Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-90,consisting of Partial Transcript Re Decision to Replace Brown & Root on Project. Pp 1,355-1,358ML20138H785 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
South Texas ![STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png](/w/images/9/9c/STP_Nuclear_Operating_Company_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
07/17/1985 |
---|
From: |
NRC |
---|
To: |
|
---|
References |
---|
OL-I-CCANP-090, OL-I-CCANP-90, NUDOCS 8510290148 |
Download: ML20138H785 (5) |
|
|
---|
Category:EXHIBITS (DOCKETING AND SERVICES BRANCH INFORMATION
MONTHYEARML20138J1931985-08-14014 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-126A,consisting of 801029 Rev 6 to Section 4.0, Project Engineering & Rev 4 to Section 5.0, Procurement to QA Plan IR 05000498/19840111985-08-14014 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-145,consisting of Forwarding Insp Repts 50-498/84-11 & 50-499/84-11 on 840730- 0802 & 0813-16.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Followup of Quadrex Rept Findings in NUREG-0948 ML20138H9341985-08-14014 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-146,consisting of Confirming Adequacy of Implementation of ASME safety-related Welding Activities & safety-related Complex Concrete Placements.Concurrence Requested Re Listed Plan ML20138J3571985-08-14014 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-138,consisting of 811215 Memo Forwarding Chronology Events Concerning Quadrex Rept.Nrr Project Manager Aware of Rept Completion in Early May 1981 ML20138J0721985-08-14014 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-147,consisting of 811119 Testimony of Np Palladino & Wj Dircks Before Subcommittee on Energy & Environ Re Adequacy of QA for Nuclear Plants Under Const ML20138J0521985-08-14014 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-147A,consisting of Pages 92-95 of 811119 House Subcommittee on Energy & Environ Oversight Hearing, QA in Power Plant Const ML20138H6801985-08-13013 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-145,consisting of Rev 5 to Project Licensing Procedure PLP-02, Reporting Design & Const Deficiencies to NRC, ML20138J1741985-08-13013 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-142,consisting of 811028 Memo Summarizing Quadrex Rept Re Engineering Design Status.Rept Not in-depth Analysis of Brown & Root Design Effort.Table Listing Areas of Concern Encl ML20138H7111985-08-13013 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-146,consisting of Rev 3 to Project Specific QA Procedure PSQP-A8, Trend Analysis Administration, .Interim Change Notice 2 to Procedure Also Encl ML20138J1571985-08-13013 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-140,consisting of 810911 Summary of 810908 Meeting W/Util in Region IV Ofc Re Quadrex Review of Brown & Root Engineering.Items Util Reported Per 10CFR50.55(e) Discussed ML20138J1211985-08-13013 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-143,consisting of 820126 Summary of 820118 Meetings W/Applicant,Brown & Root & Bechtel Re Mgt Transition Activities.List of Participants Encl IR 05000498/19830211985-08-13013 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-135,consisting of Forwarding Insp Repts 50-498/83-21 & 50-499/83-21 on 850918-1031.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Allegation Re Steel Supplier QA Program ML20138J0811985-08-13013 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-136,consisting of 850719 First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Deficient Sys Record Packages for 125-volt Dc & 4 Kv Ac Sys.Initially Reported on 850625. Review Continuing.Next Rept by 850919 ML20138H6361985-08-13013 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-143,consisting of Rev 1 to Section 2.20, General Project Requirements Reporting Significant Deficiencies Federal Regulation 10CFR50.55(e), . Change Notice GPRM-171 Also Encl ML20138H5451985-08-13013 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-144,consisting of 820126 Memo Forwarding Applicant Chronology of Alleged Quadrex Conspiracy, & NRC Comments on Chronology of Actions Re Quadrex Conspiracy 14 ML20138H5271985-08-13013 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-134,consisting of Forwarding SALP for Jul 1980 - June 1981.Areas Evaluated Include Containment & Other safety-related Structures, Support Sys,Licensing Activities & Corrective Action ML20138H6161985-08-13013 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-142,consisting of Undated STP-DC-021D, Engineering Procedure for Engineering Design Deficiencies. App