ML20138L589

Forwards Revised Tech Specs & Safety Analysis as Part of OL Renewal Request,Including Page 5 of Section 1.0 Re Establishment of Surveillance Frequencies & Page 9 of Section 3.0 Re Shutdown Margin Requirements

ML20138L589
Person / Time
Site:	University of Michigan
Issue date:	02/28/1985
From:	Kerr W MICHIGAN, UNIV. OF, ANN ARBOR, MI
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20138L505	List: IA-85-587, Submits Detailed Definition of design-basis Event, as Applicable to Facility.Licensee Should Use Definition to Show That Proposed Low Enriched U Loading Will Not Result in Significant Release of Radioactivity ML20138L502 ML20138L512 ML20138L518 ML20138L524 ML20138L549 ML20138L553 ML20138L557 ML20138L562 ML20138L567 ML20138L573 ML20138L579 ML20138L589 ML20138L592
References
FOIA-85-587 NUDOCS 8512190306
Download: ML20138L589 (2)

Text

_m _ _w _n .v

. . z _ ,, . . . .r.. - , ;..

_ . ,_.w.m. g_.y.gg.g _ g. g.

1] .

~J THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN MEMORIA1.-f*HOENIX PROJECT

_p

-i

,i

[, oeri.s cetus o .s.ven pasen:s amen. 6 6.een. vee ,

, ~ . ..... ... .

- . ~ .

j February 28, 1985 1 ,

y 4 Docket 50-2 License R-28 j

1 '

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Harold Denton, Director

-i Division of Reactor Licensing d Washington, D.C. 20555

-i j'

Dear Sir:

M .

}

) .

As a result of a preliminary review of our operating license renewal request conducted from February 26-28, 1985 with Mr. Hal Bernard and

z. three representatives from Los Alamos National Laboratory, the following *

~j modificaitons to the Technical Specifications and Safety Analysis are

4 W 4

submitted. Modified pages are attached with changes underlined.

.i ~j TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

'! 1 j' Section 1.0, page 5:

Time intervals were inserted to the definitions for use in establishing lj surveillance frequencies

. Section 3.0, page 9:

d- Shutdown margin with all' rods inserted was changed to 0.025 delta K/K 94 and with the most reactive rod stuck. out to 0.0045 delta K/K in order ij-i to allow us to meet shutdown margin requirements with the maximum excess j reactivity of 0.038 delta K/K loaded in the core.

ti .-1 4] ' '

. Core excess reactivity was specifically defined to include moveable j experiments.

v. 1 E Section 3.8, page 22:

1

l. Calculations for experiment radioactivity limits were added to section

l 14.3 of the Safety Analysis and are referenced here.

4$ SAFETY ANALYSIS

a. '.

,.; Section 14.2.5, page 53:

i ]i i Pneumatic tubes are 1-7/16 inch in diameter rather than 1-1/4 inches.

l

.. I i !

I! ! 1 8512190306 851203 PDR FOIA

AFTERGOBS-SB7 PDR

[e*-=s*

. s ,[ *, e 7 , ga

• f[ 4 {hdM",k h ",'", y ". y p 4" 3- .,

J.pr y - ,,y3

=,}- Tr ^ - , -

w.am w~~.

n.s,- . ,- u muw--

..:.;:...=.;  ; n -.;9 &c N= 4: y.--

~ - n. ~:x.v::.m z> . u .- -t-o - ..w.au ea.- :...n.m.

.. u . . ; .

w  : u' .

' .; , e

,.t # .

t - .

':f.;

Section 14.2.6, pane 57:

-lj i

$) Values of flow rates and pool drain times were altered for a pneumatic

, , tube rupture.

1 ,

i

-! . i Table 14.1, page 58:

1 L. g

".] Pneumatic tube flow rates and drain times altered somewhat due to the

-$ change in tube diameter.

'1 'l

.j Section 14.3, page 59-64:

d A failed experiment analysis was added. A failed experiment would cause j , the most severe release of radioactivity from the facility to the environ-

, f l,' ment, but activity limits are placed on experiments such that MPC exposures

' 9 .i are not exceeded. .

ns >>

j, Sincerely,

$ ,i

..=.,.

q i William Kerr, Director 1 Michigan Memorial-Phoenix Project a i 1' Enclosure

1 -

1 l

j c.

a d

1 1 l.!

a .

,dj ti A, ,

' .l. !,

I 4.i

."*e

.** i I

31 9

M i

,Pj .

s .' i n*

.9 q

l

[d, 1 j

1.

] .

,w.- .._ . . . . .