

Raanonnes We agree with your comment. This correction was s '

made in the addendum to Module $ which included revised T-pages 5 and'4 of the taplementation Matrix. --

c

-6. The comattaent in Table 3.0-1 by the applicant. to provide a Beactor Vessel Material Surveillance Procram for Voetle la

. acceptable as stated on page 3t. Q241.1. In addition. the applicant should commit to operating the reactor vessel in accordance with pressure temperature limits. The pressure temperature limits must consider the effect.that neutron

'trradiation has on the fracture resistance of the Vogtle reactor' vessel belt-line materials and must be calculated in accordance with the requirements of Appendix 0,10 CFR 50.

1 rue.saount.or neurton Israe11Y1on canage snouza ne '

+:eelenlated x _ y,. using the aJthodology recommended by the staff in

-Regulatory Guide 1.99. These commitments appear to be related to plant operation and should be identified in Section 3.4 for Module 5.

4 e - - , . - - - - - , - - - - - - , , , . , - , - - . a, , ,,m-ve-.- ,,--.r_,, ,,.a , m.,w,-.,,-o.e-em-e,,,w,.-- - , - - - - , --w-v,-w--,w.w,- ~,,-w-r