a Re Requirements for Reporting Deficiencies as Specified in 10CFR50.55(e) Encl ML20138J0001985-08-13013 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-141,consisting of Handwritten Note Re Rept by Quadrex Concerning Identification of Potential 10CFR50.55(e) Items,To Be Available in May ML20138H6521985-08-13013 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-144,consisting of Rev 7 to Procedure 5.3, Review of Nonconformance Repts for Deficiency Evaluation, Dtd 850522.Guidelines for Reportability Encl ML20138H5881985-08-13013 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-139,consisting of 810827 Memo Listing Const Deficiencies Leading Author to Believe That Brown & Root Design Engineering Has Problems ML20138H7281985-08-13013 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-147,consisting of Rev 3 to Project Specific QA Procedure PSQP-16.3, Trend Analysis, ML20138J4201985-08-13013 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-137,consisting of Evaluation of South Texas Project Const Project, Dtd Apr 1985 ML20138J0371985-08-0909 August 1985 Applicant Exhibit A-77,consisting of 840824 Response to ASLB 830622 Memorandum & Order Re Reportability of Quadrex Rept Per 10CFR50.55(e) & Part 21.Rept Reportable Per 10CFR50.55(e).W/Certificate of Svc & Procedures Manual IR 05000498/19840121985-08-0909 August 1985 Applicant Exhibit A-78,consisting of Forwarding Insp Repts 50-498/84-12 & 50-499/84-12 on 840801-0930.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Ie Bulletin Followup & Allegation Re Supplier QA Program NUREG-0948, Staff Exhibit S-136,consisting of NUREG-0948, Special Insp Rept of Quadrex Corp Rept on Design Review of Brown & Root Engineering Work for South Texas Project Units 1 & 2, Dtd Jan 19831985-08-0808 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-136,consisting of NUREG-0948, Special Insp Rept of Quadrex Corp Rept on Design Review of Brown & Root Engineering Work for South Texas Project Units 1 & 2, Dtd Jan 1983 ML20138H5091985-08-0808 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-138,consisting of QA Requirements for Design of Nuclear Power Plants. Ansi/Asme N4S.2.11-1974 ML20138H6991985-08-0808 August 1985 Applicant Exhibit A-74,consisting of First,Second,Third, Fourth,Fifth,Final & Supplemental Deficiency Repts Re HVAC & Final Deficiency Rept Re Fuel Handling Bldg HVAC Control Air Sys.Initially Reported on 810508 ML20138J4081985-08-0808 August 1985 Applicant Exhibit A-73,consisting of First Through Seventh Interim Deficiency Repts & Final Deficiency Rept Re Computer Program Verification.Initially Reported on 810508.Program Found Acceptable ML20138H9731985-08-0808 August 1985 Applicant Exhibit A-75,consisting of 810605 Final Deficiency Rept Re Shielding Analysis Verification.Initially Reported on 810508.Item Not Reportable Per 10CFR50.55(e) ML20138J0071985-08-0808 August 1985 Applicant Exhibit A-76,consisting of 820909 Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-498/82-02 & 50-499/82-02.Corrective Actions:Procedures Revised & Employees Retrained ML20138J0101985-08-0808 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-137,consisting of Guidance - 10CF50.55(e), Const Deficiency Reporting, Dtd 800401.Event Flow Diagrams Included ML20138J0281985-08-0808 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-140,consisting of Forwarding Insp Repts 50-498/82-02 & 50-499/82-02 on 820205-0319. Violation Noted:Failure to Meet 24 H Reporting Time Requirements of 10CFR50.55(e) ML20138J0341985-08-0808 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-139,consisting of Rev 2 to Reg Guide 1.64, QA Requirements for Design of Nuclear Power Plants, Dtd June 1976 ML20138H8081985-08-0808 August 1985 Staff Exhibit S-141,consisting of Discussing Insp Rept 50-498/82-02 & 50-499/82-02 on 820205,08-12 & 0311 & 19 & Forwarding Notice of Violation ML20138J3051985-08-0707 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-129,consisting of 810512 Minutes of Incident Review Committee 810511 Meeting on Item 96 Concerning Computer Program Verification.List of Attendees Encl ML20138J2011985-08-0707 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-133,consisting of 820210 Executed Statement Re Quadrex Review of Brown & Root Engineering Design Efforts & 10CFR50.55(e) Reportability ML20138J2301985-08-0707 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-132,consisting of 810604 Minutes of Incident Review Committee 850601 Meeting Re Item 97 Concerning Verification of Shielding Analysis Calculations. Item Not Reportable Per 10CFR50.55(e) & Closed ML20138J2881985-08-0707 