ML20138J121
| ML20138J121 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 08/13/1985 |
| From: | Sells D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| OL-I-CCANP-143, NUDOCS 8510290257 | |
| Download: ML20138J121 (4) | |
Text
M
[-
U
== [
/
UMn o sra rEs
[.,
NUCL% REGULCr nv COMMISSION j.I f
j uumuroa a i mw MW #
3 2 g 1o32 C'
e Docket Nos.:
50-49E'499
- 3 It c.L ]:M APPLICANT: Houstan Lignting and Power Cor.pany
"(m :3 O'
FACILITY:
South Texas Project n
SU3 JECT:
MEETING 5UMYARY On Monday, January 18,19S2 meetings were held with Houston Lighting and Power Company (HL&P). The morning meeting was neld at the offices of Bronn and Root (B&R). The af ternoon meeting was held in the offices of Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC).
J. Slau spent a few minutes discussing the status of the B&R effort concerning the transmittal of information to BPC. B&R is not developing the work packages, that have been identified in previous meetings, as originally planned.
Instead, B&R is pulling together units of information, i.e., material relating to a single purchase order, material related to pipe supports in the containment building, etc.
These are then transmitted and BPC assembles them into appropriate work packages. The total number of units to be transmitted is about 1400. As of Monday, January 18, 453 have been transmitted. Of these, some 100 plus, were transmitted on the previous Friday. The bulk of the transfer of information will be accomplished over the next two months.
Final transfer is scheduled for April 30, 1982. Several bulk transmittals have occurred.
In particular the drawings have been transferred to BPC in a bulk transfer rather than on a piece meal basis.
Schedules for the delivery of units of information to BPC were provided in the form of 35 large sheets.
I had an opportunity to look at several of the units that were ready to be sent to BPC. Each package contained a transmittal letter, check lists that indicate the documents included in the package, documents previously supplied (i.e.,
drawings) and dccuments which still need to be supplied if such is the case, and finally the included documtots.
Following the discussion of the B&R transfer schedule, I met with Mr.
White (HL&P) and Mr. Hurley (BPC) to briefly review tha status of the BPC Quadrex Report review.
This review is being conducted by an independent BPC task force operating principally out of San Francisco. This task force is to provide a report that will address each item contained in the Quadrex Report and disposition each item in one of a number of ways.
Although not clear what these categories will be, certainly it can be expected that one category will include itens that can be eliminated from further consideration and another wauld be one that recommends more detailed analysis during the transition analysis. It now appears that i
most of the items will require final dispositioning by the project office conducting the transition analysis. Originally, it was planned j
to provide an interim report listing tho',e itens that can be eliminated 8510290257 850813 2
ADOCK 05000498
( b p p) ['
lk'3 (J
(
0 PM i
.n 4
e-s'.
o
'Y' P
e #+,
,/
,/
/, / /, # e.9
/
l O
O
'd e f./ ':/'
t h
Y o*
)
'f
/,,+*
/
,/,
,,/
0 t
p.Q, 2, pjgy
~
a a,.,
_z JAN 2 61982 from further consideration with appropriate justification. It now appears that there will be only one report from the BPC task force and that it will be midMarch before that report will become available. I was assured that HL&P will not see the report prior to receipt and that upon receipt, copies will be immediately transmitted to the NRC as received.
In the afternoon meeting with BPC the records maintained that reflect receipt of information from B&R were reviewed.
The BPC review schedules were discussed and provided.
These schedules identify work packages. I was told that there are approximately 160 work packages.
The BPC professional engineering staff now stands at about 150 and review of information is initiated as soon as the material is received and has been properly logged and associated with the appropriate work package. Three work packages were reviewed, one a compliance package that covers aspects of a number of the more discipline specific packages.
No work package is complete either in terms of all material being available or; obviously, analysis.
I indicated that where Region IV desired Headquarters assistance in monitcring the transition activities, NRR was prepared to provide such assistance and that such requests are expected. I also indicated that NRR personnel may want to review a complete work package and that I felt such a review should be conducted in Houston and that the package would probably be identified in advance of the review.
When asked, I stated that I would recommend to my management that the assigned reviewers from NRR have design engineering experience to the maximum extent.possible.
Both HL&P and BPC expressed concern that review at this level of detail could cause problems unless the reviewer is familiar with design engineering practices.
In addition a meeting was held in the evening with C. Robertson (HL&P),
'J. Hurley (BPC) and J. Ghromley (BPC) to discuss transition activities in general.
This meeting was designed to more fully explore and understand the HL&P/BFC interface and the future relationship between the two as well as the impact of this transition on the licensing process.
- )
onald e h ' Project lianager Licens ing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page.
~
List of participants (Not all inclusive)
Morning Mike Powell HL&P Rick Jocobi HLSP Johnny Blau HL&P Jon White HL&P
- 5. M. Dew HL&P Pete Jordon B&R Billy Mitchell B&R John Wawrzeniak B&R Jim Hurley BPC Afternoon Rick Jacobi HL&P Rudy Molleda HL&P Chuck Halligan BPC Jim Hurley BPC Larry Damon BPC Jim Ghromley BPC l
i