ML20138K131

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Clarification on Status of NRC Rule on Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning,Per 970107 Request
ML20138K131
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/12/1997
From: Joseph Holonich
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Thompson A
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
References
REF-WM-3 NUDOCS 9702140264
Download: ML20138K131 (2)


Text

..

[

pauco e"

.4 UNITED STATES

}

j j

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

WASHINGTON, D.C. 205654uut a

%,...../

February 12, 1997 i-L I

Mr. Anthony J. Thompson Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20037

SUBJECT:

STATUS OF NRC RULE ON RADIOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR DEC0P911SSIONING j

Dear Mr. Thompson:

l I received your letter of January 7, asking for clarification on the status of NRC-or Agreement State-approved decommissioning plans,'in relation to the NRC's final rule on radiological criteria for decommissioning. Your understanding, based on the proposed rule and on statements by NRC staff, is that approved decommissioning plans which satisfy existing Agreement State or NRC regulatory limits or guidance will be " grandfathered," even if the

" approved" regulatory limits or guidance differ from those in the final decommissioning rule.

You would like to know if this understanding is correct.

In addition, Duane Schmidt, of my staff, spoke with you by telephone on January 14, to clarify items in your. letter.. In that conversation, you

.t' also indicated that you would like to know what guidance we currently follow i

-in reviewing reclamation plans, specifically as related to acceptable cleanup j

levels for uranium in soil.

l As you know, the Commission has not yet promulgated its final rule on the i-radiological criteria for decommissioning. The only information available is j

that which was provided by the proposed rule.

In the proposed rule, the l-Commission stated that the criteria in the proposed rule would not apply to sites already covered by a decommissioning plan.

It further noted that the accepted decommissioning plan would have to be in conformance with criteria 1

l identified in the Site Decommissioning Management Plan (SDMP) Action Plan.

4 The criteria in the SDMP Action Plan (57 FR 13389-13392) applicable to cleanup of uranium in soil are Options 1 and 2 of the Branch Technical Position

" Disposal or Onsite Storage of Thorium or Uranium Wastes.from Past.0perations" i

-(46 FR 52601; October 23,1981). Based on the proposed rule, your

({0 understanding is co'rrect that the NRC would grandfather previously accepted j

reclamation plans. However, I-must stress that this conclusion is based on a

\\

proposed rule.

Only after.the final rule is issued can a more definitive I/gi '

1 answer be provided..In'the proposed rule, Agreement State compatibility had not been determined.

Thus, it is not clear whether whatever NRC allows in its l

final rule will also be allowed by Agreement States, or whether stricter L

requirements might be imposed.

l cj&h gg gE CWW0#,

L 9702140264 970212 e PDR WASTE

)

j WM-3 PDRJ

Thompson, A. J.

2

?

An approved reclamation plan would be a plan that had been reviewed by the i

staff and found acceptable. The results of this evaluation will be documented

'in a Technical Evaluation Report, and the license will be amended to include a condition requiring implementation of the approved decommissioning plan.

In addition, NRC inspections must confirm acceptable and effective implementation j

of the plan. All of these factors are what would be considered in determining if a previously reviewed plan could be considered acceptable for j

grandfathering under the proposed rule. The approval process used by

=

Agreement States may be different.

It should be recognized that any changes, after the rule is finalized, to approved cleanup criteria in an accepted plan would need to be reviewed under the requirements of the final rule.

If you have any questions concerning this letter or additional concerns on these subjects, please contact Duane Schmidt, of my staff, at (301) 415-6919.

Sincerely, Joseph J. Holonich, Chief Uranium Recovery Branch Division of Waste Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards DISTRIBUTION:

File Center NMSS r/f URB r/f PUBLIC ACNW JSurmeier AGarcia DSollenberger DOCUMENT NAME: S:\\DWM\\ URB \\DWS\\tti-97a.wp 0FC URB C

URB CW4.-

C.

0GC C-URB ( l\\.

C/

v-

..u3,n.y m-NAME DSchmidt b d DGillen RFonner....-..i J M lh DATE 02/ 7 /97 d

02/ 1 /97 W

02/6/97 H

0%/N/97 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

\\