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-131,consisting of 810519 Minutes of Incident Review Committee 810511 Meeting Re Item 97 Concerning Verification of Shielding Analysis Calculations. Distribution Page for Item 102 Encl ML20138H5151985-08-0707 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-128,consisting of 810508 Telcon Minutes Between W Crossman & Me Powell Informing NRC of Three Potentially Reportable Items Per 10CFR50.55(e).All 13 of 23 Computer Programs (Codes) Reviewed Satisfactory ML20138J2621985-08-0707 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-130,consisting of 810513 Minutes of Incident Review Committee 810511 Meeting Re Item 95 Concerning Inadequate Design of HVAC sys.Thirty-day Rept Due 810605 Per 10CFR50.55(e) ML20138H5911985-08-0606 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-127,consisting of Undated Handwritten Notes Re Complete Commitment Tracking,Quadrex, Mechanical Design,Nuclear Analysis,Mechanical Analysis, Engineering Evaluation & Approach to Brown & Root ML20138H5191985-08-0606 August 1985 Applicant Exhibit A-66A,consisting of Corrected Attachment 9.7 to Rev 6 to Procedure PLP-02, Reporting Design & Const Deficiencies to Nrc ML20138H4871985-08-0606 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-124,consisting of 810121 Memo Forwarding Auditor Handbook on Deficiency Reporting, ML20138H5051985-08-0606 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-126,consisting of Rev 7 to QA Manual for Nuclear Power Plants, & Rev 2 to QA Program Section 3.0, Procurement, ML20138H5241985-08-0606 August 1985 Applicant Exhibit A-66,consisting of Rev 5 to Procedure PLP-02, Reporting Design & Const Deficiencies to NRC, ML20138H4851985-08-0606 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-123,consisting of 790927 & 1001 Ltrs Forwarding QA Audit Rept BR-28 on 790904-07.Ltrs & Feb 1980 Also Encl ML20138H5811985-08-0606 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-125,consisting of 801024 Memo Forwarding Audit BR-35 of Brown & Root,Inc Engineering Organization -26 ML20138J1361985-08-0505 August 1985 Intevenor Exhibit I-CCANP-115,consisting of Transmitting Safety & nonsafety-related Jobsite Activities to Continue During Transition Phase ML20138J1041985-08-0505 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-121,consisting of 810922 Confidential Memo Confirming 810922 Telcon W/G Oprea Re Alternate Plan for Replacement of Brown & Root as Engineer Const Manager for Facility ML20138H5401985-08-0505 August 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-CCANP-116,consisting of Undated Handwritten Notes Re Deceptive & Ineffective Practices of Brown & Root Concerning Hvac,Design Verification & Implementation of Commitments.Poor Performance Demonstrated 1985-08-09
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20206H2221999-05-0404 May 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 That Would Allow STP Nuclear Operating Co to Apply ASME Code Case N-514 for Determining Plant Cold Overpressurization Mitigation Sys Pressure Setpoint.Commission Grants Exemption ML20195C7541998-11-0505 November 1998 Order Approving Application Re Proposed Corporate Merger of Central & South West Corp & American Electric Power Co,Inc.Commission Approves Application Re Merger Agreement Between Csw & Aep ML20155H5511998-11-0202 November 1998 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Re Submission of Revs to UFSAR ML20248K5051998-06-0909 June 1998 Confirmatory Order Modifying License (Effective Immediately).Answer for Request for Hearing Shall Not Stay Immediate Effectiveness of Order NOC-AE-000109, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to 10CFR50.55a, Industry Codes & Standards.South Texas Project Fully Endorses Comments to Be Provided by NEI1998-03-30030 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to 10CFR50.55a, Industry Codes & Standards.South Texas Project Fully Endorses Comments to Be Provided by NEI ML20137U3531997-04-0808 April 1997 Order Approving Application Re Formation of Operating Company & Transfer of Operating Authority ML20116B8871996-07-19019 July 1996 Transcript of 960719 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Re Apparent Violations of NRC Requirements at Plant TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20072P5441994-07-13013 July 1994 Testimony of Rl Stright Re Results of Liberty Consulting Groups Independent Review of Prudence of Mgt of STP ML20092C3911993-11-15015 November 1993 Partially Deleted Response of Rl Balcom to Demand for Info ML20092C4031993-11-15015 November 1993 Partially Deleted Response of Hl&P to Demand for Info