ML20138J654

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Review of 850701 Submittal of Addl Info.Data Provided Substantiates Reasonableness of Estimates for Facility.Estimates Not Done Per NUREG-0654 Guidance.Summary of Evacuation Time Estimate Review Encl
ML20138J654
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 08/21/1985
From: Urbanik T
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE, TEXAS A&M UNIV.
To: Williams E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20138J646 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0654, RTR-NUREG-654 NUDOCS 8510290429
Download: ML20138J654 (2)


Text

g i

THE TEX AS A&NI UNIVE RSITY SYSTENI TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE Station TEXAS 77643 4135 i

rRANSPORr OPERATIONS PROGRAM H09) 845 1535 i

j August 21, 1985

}

i l

Edward F. Williams j

Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Mr. Williams,

I have reviewed the additional material submitted by the Savannah River Opera-tions Office (00E/SRP) dated July 1,1985.

The data provided substantiates the reasonableness of the estimates for the Savannah River Plant.

It should be noted, however, that the Savannah River Plant estimate is not done according to NUREG s

0654 guidance.

r Given that the DOE /SRP plant is a government facility and has a reasonable estimate of evacuation times, a finding that the Vogtle evacuation time estimate study is in accordance with NUREG 0654, Appendix 4, appears appropriate.

Enclosed is a summary of the Vogtle ETE review indicating a favorable determina-tion of consistency with NRC guidance.

If you have any questions, please call i

me.

}

j Sincerely,-

Thomas Urbanik II Program Manager j

.TU:jh 1

cc:

Jay MacLellan, Battelle PNL

)i 8510290429 851022 PDR ADOCK 05000424 F

PDR i

l l

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

.... -.. -.. ~ _ _

.. _, a

EVALUATION OF EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATE Vogtle I

i Item Adequate Deficient Poor None I

I.

General A. Maps X

B. Report Format X

i t

II.

Demand Estimation A. Permanent Residents X

B. Transient Populations X

C. Special Facility Population X

D. EPZ Sub-areas X

III. Traffic Capacity i

A. Evacuation Roadway Network X

B. Roadway Characteristics X

C. Adverse Weather Considered X

j IV.

Analysis A. Assumptions X

B. Methodology X

C. Carless X

V.

Other Requirements i

A. Confirmation Time X

j B. State and Local Review X

VI.

Overall X

t t

Date of_ Report: May 1983 3

t I

l I

I e

_