ML20138J654

Discusses Review of 850701 Submittal of Addl Info.Data Provided Substantiates Reasonableness of Estimates for Facility.Estimates Not Done Per NUREG-0654 Guidance.Summary of Evacuation Time Estimate Review Encl

ML20138J654
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	08/21/1985
From:	Urbanik T TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE, TEXAS A&M UNIV.
To:	Williams E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20138J646	List: ML20138J654 ML20138J663
References
RTR-NUREG-0654, RTR-NUREG-654 NUDOCS 8510290429
Download: ML20138J654 (2)

Text

g ..

. Enclosure 3 i

THE TEX AS A&NI UNIVE RSITY SYSTENI TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE Station TEXAS 77643 4135 i

rRANSPORr OPERATIONS PROGRAM H09) 845 1535 i

j August 21, 1985

}

i l Edward F. Williams j '

Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Williams,

I have reviewed the additional material submitted by the Savannah River Opera-tions Office (00E/SRP) dated July 1,1985. The data provided substantiates the reasonableness of the estimates for the Savannah River Plant. It should be noted, s however, that the Savannah River Plant estimate is not done according to NUREG r 0654 guidance.

Given that the DOE /SRP plant is a government facility and has a reasonable estimate of evacuation times, a finding that the Vogtle evacuation time estimate study is in accordance with NUREG 0654, Appendix 4, appears appropriate.

Enclosed is a summary of the Vogtle ETE review indicating a favorable determina-

, tion of consistency with NRC guidance. If you have any questions, please call i me.

}

j Sincerely,-

Thomas Urbanik II

Program Manager j .TU

jh 1

cc: Jay MacLellan, Battelle PNL

)i l

8510290429 851022 l PDR ADOCK 05000424 ,

F PDR i l

l TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

, .. _, a

. . . . - . . - . . ~ _ _ --

EVALUATION OF EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATE Vogtle I

i Item Adequate Deficient Poor None I General I.

A. Maps X B. Report Format X i

t

' II. Demand Estimation A. Permanent Residents X B. Transient Populations X C. Special Facility Population X D. EPZ Sub-areas X III. Traffic Capacity i

A. Evacuation Roadway Network X B. Roadway Characteristics X C. Adverse Weather Considered X j IV. Analysis A. Assumptions X B. Methodology X C. Carless X V. Other Requirements i

A. Confirmation Time X j B. State and Local Review X VI. Overall X t

t Date of_ Report: May 1983 3

t I .

l I

I e

-. _ . . _ _ _