ML20056G3351993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process ML20044D3311993-05-0404 May 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Mod of TS Administrative Control Requirements for Emergency & Security Plans ST-HL-AE-4162, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 50 Re Reducing Regulatory Burden on Nuclear Licenses1992-07-22022 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 50 Re Reducing Regulatory Burden on Nuclear Licenses ST-HL-AE-4146, Comment Supporting Draft Reg Guide DG-1021, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of EDG Units Used as Class 1E Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Draft Reg Guide DG-1021, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of EDG Units Used as Class 1E Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants ST-HL-AE-4145, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Rule1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Rule ML20101K1131992-06-29029 June 1992 Motion for Leave to Suppl Motion to Modify or Quash Subpoenas & Supplemental Info.* OI Policy Unfair & Violative of Subpoenaed Individuals Statutory Rights & Goes Beyond Investigatory Authority.W/Certificate of Svc ML20101G2041992-06-18018 June 1992 Motion to Modify or Quash Subpoenas.* Requests Mod of Subpoenas Due to Manner in Which Ofc of Investigations Seeks to Enforce Is Unreasonable & Fails to Protect Statutory Rights of Subpoenaed Individuals.W/Certificate of Svc ML20087L3301992-04-0202 April 1992 Affidavit of RW Cink Re Speakout Program ML20087L3491992-04-0202 April 1992 Affidavit of JW Hinson Re ATI Career Training Ctr ML20087L3651992-04-0202 April 1992 Affidavit of Rl Balcom Re Access Authorization Program ML20087L3561992-04-0202 April 1992 Affidavit of Wj Jump Re Tj Saporito 2.206 Petition ML20116F2671992-02-19019 February 1992 Requests NRC to Initiate Swift & Effective Actions to Cause Licensee to Immediately Revoke All Escorted Access to Facility ML20094E9511992-02-10010 February 1992 Requests That NRC Initiate Swift & Effective Actions to Cause Licensee to Immediately Revoke All Escorted Access to Facility & to Adequately Train All Util Employees in Use of Rev 3 to Work Process Program ML20066C5041990-09-24024 September 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re NRC Fitness for Duty Program.Urges NRC Examine Rept Filed by Bay City,Tx Woman Who Was Fired from Clerical Position at Nuclear Power Plant Due to Faulty Drug Test Administered by Util ML20006A0281990-01-0808 January 1990 J Corder Response to NRC Staff Motion to Modify Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Requests Protective Order Until NRC Makes Documents Available to Corder by FOIA or Directly.W/Certificate of Svc ML20005G1431989-12-11011 December 1989 Motion to Modify Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Protective Order Requested on Basis That Subpoena Will Impose Undue Financial Hardship on J Corder ML20005G1451989-12-0505 December 1989 Affidavit of Financial Hardship.* Requests NRC to Provide Funds for Investigation & Correction of Errors at Plant Due to Listed Reasons,Including Corder State of Tx Unemployment Compensation Defunct ST-HL-AE-3164, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components1989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20244C9131989-03-28028 March 1989 Transcript of 890328 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Discussion/ Possible Vote on Full Power Ol.Pp 1-65.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20055G7801988-11-10010 November 1988 Investigative Interview of La Yandell on 881110 in Arlington,Tx.Pp 1-13.Related Info Encl ML20055G7831988-11-0909 November 1988 Investigative Interview of R Caldwell on 881109 in Arlington,Tx.Pp 1-27.Related Info Encl ML20055G7881988-11-0909 November 1988 Investigative Interview of AB Earnest on 881109 in Arlington,Tx.Pp 1-90.Related Info Encl ML20055G7151988-11-0909 November 1988 Investigative Interview of J Kelly on 881109 in Arlington, Tx.Pp 1-35.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20205T7001988-11-0101 November 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Initiation of Fitness for Duty Program at Facility.Need for Program Based on Presumption That Nuclear Power Activities Require That Personnel Be Free from Impairment of Illegal Drugs ML20151M2071988-07-25025 July 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Fee Schedules.Principal Objection to Rules Relates to Removal of Current Ceilings on Collection of Fees ML20196A3701988-06-17017 June 1988 Notice of Receipt of Petition for Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 & Issuance of Director'S Decision Denying Petitioners Request DD-88-09, Decision DD-88-09 Denying 880317 Petition by Earth First, Gray Panthers of Austin,Lone Star Green,Public Citizen,South Texas Cancellation Campaign & Travis County Democratic Women Committee for Commission to Delay Util Licensing Vote1988-06-17017 June 1988 Decision DD-88-09 Denying 880317 Petition by Earth First, Gray Panthers of Austin,Lone Star Green,Public Citizen,South Texas Cancellation Campaign & Travis County Democratic Women Committee for Commission to Delay Util Licensing Vote ML20148K0271988-03-21021 March 1988 Transcript of 880321 Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power License for South Texas Nuclear Project,Unit 1 (Public Meeting) in Washington,Dc.Viewgraphs Encl.Pp 1-73 ML20150D1401988-03-21021 March 1988 Appeal of Director'S Decision on Southern Texas Project.* Requests That Commission Consider Appeal & Stay Licensing Decision Until Sufficient Evidence Acquired to Support Final Decision ML20150D0411988-03-17017 March 1988 Petition Of:Earth First!,Gray Panthers of Austin,Lone Star Green,Public Citizen,South Texas Cancellation Campaign, Travis County Democratic Women'S Committee.* Withholding of Issuance of License Requested ML20196H4661988-02-29029 February 1988 Receipt of Petition for Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206.* Gap 880126 Petition to Delay Voting on Full Power OL for Facility Until Investigation of All Allegations Completed Being Treated,Per 10CFR2.206 ML20148Q9531988-01-26026 January 1988 Petition of Gap.* Commission Should Delay Vote on Licensing of Facility Until Thorough Investigation of All Allegations Completed & Public Rept Issued.Exhibits Encl ML20237C2751987-12-13013 December 1987 Director'S Decision 87-20 Denying Petitioners 870529 Motion That Record in Facility Licensing Hearings Be Reopened & Fuel Loading Be Suspended Pending Resolution of Issues. Petitioner Failed to Provide Any New Evidence ML20236H3751987-10-29029 October 1987 NRC Staff Consent to Motion to Quash Subpoena Filed by E Stites.* Staff Concedes Possibility of Deficiencies in Svc of Subpoena to Stites & Therefore Does Not Oppose Motion to Quash.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20236E0111987-10-23023 October 1987 Order.* Grants NRC Request for Addl Time to Respond to Motion to Quash Subpoena of E Stites,Per 871008 Order. Response Should Be Filed by 871029.Served on 871023 ML20235T3891987-10-0808 October 1987 Motion to Quash Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Subpoena Issued by Rd Martin on 870922 Should Be Quashed Due to Stites Not Properly Served,Witness Fees & Transportation Costs Not Provided & Issuance in Bad Faith ML20235T4171987-10-0808 October 1987 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Quash or in Alternative in Support of Motion for Protective Order.* Martin 870922 Subpoena of Stites Invalid & Improper.Decision to Subpoena at Late Date Form of Harassment.W/Certificate of Svc ML20195D8561987-09-22022 September 1987 Subpoena Directing E Stites to Appear on 871008 in Arlington,Tx to Testify Before NRC Personnel Re Allegations Made Concerning safety-related Deficiencies &/Or Records Falsifications at Plant IA-87-745, Subpoena Directing E Stites to Appear on 871008 in Arlington,Tx to Testify Before NRC Personnel Re Allegations Made Concerning safety-related Deficiencies &/Or Records Falsifications at Plant1987-09-22022 September 1987 Subpoena Directing E Stites to Appear on 871008 in Arlington,Tx to Testify Before NRC Personnel Re Allegations Made Concerning safety-related Deficiencies &/Or Records Falsifications at Plant 1999-05-04
[Table view] |
Text
j3,, \ 'Nfh/ fdL Goldberg - Cross f-dhdMh fd D 5 5.
I moved. b 2 There were other instances where the tray that s DX METir 3 install in terms of routing eas acceptable and UEN5t as 4 left instal d. ~65 00T , gt :ja 5 Howev *, all future cable tray igata ations DECC TNg7y((7 6 subsequent to the cision to c hange the s pore %fstem 7 were based on the revi d suppc rt syste .
8 0 So the determina ion was ally that the design 9 was inefficient but not inade e.
10 A That is correct, i t ar of support.
11 G In terms of su ort. But 1 those areas where 12 there was congestion you might even hav a safety problem 13 there if the cabl s were too clc se together. Is that 14 correct?
15 A hat's correct.
16 So in that case, the d esign was not only inem icient 17 bu inadequate.
18 A That's correct.
19 G In the draft report on contractor replacement that' 20 you went over with Mr. Boyle yesterday, OPC-25, do you have l
that with you?
21 l
j 22 ,
I have an extra copy, if you need it.
l 23 A. Yeah. I think I do. I'm not sure. OPC-25. I 24 don't think I do have it up here.
25 0 On Page 16, there are two blanks on Page 16.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.
I B510290148 850717 PDR ADOCK 0500049g 7800 SH0AL CAEEK BLVO 346 W All9 TIN TFY A% 7RM7 g4g G()
0 pon
F -1 J ,
l
,.e
>***{*
$ +s # d
+/s '*
pe44
. *+O
b
- l/s M f / ', # #
vf s/
.v ob4
4 Goldbero - Cross
.. 1356 1
Obviously, one meant to name one company, and one 2
meant to name another company in the competition to replace 3
Brown & Root.
4 Can you tell me when those blanks were filled 5
in with Bechtel and Stone & Webster?
6 A. I'd have to see the formal issued version of this 7
that was in fact filled in and dated to answer your question.
8 G Okay.
9 Perhaps when you come back you can provide the 10 dated copy that would show you the answer to this question.
11 This is dated September 8th, as a draft. The 12 formal announcement of the replacement of Brown & Root was 13 on what date?
. l 14 g, y;think that was the 24th.
15 g Of September.
16 So that sometime between the 8th and the 24 th, 17 these blanks were filled in.
18 A Yes, that's correct.
19 4 In the process of filling in the blanks, could you 20 just move us from this draft to the discussions that took 21 place between the 8th and the 24th? Who talked about it?
22 Who made the decision? How were the blanks filled in?
23 A. We had received responses to our requests for 24 proposal that were in our view responsive inputs from 25 Bechtel, from Stone & Webster and from Ebasco.
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.
7800 SH0AL CREEK BLVD.- 3A6 W t.fl% TIN Tf f A9 727;7
g ,
icj 5, , Goldburg - Cross ,qq, 1 W2 had a review team consisting of three key 2 persons; Mr. George Oprea, our Executive Vice-President 3 Nuclear; Mr. Jack Newman, the attorney f rom Newman- Fioltzinger--
4 in those days it was Lowenstein, Newman, Reis and Axelrad--
5 and myself.
6 We basically individually prepared rating sheets 7 as to how we saw the various contractors in terms of 8 their attributes, in terms of depth, experience, people they 9 were willing to commit to our particular project, the 10 ability to commit them in the time frame that was necessary 11 to support our interests.
12 What we saw as their overall work load in the 13 likelihood that we would be able to get the resources that-14 we needed. Certainly the commercial terms / contractual 15 features.
16 And after we went through our rating, we met to 17 exchange our views as to how we saw their attributes.
18 We subsequently met with Don Jordan, our Chief 19 Executive Officer, and reviewed all the information with 20 Mr. Jordan.
21 That enabled Mr. Jordan to formulate his own opinions 22 about the strengths of these alternatives.
23 So in effect the final deciding body became four.
24 We had Mr. Jordan, Mr. Oprea, Mr. Newman, and myself.
25 And after a lot of discussion, it was decided KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.
7800 SHOAL CREEK BLVD 346 W AIK T:P. f r y Aq 7A 7'.7
Sj6 Goldberg - Cross 1358
.' 1 Bechtel offered the best hope to satisfy the needs of our
.- 2 job.
i 3
Fo they were the chosen replacement for Brown &
4 Root.
5 The runner up was Stone & Webster, and Ebasco 6 finished third.
7 0 In the initial evaluations of Mr. Oprea and 8 Mr. Newman, did Bechtel come out first or did Stone & Webster 9 come out first?
10 A As I recall, I think Mr. Newnan favored Stone &
11 Webster and I think Mr. Oprea favored Bechtel.
12 0 Apparently from this memorandum, another concern 13 was t. impact of replacing Brawn & Root on licensing o 14 the projec .
15 I no on Page 17, there is a footno which 16 reads, in part:
17 "The replacem_7t of E &R wil undoubtedly 18 have to be considered 1 the current operating 19 -
license hearing and com ic
- ions may thus arise 20 as to the timing of he ta ke ov of responsibilities f
21 of the new con' actor."
22 J
What ere the considerations in reg d to 23 licensing at you had to deal with in terms of re lacing 24 Brown Root?
25 A. Well, we certainly had to review these matters l /
KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE INC.
7800 SHOAL CREEK BLVO 346 W All4 FIN fryAr 73't.7